References
- Bannister, N. A. (2015). Reframing practice: Teacher learning through interactions in a collaborative group. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 24(3), 347–372. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2014.999196
- Billig, M., Condor, S., Edwards, D., Gane, M., Middleton, D., & Radley, A. (1988). Ideological dilemmas. A social psychology of everyday thinking. Sage.
- Campbell, T. (2015). Stereotyped at seven? Biases in teacher judgement of pupils’ ability and attainment. Journal of Social Policy, 44(3), 517–547. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279415000227
- Dick, L. K., Sztajn, P., White, T. F., & Heck, D. J. (2018, April). Investigating sociopedagogical norms: Teachers’ discussions about own and others’ instruction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 71, 297–307. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.01.004
- Dobbs, J., & Arnold, D. H. (2009). Relationship between preschool teachers’ reports of children’s behavior and their behavior toward those children. School Psychology Quarterly, 24(2), 95–105. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016157
- Dudley, P. (2013, August). Teacher learning in lesson study: What interaction-level discourse analysis revealed about how teachers utilised imagination, tacit knowledge of teaching and fresh evidence of pupils learning, to develop practical knowledge and so enhance their pupils’ learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 34, 107–121. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.04.006
- Dudley, P., Xu, H., Vermunt, J. D., & Lang, J. (2019). Empirical evidence of the impact of lesson study on students’ achievement, teachers’ professional learning and on institutional and system evolution. European Journal of Education, 54(2), 202–217. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12337
- Edwards, D. (2005). Discursive psychology. In K. L. Fitch & R. E. Sanders (Eds.), Handbook of language and social interaction (pp. 257–273). Erlbaum.
- Engeström, Y., Engeström, R., & Suntio, A. (2002). Can a school community learn to master its own future? An activity- theoretical study of expansive learning among middle school teachers. In G. Wells & G. Claxton (Eds.), Learning for life in the 21st century: Sociocultural perspectives on the future of education (pp. 211–224). Blackwell.
- Engeström, Y. (2005). Developmental work research: Expanding activity theory in practice (Vol. 12). Lehmanns Media.
- Engeström, Y. (2007a). Enriching the theory of expansive learning: Lessons from journeys toward co-configuration. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 14(1–2), 23–39. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10749030701307689
- Engeström, Y. (2007b). From stabilization knowledge to possibility knowledge in organizational learning. Management Learning, 38(3), 271–275. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507607079026
- Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2011). Discursive manifestations of contradictions in organizational change efforts. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 24(3), 368–387. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/09534811111132758
- Georgiou, S., Christou, C., Stayrinides, P., & Panaoura, G. (2002). Teacher attributions of student failure and teacher behavior toward failing students. Psychology in the Schools, 39(5), 583–595. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.10049
- Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldire.
- Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Harper & Row.
- Hennessy, S., Hassler, B., & Hofmann, R. (2015). Challenges and opportunities for teacher professional development in interactive use of technology in African schools. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 24(5), 1–28. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2015.1092466
- Hennessy, S., Hassler, B., & Hofmann, R. (2016). Pedagogic change by Zambian primary school teachers participating in the OER4Schools professional development programme for one year. Research Papers in Education, 31(4), 399–427. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2015.1073343
- Hepburn, A. (2003). An introduction to critical social psychology. Sage.
- Hofmann, R. (2020). Dialogue, teachers and professional development. In N. Mercer, R. Wegerif, & L. Major (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of research on dialogic education(pp. 213–216). Routledge.
- Hofmann, R., & Ruthven, K. (2018). Operational, interpersonal, discussional and ideational dimensions of classroom norms for dialogic practice in school mathematics. British Educational Research Journal, 44(3), 496–514. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3444
- Horn, I. S. (2007). Fast kids, slow kids, lazy kids: Framing the mismatch problem in mathematics teachers’ conversations. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(1), 37–79. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400709336942
- Horn, I. S. (2010). Teaching replays, teaching rehearsals, and re-visions of practice: Learning from colleagues in a mathematics teacher community. Teachers College Record, 112(1), 225–259.
- Horn, I. S., & Kane, B. D. (2015). Opportunities for professional learning in mathematics teacher workgroup conversations: Relationships to instructional expertise. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 24(3), 373–418. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2015.1034865
- Jackson, K., Gibbons, L., & Sharpe, C. J. (2017). Teachers’ views of students’ mathematical capabilities: Challenges and possibilities for ambitious reform. Teachers College Record, 119(7), 1–43.
- LeCompte, M. D., Preissle, J., & Tesch, R. (1993). Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research. Academic Press.
