References
- Andriessen, J., Baker, M., & Suthers, D. (Eds.). (2003). Arguing to learn: Confronting cognitions in computer-supported learning environments. Kluwer.
- Andriessen, J. E. B., & Schwarz, B. B. (2009). Argumentative design. In N. Muller Mirza & A.-N. Perret-Clermont (Eds.), Argumentation and education: Theoretical foundations and practices (pp. 145–174). Springer US.
- Aronson, E., Blaney, N., Stephin, C., Sikes, J., & Snapp, M. (1978). The jigsaw classroom. Sage Publishing Company.
- Barab, S. A., & Squire, K. D. (2004). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1301_1
- Barron, B. (2003). When smart groups fail. Mind, Culture & Activity, 12(3), 307–359. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS1203_1
- Binder, T., De Michelis, G., Ehn, P., Jacucci, G., Linde, P., & Wagner, I. (2011). Design things. MIT Press.
- Derry, S. J., Pea, R. D., Barron, B., Engle, R., Erickson, F., Goldman, R., Hall, R., Koschmann, T., Lemke, J. L., Sherin, M. G., & Sherin, B. L. (2010). Conducting video research in the learning sciences: Guidance on selection, analysis, technology, and ethics. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(1), 3–53. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400903452884
- Dishke Hondzel, C., & Sørebø Gulliksen, M. (2015). Culture and creativity: Examining variations in divergent thinking within Norwegian and Canadian communities. SAGE Open, 5(4), 2158244015611448. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015611448
- Engle, R. A., Langer-Osuna, J. M., & McKinney de Royston, M. (2014). Toward a model of influence in persuasive discussions: Negotiating quality, authority, privilege, and access within a student-led argument. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23(2), 245–268. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2014.883979
- Fleming, M. (2011). Learning in and through the arts. In J. Sefton-Green, P. Thomson, K. Jones, and L. Bresler (Eds.), The routledge international handbook of creative learning (pp. 177–186). Routledge.
- Gajdamaschko, N. (2005). Vygotsky on imagination: Why an understanding of the imagination is an important issue for schoolteachers. Teaching Education, 16(1), 13–22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1047621052000341581
- Glăveanu, V. P. (2010). Paradigms in the study of creativity: Introducing the perspective of cultural psychology. New Ideas in Psychology, 28(1), 79–93. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2009.07.007
- Goel, V., & Grafman, J. (2000). Role of the right prefrontal cortex in ILL-structured planning. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 17(5), 415–436. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/026432900410775
- Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(10), 1489–1522. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00096-X
- Goodwin, C. (2013). The co-operative, transformative organization of human action and knowledge. Journal of Pragmatics, 46(1), 8–23. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.09.003
- Green, A. E. (2016). Creativity, within reason: Semantic distance and dynamic state creativity in relational thinking and reasoning. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25(1), 28–35. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721415618485
- Hernández-Leo, D., Nieves, R., Arroyo, E., Rosales, A., Melero, J., Moreno, P., & Blat, J. (2011). Orchestration signals in the classroom: Managing the jigsaw collaborative learning flow [Paper presentation]. Towards Ubiquitous Learning, Berlin, Heidelberg.
- Hutchins, E. (2005). Material anchors for conceptual blends. Journal of Pragmatics, 37(10), 1555–1577. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2004.06.008
- Jefferson, G. (1984). On stepwise transition from talk about a trouble to inappropriately next-positioned matters. In J. M. Atkinson & J. C. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies of conversation analysis (pp. 191–222). Cambridge University Press.
- Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(1), 39–103. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0401_2
- Kleibeuker, S. W., Koolschijn, P. C. M. P., Jolles, D. D., Schel, M. A., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Crone, E. A. (2013). Prefrontal cortex involvement in creative problem solving in middle adolescence and adulthood. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 5, 197–206. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2013.03.003
- Krange, I., & Ludvigsen, S. R. (2008). What does it mean? Students’ procedural and conceptual problem solving in a CSCL environment designed within the field of science education. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3(1), 25–51. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-007-9030-4
- Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2010). What kind of explanation is a model? In M. K. Stein & L. Kucan (Eds.), Instructional explanations in the disciplines (pp. 9–22). Springer US.
- Ludvigsen, S., Gundersen, E., Indregard, S., Ishaq, B., Kleven, K., Korpås, T., Rasmussen, J., Rege, M., Rose, S., Sundberg, D., & Øye, H. (2015). The school of the future. Renewal of subjects and competences (Vol. 15). Official Norwegian Reports NOU. https://www.regjeringen.no/en/dokumenter/nou-2015-8/id2417001/
- McKenney, S., & Reeves, T. (2018). Conducting educational design research. Routledge.
- Moran, S., & John-Steiner, V. (2003). Creativity in the making. Vygotsky’s contemporary contribution to the dialectic of development and creativity. In V. J.-S. R. Keith Sawyer, S. Moran, R. J. Sternberg, D. H. Feldman, J. Nakamura, & M. Csikszentmihalyi (Eds.), Creativity and development (Counterpoints: Cognition, memory, and language) (pp. 61–90). Oxford University Press.
- Muller Mirza, N., Perret-Clermont, A. N., Tartas, V., & Iannaccone, A. (2009). Psychosocial processes in argumentation. In N. Muller Mirza & A.-N. Perret-Clermont (Eds.), Argumentation and education: Theoretical foundations and practices (pp. 67–90). Springer US.
- Murphy, K. M. (2004). Imagination as joint activity. Mind, Culture & Activity, 11(4), 267–278. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327884mca1104_3
- Murphy, K., Ivarsson, J., & Lymer, G. (2012). Embodied reasoning in architectural critique. Design Studies, 33(6), 530–556. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2012.06.005
- Nishizaka, A. (2003). Imagination in action. Theory & Psychology, 13(2), 177–207. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354303013002002
- Norwegian Ministry of Culture and Church Affairs. (2007-2008). A cultural rucksack for the future (Report No. 8 (2007–2008) to the Storting). 113 pp.
- Pierroux, P., Knutson, K., & Crowley, K. (in press). Informal learning in museums. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (2nd ed., Chap. 22). Cambridge University Press.
- Pierroux, P., & Rudi, J. (2020). Teaching composition with digital tools: A domain-specific perspective. In K. Knutson, T. Okada, & K. Crowley (Eds.), Multidisciplinary approaches to art learning and creativity: Fostering artistic exploration in formal and informal settings (pp. 124–145). Routledge.
- Pierroux, P., Sauge, B., & Steier, R. (2021). Exhibitions as a collaborative research space for university-museum partnerships. In M. Achiam, K. Drotner, & M. Haldrup (Eds.), Experimental museology: Institutions, representations, users (pp. 149–166). Routledge.
- Pierroux, P., Steier, R., & Sauge, B. (2019). Born digital architectural projects: Imagining, designing and exhibiting practices. In Å. Mäkitalo, T. Nicewonger, & M. Elam (Eds.), Designs for experimentation and inquiry: Approaching learning and knowing in digital transformation (pp. 87–109). Routledge.
- Roth, W.-M. (2001). Situating cognition. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10(1 & 2), 27–61. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS10-1-2_4
- Rubin, B. C. (2019). Theorizing context in DBR: Integrating critical civic learning into the U.S. history curriculum. In B. C. Rubin, E. B. Freedman, & J. Kim (Eds.), Design research in social studies education: Critical lessons from an emerging field (pp. 205–223). Routledge.
- Sawyer, K., & DeZutter, S. (2009). Distributed creativity: How collective creations emerge from collaboration. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3(2), 81–92. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013282
- Sawyer, K. (2012). Explaining creativity: The science of human innovation (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
- Schwarz, B. B. (2009). Argumentation and learning. In N. Muller Mirza & A.-N. Perret-Clermont (Eds.), Argumentation and education: Theoretical foundations and practices (pp. 91–126). Springer US.
- Smørdal, O., Nesnass, R., Pierroux, P., & Sem, I. (2014, October 25–26). Snøkult: Designing a multitouch table for co-composition in an educational setting [Paper presentation]. FabLearn: Conference on Creativity and Fabrication in Education, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
- Steier, R., Kersting, M., & Silseth, K. (2019). Imagining with improvised representations in CSCL environments. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 14(1), 109–136. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-019-09295-1
- Steier, R., & Pierroux, P. (2011). “What is ‘the concept’?” Sites of conceptual formation in a touring architecture workshop. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 6(3), 139–156. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18261/1891-943X-2011-03-03
- Stuedahl, D. (2019). Participation in design and changing practices of museum development. In K. Drotner, V. Dziekan, R. Parry, & K. C. Schrøder (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of museums, media and cmmunication (pp. 219–231). Routledge.
- Van de Sande, C. C., & Greeno, J. G. (2012). Achieving alignment of perspectival framings in problem-solving discourse. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21(1), 1–44. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2011.639000
- Vartanian, O. (2017). The creation and aesthetic appreciation of architecture. In J. C. Kaufman, V. P. Glăveanu, & J. Baer (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity across domains (pp. 110–122). Cambridge University Press.
- Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, eds.). Harvard University Press.
- Vygotsky, L. S. (2004a). Development of thinking and formation of concepts in the adolescent. In R. W. Rieber & D. K. Robinson (Eds.), The essential Vygotsky (pp. 415–470). Kluwer.
- Vygotsky, L. S. (2004b). Imagination and creativity in childhood. Journal of Russian & East European Psychology, 42(1), 7–97. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10610405.2004.11059210
- Zittoun, T., & Gillespie, A. (2016). Imagination in human and cultural development. Routledge.