882
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Multiplicity of Emotions in Moral Judgment and Motivation

&

REFERENCES

  • Arsenio, W. F., & Lemerise, E. A. (2004). Aggression and moral development: Integration social information processing and moral domain models. Child Development, 75, 987–1002. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00720.x
  • Basch, M. (1988). Understanding psychotherapy: The science behind the art. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • Batson, C. D., Fultz, J., & Schoenrade, P. A. (1987). Distress and empathy: Two qualitatively distinct vicarious emotions with different motivational consequences. Journal of Personality, 55, 19–39. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1987.tb00426.x
  • Chapman, H. A., & Anderson, A. K. (2011). Varieties of moral emotional experience. Emotion Review, 3, 255–257. doi:10.1177/1754073911402389
  • Chirkov, V. I., Ryan, R. M., Kim, Y., & Kaplan, U. (2003). Differentiating autonomy from individualism and independence: A self-determination theory perspective on internalization of cultural orientations and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 97–110. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.1.97
  • Condon, P., & DeSteno, D. (2011). Compassion for one reduces punishment for another. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 698–701. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.11.016
  • Crick, N. R., & Dodge, K. A. (1994). A review and reformulation of social-information-processing mechanisms in children’s social adjustment. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 74–101. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.115.1.74
  • Cushman, F. A. (2011). Moral emotions from the frog’s eye view. Emotion Review, 3, 261–263. doi:10.1177/1754073911402398
  • Decety, J., Michalska, K. J., & Kinzler, K. D. (2011). The developmental neuroscience of moral sensitivity. Emotion Review, 3, 305–307. doi:10.1177/1754073911402373
  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum.
  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 319–338. doi:10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
  • de Oliviera-Souza, R., Moll, J., & Grafman, J. (2011). Emotion and social cognition: Lessons from contemporary human neuroanatomy. Emotion Review, 3, 310–312. doi:10.1177/1754073911402399
  • DeSteno, D., Bartlett, M. Y., Baumann, J., Williams, L. A., & Dickens, L. (2010). Gratitude as moral sentiment: emotion-guided cooperation in economic exchange. Emotion, 10, 289.
  • Eisenberg, N. (2005). The development of empathy-related responding. In C. Gustavo & C. P. Edwards ( Eds.), Moral motivation through the life span ( pp. 73–117). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
  • Eisenberg, N., & Eggum, N. D. (2009). Empathic responding: Sympathy and personal distress. In J. Decety & W. Ickes ( Eds.), The social neuroscience of empathy ( pp. 71–83). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Eisenberg, N., Schaller, M., Fabes, R. A., Bustamante, D., Mathy, R. M., Shell, R., & Rhodes, K. (1988). Differentiation of personal distress and sympathy in children and adults. Developmental Psychology, 24, 766–775. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.24.6.766
  • Ekman, P. (2003). Emotions revealed: Recognizing faces and feelings to improve communication and emotional life. New York, NY: Times Books.
  • Frank, R. H. (2011). The strategic role of emotions. Emotion Review, 3, 252–254. doi:10.1177/1754073911402375
  • Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Goetz, J. L., Keltner, D., & Simon-Thomas, E. (2010). Compassion: An evolutionary analysis and empirical review. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 351–374. doi:10.1037/a0018807
  • Goleman, D. (2003). Destructive emotions: A scientific dialogue with the Dalai Lama. New York, NY: Bantam Dell.
  • Gray, K., & Wegner, D. M. (2011). Dimensions of moral emotions. Emotion Review, 3, 258–260. doi:10.1177/1754073911402388
  • Greene, J. D. (2009). Dual-process morality and the personal/impersonal distinction: A reply to McGuire, Langdon, Coltheart, and Mackenzie. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 581–584. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.01.003
  • Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail. A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108, 814–834. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.108.4.814
  • Haidt, J. (2007). The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science, 316, 998–1002. doi:10.1126/science.1137651
  • Haidt, J. (2008). Morality. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 65–72. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2008.00063.x
  • Hardy, S. (2006). Identity, reasoning, and emotion: An empirical comparison of three sources of moral motivation. Motivation and Emotion, 30, 207–215. doi:10.1007/s11031-006-9034-9
  • Hauser, M. (2006). Moral minds. How nature designed our sense of right and wrong. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
  • Hoffman, M. L. (2000). Empathy and moral development: Implications for caring and justice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Horberg, E. J., Oveis, C., & Keltner, D. (2011). Emotions as moral amplifiers: An appraisal tendency approach to the influences of distinct emotions upon moral judgment. Emotion Review, 3, 237–244. doi:10.1177/1754073911402384
  • Huebner, B., Dwyer, S., & Hauser, M. (2008). The role of emotion in moral psychology. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 1–6.
  • Hume, D. (1896). A treatise of human nature. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1740)
  • Izard, C. E. (1993). Four systems for emotion activation: cognitive and noncognitive processes. Psychological Review, 100, 68–90. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.100.1.68
  • Izard, C. E. (2007). Basic emotions, natural kinds, emotion schemas, and a new paradigm. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 260–280. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00044.x
  • Izard, C. E. (2009). Emotion theory and research: Highlights, unanswered questions, and emerging issues. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 1–25. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163539
  • Izard, C. E. (2011). Forms and functions of emotions: Matters of emotion–cognition interactions. Emotion Review, 3, 371–378. doi:10.1177/1754073911410737
  • Jameton, A. (1984). Nursing practice: The ethical issues. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Kaplan, U. (2014). Moral judgment is not based on a dichotomy between emotion and cognition: Commentary on Bazerman et al. (2011). Emotion Review, 6, 86.
  • Kaplan, U., Crockett, C. E., & Tivnan, T. (2014). Moral motivation of college students through multiple developmental structures: Evidence of intrapersonal variability in a complex dynamic system. Motivation and Emotion, 38, 336–352. doi:10.1007/s11031-013-9391-0
  • Kaplan, U., & Tivnan, T. (2014). Moral motivation based on multiple developmental structures: An exploration of cognitive and emotional dynamics. The Journal of Genetic Psychology. Research and Theory on Human Development, 175, 181–201. doi:10.1080/00221325.2013.838936
  • Kauffman, S. (1995). At home in the universe. The search for the laws of self-organization. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Kegan, R. (1982). The evolving self. Problem and process in human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Kloos, H., & Van Orden, G. C. (2009). Soft-assembled mechanisms for the unified theory. In J. P. Spencer, M. Thomas, & J. McClelland ( Eds.), Toward a theory of development? Connectionism and dynamics systems theory reconsidered ( pp. 253–267). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive developmental approach to socialization. In D. A. Goslin ( Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research ( pp. 347–480). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
  • Lane, R. D., & Schwartz, G. E. (1987). Levels of emotional awareness: A cognitive-developmental theory and its application in psychopathology. American Journal of Psychiatry, 144, 133–143.
  • Lewis, M. D. (2000a). Emotional self-organization at three time scales. In M. D. Lewis & I. Granic ( Eds.), Emotion, development, and self-organization: Dynamic systems approaches to emotional development ( pp. 37–69). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lewis, M. D. (2000b). The promise of dynamic systems approaches for an integrated account of human development. Child Development, 71, 36–43. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00116
  • Lewis, M. D. (2002). Interacting time scales in personality (and cognitive) development: Intentions, emotions, and emergent forms. In N. Granott & J. Parziale ( Eds.), Microdevelopment: Transition processes in development and learning ( pp. 183–212). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University.
  • Lewis, M. D. (2005). Bridging emotion theory and neurobiology through dynamic systems modeling. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 169–194. doi:10.1017/S0140525X0500004X
  • Lewis, M. D. (2008). Emotional habits in brain and behavior: A window on personality development. In A. Fogel & S. Shanker ( Eds.), Human development in the twenty-first century: Visionary policy ideas from systems scientists ( pp. 72–80). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lewis, M. D., & Douglas, L. (1998). A dynamic systems approach to cognition-emotion interactions in development. In M. F. Mascolo & S. Griffin ( Eds.), What develops in emotional development? ( pp. 159–188). New York, NY: Plenum.
  • Lewis, M. D., & Liu, Z. (2011). Three time scales of neural self-organization underlying basic and nonbasic emotions. Emotion Review, 3, 416–423. doi:10.1177/1754073911410748
  • Mallon, R., & Nichols, S. (2011). Dual processes and moral rules. Emotion Review, 3, 284–285. doi:10.1177/1754073911402376
  • Malti, T., Gummerum, M., Keller, M., & Buchmann, M. (2009). Children’s moral motivation, sympathy, and prosocial behavior. Child Development, 80, 442–460. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01271.x
  • McCullough, M. E., Kilpatrick, S. D., Emmons, R. A., & Larson, D. B. (2001). Is gratitude a moral affect?. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 249.
  • Narvaez, D. (2010a). The embodied dynamism of moral becoming: Reply to Haidt (2010). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 185–186. doi:10.1177/1745691610362353
  • Narvaez, D. (2010b). Moral complexity: The fatal attraction of truthiness and the importance of mature moral functioning. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 163–181. doi:10.1177/1745691610362351
  • Piaget, J. (1950). The psychology of intelligence. London, UK: Lowe and Brydone.
  • Rogers, C. R. (1957). The necessary and sufficient conditions of therapeutic personality change. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 21, 95–103. doi:10.1037/h0045357
  • Roseman, I. J. (2011). Emotional behaviors, emotivational goals, emotion strategies: Multiple levels of organization integrate variable and consistent responses. Emotion Review, 3, 434–443. doi:10.1177/1754073911410744
  • Shepard, A. (2010). Moral distress. A consequence of caring. Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing, 14, 25–27. doi:10.1188/10.CJON.25-27
  • Smith, L. B., & Thelen, E. (2003). Development as a dynamic system. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 343–348. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00156-6
  • Thelen, E., & Smith, L. B. (1994). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Thelen, E., & Smith, L. B. (2006). Dynamic systems theories. In W. Damon & R. Lerner ( Eds.), Handbook of child psychology, Vol. 1: Theoretical models of human development (6th ed., pp. 258–312). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  • Tucker, D. M. (2007). Mind from body: Experience from neural structure. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • van Geert, P. (1991). A dynamic systems model of cognitive and language growth. Psychological Review, 98, 3–53. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.98.1.3
  • van Geert, P. (1994). Dynamic systems of development. Change between complexity and chaos. New York, NY: Harvester.
  • van Geert, P. (2003). Dynamic systems approaches and modeling of developmental processes. In J. Valsiner & K. J. Conolly ( Eds.), Handbook of developmental psychology ( pp. 640–672). London, UK: Sage.
  • van Geert, P. (2009). Nonlinear complex dynamical systems in developmental psychology. In S. Guastello, M. Koopmans, & D. Pincus ( Eds.), Chaos and complexity in psychology: The theory of nonlinear dynamical systems ( pp. 242–281). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.