- Lefstein, A., & Snell, J. (2011). Professional vision and the politics of teacher learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(3), 505–514. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.10.004
- Lonka, K. (2018). Phenomenal learning from Finland. Edita.
- Louie, N. L. (2016, January). Tensions in equity-and reform-oriented learning in teachers’ collaborative conversations. Teaching and Teacher Education, 53, 10–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.10.001
- Mercer, N., Wegerif, R., & Major, L., (Eds). (2020). The Routledge international handbook of research on dialogic education. Routledge.
- Mueller, F., & Whittle, A. (2011). Translating management ideas: A discursive devices analysis. Organization Studies, 32(2), 187–210. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840610394308
- Opfer, V. D., & Pedder, D. (2011). Conceptualizing teacher professional learning. Review of Educational Research, 81(3), 376–407. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311413609
- Patterson, J. A., Hale, D., & Stessman, M. (2007). Cultural contradictions and school leaving: A case study of an urban high school. The High School Journal, 91(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1353/hsj.2008.0001
- Popp, J. S., & Goldman, S. R. (2016, October). Knowledge building in teacher professional learning communities: Focus of meeting matters. Teaching and Teacher Education, 59, 347–359. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.06.007
- Pyhältö, K., Pietarinen, J., & Soini, T. (2012). Do comprehensive school teachers perceive themselves as active professional agents in school reforms? Journal of Educational Change, 13(1), 95–116. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-011-9171-0
- Rainio, A. P., & Hofmann, R. (2015). Transformations in teachers’ discourse about their students during a school-led pedagogic intervention. European Journal of Social and Behavioral Sciences, 13(2), 1815–1829. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.15405/ejsbs.163
- Rainio, P. (2003). Tietotyön malli koulun kehittämisessä. Muutoksen esteet, edellytykset ja mahdollisuudet opettajien puheessa (Knowledge Work Model in School Development: Obstacles, Preconditions, and Possibilities for Change in Teachers’ Discussions). Research Reports 7. Center for Activity Theory and Developmental Work Research, University of Helsinki.
- Resnick, L., Asterhan, C., & Clarke, S. (2015). Socializing intelligence through academic talk and dialogue. American Educational Research Association.
- Sannino, A., Engeström, Y., & Lemos, M. (2016). Formative interventions for expansive learning and transformative agency. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25(4), 599–633. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2016.1204547
- Silverman, D. (2006). Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analysing talk, text, and interaction (3rd ed.). Sage.
- Sorhagen, N. S. (2013). Early teacher expectations disproportionately affect poor children’s high school performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 465–477. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0031754
- te Molder, H. F. M. (2015). Discursive psychology. In K. Tracy, C. Ilie, & T. Sandel (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of language and social interaction (pp. 1–11). Wiley.
- Thompson, I., McNicholl, J., & Menter, I. (2016). Student teachers’ perceptions of poverty and educational achievement. Oxford Review of Education, 42(2), 214–229. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2016.1164130
- Vedder-Weiss, D., Ehrenfeld, N., Ram-Menashe, M., & Pollak, I. (2018, December). Productive framing of pedagogical failure: How teacher framings can facilitate or impede learning from problems of practice. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 30, 31–41. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.01.002
- Virkkunen, J., Newnham, D. S., Nleya, P., & Engeström, R. (2012). Breaking the vicious circle of categorizing students in school. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 1(3–4), 183–192. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2012.08.003
- Virkkunen, J., & Shelley Newnham, D. (2013). The change laboratory: A tool for collaborative development of work and education. Sense Publishers.
- Vrikki, M., Warwick, P., Vermunt, J. D., Mercer, N., & Van Halem, N. (2017, January). Teacher learning in the context of Lesson Study: A video-based analysis of teacher discussions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 61, 211–224. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.10.014
- Wegerif, R., Kershner, R., Hennessy, S., & Ahmed, A. (2020). Foundations for research on educational dialogue. In R. Kershner, S. Hennessy, R. Wegerif, & A. Ahmed (Eds.), Research methods for educational dialogue (pp. 9–26). Bloomsbury.
- Wegerif, R. (2020). Towards a dialogic theory of education for the Internet age. In N. Mercer, R. Wegerif, & L. Major (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of research on dialogic education (pp. 14–26). Routledge.
- Wilhelm, A. G., Munter, C., & Jackson, K. (2017). Examining relations between teachers’ explanations of sources of students’ difficulty in mathematics and students’ opportunities to learn. The Elementary School Journal, 117(3), 345–370. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/690113
- Wilson, P. H., Sztajn, P., Edgington, C., Webb, J., & Myers, M. (2017). Changes in teachers’ discourse about students in a professional development on learning trajectories. American Educational Research Journal, 54(3), 568–604. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831217693801