4,520
Views
126
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Digital Youth Divas: Exploring Narrative-Driven Curriculum to Spark Middle School Girls’ Interest in Computational Activities

, , &

References

  • Ainley, M., Hidi, S., & Berndorff, D. (2002). Interest, learning, and the psychological processes that mediate their relationship. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(3), 545–561. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.94.3.545
  • Allen, C. D., & Eisenhart, M. (2017). Fighting for desired versions of a future self: How young women negotiated STEM-related identities in the discursive landscape of educational opportunity. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 26(3), 407–436. doi:10.1080/10508406.2017.1294985
  • Azevedo, F. S. (2013). The tailored practice of hobbies and its implication for the design of interest-driven learning environments. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 22(3), 462–510. doi:10.1080/10508406.2012.730082
  • Baker, D., & Leary, R. (1995). Letting girls speak out about science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(1), 3–27. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
  • Bang, M., & Medin, D. (2010). Cultural processes in science education: Supporting the navigation of multiple epistemologies. Science Education, 94(6), 1008–1026. doi:10.1002/sce.v94:6
  • Barron, B. (2006). Interest and self-sustained learning as catalysts of development: A learning ecology perspective. Human Development, 49(4), 193–224. doi:10.1159/000094368
  • Barron, B., & Bell, P. (2015). Learning environments in and out of school. In L. Corno & E. Anderman (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (3rd ed., pp. 323–336). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Barron, B., Gomez, K., Pinkard, N., & Martin, C. K. (2014). The Digital Youth Network: Cultivating new media citizenship in urban communities. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Barron, B., & Martin, C. (2016). Making matters: A framework for assessing digital media citizenship. In K. Peppler, Y. Kafai, & E. Halverson (Eds.), Makeology: Vol. 2. Makers as learners (pp. 45–63). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Barron, B., Martin, C. K., Takeuchi, L., & Fithian, R. (2009). Parents as learning partners in the development of technological fluency. International Journal of Learning and Media, 1(2), 55–77. doi:10.1162/ijlm.2009.0021
  • Barron, B., Walter, S., Martin, C. K., & Schatz, C. (2010). Predictors of creative computing participation and profiles of experience in two Silicon Valley middle schools. Computers and Education, 54(1), 178–189.
  • Barron, B., Wise, S., & Martin, C. K. (2013). Creating within and across life spaces: The role of a computer clubhouse in a child’s learning ecology. In B. Bevan, P. Bell, R. Stevens, & A. Razfar (Eds.), LOST opportunities: Learning in out of school time (pp. 99–118). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
  • Bell, P., Tzou, C., Bricker, L. A., & Baines, A. D. (2012). Learning in diversities of structures of social practice: Accounting for how, why and where people learn science. Human Development, 55(5–6), 269–284. doi:10.1159/000345315
  • Blickenstaff, J. C. (2005). Women and science careers: Leaky pipeline or gender filter? Gender and Education, 17(4), 369–386. doi:10.1080/09540250500145072
  • Blikstein, P. (2013). Digital fabrication and “making” in education: The democratization of invention. In J. Walter-Herrmann & C. Büching (Eds.), FabLabs: Of Machines, Makers and Inventors (pp. 203–222). Bielefeld, Germany: Transcript.
  • Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141–178. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0202_2
  • Ching, D., Santo, R., Hoadley, C., & Peppler, K. (2015). On-ramps, lane changes, detours and destinations: Building connected learning pathways in HIVE NYC through brokering future learning opportunities. Retrieved from http://hivenyc.org/wp-content/uploads/Hive-Research-Lab-2015-Community-White-Paper-Brokering-Future-Learning-Opportunities.pdf
  • Coburn, C. E. (2003). Rethinking scale: Moving beyond numbers to deep and lasting change. Educational Researcher, 32(6), 3–12. doi:10.3102/0013189X032006003
  • Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • College Board. (2014). 10th annual AP report to the nation. New York, NY: Author.
  • Collins, A. (1992). Toward a design science of education. In E. Scanlon & T. O’Shea (Eds.), New directions in educational technology (pp. 15–22). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
  • Corbett, C., & Hill, C. (2015). Solving the equation: The variables for women’s success in engineering and computing. Washington, DC: American Association of University Women.
  • Daily, S. D., Leonard, A. E., Jörg, S., Babu, S., Gundersen, K., & Parmar, D. (2014). Embodying computational thinking: Initial design of an emerging technological learning tool. Technology, Knowledge, & Learning, 20(1), 79–84. doi:10.1007/s10758-014-9237-1
  • Dickey, M. D. (2011). Murder on Grimm Isle: The impact of game narrative design in an educational game‐based learning environment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(3), 456–469. doi:10.1111/bjet.2011.42.issue-3
  • Druin, A. (2002). The role of children in the design of new technology. Behaviour and Information Technology, 21(1), 1–25.
  • Druin, A., Bederson, B., Boltman, A., Miura, A., Knotts-Callahan, D., & Platt, M. (1998). Children as our technology design partners. In M. Kaufmann (Ed.), The design of children’s technology (pp. 51–72). San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufman.
  • DuBow, W. M. (2011, November). Pushing toward gender parity in computing in the U.S. Paper presented at the International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation, Madrid, Spain.
  • Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Ericson, B. (2014, January 1). Detailed AP CS 2013 results: Unfortunately, much the same [Web log post]. Retrieved from https://computinged.wordpress.com/2014/01/01/detailed-ap-cs-2013-results-unfortunately-much-the-same/
  • Gee, J. P. (2004). Situated language and learning: A critique of traditional schooling. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Gieryn, T. F. (1983). Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review, 48, 781–795. doi:10.2307/2095325
  • Givens, J., Nasir, N., Ross, K., & McKinney de Royston, M. (2016). Modeling manhood: Reimagining Black male identities in school. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 47(2), 167–185. doi:10.1111/aeq.12147
  • Goode, J. (2007). If you build teachers, will students come? Professional development for broadening computer science learning for urban youth. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 36(1), 65–88. doi:10.2190/2102-5G77-QL77-5506
  • Grimaldi, S., Fokkinga, S., & Ocnarescu, I. (2013, September). Narratives in design: A study of the types, applications and functions of narratives in design practice. Paper presented at the 6th International Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
  • Gutierrez, K. D., & Rogoff, B. (2003). Cultural ways of learning: Individual traits or repertoires of practice. Educational Researcher, 32(5), 19–25. doi:10.3102/0013189X032005019
  • Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111–127. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4
  • Hill, C., Corbett, C., & St Rose, A. (2010). Why so few? Women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Washington, DC: American Association of University Women.
  • Hine, C. (2008). Virtual ethnography: Modes, varieties, affordances. In N. G. Fielding, R. M. Lee, & G. Blank (Eds), The Sage Handbook of Online Research Methods (pp. 257–270). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Hoadley, C. P. (2002, November). Creating context: Design-based research in creating and understanding CSCL. Paper presented at the Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Foundations for a CSCL community. International Society of the Learning Sciences, Boulder, CO.
  • Hodari, A. K., Ong, M., Ko, L. T., & Smith, J. M. (2016). Enacting agency: The strategies of women of color in computing. Computing in Science & Engineering, 18(3), 58–68. doi:10.1109/MCSE.2016.44
  • Holland, D. (2001). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Hulleman, C. S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2009, December 4). Promoting interest and performance in high school science classes. Science, 326(5958), 1410–1412. doi:10.1126/science.1177067
  • Johnson, A., Brown, J., Carlone, H., & Cuevas, A. (2011). Authoring identity amidst the treacherous terrain of science: A multiracial feminist examination of the journeys of three women of color in science. Journal of Research on Science Teaching, 48(4), 339–366. doi:10.1002/tea.20411
  • Kaptelinin, V., & Cole, M. (1997, December). Individual and collective activities in educational computer game playing. Paper presented at the 2nd International Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning, Toronto, ON.
  • Ketelhut, D. J. (2007). The impact of student self-efficacy on scientific inquiry skills: An exploratory investigation in River City, a multi-user virtual environment. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(1), 99–111. doi:10.1007/s10956-006-9038-y
  • Klawe, M., Whitney, T., & Simard, C. (2009). Women in computing: Take 2. Communications of the ACM, 52(2), 68–76.
  • Ko, L. T., Kachchaf, R. R., Hodari, A. K., & Ong, M. (2014). Agency of women of color in physics and astronomy: Strategies for persistence and success. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 20(2), 171–195. doi:10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.v20.i2
  • Lave, J. W., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lee, C. D. (1995). A culturally based cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching African American high school students skills in literary interpretation. Reading Research Quarterly, 30(4), 608–631. doi:10.2307/748192
  • Lee, C. D. (1997). Bridging home and school literacies: Models for culturally responsive teaching, a case for African American English. In S. B. Heath & D. Lapp (Eds.), A Handbook for Literacy Educators: Research on Teaching the Communicative and Visual Arts (pp. 330–341). New York, NY: Macmillan.
  • Lloyd, P. (2000). Storytelling and the development of discourse in the engineering design process. Design Studies, 21(4), 357–373. doi:10.1016/S0142-694X(00)00007-7
  • Malcom, S. M., Hall, P. Q., & Brown, J. W. (1976, April). The double bind: The price of being a minority woman in science. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
  • Malone, T. W. (1981). What makes things fun to learn? A study of intrinsically motivating computer games. Pipeline, 6(2), 49–51.
  • Maltese, A. V., & Tai, R. H. (2010). Eyeballs in the fridge: Sources of early interest in science. International Journal of Science Education, 32(5), 669–685. doi:10.1080/09500690902792385
  • Margolis, J., Estrella, R., Goode, J., Jellison Holme, J., & Nao, K. (2008). Stuck in the shallow end: Education, race, and computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Margolis, J., & Fisher, A. (2002). Unlocking the clubhouse: Women in computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Martin, C. K., Barron, B., Austin, K., & Pinkard, N. (2009, March). A culture of sharing: A look at identity development through the creation and presentation of digital media projects. Paper presented at the Computer Science in Education (CSEDU) Conference, Lisbon, Portugal.
