Scaffolding small groups at the group level: Improving the scaffolding behavior of mathematics teachers during mathematical discussions

References

• Agresti, A. (1992). A survey of exact inference for contingency tables. Statistical Science, 7(1), 131–153. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1214/ss/1177011454
   Google Scholar
• Borko, H., Jacobs, J., & Koellner, K. (2010). Contemporary approaches to teacher professional development. In E. Baker, B. McGaw, & P. Peterson (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (Vol. 7, pp. 548–555). Elsevier Scientific Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Calor, S. M., Dekker, R., Van Drie, J. P., Zijlstra, B. J. H., & Volman, M. L. L. (2020). “Let us discuss math”; Effects of shift‐problem lessons on mathematical discussions and level raising in early algebra. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 32(4), 743–763. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-019-00278-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu, M. M. (2004). Adapting teacher interventions to student needs during cooperative learning: How to improve student problem solving and time on-task. American Educational Research Journal, 41(2), 365–399. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312041002365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dekker, R., & Elshout-Mohr, M. (1998). A process model for interaction and mathematical level raising. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 35(3), 303–314. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003187204737
   Google Scholar
• Dekker, R., & Elshout-Mohr, M. (2004). Teacher interventions aimed at mathematical level raising during collaborative learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 56(1), 39–65. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDUC.0000028402.10122.ff
   Google Scholar
• El Emam, K. (1999). Benchmarking kappa: Interrater agreement in software process assessments. Empirical Software Engineering, 4(2), 113–133. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009820201126
   Google Scholar
• Erkens, G. (2002). Introduction to MEPA. Netherlands: Utrecht University. Retrieved March 8, 2014, from http://edugate.fss.uu.nl/mepa
   Google Scholar
• Freudenthal, H. (1991). Revisiting mathematics education. China Lectures. Kluwer Academic Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Janvier, C. (1987). Translation process in mathematics education. In C. Janvier (Ed.), Problems of representation in mathematics learning and problem solving (pp. 27–31). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Kazak, S., Wegerif, R., & Fujita, T. (2015). Combining scaffolding for content and scaffolding for dialogue to support conceptual breakthroughs in understanding probability. ZDM Mathematics Education, 47(7), 1269–1283. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0720-5
   Google Scholar
• Kieran, C. (1992). The learning and teaching of school algebra. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 390–419). Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Moderne Wiskunde 1B vmbo-gt(h). (2012b). Noordhoff Uitgevers bv. (10th ed.). ISBN: 978 9001 81381 1.
   Google Scholar
• Moderne Wiskunde 1A vmbo-gt(h)Noordhoff Uitgevers bv. (2012a). Noordhoff Uitgevers bv. (10th ed.). ISBN: 978 9001 81378 9.
   Google Scholar
• Myhill, D., & Warren, P. (2005). Scaffolds or straitjackets? Critical moments in classroom discourse. Educational Review, 57(1), 55–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NCTM. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Nyikos, M., & Hashimoto, R. (1997). Constructivist theory applied to collaborative learning in teacher education: In search of ZPD. The Modern Language Journal, 81(4), 506–517. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1997.tb05518.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palha, S., Dekker, R., Gravemeijer, K., & Van Hout-Wolters, B. (2013). Developing shift problems to foster geometrical proof and understanding. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 32(2), 142–159. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2012.12.002
   Google Scholar
• Sfard, A., & Linchevski, L. (1994). The gains and pitfalls of reification – The case of algebra. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 26(2), 191–228. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01273663
   Google Scholar
• Smit, J., Van Eerde, H., & Bakker, A. (2013). A conceptualisation of whole-class scaffolding. British Educational Research Journal, 39(5), 817–834. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Pol, J. (2012). Scaffolding in teacher-student interaction: Exploring, measuring, promoting and evaluating scaffolding. Netherlands: University of Amsterdam. https://pure.uva.nl/ws/files/1766318/110508_07.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in teacher-student interaction: A decade of research. Educational Psychology Review, 22(3), 271–297. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9127-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2012). Promoting teacher scaffolding in small-group work: A contingency perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(2), 193–205. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Pol, J., Volman, M., Elbers, E., & Beishuizen, J. (2012). Measuring scaffolding in teacher – Small-group interactions. In R. M. Gillies (Ed.), Pedagogy: New developments in the learning sciences (pp. 151–188). Nova Science Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Van de Pol, J., Volman, M., Oort, F., & Beishuizen, J. (2014). Teacher scaffolding in small-group work: An intervention study. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23(4), 600–650. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2013.805300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Leeuwen, A., Janssen, J., Erkens, G., & Brekelmans, M. (2015). Teacher regulation of multiple computer-supported collaborating groups. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 233–242. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Leeuwen, A., & Janssen, J. (2019). A systematic review of teacher guidance during collaborative learning in primary and secondary education. Educational Research Review, 27, 71–89. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Stiphout, I., Drijvers, P., & Gravemeijer, K. (2011). The development of students’ algebraic proficiency. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 8(2–3), 62–80. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/274
   Google Scholar
• Webb, N. M., Franke, M. L., Ing, M., Turrou, A. C., Johnson, N. C., & Zimmerman, J. (2019). Teacher practices that promote productive dialogue and learning in mathematics classrooms. International Journal of Educational Research, 97, 186–196. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2017.07.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb, N. M., & Ing, M. (2019). The role of teacher practice in promoting academically productive student dialogue. International Journal of Educational Research, 97, 154–156. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2018.11.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb, N. M. (1982). Student interaction and learning in small groups. Review of Educational Research, 52(3), 421–445. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543052003421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb, N. M. (2009). The teacher’s role in promoting collaborative dialogue in the classroom. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1348/000709908X380772
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yackel, E. (2002). What we can learn from analyzing the teacher’s role in collective argumentation. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 21(4), 423–440. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-3123(02)00143-8
   Google Scholar