Uninformed Consent? The Effect of Participant Characteristics and Delivery Format on Informed Consent

References

• American Psychological Association. (2016). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 65(5), 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Beardsley, E., Jefford, M., & Mileskin, L. (2007). Longer consent forms for clinical trials compromise patient understanding: So why are they lengthening? Journal of Clinical Oncology, 25(9), 13–14. doi:10.1200/JCO.2006.10.3341
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brehm, J. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, H., Raisch, D., Sather, M., Segal, A., Warren, S., & Naik, R. (2008). Impact of a clinical trials information handbook on patient knowledge, perceptions, and likelihood of participation. IRB: Ethics & Human Research, 30(1), 6–14.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Duvall-Antonacopoulos, N. M., & Serin, R. C. (2016). Comprehension of online informed consents: Can it be improved? Ethics & Behavior, 26(3), 177–193. doi:10.1080/10508422.2014.1000458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edlund, J. E., Hartnett, J. L., Heider, J. D., Perez, E. J., & Lusk, J. (2014). Experimenter characteristics and word choice: Best practices when administering an informed consent. Ethics & Behavior, 24(5), 397–407. doi:10.1080/10508422.2013.854171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliot, A. J., & Niesta, D. (2008). Romantic red: Red enhances men’s attraction to women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(5), 1150–1164. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.95.5.1150
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falagas, M. E., Korbila, I. P., Giannopoulou, K. P., Kondilis, B. K., & Peppas, G. (2009). Informed consent: How much and what do patients understand? The American Journal of Surgery, 198(3), 420–435. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.02.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festinger, D. S., Dugosh, K. L., Croft, J. R., Arabia, P. L., & Marlowe, D. B. (2010). Corrected feedback: A procedure to enhance recall of informed consent to research among substance abusing offenders. Ethics & Behavior, 20(5), 387–399. doi:10.1080/10508422.2010.491767
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flory, J., & Emanuel, E. (2004). Interventions to improve research participants’ understanding in informed consent for research: A systematic review. JAMA : the Journal of the American Medical Association, 292(13), 1593–1601. doi:10.1001/jama.292.13.1593
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foe, G., & Larson, E. L. (2016). Reading level and comprehension of research consent forms: An integrative review. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 11(1), 31–46. doi:10.1177/1556264616637483
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghandour, L., Yasmine, R., & El-Kak, F. (2013). Giving consent without getting informed: A cross-cultural issue in research ethics. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 8(3), 12–21. doi:10.1525/jer.2013.8.3.12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, L. R., Johnson, J. A., Eber, H. W., Hogan, R., Ashton, M. C., Cloninger, C. R., & Gough, H. G. (2006). The international personality item pool and the future of public domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(1), 84–96. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopper, K. D., TenHave, T. R., & Hartzel, J. (1995). Informed consent forms for clinical and research imaging procedures: How much do patients understand? American Journal of Roentgenology, 164(2), 493–496. doi:10.2214/ajr.164.2.7839996
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knepp, M. M. (2014). Personality, sex of participant, and face-to-face interaction affect reading of informed consent forms. Psychological Reports, 114(1), 297–313. doi:10.2466/17.07.PR0.114k13w1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1121–1134. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1121
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavelle-Jones, C., Byrne, D. J., Rice, P., & Cuschieri, A. (1993). Factors affecting quality of informed consent. Bmj, 306(6882), 885–890. doi:10.1136/bmj.306.6882.885
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann, T. (1994). Informed consent for psychological research: Do subjects comprehend consent forms and understand their legal rights? Psychological Science, 5(3), 140–143. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00650.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNutt, L., Waltermaurer, E., Bednarczyk, R. A., Carlson, B. E., Kotval, J., McCauley, J., … Ford, D. E. (2008). Are we misjudging how well informed consent forms are read? Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 3(1), 89–97. doi:10.1525/jer.2008.3.1.89
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogloff, J. R. P., & Otto, R. K. (1991). Are research participants truly informed? Readability of informed consent forms used in research. Ethics & Behavior, 1(4), 239–252. doi:10.1207/s15327019eb0104_2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pedersen, E. R., Neighbors, C., Tidwell, J., & Lostutter, T. W. (2011). Do undergraduate student research participants read psychological research consent forms? Examining memory effects, condition effects, and individual differences. Ethics & Behavior, 21(4), 332–350. doi:10.1080/10508422.2011.585601
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrault, E. K., & Keating, D. M. (2017). Seeking ways to inform the uninformed: Improving the informed consent process in online social science research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 13(1), 50–60. doi:10.1177/1556264617738846
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrault, E. K., & Nazione, S. A. (2016). Informed consent – Uninformed participants: Shortcomings of online social science consent forms and recommendations for improvement. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 11(3), 274–280. doi:10.1177/1556264616654610
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2002). Overview of self-determination theory: An organismic dialectical perspective. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 3–33). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester.
   Google Scholar
• Stunkel, L., Benson, M., McLellan, L., Sinaii, N., Bedarida, G., Emanuel, E., & Grady, C. (2010). Comprehension and informed consent: Assessing the effect of a short consent form. IRB: Ethics & Human Research, 32(4), 1–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Theiss, J. D., Hobbs, W. B., Giordano, P. J., & Brunson, O. M. (2014). Undergraduate consent form reading in relation to conscientiousness, procrastination, and the point-of-time effect. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 9(3), 11–17. doi:10.1177/1556264614540593
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tinker, M. A., & Paterson, D. G. (1931). Studies of typographical factors influencing speed of reading. VII. Variations in color of print and background. Journal of Applied Psychology, 15(5), 471–479. doi:10.1037/h0076001
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (1979). The Belmont report. Retrieved from https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/belmont.html
   Google Scholar
• Varnhagen, C. K., Gushta, M., Daniels, J., Peters, T. C., Parmar, N., Law, D., … Johnson, T. (2005). How informed is online informed consent? Ethics & Behavior, 15(1), 37–48. doi:10.1207/s15327019eb1501_3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, D. R., Hooker, D. T., & Freeberg, F. E. (1990). Informed consent documents: Increasing comprehension by reducing reading level. IRB: A Review of Human Subjects Research, 12(3), 1–5. doi:10.2307/3564107
   Google Scholar