  • Martin, C. K., Nacu, D., & Pinkard, N. (2016). Revealing opportunities for 21st century learning: An approach to interpreting user trace log data. Journal of Learning Analytics, 3(2), 37–87. doi:10.18608/jla.2016.32.4
  • Mosatche, H., Matloff-Nieves, S., Kekelis, L., & Lawner, E. (2013). Effective STEM programs for adolescent girls: Three approaches and many lessons learned. Afterschool Matters, 17, 17–25.
  • Muller, M. J. (2003). Participatory design: The third space in HCI. Human-Computer Interaction: Development Process, 4235, 165–185.
  • Nacu, D. C., Martin, C. K., Pinkard, N., & Gray, T. (2014). Analyzing educators’ online interactions: A framework of online learning support roles. Learning, Media and Technology, 41(2), 283–305. doi:10.1080/17439884.2015.975722
  • Nasir, N. I. (2011). Racialized identities: Race and achievement among African American youth. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Nasir, N. I., & Cooks, J. (2009). Becoming a hurdler: How learning settings afford identities. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 40(1), 41–61. doi:10.1111/j.1548-1492.2009.01027.x
  • Nasir, N. I., & Hand, V. (2008). From the court to the classroom: Opportunities for engagement, learning, and identity in basketball and classroom mathematics. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17(2), 143–179. doi:10.1080/10508400801986108
  • Nasir, N. I., Snyder, C. R., Shah, N., & Ross, K. M. (2012). Racial storylines and implications for learning. Human Development, 55(5–6), 285–301. doi:10.1159/000345318
  • National Science Foundation. (2003a). Back to school: Five myths about girls and science [Press release]. Arlington, VA: Author.
  • National Science Foundation. (2003b). New formulas for America’s workforce: Girls in science and engineering. Arlington, VA: Author.
  • Peppler, K., Gresalfi, M., Tekinbas, K. S., & Santo, R. (2014). Soft circuits: Crafting e-fashion with DIY electronics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Pruitt, J., & Adlin, T. (2006). The persona lifecycle. San Francisco, CA: Elsevier Press.
  • Putnam, C. (2010). Bridging the gap between user experience research and design in industry: An analysis of two common communication tools: personas and scenarios ( Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (Publication No. AAT 3422001)
  • Renninger, A., Nieswandt, M., & Hidi, D. (2015). Handbook of interest in mathematics and science learning. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
  • Rosser, S. V. (2004). The science glass ceiling: Academic women scientists and the struggle to succeed. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Rowe, J., Mott, B., McQuiggan, S., Robison, J., Lee, S., & Lester, J. (2009, July). Crystal Island: A narrative-centered learning environment for eighth grade microbiology. Paper presented at a workshop on intelligent educational games at the 14th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, Brighton, UK.
  • Scott, K. A., Sheridan, K. M., & Clark, K. (2015). Culturally responsive computing: A theory revisited. Learning, Media and Technology, 40(4), 412–436. doi:10.1080/17439884.2014.924966
  • Scott, K. A., & White, M. (2013). COMPUGIRLS’ standpoint: Culturally responsive computing and its effect on girls of color. Urban Education, 48(5), 657–681.
  • Sfard, A., & Prusak, A. (2005). Telling identities: In search of an analytic tool for investigating learning as a culturally shaped activity. Educational Researcher, 34(4), 14–22. doi:10.3102/0013189X034004014
  • Squire, K. (2006). From content to context: Videogames as designed experience. Educational Researcher, 35(8), 19–29. doi:10.3102/0013189X035008019
  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Tai, R. H., Qi Liu, C., Maltese, A. V., & Fan, X. (2006, May 26). Planning early for careers in science. Science, 312, 1143–1145. doi:10.1126/science.1128690
  • Varelas, M., Martin, D. B., & Kane, J. M. (2013). Content learning and identity construction: A framework to strengthen African American students’ mathematics and science learning in urban elementary schools. Human Development, 55(5–6), 319–339. doi:10.1159/000345324
  • Visintainer, T. (2015). What is and who can do science? Supporting youth of colors’ identities as learners, doers, and change agents in science ( Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (Publication No. AAT 3720874)
  • Vossoughi, S., & Bevan, B. (2014). Making and tinkering: A review of the literature. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
  • Warschauer, M., & Matuchniak, T. (2010). New technology and digital worlds: Analyzing evidence of equity in access, use, and outcomes. Review of Research in Education, 34(1), 179–225. doi:10.3102/0091732X09349791
  • Watkins, S. C. (2012). Digital divide: Navigating the digital edge. International Journal of Learning and Media, 3(2), 1–12. doi:10.1162/ijlm_a_00072
  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning as a social system. Systems Thinker, 9(5), 2–3.
  • Wortham, S. (2006). Learning identity: The joint emergence of social identification and academic learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.