339
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

When Birds of a Feather Flock Together: The Role of Core-Self Evaluations and Moral Intensity in the Relationship Between Network Unethicality and Unethical Choice

, , &

REFERENCES

  • Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Anderman, E. M., & Danner, F. (2008). Achievement goals and academic cheating. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 1, 155–180.
  • Anderman, E. M., Griesinger, T., & Westerfield, G. (1998). Motivation and cheating during early adolescence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 84–93.
  • Aquino, K., Freeman, D., Reed II, A., Lim, V. K., & Felps, W. (2009). Testing a social-cognitive model of moral behavior: The interactive influence of situations and moral identity centrality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 123–141.
  • Asch, S. E. (1955). Opinions and social pressure. Scientific American, 193, 31–35.
  • Baldwin, T. T., Bedell, M. D., & Johnson, J. L. (1997). The social fabric of a team-based M.B.A. program: Network effects on student satisfaction and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 1369–1397.
  • Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statiscal considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.
  • Belar, C., Brown, R., Hersch, L., Hornyak L., Rozensky, R., Sheridan, E., .. Reed, G. W. (2001). Self-assessment in clinical health psychology: A model for ethical expansion of practice. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 32, 135–141.
  • Bond, R., & Smith, P. B. (1996). Culture and conformity: A meta-analysis of studies using Asch’s (1952b, 1956) Line Judgment Task. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 111–137.
  • Bono, J. E., & Judge, T. A. (2003). Core self-evaluations: A review of the trait and its role in job satisfaction and performance. European Journal of Personality, 17, 5–18.
  • Borgatti, S. P., & Cross, R. (2003). A relational view of information seeking and learning in social networks. Management Science, 49, 432–445.
  • Borgatti, S. P., & Halgin, D. S. (2011). On network theory. Organization Science, 22, 1168–1181.
  • Borkowski, S. C., & Ugras, Y. J. (1998). Business students and ethics: A meta-analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 1117–1127.
  • Brady, F. N., & Wheeler, G. E. (1996). An empirical study of ethical predispositions. Journal of Business Ethics, 16, 927–940.
  • Brass, D. J., Butterfield, K. D., & Skaggs, B. C. (1998). Relationships and unethical behavior: A social network perspective. Academy of Management Review, 23, 14–31.
  • Burt, R. S. (1987). Social contagion and innovation: Cohesion versus structural equivalence. American Journal of Sociology, 92, 1287–1335.
  • Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (2013). Regression analysis of count data (No. 53). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Chang, C.-H., Ferris, D. L., Johnson, R. E., Rosen, C. C., & Tan, J. A. (2012). Core self-evaluations: A review and evaluation of the literature. Journal of Management, 38, 81–128.
  • Christie, R., & Geis, F. (1970). Studies in Machiavellianism. New York, NY: Academic Press.
  • Cho, T. S., & Hambrick, D. C. (2006). Attention as the mediator between top management team characteristics and strategic change: The case of airline deregulation. Organization Science, 17, 453–469.
  • Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S., & Aiken, L. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analyses for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Detert, J. R., Trevino, L. K., & Sweitzer, V. L. (2008). Moral disengagement in ethical decision making: A study of Antecedents and Outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 374–391.
  • Doty, D. H., & Glick, W. H. (1988). Method variance in I/O Research major effect or mythical beast. Paper presented at the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology Conference, Dallas, TX.
  • Erickson, B. H. (1988). The relational basis of attitudes. In B. Wellman & S. D. Berkowitz (Eds.), Social structures: A network approach (pp. 99–121). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ford, R. C., & Richardson, W. D. (1994). Ethical decision making: A review of empirical literature. Journal of Business Ethics, 13, 205–221.
  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 28, 39–50.
  • Franke, G. R., Crown, D. F., & Spake, D. F. (1997). Gender differences in ethical perceptions of business practices: A social role thoery perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 920–934.
  • Frey, B. F. (2000a). The impact of moral intensity on decision-making in a business context. Journal of Business Ethics, 26, 181–195.
  • Frey, B. F. (2000b). Investigating moral intensity with the world-wide web: A look at participant reactions and a comparison of methods. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 32, 423–431.
  • Gordon, M. E., Schmitt, N., & Schneider, W. G. (1984). Laboratory research on bargaining and negotiations: An evaluation. Industrial Relations, 23, 218–233.
  • Gordon, M. E., Slade, L. A., & Schmitt, N. (1986). The “science of the sophomore” revisited: from conjecture to empiricism. Academy of Management Review, 11, 191–207.
  • Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. The American Journal of Sociology, 91, 481–510.
  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
  • Henle, C. A., Giacalone, R. A., & Jurkiewicz, C. L. (2005). The role of ethical ideology in workplace deviance. Journal of Business Ethics, 56, 219–230.
  • Ho, V. T., & Levesque, L. L. (2005). With a little help from my friends (and substitutes): Social referents and influence in psychological contract fulfillment. Organization Science, 16, 275–289.
  • Izraeli, D. (1988). Ethical beliefs and behavior among managers: A cross-cultural perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 7, 263–271.
  • Joseph, J., Berry, K., & Deshpande, S. P. (2009). Impact of emotional intelligence and other factors on perception of ethical behavior of peers. Journal of Business Ethics, 89, 539–546.
  • Jones, T. M. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16, 366–395.
  • Jones, T. M., & Ryan, L. V. (1997). The link between ethical judgment and action in organizations: A moral approbation approach. Organization Science, 8, 663–680.
  • Jordan, J. (2009). A social cognition framework for examining moral awareness in managers and academics. Journal of Business Ethics, 84, 237–258.
  • Judge, T. A. (2009). Core self-evaluations and work success. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 58–62.
  • Judge, T. A., & Bono, J. E. (2001). Relationship of core self-evaluations traits—self-esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability—with job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 80–92.
  • Judge, T. A., Bono, T. E., & Locke, E. A. (2000). Personality and job satisfaction: The mediating role of job characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 237–249.
  • Judge, T. A., Erez, A., Bono, J. E., & Thorensen, C. J. (2003). The core-self evaluations scale (CSES): Development of a measure. Personnel Psychology, 56 303–331.
  • Judge, T. A., Locke, E. A., Durham, C. C., & Kluger, A. N. (1998). Dispositional effects on job and life satisfaction: The role of core evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 17–34.
  • Judge, T. A., Van Vianen, A. E., & De Pater, I. E. (2004). Emotional stability, core self-evaluations, and job outcomes: A review of the evidence and an agenda for future research. Human Performance, 17, 325–346.
  • Kish-Gephart, J. J., Harrison, D. A., & Treviño, L. K. (2010). Bad apples, bad cases, and bad barrels: Meta-analytic evidence about sources of unethical decisions at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 1–31.
  • Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive developmental approach to socialization. New York, NY: Rand McNally.
  • Kohlberg, L. (1976). Moral stages and moralization: The cognitive-developmental approach. In T. Lickona (Ed.), Moral development and behavior (pp. 31–53). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
  • Lasson, E. D., & Bass, A. R. (1997). Integrity testing and deviance: Construct validity and the role of situational factors. Journal of Business and Psychology, 12, 121–146.
  • Latham, L. L., & Perlow, R. (1996). The relationship of client-directed agressive and nonclient-directed agressive work behavior with self control. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26, 1027–1041.
  • Lindell, M. K., & Brandt, C. J. (2000). Climate quality and climate consensus as mediators of the relationship between organizational antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 331–348.
  • Lindell, M. K., & Whitney, D. J. (2001). Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 114–121.
  • Lix, L. M., Keselman, J. C., & Keselman, H. J. (1996). Consequences of assumption violations revisited: A quantitative review of alternatives to the one-way analysis of variance F test. Review of Educational Research, 66, 579–619.
  • Loe, T. W., Ferrell, L., & Mansfield, P. (2000). A review of emperical studies assessing ethical decision making in business. Journal of Business Ethics, 25, 185–204.
  • Malhotra, N. K., Kim, S. S., & Patil, A. (2006). Common method variance in IS research: A comparison of alternative approaches and a reanalysis of past research, Management Science, 52, 1865–1883.
  • March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. New York, NY: Wiley & Sons.
  • Marsden, P. V. (1990). Network data and measurement. Annual Review of Sociology, 16, 435–463.
  • McCabe, D. L., & Bowers, W. J. (1994). Academic dishonesty among males in college: A thirty-year perspective. Journal of College Student Development, 35, 5–10.
  • McCabe, D. L., Butterfield, K. D., & Treviño, L. K. (2006). Academic dishonesty in graduate business programs: Prevalence, causes, and proposed action. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5, 294–305.
  • McCabe, D. L., & Treviño, L. K. (1993). Academic dishonesty: Honor codes and other contextual influences. Journal of Higher Education, 64, 522–538.
  • McCabe, D. L., Treviño, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D. (1996). The influence of collegiate and corporate codes of conduct on ethics-related behavior in the workplace. Business Ethics Quarterly, 6, 461–476.
  • McMullen, J. S., Shepherd, D. A., & Patzelt, H. (2009). Managerial (In)attention to competitive threats. Journal of Management Studies, 46, 157–181.
  • Miles, J., & Shelvin, M. (2003). Applying regression and correlation. London, UK: Sage.
  • Mitchell, T. R., & James, L. R. (2001). Building better theory: Time and the specification of when things happen. Academy of Management Review, 26, 530–547.
  • Mizruchi, M. S., Stearns, L. B., & Fleischer, A. (2011). Getting a bonus: Social networks, performance, and reward among commercial bankers. Organization Science, 22, 42–59.
  • Ng, J., White, G., Lee, A., & Moneta, A. (2009). Design and validation of a novel new instrument for measuring the effect of moral intensity on accountants’ propensity to manage earnings. Journal of Business Ethics, 84, 367–387.
  • Nonis, S., & Smith, C. (2001). Personal value profiles and ethical business decisions. Journal of Education for Business Ethics, 76, 251–256.
  • Ocasio, W. (1997). Towards an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 187–206.
  • Ocasio, W. (2011). Attention to attention. Organization Science, 22, 1286–1296.
  • O’Fallon, M. J., & Butterfield, K. D. (2005). A review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: 1996–2003. Journal of Business Ethics, 59, 375–413.
  • O’Fallon, M., & Butterfield, K. (2011a). The influence of unethical peer behavior on observers’ unethical behavior: A social cognitive perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 3, 1–15.
  • O’Fallon, M., & Butterfield, K. (2011b). Moral differentiation: Exploring boundaries of the “monkey see, monkey do” perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 102, 379–399.
  • Ogilby, S. (1995). The ethics of academic behavior: Will it affect professional behavior?. Journal of Education for Business, 71, 92–97.
  • Oh, H., Chung, M.-H., & Labianca, G. (2004). Group social capital and group effectiveness: The Role of informal socializing ties. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 860–875.
  • Paolilo, J. G., & Vitell, S. (2002). An emperical investigation of the influences of selected personal, organizational and moral intensity factors on ethical decision making. Journal of Business Ethics, 35, 65–74.
  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903.
  • Raver, J. L., & Nishii, L. H. (2010). Once, twice, or three times as harmful? Ethnic harassment, gender harassment, and generalized workplace harassment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 236–254.
  • Rerup, C. (2009). Attentional triangulation: Learning from unexpected rare crises. Organization Science, 20, 876–893.
  • Rest, J. R. (1986). Moral development: Advances in research and theory. New York, NY: Praeger.
  • Reynolds, S. J., & Ceranic, T. (2007). The effects of moral judgment and moral identiy on moral behavior: An empirical examiniation of the moral individual. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1610–1624.
  • Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 80, 1–28.
  • Salancik, G. R., & Pfeffer, J. (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 224–253.
  • Sheppard, B. H., Hartwick, J., & Warshaw, P. R. (1988). The theory of reasoned action: A meta-analysis of past research with recommendations for modifications and future research. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 325–343.
  • Simha, A., Armstrong, J. P., & Albert, J. F. (2012). Attitudes and behaviors of academic dishonesty and cheating—Do ethics education and ethics training affect either attitudes or behaviors? Journal of Business Ethics Education, 9, 129–144.
  • Simon, H. A. (1947). Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organizations. Chicago, IL: Macmillan.
  • Sims, R. (1993). The relationship between academic dishonesty and unethical business practices. Journal of Education for Business, 68, 207–211.
  • Singhapakdi, A. (1999). Perceived importance of ethics and ethical decisions in marketing. Journal of Business Research, 45, 89–99.
  • Smith, K. J., Davy, J. A., Rosenberg, D. L., & Haight, G. T. (2009). The role of motivation and attitude on cheating among business students. Journal of Academic and Business Ethics, 1, 12–37.
  • Sonenshein, S. (2009). The emergence of ethical issues during strategic change. Organization Science, 20, 223–239.
  • Spector, P. E. (2006). Method variance in organizational research. Organizational Research Methods,9, 221–232.
  • Staats, S., Hupp, J. M., & Hagley, A. M. (2008). Honesty and heroes: A positive psychology view of heroism and academic honesty. The Journal of Psychology, 142, 357–372.
  • Stone, E., & Hollenbeck, J. (1989). Clarifying some controversial issues surrounding statistical procefures for detecting modertor variables: Empirical evidence and related matters. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 3–10.
  • Sturman, M. C. (1999). Multiple approaches to analyzing count data in studies of individual differences: The propensity for Type I errors, illustrated with the case of absenteeism prediction. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59, 414–430.
  • Sullivan, B. N. (2010). Competition and beyond: Problems and attention allocation in the organizational rulemaking process. Organization Science, 21, 432–450.
  • Sweeney, B., & Costello, F. (2009). Moral intensity and ethical decision-making: A empirical examination of undergraduate accounting and business students. Accounting Education, 18, 75–97.
  • Tenbrunsel, A. E., & Smith-Crowe, K. (2008). Ethical decision making: Where we’ve been and where we’re going. Academy of Management Annals, 2, 545–607.
  • Tillman, C. J. (2011). Character, conditions, and cognitions: The role of personality, climate, intensity, and moral disengagement in the unethical decision making process. Unpublished dissertation, University of Alabama.
  • Treviño, L. K. (1986). Ethical decision making in organizations: A person–situation interactionist model. Academy of Management Review, 11, 601–617.
  • Treviño, L. K., & Weaver, G. R. (2003). Managing ethics in business organizations: Social scientific perspectives. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Treviño, L. K., Weaver, G. R., & Reynolds, S. J. (2006). Behavioral ethics in organizations: A review. Journal of Management, 32, 951–990.
  • Treviño, L. K., & Youngblood, S. A. (1990). Bad apples in bad barrels: A causal analysis of ethical decision-making behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 378–385.
  • Umphress, E. E., & Bingham, J. B. (2011). When employees do bad things for good reasons: Examining unethical pro-organizational behaviors. Organization Science, 22, 621–640.
  • Vandenberg, R. J. (2006). Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends: Where pray tell did they get this idea?, Organizational Research Methods, 9, 194–201.
  • Van Yperen, N. W., Hamstra, M. R., & Van der Klauw, M. (2011). To win, or not to lose, at any cost: The impact of achievement goals on cheating. British Journal of Management, 22, S5–S15.
  • Venkataramani, V., & Dalal, R. S. (2007). Who helps and harms whom? Relational antecedents of interpersonal helping and harming in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 952–966.
  • Venkataramani, V., Green, S. G., & Schleicher, D. J. (2010). Well-connected leaders: The impact of leaders’ social network ties on LMX and members’ work attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 1071–1084.
  • Vissa, B., & Chacar, A. S. (2009). Leveraging ties: The contingent value of entrepreneurial teams’ external advice networks on Indian software venture performance. Strategic Management Journal, 30, 1179–1191.
  • Wasieleski, D., & Hayibor, S. (2008). Breaking the rules: Examining the facilitation effects of moral intensity characteristics on the recognition of rule violations. Journal of Business Ethics, 78, 275–289.
  • Weick, K. E., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2006). Mindfulness and the quality of organizational attention. Organization Science, 17, 514–524.
  • Williams, K. M., Nathanson, C., & Paulhus, D. L. (2010). Identifying and profiling scholastic cheaters: their personality, cognitive ability, and motivation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 16, 293–307.
  • Zey-Ferrell, M., & Ferrell, O. C. (1982). Role set configuration and opportunity as predictors of unethical behavior in organizations. Human Relations, 35, 587–604.
  • Zey-Ferrell, M., Weaver, K. M., & Ferrell, O. C. (1979). Predicting unethical behavior among marketing practitioners. Human Relations, 32, 557–569.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.