Group Ethical Decision Making Process in Chinese Business: Analysis From Social Decision Scheme and Cultural Perspectives

REFERENCES

• Abdolmohammadi, M. J., Gabhart, D. R. L., & Reeves, M. F. (1997). Ethical cognition of business students individually and in groups. Journal of Business Ethics, 16, 1717–1725. doi:10.1023/A:1005709723798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdolmohammadi, M. J., & Reeves, M. F. (2003). Does group reasoning improve ethical reasoning? Business and Society Review, 108, 127–137. doi:10.1111/1467-8594.00001
   Google Scholar
• Ali, M., Ng, Y. L., & Kulik, C. T. (2014). Board age and gender diversity: A test of competing linear and curvilinear predictions. Journal of Business Ethics, 125, 497–512. doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1930-9
   Google Scholar
• Baker, T. L., & Hunt, T. G. (2003). An exploratory investigation into the effects of team composition on moral orientation. Journal of Managerial Issues, 15, 106–119.
   Google Scholar
• Bergmann, A., & Yellin, T. (2013). World’s largest economies. CNNMoney. Retrieved from http://money.cnn.com/news/economy/world_economies_gdp
   Google Scholar
• Bezrukova, K., Thatcher, S., Jehn, K., & Spell, C. (2012). The effects of alignments: Examining group faultlines, organizational cultures, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 77–92. doi:10.1037/a0023684
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloomberg. (2013). World news: Foreign investment in China. Retrieved from http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2013-11-19
   Google Scholar
• Brief, A. P., Buttram, R. T., & Dukerich, J. M. (2001). Collective corruption in the corporate world: Toward a process model. In M. E. Turner (Ed.), Groups at work: Theory and research (pp. 471–499). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Caldwell, D., & Moberg, D. J. (2007). An exploratory investigation of the effect of ethical culture in activating moral imagination. Journal of Business Ethics, 73, 193–204. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9190-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C., Lee, S., & Stevenson, H. W. (1995). Response style and cross-cultural comparisons of rating scales among East Asian and North American students. Psychological Science, 6, 170–175. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00327.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, T. S., Chan, H. M., Chan, K. M., King, A. S. Y. C., Chiu, C. Y., & Yang, C. F. (2003). On zhongyong rationality: The Confucian doctrine of the mean as a missing link between instrumental rationality and communicative rationality. Asian Journal of Social Science, 31(1), 107–127. doi:10.1163/156853103764778559
   Google Scholar
• Cheung, T. S., Chan, H. M., Chan, K. M., King, A. S. Y. C., Chiu, C. Y., & Yang, C. F. (2006). How Confucian are contemporary Chinese? Construction of an ideal type and its application to three Chinese communities. European Journal of East Asian Studies, 5(2), 157–180. doi:10.1163/157006106778869289
   Google Scholar
• Davis, J. H. (1973). Group decision and social interaction: A theory of social decision schemes. Psychological Review, 80, 97–125. doi:10.1037/h0033951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De George, R. T. (2013). A history of business ethics. Retrieved from http://www.scu.edu/ethics/practicing/focusareas/business/conference/presentations/business-ethics-history.html
   Google Scholar
• DeGrassi, S. W., Morgan, W. B., Walker, S. S., Wang, Y. I., & Sabat, I. (2012). Ethical decision making: Group diversity holds the key. Journal of Leadership, Accountability and Ethics, 9(6), 51–65.
   Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., & Diekman, A. B. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In T. Eckes & H. M. Trautner (Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender (pp. 123–174). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Flaming, L., Agacer, G., & Uddin, N. (2010). Ethical decision making differences between Philippines and United States students. Ethics & Behavior, 20(1), 65–79. doi:10.1080/10508420903482624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsyth, D. R. (2009). Group dynamics (5th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Green, S. G., & Taber, T. D. (1980). the effect of three social decision schemes on decision group process. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 25(1), 97–106. doi:10.1016/0030-5073(80)90027-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haines, R., & Leonard, L. N. K. (2007). Individual characteristics and ethical decision making in an IT context. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 107(1), 5–20. doi:10.1108/02635570710719025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamamura, T., Heine, S. J., & Paulhus, D. L. (2008). Cultural differences in response styles: The role of dialectical thinking. Personality and Individual Differences, 44(4), 932–942. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2007.10.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillman, A. J., Cannella, A. A., & Paetzold, R. L. (2000). The resource dependence role of corporate directors: Strategic adaptation of board composition in response to environmental change. Journal of Management Studies, 37(2), 235–255. doi:10.1111/1467-6486.00179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinsz, V. B. (1990). Cognitive and consensus processes in group recognition memory performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(4), 705–718. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.59.4.705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G. (2003). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hsi, C. (1985). Si shu ji zhu. Changsha: YueLu Press.
   Google Scholar
• International Institute for Sustainable Development. (2013). Chinese outward investment. Retrieved from https://www.iisd.org/investment/research/china.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Ji, L. J., Lee, A., & Guo, T. (2010). The thinking styles of Chinese people. In M. Bond (Ed.), The handbook of Chinese psychology (2nd ed., pp. 155–167). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ji, L. J., Peng, K., & Nisbett, R. E. (2000). Culture, control, and perception of relationships in the environment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(5), 943–955. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.5.943
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, T. M. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16(2), 366–395. doi:10.5465/AMR.1991.4278958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr, N. L., Davis, J. H., Meek, D., & Rissman, A. K. (1975). Group position as a function of member attitudes: Choice shift effects from the perspective of social decision scheme theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31(3), 574–593. doi:10.1037/h0076483
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr, N. L., & Tindale, R. S. (2004). Group performance and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 623–655. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stages in the development of moral thought and action. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Koning, L., Van, D. E., Van, B. I., & Steinel, W. (2010). An instrumental account of deception and reactions to deceit in bargaining. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20(1), 57–73. doi:10.5840/beq20102015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laughlin, P. R. (2011). Social choice theory, social decision scheme theory, and group decision making. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14(1), 63–79. doi:10.1177/1368430210372524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laughlin, P. R., & Earley, P. C. (1982). Social combination models, persuasive arguments theory, social comparison theory, and choice shift. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(2), 273–280. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.42.2.273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laughlin, P. R., & Ellis, A. L. (1986). Demonstrability and social combination processes on mathematical intellective tasks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22(3), 177–189. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(86)90022-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Y. T. (2000). What is missing in Chinese-Western dialectical reasoning. American Psychologist, 55(9), 1065–1067. doi:10.1037//0003-066X.55.9.1065
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LePine, J. A., Hollenbeck, J. R., Ilgen, D. R., Colquitt, J. A., & Ellis, A. (2002). Gender composition, situational strength, and team decision making accuracy: A criterion decomposition approach. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 88(1), 445–475. doi:10.1006/obhd.2001.2986
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, L., Yuan, Y. C., & McLeod, P. L. (2012). Twenty-five years of hidden profiles in group decision making: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16(1), 54–75. doi:10.1177/0146167209333176
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, B., Shemla, M., Li, J., & Wegge, J. (2015). On the same side of the faultline: Inclusion in the leader’s subgroup and employee performance. Journal of Management Studies, 52(3), 354–380. doi:10.1111/joms.12118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullen, M. R. (1995). Diagnosing measurement equivalence in cross-national research. Journal of International Business Studies, 26(3), 573–596. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols, M. L., & Day, V. E. (1982). A comparison of moral reasoning of groups and individuals on the Defining Issues Test. Academy of Management Journal, 25, 201–208. doi:10.2307/256035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Leary, C., & Pangemanan, G. (2007). The effect of groupwork on ethical decision making of accountancy students. Journal of Business Ethics, 75, 215–228. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9248-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohtsubo, Y., Masuchi, A., & Nakanishi, D. (2002). Majority influence process in group judgment: Test of the social judgment scheme model in a group polarization context. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 5, 249–261. doi:10.1177/1368430202005003005
   Google Scholar
• Pearsall, M. J., & Ellis, A. P. J. (2011). Thick as thieves: The effects of ethical orientation and psychological safety on unethical team behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 401–411. doi:10.1037/a0021503
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randall, D. M., & Gibson, A. M. (1990). Methodology in business ethics research: A review and critical assessment. Journal of Business Ethics, 9, 457–471. doi:10.1007/BF00382838
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rest, J. R., Bebeau, W. M., & Volker, J. (1986). An overview of the psychology of morality. In J. R. Rest (Ed.), Moral development: Advances in research and theory. New York, NY: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, S. J. (2008). Moral attentiveness: Who pays attention to the moral aspects of life? Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1027–1041. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.5.1027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarker, S., Sarker, S., Chatterjee, S., & Valacich, J. S. (2010). Media effects on group collaboration: An empirical examination in an ethical decision making context. Decision Sciences, 41, 887–931. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.2010.00291.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchanta, M., & Mavin, D. (2013, January 16). Deloitte tightens client screening after China scandals. The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424127887323468604578245201953713258
   Google Scholar
• Schminke, M., Wells, D., Peyrefitte, J., & Sebora, T. C. (2002). Leadership and ethics in work groups: A longitudinal assessment. Group and Organization Management, 27, 272–293. doi:10.1177/10501102027002006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sniezek, J. A., & Henry, R. A. (1990). Revision, weighting, and commitment in consensus group judgment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 45, 66–84. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(90)90005-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spicer, J., & Giannone, J. (2011). Exclusive: Broker says China concerns drove margin ban. Retrieved from http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/06/09/us-interactivebrokers-china-idUSTRE7584
   Google Scholar
• Stasser, G. (1999). A primer of social decision scheme theory: Models of group influence, competitive model-testing, and prospective modeling. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 80, 3–20. doi:10.1006/obhd.1999.2851
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stasser, G., & Stewart, D. (1992). Discovery of hidden profiles by decision making groups: Solving a problem versus making a judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 426–434. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.3.426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stasser, G., Taylor, L. A., & Hanna, C. (1989). Information sampling in structured and unstructured discussions of three- and six-person groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 67–78. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.1.67
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiner, I. D. (1972). Group process and productivity. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stendardi, E. J., Graham, J. F., & O’Reilly, M. (2006). The impact of gender on the personal financial planning process: Should financial advisors tailor their process to the gender of the client? Humanomics, 22, 223–238. doi:10.1108/08288660610710746
   Google Scholar
• Stenmark, C. (2013). Forecasting and ethical decision making: What matters? Ethics & Behavior, 23, 445–462. doi:10.1080/10508422.2013.807732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swol, L. M. V. (2008). Performance and process in collective and individual memory: The role of social decision schemes and memory bias in collective memory. Memory, 16, 274–287. doi:10.1080/09658210701810187
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tindale, R. S., & Sheffey, S. (2002). Shared information, cognitive load, and group memory. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 5, 5–18. doi:10.1177/1368430202005001535
   Google Scholar
• Treviño, L. K., Nieuwenboer, N. A. D., & Kish-Gephart, J. J. (2014). (Un)ethical behavior in organizations. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 635–660. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143745
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, M. Y., Tang, D. L., Kao, C. T., & Sun, V. C. (2013). Banner evaluation predicted by eye tracking performance and the median thinking style. In A. Marcus (Ed.), Design, user experience, and usability. health, learning, playing, cultural, and cross-cultural user experience (pp. 129–138). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, E., & Hsee, C. (2000). Culture and individual judgment and decision making. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49, 32–61. doi:10.1111/1464-0597.00005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiner, I. B., Schmitt, N. W., & Highhouse, S. (2012). Handbook of psychology, industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 12). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Werhane, P. H. (1999). Moral imagination and management decision making. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Westphal, J. D., & Milton, L. P. (2000). How experience and network ties affect the influence of demographic minorities on corporate boards. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 366–398. doi:10.2139/ssrn.236441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, D. W., & Lean, E. (2008). The impact of perceived leader integrity on subordinates in a work team environment. Journal of Business Ethics, 81, 765–778. doi:10.1007/s10551-007-9546-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, K. (1998). Exploring zhongyong thinking from the triple meaning of zhong. Kong Meng’s Monthly, 37, 5–9.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, C. F. (2010). Multiplicity of Zhong Yong Studies. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 12(34), 3–96.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, J. (2013). Linking proactive personality to moral imagination: Moral identity as a moderator. Social Behavior & Personality: An International Journal, 41(1), 165–176. doi:10.2224/sbp.2013.41.1.165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao, X., Yang, Q., Dong, N., & Wang, L. (2010). Moderating effect of Zhong Yong on the relationship between creativity and innovation behaviour. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 13(1), 53–57. doi:10.1111/j.1467-839X.2010.01300.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• You, D., Maeda, Y., & Bebeau, M. J. (2011). Gender differences in moral sensitivity: A meta-analysis. Ethics & Behavior, 21, 263–282. doi:10.1080/10508422.2011.585591
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, P., Gray, M. J., Zhu, W.-Z., & Jiang, G.-R. (2014). Influence of culture on ethical decision making in psychology. Ethics & Behavior, 24, 510–522. doi:10.1080/10508422.2014.891075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar