Roles, Rules, and Keys: How Different Play Configurations Shape Collaborative Science Inquiry

References

• Ackermann, E. (1996). Perspective-taking and object construction: Two keys to learning. In Y. Kafai & M. Resnick (Eds.), Constructionism in practice (pp. 25–35). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Barab, S. A., Dodge, T., Ingram-Goble, A., Pettyjohn, P., Peppler, K., Volk, C., & Solomou, M. (2010). Pedagogical dramas and transformational play: Narratively rich games for learning. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 17, 235–264. doi:10.1080/10749030903437228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind: Collected essays in anthropology, psychiatry, evolution, and epistemology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buchbinder, M. H. (2008). ‘You’re still sick!’ Framing, footing, and participation in children’s medical play. Discourse Studies, 10, 139–159. doi:10.1177/1461445607087018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caillois, R. (1955). The structure and classification of games (E. P. Halperin, Trans.). Diogenes, 3(12), 62–75. doi:10.1177/039219215500301204
   Google Scholar
• Chee, Y. S., Mehrotra, S., & Ong, J. C. (2015). Authentic game-based learning and teachers’ dilemmas in reconstructing professional practice. Learning, Media and Technology, 40, 514–535. doi:10.1080/17439884.2014.953958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, D. B., Nelson, B. C., Sengupta, P., & D’Angelo, C. M. (2009). Rethinking science learning through digital games and simulations: Genres, examples, and evidence. Paper commissioned for the national research council workshop on games and simulations, Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://sites.nationalacademies.org/cs/groups/dbassesite/documents/webpage/dbasse_080068.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Corsaro, W. A. (2011). The sociology of childhood. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dancygier, B., & Sweetser, E. (2012). Viewpoint in language: A multimodal perspective. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Danish, J. A. (2014). Applying an activity theory lens to designing instruction for learning about the structure, behavior, and function of a honeybee system. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23, 100–148. doi:10.1080/10508406.2013.856793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danish, J. A., Enyedy, N., Saleh, A., Lee, C., & Andrade, A. (2015). Science through technology enhanced play: Designing to support reflection through play and embodiment. In O. Lindwall, P. Häkkinen, T. Koschman, P. Tchounikine, & S. Ludvigsen (Eds.), Exploring the material conditions of learning: The Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) conference (Vol. 1, pp. 332–339). Gothenburg, Sweden: The International Society of the Learning Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Danish, J. A., Enyedy, N., Humburg, M., Davis, B., & Tu, X. (2019). Collective embodied activity and how different concepts map to social exploration. In K. Lund, G. Niccolai, E. Lavoué, C. Hmelo-Silver, G. Gweon, & M. Baker (Eds.), A wide lens: Combining embodied, enactive, extended, and embedded learning in collaborative settings, 13th international conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) (Vol. 2, pp. 801–802). Lyon, France: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, B., Tu, X., Georgen, C., Danish, J. A., & Enyedy, N. (accepted). The impact of different play activity designs on students’ embodied learning. Information and Learning Science Journal.
   Google Scholar
• DeLiema, D., Saleh, A., Lee, C., Enyedy, N., Danish, J. A., Illum, R., … Mahoney, C. (2016). Blending play and inquiry in augmented reality: A comparison of playing a video game to playing within a participatory model. In C.-K. Looi, J. Polman, U. Cress, & P. Reimann (Eds.), Transforming learning, empowering learners: The International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) (Vol. 2, pp. 450–457). Singapore: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Enyedy, N. (2003). Knowledge construction and collective practice: At the intersection of learning, talk, and social configurations in a computer-mediated mathematics classroom. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 361–408. doi:10.1207/S15327809JLS1203_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enyedy, N., Danish, J. A., Delacruz, G., & Kumar, M. (2012). Learning physics through play in an augmented reality environment. International Journal of Computer-supported Collaborative Learning, 7, 347–378. doi:10.1007/s11412-012-9150-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enyedy, N., Danish, J. A., & DeLiema, D. (2015). Constructing liminal blends in a collaborative augmented-reality learning environment. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 10, 7–34. doi:10.1007/s11412-015-9207-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erickson, F., & Schultz, J. (1981). When is a context? Some issues and methods in the analysis of social competence. In J. Green & C. Wallat (Eds.), Ethnography and language in educational settings (pp. 147–160). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Frasca, G. (2003). Simulation versus narrative: Introduction to ludology. In M. Wolf & B. Perron (Eds.), The video game theory reader (pp. 221–236). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (2007). Good videogames and good learning: Collected essays on video games. New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York, NY: Aldine Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, R., Black, J., Maxwell, J. W., Plass, J., & Keitges, M. J. (2012). Engaged learning with digital media: The points of viewing theory. In W. M. Reynolds, G. E. Miller, & I. B. Weiner (Eds.), Handbook of psychology (Vol. 7, Educational Psychology, pp. 321–364). New York, NY: Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (2013). The co-operative, transformative organization of human action and knowledge. Journal of Pragmatics, 46, 8–23. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2012.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M. H. (2006). The hidden life of girls: Games of stance, status, and exclusion. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Habgood, M. P. J., & Ainsworth, S. E. (2011). Motivating children to learn effectively: Exploring the value of intrinsic integration in educational games. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20, 169–206. doi:10.1080/10508406.2010.508029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, R., & Stevens, R. (2015). Interaction analysis approaches to knowledge in use. In A. A. diSessa, M. Levin, & N. J. S. Brown (Eds.), Knowledge and interaction: A synthetic agenda for the learning sciences (pp. 72–108). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hoey, E. M., DeLiema, D., Chen, R. S., & Flood, V. J. (2018). Imitation in children’s locomotor play. Research on Children and Social Interaction, 2, 1–24. doi:10.1558/rcsi.36016
   Google Scholar
• Huizinga, J. (1944/1950). Homo ludens: A study of the play-element in culture (Trans.). Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hunicke, R., LeBlanc, M., & Zubek, R. (2004). MDA: A formal approach to game design and game research. In D. Fu, S. Henke, & J. Orkin (Eds.), Proceedings of the challenges in game AI workshop, 19th national conference on artificial intelligence(pp. 1–5). Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press. Retrieved from http://www.aaai.org/Papers/Workshops/2004/WS-04-04/WS04-04-001.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4, 39–103. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0401_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jurow, A. S. (2005). Shifting engagements in figured worlds: Middle school mathematics students’ participation in an architectural design project. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14, 35–67. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1401_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juul, J. (2013). The art of failure: an essay on the pain of playing video games. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Keifert, D., Lee, C., Dahn, M., Illum, R., DeLiema, D., Enyedy, N., & Danish, J. (2017). Agency, embodiment, & affect during play in a mixed-reality learning environment. In P. Blikstein & D. Abrahamson (Eds.), Proceedings of the 16th interaction child & design conference (pp. 268–277). Palo Alto, CA: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, E. F. (1983). A feeling for the organism: The life and work of Barbara McClintock. San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, V. (Ed.). (2015). Learning technologies and the body: Integration and implementation in formal and informal learning environments. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lindgren, R., & Johnson-Glenberg, M. (2013). Emboldened by embodiment: Six precepts for research on embodied learning and mixed reality. Educational Researcher, 42, 445–452. doi:10.3102/0013189X13511661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindgren, R., Tscholl, M., Wang, S., & Johnson, E. (2016). Enhancing learning and engagement through embodied interaction within a mixed reality simulation. Computers & Education, 95, 174–187. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons, L. (2015). Exhibiting data: Using body-as-interface designs to engage visitors with data visualizations. In V. Lee (Ed.), Learning technologies and the body: Integration and implementation in formal and informal learning environments (pp. 185–200). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moher, T., Alessandro, G., Perritano, A., Guerra, P., Lopez-Silva, B., Tissenbaum, M., … Fong, C. (2014). Action and reflection in an embodied foraging simulation. In J. L. Polman, E. A. Kyza, K. D. O’Neill, I. Tabak, W. R. Penuel, S. A. Jurow, … L. D’Amico (Eds.), Learning and becoming in practice: The International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) (Vol. 3, pp. 1276–1277). Boulder, CO: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Naismith, J., (Interviewee). (1939, January 31). We the people [Radio broadcast]. Retrieved from http://exhibits.lib.ku.edu/exhibits/show/naismith150/collections/radio-interview
   Google Scholar
• Nemirovsky, R., & Ferrara, F. (2009). Mathematical imagination and embodied cognition. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70, 159–174. doi:10.1007/s10649-008-9150-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ochs, E., Gonzalez, P., & Jacoby, S. (1996). When I come down, I’m in a domain state: Grammar and graphic representation in the interpretive activity of physics. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, & S. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 328–369). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer, R. K. (2002). Improvisation and narrative. Narrative Inquiry, 12, 319–349. doi:10.1075/ni.12.2.05saw
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayeki, Y. (1989). Anthropomorphic epistemology: When a dialogue with objects starts. Unpublished Presentation. Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition, University of California, San Diego. Retrieved from http://lchc.ucsd.edu/mca/Mail/xmcamail.2015-01.dir/pdfRcYsWIiEHi.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Schauble, L., Klopfer, L. E., & Raghavan, K. (1991). Students’ transition from an engineering model to a science model of experimentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 859–882. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sicart, M. (2014). Play matters. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sidnell, J. (2010). Conversation analysis: An introduction. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Sidnell, J. (2011). The epistemics of make-believe. In T. Stivers, L. Mondada, & J. Steensig (Eds.), The morality of knowledge in conversation (pp. 131–155). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steen, F. F., & Owens, S. A. (2001). Evolution’s pedagogy: An adaptationist model of pretense and entertainment. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 1, 289–321. doi:10.1163/156853701753678305
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilensky, U., & Reisman, K. (2006). Thinking like a wolf, a sheep, or a firefly: Learning biology through constructing and testing computational theories—An embodied modeling approach. Cognition and Instruction, 24, 171–209. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci2402_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, S. A., Elinich, K., Wang, J., Steinmeier, C., & Tucker, S. (2012). Using augmented reality and knowledge-building scaffolds to improve learning in a science museum. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 7, 519–541. doi:10.1007/s11412-012-9156-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar