Inquiry as a Members’ Phenomenon: Young Children as Competent Inquirers

References

• Barron, B. J., Schwartz, D. L., Vye, N. J., Moore, A., Petrosino, A., Zech, L., & Bransford, J. D. (1998). Doing with understanding: Lessons from research on problem-and project-based learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7, 271–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berland, L. K., Schwarz, C. V., Krist, C., Kenyon, L., Lo, A. S., & Reiser, B. J. (2015). Epistemologies in practice: Making scientific practices meaningful for students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(7), 1082–1112. doi:10.1002/tea.21257
   Google Scholar
• Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26, 369–398. doi:10.1080/00461520.1991.9653139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumer, H. (1954). What is wrong with social theory? American Sociological Review, 19, 3–10. doi:10.2307/2088165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bransford, J., Vye, N., Stevens, R., Kuhl, P., Schwartz, D., Bell, P., … Sabelli, N. (2005). Learning theories and education: Toward a decade of synergy. In P. Alexandr & P. Winnie (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 209–244). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. R., & Fehige, Y. (2014). Thought experiment. In The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2014 ed.). Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2014/entries/thought-experiment/
   Google Scholar
• Chouinard. (2007). Children’s questions: A mechanism for cognitive development. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 72(1), 1–129. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5834.2007.00436.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1981). The philosophy of John Dewey (Vols. 1 and 2). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Einstein, A. (1991). Autobiographical notes. P. A. Schilpp (Ed.). La Salle, IL: Open Court. (Original work published in 1949)
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, F., & Schultz, J. (1997). When is a context? Some issues and methods in the analysis of social competence. In M. Cole, Y. Engeström, & O. Vasquez (Eds.), Mind, culture, and activity (pp. 22–31). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (2013). The co-operative, transformative organization of human action and knowledge. Journal of Pragmatics, 46, 8–23. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2012.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (2018). Co-operative action. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M. H. (2007). Occasioned knowledge exploration in family interaction. Discourse & Society, 18, 93–110. doi:10.1177/0957926507069459
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadzigeorgiou, Y. P. (2012). Fostering a sense of wonder in the science classroom. Research in Science Education, 42, 985–1005. doi:10.1007/s11165-011-9225-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, R. (1999). The organization and development of discursive practices for “having a theory”. Discourse Processes, 27, 187–218. doi:10.1080/01638539909545058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (2013). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hudicourt-Barnes, J. (2003). The use of argumentation in Haitian Creole science classrooms. Harvard Educational Review, 73, 73–93. doi:10.17763/haer.73.1.hnq801u57400l877
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaber, L. Z., & Hammer, D. (2016). Learning to feel like a scientist. Science Education, 100, 189–220. doi:10.1002/sce.21202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4, 39–103. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0401_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keifert, D. (2012). Young children’s everyday inquiry: A field study of a young girl’s play across contexts. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the Learning Sciences, Sydney, AU (Vol. 1, pp. 315–322).
   Google Scholar
• Keifert, D. (2015). Young children participating in inquiry: Moments of joint inquiry and questioning practices at home and in school ( Doctoral dissertation). Northwestern University. Retrieved from Proquest. (3724286).
   Google Scholar
• Keifert, D. T. (in press). Attending to domains of value in family culture. Cognition and Instruction.
   Google Scholar
• Keifert, D. T., & Marin, A. M. (2018). A commentary on Charles Goodwin’s co-operative action for learning scientists. Cognition and Instruction. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/07370008.2018.1460845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller, E. F. (1984). A feeling for the organism: The life and work of Barbara McClintock. New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Koh, E., Cho, Y. H., Caleon, I. S., & Wei, Y. (2014). Where are we now? Research trends in the learning sciences. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference of the Learning Sciences, Boulder, CO (Vol. 1, pp. 535–542).
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. (1989). Children and adults as intuitive scientists. Psychological Review, 96, 674–689.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. (2016). What do young science students need to learn about variables? Science Education, 100, 392–403. doi:10.1002/sce.21207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D., & Dean, J. D. (2005). Is developing scientific thinking all about learning to control variables? Psychological Science, 16, 866–870. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01628.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. S. (1977). The essential tension: Selected studies in scientific tradition and change. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Manz, E. (2015). Resistance and the development of scientific practice: Designing the mangle into science instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 33, 89–124. doi:10.1080/07370008.2014.1000490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marin, A. M. (2013). Learning to attend and observe: Parent-child meaning making in the natural world ( Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Proquest. (3605744).
   Google Scholar
• McCloskey, M. (1983). Naive theories of motion. In D. Gentner & A. L. Stevens (Eds.), Mental models (pp. 299–324). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• McDermott, R. P., Gospondinoff, K., & Aron, J. (1978). Criteria for an ethnographically adequate description of concerted activities and their contexts. Semiotica, 24, 245–275. doi:10.1515/semi.1978.24.3-4.245
   Google Scholar
• Mehus, S., Stevens, R., & Grigholm, L. (2010). Interactional arrangements for learning about science in early childhood: A case study across preschool and home contexts. Paper presented at the 9th International Conference of the Learning Sciences, Chicago, IL
   Google Scholar
• Nasir, N., Rosebery, A., Warren, B., & Lee, C. (2006). Learning as cultural process: Achieving equity through diversity. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 489–504). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi:10.17226/13165
   Google Scholar
• NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ochs, E. (1979). Transcription as theory. In E. Ochs & B. Shieffelin (Eds.), Developmental psychology (pp. 43–72). New York, NY: Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Ochs, E., Gonzales, P., & Jacoby, S. (1996). “When I come down I’m in the domain state”: Grammar and graphic representation in the interpretive activity of physicists. In E. Ochs, E. Schegloff, & S. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 328–369). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ochs, E., & Taylor, C. (1992). Science at dinner. In C. Kramsch & S. McConnell-Ginet (Eds.), Text and context: Cross-disciplinary perspectives on language study (pp. 29–45). Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.
   Google Scholar
• Ochs, E., Taylor, C., Rudolph, D., & Smith, R. (1992). Storytelling as a theory-building activity. Discourse Processes, 15, 37–72. doi:10.1080/01638539209544801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penney, L., & Stevens, R. (2012). Questioning among preschool children. In the symposium Everyday Interactions and Activities: Field Studies of Early Learning Across Settings. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the Learning Sciences, Sydney, Australia (Vol. 2, pp. 91–98).
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, A. M., Watkins, J., & Hammer, D. (2017). Problematizing as a scientific endeavor. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13, 020107. doi:10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.020107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pomerantz, A., & Fehr, B. J. (1997). Conversation analysis: An approach to the study of social action as sense making practices. In T. A. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as social interaction (pp. 64–91). London, England: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Rosebery, A. S., Ogonowski, M., DiSchino, M., & Warren, B. (2010). “The coat traps all your body heat”: Heterogeneity as fundamental to learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19, 322–357. doi:10.1080/10508406.2010.491752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosebery, A., Warren, B., Ballenger, C., & Ogonowski, M. (2005). The generative potential of students’ everyday knowledge in learning science. In T.  A. Romberg, T. P. Carpenter, & F. Dremock (Eds.), Understanding mathematics and science matters (pp. 55–80). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H. (1967/1992). Omnirelevant devices; settinged activities; “indicator terms” (February 16, 1967). In G. Jefferson (Ed.), Lectures on conversation: Volumes I and II (pp. 515–522). Oxford, England: Blackwell (Original work published 1967).
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A Simplest Systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–735. doi:10.1353/lan.1974.0010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1972). Sequencing in conversational openings. In J. J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (Eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication (pp. 346–380). New York, NY: Basil Blackwell Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1997). Whose text? Whose context? Discourse & Society, 8(2), 165–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scipio, D. A. (2015). Developing mentors: Adult participation, practices, and learning in an out-of-school time STEM program (Order No. 3725113). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (1722533538).
   Google Scholar
• Scopelitis, S. A. (2013). Interactive Explanations: The Functional Role of Gestural and Bodily Action for Explaining and Learning Scientific Concepts in Face-to-Face Arrangements ( Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Proquest. (3588854).
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. P., III, diSessa, A. A., & Roschelle, J. (1994). Misconceptions reconceived: A constructivist analysis of knowledge in transition. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3, 115–163. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0302_1
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, R. (2010). Learning as a members’ phenomenon: Toward an ethnographically adequate science of learning. Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, 109(1), 82–97.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, R., & Hall, R. (1998). Disciplined perception: Learning to see technoscience. In M. Lampert & M. L. Blunk (Eds.), Talking mathematics in school: Studies of teaching and learning (pp. 107–149). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stroupe, D. (2015). Describing “science practice” in learning settings. Science Education, 99, 1033–1040. doi:10.1002/sce.2015.99.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vossoughi, S., & Gutiérrez, K. (2014). Studying movement, hybridity, and change: Toward a multi-sited sensibility for research on learning across contexts and borders. National Society for the Study of Education, 113(2), 603–632.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, B., Ballenger, C., Ogonowski, M., Rosebery, A. S., & Hudicourt‐Barnes, J. (2001). Rethinking diversity in learning science: The logic of everyday sense‐making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 529–552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, B., Ogonowski, M., & Pothier, S. (2005). “Everyday” and “scientific”: Rethinking dichotomies in modes of thinking in science learning. In R. Nemirovsky, A. S. Rosebery, J. Solomon, & B. Warren (Eds.), Everyday matters in science and mathematics: Studies of complex classroom events (pp. 119–148). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Youngquist, J., & Pataray-Ching, J. (2004). Revisiting “play”: Analyzing and articulating acts of inquiry. Early Childhood Education Journal, 31(3), 171–178.
   Google Scholar