The Influence of Surprise on Upset Recovery Performance in Airline Pilots

References

• Anthony, C. R., & Biers, D. W. (1997). Unidimensional versus multidimensional workload scales and the effect of number of rating scale categories. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 41, 1084–1088. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi:10.1177/107118139704100279
   Google Scholar
• Belcastro, C. M., & Foster, J. V. (2010, August). Aircraft loss-of-control accident analysis. Paper presented at the AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference, Toronto, ON, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Boeing Commercial Airplanes. (2016). Statistical summary of commercial jet airplane accidents, worldwide operations, 1959–2015. Retrieved from www.boeing.com/news/techissues/pdf/statsum.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Boucsein, W. (2012). Electrodermal activity. New York, NY: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Casner, S. M., Geven, R. W., & Williams, K. T. (2013). The effectiveness of airline pilot training for abnormal events. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 55, 477–485. doi:10.1177/0018720812466893
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinn, S. (2000). A simple method for converting an odds ratio to effect size for use in meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 19, 3127–3131. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0258
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Boer, R. J. & Hurts, K. (2017). Automation surprise: Results of a field survey of Dutch pilots. Aviation Psychology and Applied Human Factors, 7(1), 28–41.
   Google Scholar
• European Aviation Safety Authority. (2015). Loss of control prevention and recovery training (Notice of proposed amendment 2015-13). Retrieved from https://easa.europa.eu/system/files/dfu/NPA%202015-13.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Eysenck, M. W., Derakshan, N., Santos, R., & Calvo, M. G. (2007). Anxiety and cognitive performance: Attentional control theory. Emotion, 7, 336–353. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.7.2.336
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federal Aviation Administration. (2015). Stall prevention and recovery training (Advisory Circular No. 120-109A). Retrieved from https://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/Advisory_Circular/AC_120-109A.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Goman, M., & Khrabrov, A. (1994). State-space representation of aerodynamic characteristics of an aircraft at high angles of attack. Journal of Aircraft, 31, 1109–1115. doi:10.2514/3.46618
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groen, E., Ledegang, W., Field, J., Smaili, H., Roza, M., Fucke, L., … Grigoryev, M. (2012). SUPRA-enhanced upset recovery simulation. Paper presented at the AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference, Toronto, ON, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Holm, S. (1979). A simple sequential rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6, 65–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houtman, I. L. D., & Bakker, F. C. (1989). The anxiety thermometer: A validation study. Journal of Personality Assessment, 53, 575–582. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa5303_14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Civil Aviation Organization. (2013). Manual of evidence-based training (Doc 9995). Retrieved from http://www2010.icao.int/SAM/Documents/2014-AQP/EBT%20ICAO%20Manual%20Doc%209995.en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Klein, G., Phillips, J. K., Rall, E. L., & Peluso, D. A. (2007). A data-frame theory of sensemaking. In R. R. Hoffman (Ed.), Expertise out of context: Proceedings of the sixth international conference on naturalistic decision making (pp. 113–155). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Kochan, J. A., Breiter, E. G., & Jentsch, F. (2004). Surprise and unexpectedness in flying: Database reviews and analyses. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 48, 335–339.
   Google Scholar
• Landman, A., Groen, E. L., van Paassen, M. M., Bronkhorst, A., & Mulder, M. (2017). Dealing with unexpected events on the flight deck: A conceptual model of startle and surprise. The Journal of Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0018720817723428
   Google Scholar
• Ledegang, W. D., & Groen, E. L. (2015). Stall recovery in a centrifuge-based flight simulator with an extended aerodynamic model. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 25, 122–140. doi:10.1080/10508414.2015.1131085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, W. L., Murray, P. S., Bates, P. R., & Lee, P. S. (2015). Fear-potentiated startle: A review from an aviation perspective. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 25, 97–107. doi:10.1080/10508414.2015.1128293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, W. L., Murray, P. S., Bates, P. R., & Lee, P. S. (2016). A flight simulator study of the impairment effects of startle on pilots during unexpected critical events. Aviation Psychology and Applied Human Factors, 6, 24–32. doi:10.1027/2192-0923/a000092
   Google Scholar
• Mulder, M., Pleijsant, J. M., van der Vaart, H., & van Wieringen, P. (2000). The effects of pictorial detail on the timing of the landing flare: Results of a visual simulation experiment. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 10, 291–315. doi:10.1207/S15327108IJAP1003_05
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Transportation Safety Board. (2010). Aviation accident report: Loss of control on approach Colgan Air, Inc. operating as Continental Connection Flight 3407 Bombardier DHC-8-400, N200WQ (Tech. Rep. No. NTSB/AAR-10/01 PB2010-910401). Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Pan, J., & Tompkins, W. J. (1985). A real-time QRS detection algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 3, 230–236. doi:10.1109/TBME.1985.325532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rankin, A., Woltjer, R., & Field, J. (2016). Sensemaking following surprise in the cockpit—A re-framing problem. Cognition, Technology & Work, 18, 623–642. doi:10.1007/s10111-016-0390-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rankin, A., Woltjer, R., Field, J., & Woods, D. D. (2013, June). “Staying ahead of the aircraft” and managing surprise in modern airliners. Paper presented at the 5th Resilience Engineering Symposium: Managing trade-offs, Soesterberg, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Rivera, J., Talone, A. B., Boesser, C. T., Jentsch, F., & Yeh, M. (2014). Startle and surprise on the flight deck: Similarities, differences, and prevalence. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 58, 1047–1051. doi:10.1177/1541931214581219
   Google Scholar
• Sarter, N. B., Woods, D. D., & Billings, C. E. (1997). Automation surprises. Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics, 2, 1926–1943.
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder, J. A., Bürki-Cohen, J., Shikany, D. A., Gingras, D. R., & Desrochers, P. (2014, January). An evaluation of several stall models for commercial transport training. Paper presented at the AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Sedghamiz, H. (2014). Complete Pan Tompkins Implementation ECG QRS detector. Retrieved from http://nl.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/45840-complete-pan-tompkins-implementation-ecg-qrs-detector
   Google Scholar
• Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., & Lushene, R. E. (1970). Manual for the State–Trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Upset Recovery Industry Team (2008). Airplane Upset Recovery Training Aid, Revision 2. Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Administration & Airline Industry. Retrieved from https://flightsafety.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/AP_UpsetRecovery_Book.pdf
   Google Scholar
• van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (1997). Training complex cognitive skills: A four-component instructional design model for technical training. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Young, M. S., & Stanton, N. A. (2002). Malleable attentional resources theory: A new explanation for the effects of mental underload on performance. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 44, 365–375. doi:10.1518/0018720024497709
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar