From Seeing to Observing: How Parents and Children Learn to See Science in a Botanical Garden

References

• Allen, S. (2002). Looking for learning in visitor talk. In G. Leinhardt, K. Crowley, & K. Knutson (Eds.), Learning Conversations in Museums (pp. 259–303). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Ash, D. (2004a). Dialogue in two languages: The science in the dialogue and the dialogue in the science. Science Education, 88(6), 855–884. doi:10.1002/sce.20002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ash, D. (2004b). How families use questions at dioramas. Curator, 47(1), 84–100. doi:10.1111/j.2151-6952.2004.tb00367.x
   Google Scholar
• Ault, C. R. (1998). Criteria of excellence for geological inquiry: The necessity of ambiguity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(2), 189–212. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, P., Lewenstein, B., Shouse, A. W., & Feder, M. A. (Eds.). (2009). Learning science in informal environments. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boland, A. M., Haden, C. A., & Ornstein, P. A. (2003). Boosting children’s memories by training mothers in the use of elaborative conversational style as an event unfolds. Journal of Cognition and Development, 4(1), 39–65. doi:10.1080/15248372.2003.9669682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braswell, G. S., & Callanan, M. (2003). Learning to draw recognizable graphic representations during mother-child interactions. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 49(4), 471–494. doi:10.1353/mpq.2003.0019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callanan, M. A. (1990). Parents’ descriptions of objects: Potential data for children’s inferences about category principles. Cognitive Development, 5, 101–122. doi:10.1016/0885-2014(90)90015-L
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callanan, M. A., & Jipson, J. (2001). Explanatory conversations and young children’s developing scientific literacy. In K. Crowley, C. D. Schunn, & T. Okada (Eds.), Designing for Science (pp. 21–49). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Callanan, M. A., & Oakes, L. M. (1992). Preschoolers’ questions and parents’ explanations: Causal thinking in everyday activity. Child Development, 7, 213–233.
   Google Scholar
• Carey, S. (1985). Conceptual change in childhood. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books/MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chinn, C. A., & Malhotra, B. A. (2001). Epistemologically authentic scientific reasoning. In K. Crowley, C. D. Schunn, & T. Okada (Eds.), Designing for Science: Implications from Everyday, Classroom, and Professional Settings (pp. 351–392). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Crowley, K., Callanan, M., Jipson, J., Galco, J., Topping, K., & Shrager, J. (2001). Shared scientific thinking in everyday parent-child activity. Science Education, 85, 712–732. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowley, K., & Jacobs, M. (2002). Building islands of expertise. In G. Leinhardt, K. Crowley, & K. Knutson (Eds.), Learning Conversations in Museums (pp. 333–356). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Daston, L. (2008). On scientific observation. Isis, 99, 97–100. doi:10.1086/587535
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daston, L., & Galison, P. (2007). Objectivity. New York, NY: Zone.
   Google Scholar
• Daston, L., & Lunbeck, E. (Eds.). (2011). Histories of scientific observation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, E. (2014). Equity in informal science education: Developing an access and equity framework for science museums and science centres. Studies in Science Education, 50(2), 209–247. doi:10.1080/03057267.2014.957558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond, J. (1986). The behavior of family groups in science museums. Curator, 29(2), 139–154. doi:10.1111/j.2151-6952.1986.tb01434.x
   Google Scholar
• Dierking, L. D. (1987). Parent-child interactions in a free choice learning setting: An examination of attention directing behaviors ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Dierking, L. D., & Falk, J. H. (1994). Family behavior and learning in informal science settings: A review of the research. Science Education, 78(1), 57–72. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R., & Scott, P. (1996). Young people’s images of science. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eberbach, C., & Crowley, K. (2005). From living to virtual: Learning from museum objects. Curator, 48(3), 317–338. doi:10.1111/j.2151-6952.2005.tb00175.x
   Google Scholar
• Eberbach, C., & Crowley, K. (2009). From everyday to scientific: How children learn to observe the biological world. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 39–68. doi:10.3102/0034654308325899
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K. A. (Ed.). (1996). The road to excellence: The acquisition of expert performance in the arts and sciences, sports and games. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Estes, J. R., Amos, B. R., & Sullivan, J. R. (1983). Pollination from two perspectives: The agricultural and biological sciences. In C. E. Jones & R. J. Little (Eds.), Handbook of Experimental Pollination Biology (pp. 536–552). New York, NY: Scientific and Academic Editions.
   Google Scholar
• Finley, F. N., & Pocovi, M. C. (Eds.). (2000). Considering the scientific method of inquiry. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
   Google Scholar
• Fivush, R., Haden, C. A., & Reese, E. (2006). Elaborating on elaboration: Role of maternal reminiscing style in cognitive and socioemotional development. Child Development, 77(6), 1568–1588. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00960.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, D. (2005). The challenges of observing geologically: Third graders’ descriptions of rock and mineral properties. Science Education, 89(2), 276–295. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleason, M., & Schauble, L. (2000). Parents’ assistance of their children’s scientific reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 17(4), 343–378. doi:10.1207/S1532690XCI1704_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96(3), 606–633. doi:10.1525/aa.1994.96.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gopnik, A., Meltzoff, A. N., & Kuhl, P. K. (1999). The scientist in the crib. New York, NY: Morrow.
   Google Scholar
• Gould, S. J. (1986). Evolution and the triumph of homology, or why history matters. American Scientist, 74, 60–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutwill, J. P., & Allen, S. (2010). Facilitating family group inquiry at science museum exhibits. Science Education, 94(4), 710–742. doi:10.1002/sce.20387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haden, C. A. (2010). Talking about science in museums. Child Development Perspectives, 4(1), 62–67. doi:10.1111/j.1750-8606.2009.00119.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haila, Y. (1992). Measuring nature: Quantitative data in field biology. In A. E. Clark & J. H. Fujimura (Eds.), The Right Tools for the Job (pp. 233–253). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hilke, D. D. (1989). The family as a learning system: An observational study of families in museums. In B. H. Butler & M. B. Sussman (Eds.), Museum Visits and Activities for Family Life Enrichment (pp. 101–130). New York, NY: Haworth Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jipson, J., & Callanan, M. (2003). Mother-child conversation and children’s understanding of biological and nonbiological changes in size. Child Development, 74(2), 629–644. doi:10.1111/cdev.2003.74.issue-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, K. Y., & Crowley, K. (2010). Negotiating the goal of museum inquiry: How families engineer and experiment. In M. K. Stein & L. Kucan (Eds.), Instructional Explanations in the Disciplines (pp. 51–65). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kisiel, J., Rowe, S., Vartabedian, M. A., & Kopczak, C. (2012). Evidence for family engagement in scientific reasoning at interactive animal exhibits. Sciences Editors, 96, 1047–1070. doi:10.1002/sce.21036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klahr, D., & Simon, H. A. (1999). Studies of scientific discovery: Complementary approaches and convergent findings. Psychological Bulletin, 125(5), 524–543. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.5.524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knutson, K., & Crowley, K. (2010). Connecting with art: How families talk about art in a museum setting. In M. K. Stein & L. Kucan (Eds.), Instructional Explanations in the Disciplines (pp.189–206). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Knutson, K., Lyon, M., Crowley, K., & Giarratani, L. (2016). Flexible interventions to increase family engagement at natural history museum dioramas. Curator: The Museum Journal, 59(4), 339–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krajcik, J., Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R., Bass, K. M., Fredricks, J., & Soloway, E. (1998). Inquiry in project-based science classrooms: Initial attempts by middle school students. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7, 313–350. doi:10.1080/10508406.1998.9672057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law J. & Lynch, M. (1990). Lists, field guides, and the descriptive organization of seeing: Birdwatching as an exemplary observational activity. In M. Lynch & S. Woolgar (Eds.), Representation in Scientific Practice (pp. 267–299). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2004). Modeling variation through distribution. American Educational Research Journal, 41(4), 635–679. doi:10.3102/00028312041003635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2006). Scientific thinking and scientific literacy: Supporting development in learning contexts. In W. Damon, R. Lerner, K. A. Renninger, & I. E. Sigel (Eds.), Handbook of Child Psychology: Vol. 4. Child Psychology in Practice (6th ed., pp. 153–196). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Lehrer, R., Schauble, L., & Petrosino, A. J. (2001). Reconsidering the role of experiment in science education. In K. Crowley, C. Schunn, & T. Okada (Eds.), Designing for science (pp. 251–278). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Leinhardt, G., & Crowley, K. (2002). Objects of learning, objects of talk: Changing minds in museums. In S. G. Paris (Ed.), Multiple Perspectives on Children’s Object-Centered Learning (pp. 139–166). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Leinhardt, G., & Knutson, K. (2004). Listening in on museum conversations. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lobato, J., Rhodehamel, B., & Hohensee, C. (2012). “Noticing” as an alternative transfer of learning process. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21, 433–482. doi:10.1080/10508406.2012.682189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machamer, P., Darden, L., & Craver, C. F. (2000). Thinking about mechanisms. Philosophy of Science, 67, 1–25. doi:10.1086/392759
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayr, E. (1982). Growth of biological thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mayr, E. (1997). This is biology. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
   Google Scholar
• McGuigan, F., & Salmon, K. (2004). The time to talk: The influence of the timing of adult-child talk on children’s event memory. Child Development, 75(3), 669–686. doi:10.1111/cdev.2004.75.issue-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melber, L. M. (2007). Maternal scaffolding in two museum exhibition halls. Curator, 50(3), 341–354. doi:10.1111/j.2151-6952.2007.tb00276.x
   Google Scholar
• Metz, K. (1995). Reassessment of development constraints on children’s science instruction. Review of Educational Research, 65(2), 93–127. doi:10.3102/00346543065002093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metz, K. (2000). Young children’s inquiry in biology: Building the knowledge bases to empower independent inquiry. In J. Minstrell & E. H. van Zee (Eds.), Inquiry into inquiry learning and teaching in science (pp. 371–404). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
   Google Scholar
• Metz, K. (2004). Children’s understanding of scientific inquiry: Their conceptualization of uncertainty in investigations of their own design. Cognition and Instruction, 22(2), 219–290. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci2202_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, J. A. (1993). Science as a way of knowing: The foundations of modern biology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, S. P. (1984). Defining observational competence. Science Education, 68(2), 129–142. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, S. P. (1985). The philosophical basis for observation in science and science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22(9), 817–833. doi:10.1002/tea.3660220905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogilvie, B. W. (2006). The science of describing. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ornstein, P. A., Haden, C. A., & Hedrick, A. M. (2004). Learning to remember: Social-communicative exchanges and the development of children’s memory skills. Developmental Review, 24, 374–395. doi:10.1016/j.dr.2004.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmquist, S., & Crowley, K. (2007). From teachers to testers: Parents’ role in child expertise development in informal settings. Science Education, 91(5), 783–804. doi:10.1002/sce.20215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel, V. L., Kaufman, D. R., & Magder, S. A. (1996). The acquisition of medical expertise in complex dynamic environments. In K. A. Ericsson (Ed.), The Road to Excellence: The Acquisition of Expert Performance in the Arts and Sciences, Sports and Games (pp. 127–163). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rogoff, B., Paradise, R., Mejia Arauz, R., Correa-Chavez, M., & Angelill, C. (2003). Firsthand learning through intent participation. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 175–203. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schauble, L., Gleason, M., Lehrer, R., Bartlett, K., Petrosino, A., Allen, A., … Street, J. (2002). Supporting science learning in museums. In G. Leinhardt, K. Crowley, & K. Knutson (Eds.), Learning Conversations in Museums (pp. 425–452). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (2001). “Seek and ye shall find”: How curiosity engenders discovery. In K. Crowley, C. Schunn, & T. Okada (Eds.), Designing for Science: Implications from Everyday, Classroom, and Professional Settings (pp. 5–20). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, B. K., & Reiser, B. J. (2005). Explaining behavior through observational investigation and theory articulation. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(3), 315–360. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1403_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobel, D. M., & Jipson, J. L. (2015). Cognitive development in museum settings: Relating research and practice. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, R., & Hall, R. (1997). Seeing tornado: How video traces mediate visitor understandings of (natural?) phenomena in a science museum. Science Education, 81, 735–747. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szechter, L. E., & Carey, E. J. (2009). Gravitating toward science: Parent-child interactions at a gravitational-wave observatory. Science Education, 93, 846–858. doi:10.1002/sce.20333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tessler, M., & Nelson, K. (1994). Making memories: The influence of joint encoding on later recall by young children. Consciousness and Cognition, 3, 307–326. doi:10.1006/ccog.1994.1018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tharp, R. G., & Gallimore, R. (1988). Rousing minds to life: Teaching, learning, and schooling in social context. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tomkins, S., & Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2001). Looking for ideas: Observation, interpretation and hypothesis-making by 12-year-old pupils undertaking scientific investigations. International Journal of Science Education, 23(8), 791–813. doi:10.1080/09500690119322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trumbull, D., Bonney, R., & Grudens-Schuck, N. (2005). Developing materials to promote inquiry: Lessons learned. Science Education, 89(1), 1–22. doi:10.1002/sce.20081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W. F. (1994). Mental models of the day/night cycle. Cognitive Science, 18, 123–183. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1801_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, B., Ogonowski, M., & Pothier, S. (2005). “Everyday” and “scientific”: Rethinking dichotomies in modes of thinking in science learning. In R. Nemirosky, A. S. Rosebery, J. Solomon, & B. Warren (Eds.), Everyday Matters in Science and Mathematics (pp. 119–148). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Wickman, P. O., & Östman, L. (2002). Learning as discourse change: A sociocultural mechanism. Science Education, 86, 601–623. doi:10.1002/sce.10036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 17, 89–100. doi:10.1111/jcpp.1976.17.issue-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, H. T., & McClain, L. R. (2013). Intergenerational learning at a nature center: Families using prior experiences and participation frameworks to understand raptors. Environmental Education Research. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/13504622.2013.775219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, H. T., Reeve, S., & Bell, P. (2010). Family sense-making practices in science center conversations. Science Education, 94, 478–505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar