Designing Disruptions for Productive Hybridity: The Case of Walking Scale Geometry

References

• Abreu, G. D. (1995). Understanding how children experience the relationship between home and school mathematics. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 2, 119–142. doi:10.1080/10749039509524693
   Google Scholar
• Abreu, G. D., & Cline, T. (2003). Schooled mathematics and cultural knowledge. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 11, 11–30. doi:10.1080/14681360300200158
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, J. M., & Heritage, J. (1984). Transcript notation. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. ix–xvi). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Banks, J., Au, K., Ball, A., Bell, P., Gordon, E., Gutiérrez, K., … Zhou, M. (2007). Learning in and out of school in diverse environments: Life-long, life-wide, life-deep. Seattle: University of Washington, The Learning in Informal and Formal Environments Center and the Center for Multicultural Education.
   Google Scholar
• Barron, B. (2003). When smart groups fail. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 307–359. doi:10.1207/S15327809JLS1203_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boaler, J., & Greeno, J. G. (2000). Identity, agency, and knowing in mathematics worlds. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 171–200). Westport, CT: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 141–178. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0202_2
   Google Scholar
• Calabrese Barton, A., & Tan, E. (2009). Funds of knowledge and discourses and hybrid space. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 50–73. doi:10.1002/tea.v46:1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Civil, M. (2002a). Culture and mathematics: A community approach. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 23, 133–148. doi:10.1080/07256860220151050A
   Google Scholar
• Civil, M. (2002b). Everyday mathematics, mathematicians’ mathematics, and school mathematics: Can we bring them together? Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 11, 40–62.
   Google Scholar
• Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32, 9–13. doi:10.3102/0013189X032001009
   Google Scholar
• Cobb, P., & Hodge, L. L. (2002). A relational perspective on issues of cultural diversity and equity as they play out in the mathematics classroom. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 4, 249–284. doi:10.1207/S15327833MTL04023_7
   Google Scholar
• Davies, C., & Uttal, D. H. (2007). Map use and the development of spatial cognition. In J. M. Plumert & J. P. Spencer (Eds.), The emerging spatial mind (pp. 219–247). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engle, R. A. (2011). The productive disciplinary engagement framework: Origins, key concepts, and developments. In D. Dai (Ed.), Design research on learning and thinking in educational settings: Enhancing intellectual growth and functioning (pp. 161–200). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Engle, R. A., & Conant, F. R. (2002). Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: Explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 20, 399–483. doi:10.1207/S1532690XCI2004_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enyedy, N. (2005). Inventing mapping: Creating cultural forms to solve collective problems. Cognition and Instruction, 23, 427–466. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci2304_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enyedy, N., & Mukhopadhyay, S. (2007). They don’t show nothing I didn’t know: Emergent tensions between culturally relevant pedagogy and mathematics pedagogy. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16, 139–174. doi:10.1080/10508400701193671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erickson, F. (2004). Talk and social theory: Ecologies of speaking and listening in everyday life. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• González, N., Andrade, R., Civil, M., & Moll, L. (2001). Bridging funds of distributed knowledge: Creating zones of practices in mathematics. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 6, 115–132. doi:10.1207/S15327671ESPR0601-2_7
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1489–1522. doi:10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00096-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (2007). Environmentally coupled gestures. In S. Duncan, J. Cassell, & E. Levy (Eds.), Gesture and the dynamic dimensions of language (pp. 195–212). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (2010). Things and their embodied environments. In L. Malafouris & C. Renfrew (Eds.), The cognitive life of things: Recasting the boundaries of the mind (pp. 103–120). Cambridge, UK: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.
   Google Scholar
• Greeno, J. G., & Hall, R. P. (1997). Practicing representation: Learning with and about representational forms. Phi Delta Kappan, 78, 361–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gresalfi, M. S., & Cobb, P. (2006). Cultivating students’ discipline-specific dispositions as a critical goal for pedagogy and equity. Pedagogies, 1, 49–57. doi:10.1207/s15544818ped0101_8
   Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez, K. D., Baquedano-López, P., & Tejeda, C. (1999). Rethinking diversity: Hybridity and hybrid language practices in the third space. Mind, Culture and Activity, 6, 286–303. doi:10.1080/10749039909524733
   Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez, K. D., & Rogoff, B. (2003). Cultural ways of learning: Individual traits or repertoires of practice. Educational Researcher, 32, 19–25. doi:10.3102/0013189X032005019
   Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez, K., Rymes, B., & Larson, J. (1995). Script, counterscript, and underlife in the classroom: James Brown versus Brown v. Board of Education. Harvard Educational Review, 65, 445–471. doi:10.17763/haer.65.3.r16146n25h4mh384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez, R. (2002). Enabling the practice of mathematics teachers in context: Toward a new equity research agenda. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 4, 145–187. doi:10.1207/S15327833MTL04023_4
   Google Scholar
• Gutstein, E. (2006). Reading and writing the world with mathematics: Toward a pedagogy for social justice. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, R., & Greeno, J. G. (2008). Conceptual learning. In T. L. Good (Ed.), 21st century education: A reference handbook (pp. 212–221). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, R., & Ma, J. Y. (2011, June). Learning a part together: Participant trajectories with ensemble spatial forms in a high school marching band. In R. Hall (Chair), Difference, culture, and distribution in mathematics and science learning. Symposium conducted at the 41st Annual Meeting of the Jean Piaget Society, Berkley, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, R., Stevens, R., & Torralba, T. (2002). Disrupting representational infrastructure in conversations across disciplines. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 9, 179–210. doi:10.1207/S15327884MCA0903_03
   Google Scholar
• Hall, R., Wieckert, K., & Wright, K. (2010). How does cognition get distributed? Case studies of making concepts general in technical and scientific work. In M. T. Banich & D. Caccamise (Eds.), Generalization of knowledge: Multidisciplinary perspectives (pp. 225–246). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harel, G. (2007). The DNR system as a conceptual framework for curriculum development and instruction. In R. A. Lesh, E. Hamilton, & J. J. Kaput (Eds.), Foundations for the future in mathematics education (pp. 263–280). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Hull, G. A., & Greeno, J. G. (2006). Identity and agency in nonschool and school worlds. In Z. Bekerman, N. C. Burbules, & D. S. Keller (Eds.), Learning in places: The informal education reader (pp. 75–97). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, K. J. (2009). The social construction of youth and mathematics: The case of a fifth-grade classroom. In D. B. Martin (Ed.), Mathematics teaching, learning, and liberation in the lives of Black children (pp. 175–199). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4, 39–103. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0401_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamberelis, G. (2001). Producing heteroglossic classroom (micro)cultures through hybrid discourse practice. Linguistics and Education, 12, 85–125. doi:10.1016/S0898-5898(00)00044-9
   Google Scholar
• Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). But that’s just good teaching! The case for culturally relevant pedagogy. Theory Into Practice, 34, 159–165. doi:10.1080/00405849509543675
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladson-Billings, G. (1997). It doesn’t add up: African American students’ mathematics achievement. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28, 697–708. doi:10.2307/749638
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, K., & White, T. (2014). How groups cooperate in a networked geometry learning environment. Instructional Science, 42, 615–637. doi:10.1007/s11251-013-9303-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., Murtaugh, M., & de la Rocha, O. (1984). The dialectic of arithmetic in grocery shopping. In B. Rogoff & J. Lave (Eds.), Everyday cognition: Its development in social context (pp. 67–94). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, C. D. (2001). Is October Brown Chinese? A cultural modeling activity system for underachieving students. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 97–141. doi:10.3102/00028312038001097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehrer, R., Jacobson, C., Kemeny, V., & Strom, D. (1999). Building on children’s intuitions to develop mathematical understanding of space. In E. Fennema & T. A. Rommberg (Eds.), Mathematics classrooms that promote understanding (pp. 63–87). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Lehrer, R., & Lesh, R. (2003). Mathematical learning. In W. M. Reynolds & G. E. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of psychology (pp. 357–391). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Lemke, J. L. (2000). Across the scales of time: Artifacts, activities, and meanings in ecosocial systems. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 7, 273–290. doi:10.1207/S15327884MCA0704_03
   Google Scholar
• Lotan, R. A. (2003). Group-worthy tasks. Educational Leadership, 60(6), 72–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucey, H., Melody, J., & Walkerdine, V. (2003). Uneasy hybrids: Psychosocial aspects of becoming educationally successful for working-class young women. Gender and Education, 15, 285–299. doi:10.1080/09540250303865
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, J. Y. (2013, April). Designing disruptions to classroom mathematics: Multi-party, embodied and material resources for participating in walking scale geometry. Paper presented at Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, J. Y., & Munter, C. (2014). The spatial production of learning opportunities in skateboard parks. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 21, 238–258. doi:10.1080/10749039.2014.908219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehan, H. (1980). The competent student. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 11, 131–152. doi:10.1525/aeq.1980.11.3.05x1865s
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moje, E. B., Ciechanowski, K. M., Kramer, K., Ellis, L., Carrillo, R., & Collazo, T. (2004). Working toward third space in content area literacy: An examination of everyday funds of knowledge and discourse. Reading Research Quarterly, 39, 38–70. doi:10.1598/RRQ.39.1.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moll, L. C., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory Into Practice, 31, 132–141. doi:10.1080/00405849209543534
   Google Scholar
• Moschkovich, J. N. (2002). An introduction to examining everyday and academic mathematical practices. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. Monograph, 11, 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Moschkovich, J. (2007). Bilingual mathematics learners: How views of language, bilingual learners, and mathematical communication affect instruction. In N. S. Nasir & P. Cobb (Eds.), Improving access to mathematics: Diversity and equity in the classroom (pp. 89–104). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Munter, C., Heyd-Metzuyanim, E., & Greeno, J. G. (2014). Designing for disruption through misaligned frames. In J. L. Polman, E. A. Kyza, D. K. O’Neill, I. Tabak, W. Penuel, A. S. Jurow, … L. D’Amico (Eds.), Learning and becoming in practice: The international conference of the learning sciences (ICLS) 2014 (Vol. 3, pp. 1396–1405). Boulder, CO: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Nasir, N., Hand, V., & Taylor, E. V. (2008). Culture and mathematics in school: Boundaries between “cultural” and “domain” knowledge in the mathematics classroom and beyond. Review of Research in Education, 32, 187–240. doi:10.3102/0091732X07308962
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nemirovsky, R., Kelton, M. L., & Rhodehamel, B. (2013). Playing mathematical instruments: Emerging perceptuomotor integration with an interactive mathematics exhibit. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44, 372–415. doi:10.5951/jresematheduc.44.2.0372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nemirovsky, R., Tierney, C., & Wright, T. (1998). Body motion and graphing. Cognition and Instruction, 16, 119–172. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci1602_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nespor, J. (1997). Tangled up in school: Politics, space, bodies, and signs in the educational process. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Rosebery, A. S., Ogonowski, M., DiSchino, M., & Warren, B. (2010). “The coat traps all your body heat”: Heterogeneity as fundamental to learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19, 322–357. doi:10.1080/10508406.2010.491752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–735. doi:10.1353/lan.1974.0010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saxe, G. B. (1991). Culture and cognitive development: Studies in mathematical understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Saxe, G. B. (1992). Studying children’s learning in context: Problems and prospects. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 215–234. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0202_4
   Google Scholar
• Saxe, G. B., & Esmonde, I. (2005). Studying cognition in flux: A historical treatment of Fu in the shifting structure of Oksapmin mathematics. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 12, 171–225.
   Google Scholar
• Schoenfeld, A. H. (1991). On mathematics as sense-making: An informal attack on the unfortunate divorce of formal and informal mathematics. In J. F. Voss, D. N. Perkins, & J. W. Segal (Eds.), Informal reasoning and education (pp. 311–343). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Spradley, J. P. (1980). Participant observation. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, R., & Hall, R. (1998). Disciplined perception: Learning to see in technoscience. In M. Lampert & M. L. Blunk (Eds.), Talking mathematics in school: Studies of teaching and learning (pp. 107–149). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Streeck, J., & Mehus, S. (2005). Microethnography: The study of practices. In K. L. Fitch & R. E. Sanders (Eds.), Handbook of language and social interaction (pp. 381–404). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Wager, A. A. (2012). Incorporating out-of-school mathematics: From cultural context to embedded practice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 15, 9–23. doi:10.1007/s10857-011-9199-3
   Google Scholar
• Walkerdine, V. (1997). Difference, cognition, and mathematics education. For the Learning of Mathematics, 10, 51–56.
   Google Scholar