3,290
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Introduction

Introduction to the Special Issue

, &

References

  • Barab, S., & Squire, K. (Eds.). (2004). Special issue on design-based research. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1).
  • Beach, K. (1995). Activity as a mediator of sociocultural change and individual development: The case of school‐work transition in Nepal. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 2(4), 285–302. doi:10.1080/10749039509524707
  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 141–178.
  • Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1994). Guided discovery in a community of learners. In K. McGilly (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 229–270). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.
  • Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1996). Psychological theory and the design of innovative learning environments: On procedures, principles, and systems. In L. Schauble & R. Glaser (Eds.), Innovations in learning: New environments for education (pp. 289–325). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Brown, A. L., & Palincsar, A. (1982). Inducing strategic learning from texts by means of informed, self-control training. Topics in Learning & Learning Disabilities, 2(1), 1–17.
  • Cobb, P., McClain, K., & Gravemeijer, K. (2003). Learning about statistical covariation. Cognition and Instruction, 21(1), 1–78. doi:10.1207/S1532690XCI2101_1
  • Cole, M. (2007). Sustaining model systems of educational activity: Designing for the long haul. In J. Campione, K. Metz, & A. S. Palincsar (Eds.), Children’s learning in laboratory and classroom contexts: Essays in honor of Ann Brown (pp. 71–87). New York, NY: Erlbaum.
  • Cole, M., & The Distributed Literacy Consortium. (2006). The fifth dimension: An after-school program built on diversity. New York, NY: Russell Sage.
  • Cole, M., & Engeström, Y. (2007). Cultural-historical approaches to designing for development. In J. Valsiner & A. Rosa (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of sociocultural psychology (pp. 484–507). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Cole, M., & Packer, M. (2016 /this issue). Design-based intervention research as the science of the doubly artificial. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25, 503–530. doi:10.1080/10508406.2016.1187148
  • Danish, J. A. (2014). Applying an activity theory lens to designing instruction for learning about the structure, behavior, and function of a honeybee system. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23, 100–148. doi:10.1080/10508406.2013.856793
  • Davydov, V. V. (1988). Problems of developmental teaching: The experience of theoretical and experimental research. Soviet Education, 30, 8–10.
  • Downing-Wilson, D., Lecusay, R., & Cole, M. (2011). Design experimentation and mutual appropriation: Two strategies for university/community collaborative after-school interventions. Theory & Psychology, 21(5), 656–680. doi:10.1177/0959354311414456
  • Ellis, A. B. (2007). A taxonomy for categorizing generalizations: Generalizing actions and reflection generalizations. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(2), 221–262. doi:10.1080/10508400701193705
  • Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki, Finland: Orienta-Konsultit.
  • Engeström, Y. (1999). Innovative learning in work teams: Analyzing cycles of knowledge creation in practice. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R.-L. Punamäki-Gitai (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 377–404). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Engeström, Y. (2011). From design experiments to formative interventions. Theory & Psychology, 21(5), 598–628. doi:10.1177/0959354311419252
  • Engeström, Y., Engeström, R., & Suntio, A. (2002). From paralyzing myths to expansive action: Building computer-supported knowledge work into the curriculum from below. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Computer support for collaborative learning: Foundations for a CSCL community (pp. 211–224). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2010). Studies of expansive learning: Foundations, findings and future challenges. Educational Research Review, 5, 1–24.
  • Engeström, Y., Virkkunen, J., Helle, M., Pihlaja, J., & Poikela, R. (1996). The change laboratory as a tool for transforming work. Lifelong Learning in Europe, 1(2), 10–17.
  • Goldman, S., & Booker, A. (2009). Making math a definition of the situation: Families as sites for mathematical practices. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 40(4), 369–387. doi:10.1111/j.1548-1492.2009.01057.x
  • Greeno, J. G. (2016/this issue). Cultural-historical activity theory/design-based research in Pasteur's quadrant. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25, 634–639. doi:10.1080/10508406.2016.1221718
  • Gutiérrez, K. D., Baquedano-Lopez, P., & Tejada, C. (2000). Rethinking diversity: Hybridity and hybrid language practices in the third space. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 6(4), 286–303. doi:10.1080/10749039909524733
  • Gutiérrez, K. D., & Jurow, A. S. (2016 /this issue). Social design experiments: Toward equity by design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25, 565–598. doi:10.1080/10508406.2016.1204548
  • Hall, R., & Nemirovsky, R. (2012). Introduction to the special issue: Modalities of body engagement in mathematical activity and learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21(2), 207–215. doi:10.1080/10508406.2011.611447
  • Kaptelinin, V. (1996). Computer-mediated activity: Functional organs in social and developmental contexts. In B. A. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human computer interaction (pp. 45–68). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Kelly, A. E. (Ed.). (2003). Special issue: The role of design in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1).
  • Kelly, A. (2004). Design research in education: Yes, but is it methodological? Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 115–128. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1301_6
  • Kuutti, K. (1999). Activity theory, transformation of work, and information systems design. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R.-L. Punamäki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 360–376). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition. (1982). A model system for the study of learning difficulties. Quarterly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition, 4, 39–66.
  • Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition. (2010). Cultural-historical activity theory. In B. McGaw, P. Peterson, & E. Baker (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (3rd ed., pp. 360–366). New York, NY: Elsevier.
  • Lamberg, T. D., & Middleton, J. A. (2009). Design research perspectives on transitioning from individual microgenetic interviews to a whole-class teaching experiment. Educational Researcher, 38(4), 233–245. doi:10.3102/0013189X09334206
  • Lee, C. D. (2001). Is October Brown Chinese? A cultural modeling activity system for underachieving students. American Educational Research Journal, 38(1), 97–141. doi:10.3102/00028312038001097
  • Matusov, E. (2011). An ecological model of inter-institutional sustainability of an after-school program: The La Red Magica community-university partnership in Delaware. Outlines, 1, 19–45.
  • Meshcheryakov, A. (1979). Awakening to life: Forming behaviour and mind in deaf-blind children. Moscow, Soviet Union: Progress.
  • Moll, L. C., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory Into Practice, 31(2), 132–141. doi:10.1080/00405849209543534
  • Newman, F. (2003). Undecidable emotions (What is social therapy? And how is it revolutionary?). Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 16(3), 215–232. doi:10.1080/10720530390209252
  • O’Neill, D. K. (2012). Designs that fly: What the history of aeronautics tells us about the future of design-based research in education. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 35(2), 119–140. doi:10.1080/1743727X.2012.683573
  • O’Neill, D. K. (2016). When form follows fantasy: Lessons for learning scientists from modernist architecture and urban planning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25(1), 133–152. doi:10.1080/10508406.2015.1094736
  • O'Neill, D. K. (2016 /this issue). Understanding design research–practice partnerships in context and time: Why learning sciences scholars should learn from cultural-historical activity theory approaches to design-based research. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25, 497–502. doi:10.1080/10508406.2016.1226835
  • Pea, R. D. (2004). The social and technological dimensions of scaffolding and related theoretical concepts for learning, education, and human activity. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 423–451. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1303_6
  • Penuel, W. R. (2014). Emerging forms of formative intervention research in education. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 21(2), 97–117. doi:10.1080/10749039.2014.884137
  • Penuel, W. R., Fishman, B. J., Cheng, B. H., & Sabelli, N. (2011). Organizing research and development at the intersection of learning, implementation, and design. Educational Researcher, 40(7), 331–337. doi:10.3102/0013189X11421826
  • Sandoval, W. A., & Bell, P. (Eds.). (2004). Special issue: Design-based research methods for studying learning in context. Educational Psychologist, 39(4).
  • Sannino, A., Engeström, Y., & Lemos, M. (2016 /this issue). Formative interventions for expansive learning and transformative agency. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25, 599–633. doi:10.1080/10508406.2016.1204547
  • Schliemann, A. D. (2002). Representational tools and mathematical understanding. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(2–3), 301–317. doi:10.1080/10508406.2002.9672141
  • Severance, S., Penuel, W. R., Sumner, T., & Leary, H. (2016 /this issue). Organizing for teacher agency in curricular co-design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25, 531–564. doi:10.1080/10508406.2016.1207541
  • Steffe, L. P., & Thompson, P. W. (2000). Teaching experiment methodology: Underlying principles and essential elements. In A. E. Kelly & R. A. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 267–307). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Stokes, D. E. (1997). Pasteur’s quadrant: Basic science and technological innovation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Wertsch, J. V., del Rio, P., & Alvarez, A. (1995). Sociocultural studies of mind. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Yamagata-Lynch, L. C. (2007). Confronting analytical dilemmas for understanding complex human interactions in design-based research from a cultural-historical activity theory (CHAT) framework. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(4), 451–484. doi:10.1080/10508400701524777
  • Zaporozhets, A. V., & Elkonin, D. B. (1971). The psychology of preschool children (J. Shybut & S. Simon, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.