Learning Along Lines: Locative Literacies for Reading and Writing the City

REFERENCES

• Agarwal, P. (2005). Topological and geometric operators for ontological classification of vague geographic concepts. Spatial Cognition & Computation, 5(1), 69–88. doi:10.1207/s15427633scc0501_3
   Google Scholar
• Alibali, M. W., & Nathan, M. J. (2012). Embodiment in mathematics teaching and learning: Evidence from learners’ and teachers’ gestures. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21(2), 247–286. doi:10.1080/10508406.2011.611446
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barron, B., Martin, C. K., Takeuchi, L., & Fithian, R. (2009). Parents as learning partners in the development of technological fluency. International Journal of Learning and Media, 1(2), 55–77. doi:10.1162/ijlm.2009.0021
   Google Scholar
• Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(4), 577–660.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonilla, Y. (2011). The past is made by walking: Labor activism and historical production in postcolonial Guadeloupe. Cultural Anthropology, 26(3), 313–339. doi:10.1111/cuan.2011.26.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brantlinger, E. A. (2003). Dividing classes: How the middle class negotiates and rationalizes school advantage. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caquard, S. (2011). Cartographies of fictional worlds: Conclusive remarks. The Cartographic Journal, 48(4),224–225.
   Google Scholar
• Carrington, V., & Robinson, M. (Eds.). (2009). Digital literacies: Social learning and classroom practices. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cresswell, T. (2006). On the move: Mobility in the modern western world. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• de Certeau, M. (1984). The practice of everyday life. Berkeley, CA: University of California Berkeley Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Souza e Silva, A., & Frith, J. (2014). Re- narrating the city through the presentation of location. In J. Farman (Ed.), The mobile story: Narrative practices with locative technologies [Kindle edition] (pp. 34-50). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• diSessa, A. A. (2000). Changing minds: Computers, learning, and literacy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duranti, A. (1997). Linguistic anthropology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Enyedy, N. (2005). Inventing mapping: Creating cultural forms to solve collective problems. Cognition and Instruction, 23(4), 427–466. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci2304_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farman, J. (2010). Mapping the digital empire: Google Earth and the process of postmodern cartography. New Media & Society, 12(6), 869–888.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farman, J. (2014). Creative misuse as resistance: Surveillance, mobile technologies, and locative games. Surveillance & Society, 12(3), 377–388.
   Google Scholar
• Farnell, B. (1999). Moving bodies, acting selves. Annual Review of Anthropology, 28, 341–373. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.28.1.341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. Computers in Entertainment, 1(1), 20–20. doi:10.1145/950566
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (2012). The old and the new in the new digital literacies. The Educational Forum, 76, 418–420.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. London, UK: Weidenfield & Nicolson.
   Google Scholar
• Glenberg, A. M., Gutierrez, T., Levin, J. R., Japuntich, S., & Kaschak, M. P. (2004). Activity and imagined activity can enhance young children’s reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(3), 424–436. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.96.3.424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldin‐Meadow, S. (2009). How gesture promotes learning throughout childhood. Child Development Perspectives, 3(2), 106–111. doi:10.1111/cdep.2009.3.issue-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodchild, M. F., & Janelle, D. G. (2010). Toward critical spatial thinking in the social sciences and humanities. GeoJournal, 75(1), 3–13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96(3), 606–633. doi:10.1525/aa.1994.96.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (2003). Embedded context. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 36(4), 323–350. doi:10.1207/S15327973RLSI3604_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, E., Elwood, S., & Mitchell, K. (2016). Critical spatial learning: Participatory mapping, spatial histories, and youth civic engagement. Children’s Geographies, 14(5), 558–572.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenfield, A. (2010). Everyware: The dawning age of ubiquitous computing. San Francisco, CA: New Riders.
   Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez, K., & Vossoughi, S. (2010). Lifting off the ground to return anew: Documenting and designing for equity and transformation through social design experiments. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1–2), 100–117. doi:10.1177/0022487109347877
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haddington, P., & Keisanen, T. (2009). Location, mobility and the body as resources in selecting a route. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(10), 1938–1961. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, R., Ma, J., & Nemirovsky, R. (2015). Re-scaling bodies in/as representational instruments in GPS drawing. In V. R. Lee (Ed.), Learning technologies and the body: Integration and implementation (pp. 112-131). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, R., & Nemirovsky, R. (2012). Introduction to the special issue: Modalities of body engagement in mathematical activity and learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21(2), 207–215.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, L. K. (2014). Negotiating spatial narratives through GPS tracking. In J. Farman (Ed.), The mobile story: Narrative practices with locative technologies [Kindle edition] (pp. 128-137). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (1991). Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (2008). The right to the city. The New Left Review, 53, 23–40.
   Google Scholar
• Hatcher, A., Bartlett, C., Marshall, A., & Marshall, M. (2009). Two-eyed seeing in the classroom environment: Concepts, approaches, and challenges. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 9(3), 141–153. doi:10.1080/14926150903118342
   Google Scholar
• Heinrich, M., Thomas, B. H., Mueller, S., & Sandor, C. (2008, December). An augmented reality weather system. In Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology (pp. 170–173). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Hemment, D. (2006). Locative arts. Leonardo, 39(4), 348–355. doi:10.1162/leon.2006.39.4.348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hostetter, A. B., & Alibali, M. W. (2008). Visible embodiment: Gestures as simulated action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(3), 495–514. doi:10.3758/PBR.15.3.495
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingold, T. (2007). Lines. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, T. (2011). Being alive: Essays on movement, knowledge and description. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Ito, M., Horst, H., Bittanti, M., Boyd, D., Herr-Stephenson, B., Lange, P., & Robinson, L. (2010). Hanging out, messing around and geeking out: Kids learning and living in new media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H. (2006). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. Chicago, IL: The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H., Purushotma, R., Weigel, M., Clinton, K., & Robison, A. J. (2009). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(1), 39–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karanasios, S., Thakker, D., Lau, L., Allen, D., Dimitrova, V., & Norman, A. (2013). Making sense of digital traces: An activity theory driven ontological approach. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(12), 2452–2467. doi:10.1002/asi.2013.64.issue-12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingston, R. (2007). Public participation in local policy decision-making: The role of Web-based mapping. The Cartographic Journal, 4(2), 138–144. doi:10.1179/000870407X213459
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). The metaphorical structure of the human conceptual system. Cognitive Science, 4(2),195–208.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2007). Beware, your imagination leaves digital traces. Retrieved from http://www.bruno-latour.fr/sites/default/files/P-129-THES-GB.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lauriault, T. P., & Wood, J. (2009). GPS tracings—personal cartographies. The Cartographic Journal, 46(4), 360–365. doi:10.1179/000870409X12549997389628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Hall, R. (2014, June). Changing practice. Keynote address to the International Conference of Learning Sciences, Boulder, CO.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, V. (2014). Learning technologies and the body: Integration and implementation in formal and informal learning environments (Vol. 135). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Leander, K. M., Phillips, N. C., & Taylor, K. H. (2010). The changing social spaces of learning: Mapping new mobilities. Review of Research in Education, 34(1),329–394.
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space (Vol. 142). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lemke, J. (2009). Multimodal genres and transmedia traversals: Social semiotics and the political economy of the sign. Semiotica, 2009(173), 283–297.
   Google Scholar
• Leonard, J., Russell, N. M., Hobbs, R. M., & Buchanan, H. (2013). Using GIS to teach placed-based mathematics in rural classrooms. The Rural Educator, 34(3), 10–17.
   Google Scholar
• Lindgren, R., & Johnson-Glenberg, M. (2013). Emboldened by embodiment six precepts for research on embodied learning and mixed reality. Educational Researcher, 42(8), 445–452. doi:10.3102/0013189X13511661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, L., Andris, C., & Ratti, C. (2010). Uncovering cabdrivers’ behavior patterns from their digital traces. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 34(6), 541–548. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2010.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, J. Y., & Munter, C. (2014). The spatial production of learning opportunities in skateboard parks. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 21(3), 238–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnet, S., & Rodgers, T. (2012). Stripping for the state: Whole body imaging technologies and the surveillance of othered bodies. Feminist Media Studies, 12(1), 101–118. doi:10.1080/14680777.2011.558352
   Google Scholar
• Marin, A. M. (2013). Learning to attend and observe: Parent-child meaning making in the natural world. (Dissertation). Northwestern University, Evanston, IL..
   Google Scholar
• Marin, A. M. (2014). Re-placing walking in the analysis of children’s observational inquiry. In J. L. Polman, E. A. Kyza, D. K. O’Neill, I. Tabak, W. R. Penuel, & A. Jurow (Eds.), Learning and Becoming in Practice: The International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) 2014 (Vol. 3, pp. 1237–1246). Boulder, CO: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Marston, S., Woodard, K., & Jones, J.P. (2009). Scale. In D. Gregory, R. Johnston, G. Pratt, M.J. Watts, & S. Whatmore (Eds.)., The Dictionary of Human Geography (pp. 664–666). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• McFarlane, C. (2010). The comparative city: Knowledge, learning, urbanism. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 34(4), 725–742. doi:10.1111/ijur.2010.34.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michelson, E. (1998). Re‐membering: The return of the body to experiential learning. Studies in Continuing Education, 20(2), 217–233.
   Google Scholar
• Monmonier, M. (1996). How to lie with maps. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, K. M. (2011). Building stories: The embodied narration of what might come to pass. In J. Streeck, C. Goodwin, & C. LeBaron (Eds.), Embodied Interaction: Language and Body in the Material World (pp. 243–253). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2006). Learning to think spatially. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nespor, J. (1997). Tangled up in school: Politics, space, bodies, and signs in the educational process. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Nold, C. (2009). Emotional cartography. Retrieved from http://emotionalcartography.net/
   Google Scholar
• Norris, S. (2004). Analyzing multimodal interaction: A methodological framework. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Prinsloo, M., & Roswell, J. (2012). Digital literacies as placed resources in the globalised periphery. Language and Education, 26(4), 271–277. doi:10.1080/09500782.2012.691511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie, J. (2014). The affordances and constraints of mobile locative narratives. In J. Farman (Ed.), The mobile story: Narrative practices with locative technologies [Kindle edition] (pp. 53–67). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rosner, D. K., Saegusa, H., Friedland, J., & Chambliss, A. (2015, April). Walking by drawing. In B. Begole, J. Kim, K. Inkpen, & W. Woo (Chairs), Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 397–406). New York NY: Association for Computing & Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Rothfarb, R. J. (2011, August). Science in the city AR: Using mobile augmented reality for science inquiry activities. In SIGGRAPH 2011 posters (p. 81). New York, NY: Association for Computing & Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Ryokai, K., & Agogino, A. (2013). Off the paved paths: Exploring nature with a mobile augmented reality learning tool. International Journal of Mobile Human Computer Interaction, 5(2), 21–49. doi:10.4018/IJMHCI
   Google Scholar
• Sample, M. (2014). Location is not compelling (until it is haunted). In J. Farman (Ed.), The mobile story: Narrative practices with locative technologies [Kindle edition] (pp. 68–78). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schuurman, N. (2006). Formalization matters: Critical GIS and ontology research. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 96(4), 726–739. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.2006.00513.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sefton-Green, J. (2006). Youth, technology, and media cultures. Review of Research in Education, 30, 279–306. doi:10.3102/0091732X030001279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, B., Hall, R., & Heiberger, L. (2015, April). Assembling American roots music: Visitors’ micro-curation and engagement in museum gallery spaces. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the Association of American Geographers, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Shekhar, S., Feiner, S. K., & Aref, W. G. (2015). Spatial computing. Communications of the ACM, 59(1), 72–81. doi:10.1145/2859829
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soja, E. W. (1989). Post modern geographies: The reassertion of space in critical social theory. London, UK: Verso Books.
   Google Scholar
• Solem, M. N., Huynh, N. T., & Boehm, R. G. (Eds.). (2015). Learning progressions for maps, geospatial technology, and spatial thinking: A research handbook. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars.
   Google Scholar
• Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, “translations” and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science, 19, 387–420. doi:10.1177/030631289019003001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, R. (2012). The missing bodies of mathematical thinking and learning have been found. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21(2), 337–346.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research ( Vol. 15). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Streeck, J., Goodwin, C., & Lebaron, C. (Eds.). (2011). Multimodality and human activity: Research on human behavior. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, L. A. (1995). Making work visible. Communications of the ACM, 38(9), 56–64. doi:10.1145/223248.223263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tate, W. F. (1995). Returning to the root: A culturally relevant approach to mathematics pedagogy. Theory Into Practice, 34(3), 166–173. doi:10.1080/00405849509543676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, K. H. (2013). Counter-mapping the neighborhood: A social design experiment for spatial justice ( Doctoral dissertation). Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, K. H., & Hall, R. (2010, May). Getting into the map: How the public learns to take place in urban planning. Paper presented at the American Education Research Association Conference, Denver, CO.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, K. H. & Hall, R. (2011, February). Forming publics: Negotiating what happens at the interface of participatory planning. Paper presented at the 32nd Annual Ethnography in Education Forum, Philadelphia, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, K. H., & Hall, R. (2013). Counter-mapping the neighborhood on bicycles: Mobilizing youth to reimagine the city. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 18(1–2), 65–93. doi:10.1007/s10758-013-9201-5
   Google Scholar
• Umphress, J., & Sherin, B. (2014). The body as viewfinder. In V. R. Lee (Ed.), Learning technologies and the body: Integration and implementation in formal and informal learning environments (pp. 220–237). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Van Wart, S. J., Vakil, S., & Parikh, T. S. (2014, June). Apps for social justice: Motivating computer science learning with design and real-world problem solving. Paper presented at the 2014 Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, Uppsala, Sweden.
   Google Scholar