2,686
Views
31
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Learning that physics is ‘not for me’: Pedagogic work and the cultivation of habitus among advanced level physics students

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 347-384 | Received 21 Dec 2018, Accepted 13 Dec 2019, Published online: 04 Feb 2020

References

  • Allen, C. D., & Eisenhart, M. (2017). Fighting for desired versions of a future self: How young women negotiated STEM-related identities in the discursive landscape of educational opportunity. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 26(3), 407–436. doi:10.1080/10508406.2017.1294985
  • Archer, L. (2008). The impossibility of minority ethnic educational ‘success’? An examination of the discourses of teachers and pupils in British secondary schools. European Educational Research Journal, 7(1), 89–107. doi:10.2304/eerj.2008.7.1.89
  • Archer, L., Moote, J., & MacLeod, E. (in press). Lighting the fuse: Cultivating the masculine physics habitus – A case study of Victor aged 10-18. In A. T. Danielsson & A. Gonsalves (Eds.), Physics education and gender: Identity as an analytic lens for research. Springer.
  • Archer, L., Dawson, E., DeWitt, J., Godec, S., King, H., Mau, A., … Seakins, A. (2017). Using Bourdieu in practice? Urban secondary teachers’ and students’ experiences of a Bourdieusian-inspired pedagogical approach. British Journal of Sociology of Education. Published online. doi:10.1080/01425692.2017.1335591
  • Archer, L., Dawson, E., DeWitt, J., Seakins, A., & Wong, B. (2015). Science capital: A conceptual, methodological, and empirical argument for extending bourdieusian notions of capital beyond the arts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(7), 922–948.
  • Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2012). Science aspirations, capital, and family habitus: How families shape children’s engagement and identification with science. American Educational Research Journal, 49(5), 881–908. doi:10.3102/0002831211433290
  • Archer, L., & Francis, F. (2007). Understanding minority ethnic achievement. London, UK: Routldege.
  • Archer, L., Moote, J., Francis, B., DeWitt, J., & Yeomans, L. (2017). The ‘exceptional’ physics/engineering girl: A sociological analysis of longitudinal data from girls aged 10-16 to explore gendered patterns of post-16 participation. American Educational Research Journal, 54(1), 88–126. doi:10.3102/0002831216678379
  • Beddoes, K., & Borrego, M. (2011). Feminist theory in three engineering education journals: 1995-2008. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(2), 281–303. doi:10.1002/jee.2011.100.issue-2
  • Bourdieu, B., & Passeron, J.-C. (1977/2000). Reproduction in education. London & Beverly Hills: Sage.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. London: Routledge.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1993). The field of cultural production. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1996/2010). The myth of “globalization” and the European welfare state. In G. Sapiro (Ed.), Sociology is a martial art: Political writings by Pierre Bourdieu. New York, NY: New Press.
  • Bourdieu, P. (2010). Sociology is a martial art: Political writings by Pierre Bourdieu. New York, NY: The New Press.
  • Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. C. (1990). Reproduction: In education, society and culture (2nd ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. J. D. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
  • Bruner, J. S. (1960). The process of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Educational Press.
  • Calabrese Barton, A., & Tan, E. (2010). We Be Burnin’! Agency, identity, and science learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(2), 187–229. doi:10.1080/10508400903530044
  • Calabrese Barton, A., & Upadhyay, B. (2010). Teaching and learning science for social justice: Introduction to the special issue. Equity and Excellence in Education, 43(1), 1–5. doi:10.1080/10665680903484917
  • Campaign for Science and Engineering. (2014). Improving diversity in STEM. A report by the Campaign for Science and Engineering. London, UK: King’s College London.
  • Carlone, H., Scott, C. M., & Lowder, C. (2014). Becoming (less) scientific: A longitudinal study of students’ identity work from elementary to middle school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(7), 836–869. doi:10.1002/tea.21150
  • Carlone, H. B. (2004). The cultural production of science in reform-based physics: Girls’ access, participation, and resistance. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 392–414. doi:10.1002/tea.20006
  • Connolly, P., & Healy, J. (2004). Symbolic Violence, locality and social class: The educational and career aspirations of 10-11-year old boys in Belfast. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 12(1), 15–32. doi:10.1080/14681360400200187
  • Danielsson, A. T. (2009). Doing physics–Doing gender: An exploration of physics students’ identity constitution in the context of laboratory work. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.
  • DeWitt, J., Archer, L., & Mau, A. (2016). Dimensions of science capital: Exploring the potential of the concept of science capital for understanding students’ science participation. International Journal of Science Education, 38(16), 2431–2449. doi:10.1080/09500693.2016.1248520
  • Duckworth, D., & Entwistle, N. J. (1974). Attitudes to school subjects: A repertory grid technique. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 44(1), 76–83.
  • Francis, B. (2005). Boys, girls and achievement: Addressing the classroom issues. London, UK: Routledge.
  • Francis, B., Archer, L., Moote, J., & DeWitt, J. (2017). The construction of Physics as a quintessentially masculine subject: Young people’s perceptions of gender issues in access to Physics. Sex Roles, 76, 156–174. doi:10.1007/s11199-016-0669-z
  • Gill, J., Sharp, R., Mills, J. E., & Franzway, S. (2008). I still wanna be an engineer! Women, education and the engineering profession. European Journal of Engineering Education, 33(4), 391–402. doi:10.1080/03043790802253459
  • Gonsalves, A. (2014). “Physics and the girly girl—There is a contradiction somewhere”: Doctoral students’ positioning around discourses of gender and competence in physics. Special issue on Gender and Science in Cultural Studies in Science Education, 9, 503–521. doi:10.1007/s11422-012-9447-6
  • Gonsalves, A., Danielsson, A., & Pettersson, H. (2016). Masculinities and experimental practices in physics: The view from three case studies. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(2), 020120-1–020120-15. doi:10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.020120
  • Green, J., Martin, A. J., & Marsh, H. W. (2007). Motivation and engagement in English, physics and science high school subjects: Towards an understanding of multidimensional domain specificity. Learning and Individual Differences, 17(3), 269–279. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2006.12.003
  • Hasse, C. (2002). Gender diversity in play with physics: The problem of premises for participation in activities. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 9(4), 250–269. doi:10.1207/S15327884MCA0904_02
  • Häussler, P., & Hoffmann, L. (2002). An intervention study to enhance girls’ interest, self-concept, and achievement in physics classes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 870–888. doi:10.1002/tea.10048
  • Hodson, D. (2014). Nature of science in the science curriculum: Origin, development, implications and shifting emphases. In M. R. Matthews (Ed.), International handbook of research in history, philosophy and science teaching (pp. 911–970). Netherlands: Springer.
  • Holland, D., Lachiotte, W., Jr., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Institute of Physics. (2012). It’s different for girls: The influence of schools. London, UK: Author.
  • Institute of Physics. (2017). Improving gender balance: Reflections on the impact of interventions in schools. London, UK: Author.
  • Jenkins, R. (Ed.). (2006). Pierre Bourdieu (Rev ed.). London, UK: Routledge.
  • Jobér, A. (2017). Revising laboratory work: Sociological perspectives on the science classroom. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 12(3), 615–635. doi:10.1007/s11422-016-9765-1
  • Keller, E. F. (1985). Reflections on gender and science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Mujtaba, T., & Reiss, M. J. (2013). Inequality in experiences of physics education: Secondary school girls’ and boys’ perceptions of their physics education and intentions to continue with physics after the age of 16. International Journal of Science Education, 35(11), 1824–1845. doi:10.1080/09500693.2012.762699
  • Murphy, P., & Whitelegg, E. (2006). Girls in the physics classroom: A review of the research on the participation of girls in physics. London, UK: Institute of Physics.
  • Nasir, N.-S., & Hand, V. (2008). From the court to the classroom: Opportunities for engagement, learning, and identity in basketball and classroom mathematics. Journal of Learning Sciences, 17, 143–179. doi:10.1080/10508400801986082
  • OfQual. (2017, March). Progression from GCSE to A level: Comparative progression analysis as a new approach to investigating inter-subject comparability. (Ofqual/17/6204). London, UK: Author.
  • Ong, M. (2005). Body projects of young women of color in physics: Intersections of gender, race, and science. Social Problems, 52, 593–617. doi:10.1525/sp.2005.52.4.593
  • Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 994–1020. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
  • Pettersson, H. (2011). Making masculinity in plasma physics: Machines, labour, and experiments. Science Studies, 24(1), 47–65.
  • Raelin, J. A., Bailey, M. B., Hamann, J., Pendleton, L. K., Reisberg, R., & Whitman, D. L. (2014). The gendered effect of cooperative education, contextual support, and self-efficacy on undergraduate retention. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(4), 599–624. doi:10.1002/jee.20060
  • Reay, D., Crozier, G., & Clayton, J. (2009). ‘Strangers in paradise’? Working‐class students in elite universities. Sociology, 43(6), 1103–1112. doi:10.1177/0038038509345700
  • Reid, N. (2003). Gender and physics. International Journal of Science Education, 25(4), 509–536. doi:10.1080/0950069022000017270
  • Ro, H. K., & Knight, D. B. (2016). Gender differences in learning outcomes from the college experiences of engineering students. Journal of Engineering Education, 105(3), 478–507. doi:10.1002/jee.20125
  • Robb, N., Dunkley, L., Boynton, P., & Greenhalgh, T. (2007). Looking for a better future: Identity construction in socio-economically deprived 16-year olds considering a career in medicine. Social Science & Medicine, 65(4), 738–754. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.03.011
  • Roth, W.-M., Lawless, D., & Tobin, K. (2000). Towards a praxeology of teaching. Canadian Journal of Education, 25(1), 1–15. doi:10.2307/1585864
  • Sappleton, N., & Takruri-Rizk, H. (2008). The gender subtext of science, engineering, and technology (SET) organizations: A review and critique. Women’s Studies, 37(3), 284–316. doi:10.1080/00497870801917242
  • Shanahan, M. ‐. C. (2009). Identity in science learning: Exploring the attention given to agency and structure in studies of identity. Studies in Science Education, 45(1), 43–64. doi:10.1080/03057260802681847
  • Smail, B., Whyte, J., & Kelly, A. (1982). Girls into science and technology: The first two years. School Science Review, 63(225), 620–629.
  • Thomas, L. (2002). Student retention in higher education: The role of institutional habitus. Journal of Education Policy, 17(4), 423–442. doi:10.1080/02680930210140257
  • Tomanovic, S. (2004). Family habitus as the cultural context for childhood. Childhood, 11(3), 339–360. doi:10.1177/0907568204044887
  • Tracy, C. (2016, April 19). Do students choose subjects based on how hard they are graded? Institute of Physics. Retrieved from http://www.iopblog.org/the-effects-of-grading-on-choice/
  • Traweek, S. (1988). Beamtimes and lifetimes. The world of high energy physicists. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Tripney, J., Newman, M., Bangpan, M., Niza, C., Mackintosh, M., & Sinclair, J. (2010). Factors influencing young people (aged 14-19) in education about STEM subject choices: A systematic review of the UK literature (Wellcome Trust Education Reports). London: Wellcome Trust.
  • U.S. Department of Education. (2015). Stats in Brief: Gender differences in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) interest, credits earned, and NAEP performance in the 12th grade. Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences, National Centre for Education Statistics.
  • UNESCO. (2010). Engineering: Issues, challenges and opportunities for development. Paris, France: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation.
  • Vincent, C., & Ball, S. J. (2005). Childcare, choice and class practices. London, UK: Routledge.
  • WISE. (2017). Women in STEM workforce 2017. Retrieved from https://www.wisecampaign.org.uk/statistics/women-in-stem-workforce-2017/

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.