Gaze Behavior and Visual Attention: A Review of Eye Tracking Studies in Aviation

References

• Alexander, A. L., & Wickens, C. D. (2005a). Flightpath tracking, change detection and visual scanning in an integrated hazard display. In Proceedings of the 49th Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (pp. 68–72). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, A. L., & Wickens, C. D. (2005b). Synthetic vision systems: Flightpath tracking, situation awareness, and visual scanning in an integrated hazard display. In Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (pp. 1–6).
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, A. L., & Wickens, C. D. (2006). Integrated hazard displays: Individual differences in visual scanning and pilot performance. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 50th annual meeting (pp. 81–85). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Allsop, J., & Gray, R. (2014). Flying under pressure: Effects of anxiety on attention and gaze behavior in aviation. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 3, 63–71. doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2014.04.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellenkes, A. H., Wickens, C. D., & Kramer, A. F. (1997). Visual scanning and pilot expertise: The role of attentional flexibility and mental model development. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 68, 569–579.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beringer, D. B., & Ball, J. D. (2001). A comparison of pilot navigation performance using conventional instrumentation, head-down, and head-up highway-in-the-sky primary flight displays. In Proceedings of the 45th Human Factors and Ergonomics Society annual meeting (pp. 16–20). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Björklund, C. M., Alfredson, J., & Dekker, S. W. A. (2006). Mode monitoring and call-outs: An eye tracking study of two-crew automated flight deck operations. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 16, 263–275. doi:10.1207/s15327108ijap1603_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, D. L., Vitense, H. S., Wetzel, P. A., & Anderson, G. M. (2002). Instrument scan strategies of F-117A pilots. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 73, 1007–1013.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Colvin, K., Dodhia, R., & Dismukes, R. K. (2005). Is pilots’ visual scanning adequate to avoid mid-air collisions. In Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (pp. 104–109).
   Google Scholar
• Dehais, F., Causse, M., & Pastor, J. (2008). Embedded eye tracker in a real aircraft: New perspectives on pilot/aircraft interaction monitoring. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Research in Air Transportation (pp. 303–309).
   Google Scholar
• Dehais, F., Peysakhovich, V., Scannella, S., Fongue, J., & Gateau, T. (2015). Automation surprise in aviation: Real-time solutions. In Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2525–2534). New York, NY: The Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Deubel, H., & Schneider, W. X. (1996). Saccade target selection and object recognition: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism. Vision Research, 36, 1827–1837. doi:10.1016/0042-6989(95)00294-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Nocera, F., Camilli, M., & Terenzi, M. (2007). A random glance at the flight deck: Pilots’ scanning strategies and the real-time assessment of mental workload. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 1, 271–285. doi:10.1518/155534307X255627
   Google Scholar
• Diez, M., Boehm-Davis, D. A., Holt, R. W., Pinney, M. E., Hansberger, J. T., & Schoppek, W. (2001). Tracking pilot interactions with flight management systems through eye movements. In Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, K. K. E., Kramer, L. J., Shelton, K. J., Arthur, J. J. T., & Prinzel, L. J. (2011). Transition of attention in terminal area NextGen operations using synthetic vision systems. In Proceedings of the 55th Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (pp. 46–50). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Aviation Administration. (2016). Advisory circular: Pilots’ role in collision avoidance (Report No. AC 90-48D). Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from https://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/Advisory_Circular/AC_90-48D.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fitts, P. M., Jones, R. E., & Milton, J. L. (1950). Eye movements of aircraft pilots during instrument-landing approaches. Aeronautical Engineering Review, 9, 24–29.
   Google Scholar
• Flight Safety Foundation. (2014). A practical guide for improving flight path monitoring. Retrieved from flightsafety.org/files/flightpath/EPMG.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fox, J., Merwin, D., Marsh, R., McConkie, G., & Kramer, A. (1996). Information extraction during instrument flight: An evaluation of the validity of the eye-mind hypothesis. In Proceedings of the 40th Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (pp. 77–81). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, R., Navia, J. A., & Allsop, J. (2014). Action-specific effects in aviation: What determines judged runway size? Perception, 43, 145–154. doi:10.1068/p7601
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasbrook, A. H., & Young, P. E. (1968a). Peripheral vision cues: Their effect on pilot performance during instrument landing approaches and recoveries from unusual attitudes (Report No. AM 68-12). Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Administration. Retrieved from http://www.faa.gov/data_research/research/med_humanfacs/oamtechreports/1960s/media/AM68-12.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hasbrook, A. H., & Young, P. E. (1968b). Pilots response to peripheral vision cues during instrument flying tasks (Report No. AM 68-11). Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Administration. Retrieved from http://www.faa.gov/data_research/research/med_humanfacs/oamtechreports/1960s/media/AM68-11.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Helleberg, J. R., & Wickens, C. D. (2003). Effects of data-link modality and display redundancy on pilot performance: An attentional perspective. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 13, 189–210. doi:10.1207/S15327108IJAP1303_01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, J. M. (2003). Human gaze control during real-world scene perception. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 498–504. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2003.09.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, H.-F., Su, H.-S., Li, W.-C., Yu, C.-S., & Braithwaite, G. (2016). Pilots’ latency of first fixation and dwell among regions of interest on the flight deck. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics (pp. 389–396). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Huettig, G., Anders, G., & Tautz, A. (1999). Mode awareness in a modern glass cockpit. Paper presented at the 10th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, Columbus, OH.
   Google Scholar
• International Air Transport Association. (2015). Controlled flight into terrain accident analysis report. Retrieved from http://www.iata.org/whatwedo/safety/Documents/CFIT-Report-1st-Ed-2015.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Janelle, C. M. (2002). Anxiety, arousal and visual attention: A mechanistic account of performance variability. Journal of Sports Sciences, 20, 237–251. doi:10.1080/026404102317284790
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jipp, M., & Teegen, U. (2011). An empirical analysis of the gaze behavior of aircraft pilots within a highly automated aircraft-air traffic control environment. In Proceedings of the 55th Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (pp. 1205–1209). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, N., Wiegmann, D., & Wickens, C. (2006). Effects of advanced cockpit displays on general aviation pilots’ decisions to continue visual flight rules flight into instrument meteorological conditions. In Proceedings of the 50th Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (pp. 30–34). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, R. E., Milton, J. L., & Fitts, P. M. (1949). Eye fixations of aircraft pilots: IV. Frequency, duration, and sequence of fixations during routine instrument flight (AF Technical Report 5795). Dayton, OH: United States Air Force–Air Materiel Command.
   Google Scholar
• Kasarskis, P., Stehwien, J., Hickox, J., Aretz, A., & Wickens, C. D. (2001). Comparison of expert and novice scan behaviors during VFR flight. In Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Department of Aviation and Aeronautical Engineering.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J., Palmisano, S. A., Ash, A., & Allison, R. S. (2010). Pilot gaze and glideslope control. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception (TAP), 7, 18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirby, C. E., Kennedy, Q., & Yang, J. H. (2014). Helicopter pilot scan techniques during low-altitude high-speed flight. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 85, 740–744. doi:10.3357/ASEM.3888.2014
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kramer, A., Tham, M., Konrad, C., Wickens, C., & Lintern, G. (1994). Instrument scan and pilot expertise. In Prcoeedings of the 38th Human Factors and Ergonomics Society annual meeting (pp. 36–40).
   Google Scholar
• Li, W.-C., Chiu, F.-C., & Wu, K.-J. (2012). The evaluation of pilots performance and mental workload by eye movement. In Proceedings of the 30th European Association for Aviation Psychology.
   Google Scholar
• Li, W.-C., White, J., Braithwaite, G., Greaves, M., & Lin, J.-H. (2016). The evaluation of pilot’s situational awareness during mode changes on flight mode annunciators. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics (pp. 409–418). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Liggett, K. K., Reising, J. M., & Hartsock, D. C. (1999). Development and evaluation of a background attitude indicator. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 9, 49–71. doi:10.1207/s15327108ijap0901_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenz, B., Biella, M., Teegen, U., Stelling, D., Wenzel, J., Jakobi, J., … Korn, B. (2006). Performance, situation awareness, and visual scanning of pilots receiving onboard taxi navigation support during simulated airport surface operation. Human Factors and Aerospace Safety, 6, 135–154.
   Google Scholar
• Nibbeling, N., Oudejans, R. R. D., & Daanen, H. A. M. (2012). Effects of anxiety, a cognitive secondary task, and expertise on gaze behavior and performance in a far aiming task. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 13, 427–435. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2012.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ottati, W. L., Hickox, J. C., & Richter, J. (1999). Eye scan patterns of experienced and novice pilots during visual flight rules (VFR) navigation. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 43rd Annual Meeting (pp. 66–70). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Robinski, M., & Stein, M. (2013). Tracking visual scanning techniques in training simulation for helicopter landing. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 6, 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russi-Vigoya, M. N., & Patterson, P. (2015). Analysis of pilot eye behavior during glass cockpit simulations. Procedia Manufacturing, 3, 5028–5035. doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.515
   Google Scholar
• Sarter, N. B., Mumaw, R. J., & Wickens, C. D. (2007). Pilots’ monitoring strategies and performance on automated flight decks: An empirical study combining behavioral and eye tracking data. Human Factors, 49, 347–357. doi:10.1518/001872007X196685
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarter, N. B., & Woods, D. D. (1994). Pilot interaction with cockpit automation II: An experimental study of pilots’ model and awareness of the flight management system. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 4, 1–28. doi:10.1207/s15327108ijap0401_1
   Google Scholar
• Sarter, N. B., & Woods, D. D. (1995). How in the world did we ever get into that mode? Mode error and awareness in supervisory control. Human Factors, 37, 5–19. doi:10.1518/001872095779049516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scannella, S., Peysakhovich, V., Ehrig, F., & Dehais, F. (2015). Can flight phase be inferred using eye movements? Evidence from real flight conditions. Paper presented at the 18th European Conference on Eye Movements, Vienna, Austria.
   Google Scholar
• Schaudt, W. A., Caufield, K. J., & Dyre, B. P. (2002). Effects of a virtual air speed error indicator on guidance accuracy and eye movement control during simulated flight. In Proceedings of the 46th Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (pp. 1594–1598). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Schnell, T., Kwon, Y., Merchant, S., & Etherington, T. (2004). Improved flight technical performance in flight decks equipped with synthetic vision information system displays. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 14, 79–102. doi:10.1207/s15327108ijap1401_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schriver, A. T., Morrow, D. G., Wickens, C. D., & Talleur, D. A. (2008). Expertise differences in attentional strategies related to pilot decision making. Human Factors, 50, 864–878. doi:10.1518/001872008X374974
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheridan, T. (1970). On how often the supervisor should sample. IEEE Transactions on Systems Science and Cybernetics, 2, 140–145. doi:10.1109/TSSC.1970.300289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheridan, T. B. (1992). Telerobotics, automation, and human supervisory control. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steelman, K. S., McCarley, J. S., & Wickens, C. D. (2011). Modeling the control of attention in visual workspaces. Human Factors, 53, 142–153. doi:10.1177/0018720811404026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, J., Yang, J. H., Day, M., & Kennedy, Q. (2011). Training simulation for helicopter navigation by characterizing visual scan patterns. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 82, 871–878. doi:10.3357/ASEM.2947.2011
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Svensson, E., Angelborg-Thanderez, M., Sjöberg, L., & Olsson, S. (1997). Information complexity-mental workload and performance in combat aircraft. Ergonomics, 40, 362–380. doi:10.1080/001401397188206
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talleur, D. A., & Wickens, C. D. (2003). The effect of pilot visual scanning strategies on traffic detection accuracy and aircraft control. In Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (pp. 1143–1148).
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, L. C., & Wickens, C. D. (2004). Eye tracking and individual differences in off-normal event detection when flying with a synthetic vision system display. In Proceedings of the 48th Human Factors and Ergonomics Society annual meeting (pp. 223–227). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Transportation. (2015). U.S. air carrier traffic statistics. Retrieved from http://www.rita.dot.gov/bts/acts/customized/table?adfy=2014&adfm=1&adty=2014&adtm=12&aos=6&artd=1&arti&arts&asts&astns&astt=3&ascc=2&ascp=1
   Google Scholar
• U.S. National Transportation Safety Board. (1994). Safety study: A review of flightcrew-involved, major accidents of U.S. air carriers, 1978 through 1990 (Report No. NTSB/SS-94/01). Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a532150.pdf
   Google Scholar
• U.S. National Transportaion Safety Board. (2010). Loss of control on approach Colgan Air, Inc. operating as Continental Connection flight 3407 Bombardier DHC-8-400, N200WQ Clarence Center, New York, February 12, 2009 (Report No. NTSB/AAR-10/01). Retreived from www.ntsb.gov/investigations/AccidentReports/Reports/AAR1001.pdf
   Google Scholar
• van de Merwe, K., van Dijk, H., & Zon, R. (2012). Eye movements as an indicator of situation awareness in a flight simulator experiment. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 22, 78–95. doi:10.1080/10508414.2012.635129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dijk, H., van de Merwe, K., & Zon, R. (2011). A coherent impression of the pilots’ situation awareness: Studying relevant human factors tools. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 21, 343–356. doi:10.1080/10508414.2011.606747
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vickers, J. N. (2009). Advances in coupling perception and action: The quiet eye as a bidirectional link between gaze, attention, and action. Progress in Brain Research, 174, 279–288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vickers, J. N., & Lewinski, W. (2012). Performing under pressure: Gaze control, decision making and shooting performance of elite and rookie police officers. Human Movement Science, 31, 101–117. doi:10.1016/j.humov.2011.04.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vine, S. J., Chaytor, R. J., McGrath, J. S., Masters, R. S., & Wilson, M. R. (2013). Gaze training improves the retention and transfer of laparoscopic technical skills in novices. Surgical Endoscopy, 27, 3205–3213. doi:10.1007/s00464-013-2893-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vine, S. J., Uiga, L., Lavric, A., Moore, L. J., Tsaneva-Atanasova, K., & Wilson, M. R. (2015). Individual reactions to stress predict performance during a critical aviation incident. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, 28, 467–477. doi:10.1080/10615806.2014.986722
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vine, S. J., & Wilson, M. R. (2010). Quiet eye training: Effects on learning and performance under pressure. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 22, 361–376. doi:10.1080/10413200.2010.495106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vine, S. J., & Wilson, M. R. (2011). The influence of quiet eye training and pressure on attention and visuo-motor control. Acta Psychologica, 136, 340–346. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.12.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weibel, N., Fouse, A., Emmenegger, C., Kimmich, S., & Hutchins, E. (2012). Let’s look at the cockpit: Exploring mobile eye tracking for observational research on the flight deck. In Proceedings of the 7th Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications (pp. 107–114). New York, NY: The Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Wickens, C. D., & Alexander, A. L. (2009). Attentional tunneling and task management in synthetic vision displays. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 19, 182–199. doi:10.1080/10508410902766549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickens, C. D., Alexander, A. L., Horrey, W. J., Nunes, A., & Hardy, T. J. (2004). Traffic and flight guidance depiction on a synthetic vision system display: The effects of clutter on performance and visual attention allocation. In Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (pp. 218–222). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wickens, C. D., Goh, J., Helleberg, J., Horrey, W. J., & Talleur, D. A. (2003). Attentional models of multitask pilot performance using advanced display technology. Human Factors, 45, 360–380. doi:10.1518/hfes.45.3.360.27250
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickens, C. D., Helleberg, J., Goh, J., Xu, X., & Horrey, W. J. (2001). Pilot task management: Testing an attentional expected value model of visual scanning (Report No. ARL-01-14/NASA-01-7). Savoy, IL: UIUC Institute of Aviation.
   Google Scholar
• Wickens, C. D., Helleberg, J., & Xu, X. (2002). Pilot maneuver choice and workload in free flight. Human Factors, 44, 171–188. doi:10.1518/0018720024497943
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickens, C. D., McCarley, J. S., Alexander, A. L., Thomas, L. C., Ambinder, M., & Zheng, S. (2008). Attention-situation awareness (A-SA) model of pilot error. In D. Foyle & B. Hooey (Eds.), Human performance modeling in aviation (pp. 213–239). Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, K. W. (2002). Impact of aviation highway-in-the-sky displays on pilot situation awareness. Human Factors, 44, 18–27. doi:10.1518/0018720024494801
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, M. A., Singer, R. N., & Frehlich, S. G. (2002). Quiet eye duration, expertise, and task complexity in near and far aiming tasks. Journal of Motor Behavior, 34, 197–207. doi:10.1080/00222890209601941
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, J., Hooey, B. L., & Foyle, D. C. (2005). Head-up display symbology for surface operations: Eye tracking analysis of command-guidance vs. situation-guidance formats. In Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (pp. 835–841).
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, M., McGrath, J., Vine, S., Brewer, J., Defriend, D., & Masters, R. (2010). Psychomotor control in a virtual laparoscopic surgery training environment: Gaze control parameters differentiate novices from experts. Surgical Endoscopy, 24, 2458–2464. doi:10.1007/s00464-010-0986-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiong, W., Wang, Y., Zhou, Q., Liu, Z., & Zhang, X. (2016). The research of eye movement behavior of expert and novice in flight simulation of landing. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics (pp. 485–493). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar