References
- Bagdasarov, Z., Harkrider, L. N., Johnson, J. F., MacDougall, A. E., Devenport, L. D., Connelly, S., Mumford, M. D., Peacock, J., & Thiel, C. E. (2012). An investigation of case-based instructional strategies on learning, retention, and ethical decision-making. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 7(4), 79–86. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1525/jer.2012.7.4.79
- Bagdasarov, Z., Johnson, J., Macdougall, A., Steele, L., Connelly, S., & Mumford, M. (2016). Mental models and ethical decision-making: The mediating role of sensemaking. Journal of Business Ethics, 138(1), 133–144. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2620-6
- Barnett, T. (2001). Dimensions of moral intensity and ethical decision making: An empirical study. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31(5), 1038–1057. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2001.tb02661.x
- Beehler, C. K., Antes, A. L., Wang, X., Caughron, J. J., Theil, C. L., & Mumford, M. D. (2010). Causal analysis in forecasting and ethical decision-making. Ethics & Behavior, 20(2), 110–127.
- Byrne, C. L., Shipman, A. S., & Mumford, M. D. (2010). The effects of forecasting on creative problem-solving: An experimental study. Creativity Research Journal, 22(2), 119–138. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2010.481482
- Carlson, D. S., Kacmar, K. M., & Wadsworth, L. L. (2002). The impact of moral intensity dimensions on ethical decision making: Assessing the relevance of orientation. Journal of Managerial Issues, 14(1), 15–30. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40604371
- Davis, M. A., Johnson, N. B., & Ohmer, D. G. (1998). Issue-contingent effects on ethical decision making: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(4), 373–389. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005760606745
- de Graaff, M. C., Giebels, E., Meijer, D. J. W., & Verweij, D. E. M. (2016). Sensemaking in military critical incidents: The impact of moral intensity. Business & Society, 58(4), 749–778. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650316680996
- Drazin, R., Glynn, M. A., & Kazanjian, R. K. (1999). Multilevel theorizing about creativity in organizations: A sensemaking perspective. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 286–307. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1999.1893937
- Frederiksen, N., & Ward, W. C. (1978). Measures for the study of creativity in scientific problem-solving. Applied Psychological Measurement, 2(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/014662167800200101
- Fritzsche, D. J. (1988). An examination of marketing ethics: Role of the decision maker, consequences of the decision, management position, and sex of the respondent. Journal of Macromarketing, 8(2), 29–39. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/027614678800800205
- Greene, J. D. (2007). Why are VMPFC patients more utilitarian? A dual-process theory of moral judgment explains. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(8), 322–323. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2007.06.004
- Harkrider, L. N., Thiel, C. E., Bagdasarov, Z., Mumford, M. D., Johnson, J. F., Connelly, S., & Devenport, L. D. (2012). Improving case-based ethics training with codes of conduct and forecasting content. Ethics & Behavior, 22(4), 258–280. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2012.661311
- Harrington, S. J. (1997). A test of a person-issue contingent model of ethical decision making in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(4), 363–375. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017900615637
- Hershey, D. A., Walsh, D. A., Read, S. J., & Chulef, A. S. (1990). The effects of expertise on financial problem solving: Evidence for goal-directed, problem-solving scripts. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 46(1), 77–101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(90)90023-3
- Hunt, S. D., & Vitell, S. (1986). A general theory of marketing ethics. Journal of Macromarketing, 6(1), 5–16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/027614678600600103
- Hunt, S. D., & Vitell, S. J. (2006). The general theory of marketing ethics: A revision and three questions. Journal of Macromarketing, 26(2), 143–153. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0276146706290923
- Jones, T. M. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16(2), 366–395. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1991.4278958
- Kligyte, V., Marcy, R. T., Waples, E. P., Sevier, S. T., Godfrey, E. S., Mumford, M. D., & Hougen, D. F. (2008). Application of a sensemaking approach to ethics training in the physical sciences and engineering. Science and Engineering Ethics, 14(2), 251–278. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-007-9048-z
- Laczniak, G. R., & Inderrieden, E. J. (1987). The influence of stated organizational concern upon ethical decision making. Journal of Business Ethics, 6(4), 297–307. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00382939
- Lonergan, D. C., Scott, G. M., & Mumford, M. D. (2004). Evaluative aspects of creative thought: Effects of appraisal and revision standards. Creativity Research Journal, 16(2–3), 231–246. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2004.9651455
- Marcy, R. T., & Mumford, M. D. (2007). Social innovation: Enhancing creative performance through causal analysis. Creativity Research Journal, 19(2–3), 123–140. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410701397180
- Marta, S., Leritz, L. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2005). Leadership skills and the group performance: Situational demands, behavioral requirements, and planning. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(1), 97–120. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.04.004
- May, D. R., & Pauli, K. P. (2002). The role of moral intensity in ethical decision making: A review and investigation of moral recognition, evaluation, and intention. Business & Society, 41(1), 84–117. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650302041001006
- Morris, S. A., & McDonald, R. A. (1995). The role of moral intensity in moral judgments: An empirical investigation. Journal of Business Ethics, 14(9), 715–726. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00872325
- Mumford, M. D., Connelly, S., Brown, R. P., Murphy, S. T., Hill, J. H., Antes, A. L., Waples, E. P., & Devenport, L. D. (2008). A sensemaking approach to ethics training for scientists: Preliminary evidence of training effectiveness. Ethics & Behavior, 18(4), 315–339. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10508420802487815
- Mumford, M. D., Godfrey, E. S., Sevier, S. T., Marcy, R. T., & Kligyte, V. (2008). A qualitative approach to responsible conduct of research training development: Identification of metacognitive strategies. Science and Engineering Ethics, 14(1), 33–39. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-007-9050-5
- Mumford, M. D., Schultz, R. A., & Osburn, H. K. (2002). Planning in organizations: Performance as a multi-level phenomenon. Annual Review of Research in Multi-Level Issues, 1, 3–65. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/s1475-9144(02)01026-3
- Mumford, M. D., Schultz, R. A., & Van Doorn, J. R. (2001). Performance in planning: Processes, requirements, and errors. Review of General Psychology, 5(3), 213. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.5.3.213
- Mumford, M. D., Steele, L., McIntosh, T., & Mulhearn, T. (2015). Forecasting and leader performance: Objective cognition in a socio-organizational context. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(3), 359–369. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.02.003
- Redmond, M. R., Mumford, M. D., & Teach, R. (1993). Putting creativity to work: Effects of leader behavior on subordinate creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 55(1), 120–151. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1993.1027
- Rest, J. R. (1986). Moral development: Advances in research and theory. University of Minnesota Press.
- Shipman, A. S., Byrne, C. L., & Mumford, M. D. (2010). Leader vision formation and forecasting: The effects of forecasting extent, resources, and timeframe. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(3), 439–456. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.03.008
- Singer, M., Mitchell, S., & Turner, J. (1998). Consideration of moral intensity in ethicality judgements: Its relationship with whistle-blowing and need-for-cognition. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(5), 527–541. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1005765926472
- Singhapakdi, A., Vitell, S. J., & Kraft, K. L. (1996). Moral intensity and ethical decision-making of marketing professionals. Journal of Business Research, 36(3), 245–255. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(95)00155-7
- Stenmark, C. (2013). Forecasting and ethical decision making: What matters? Ethics & Behavior, 23(6), 445–462. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2013.807732
- Stenmark, C. K., Antes, A. L., Thiel, C. E., Caughron, J. J., Wang, X., & Mumford, M. D. (2011). Consequences identification in forecasting and ethical decision-making. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 6(1), 25–32. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1525/jer.2011.6.1.25
- Stenmark, C. K., Antes, A. L., Wang, X., Caughron, J. J., Thiel, C. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2010). Strategies in forecasting outcomes in ethical decision-making: Identifying and analyzing the causes of the problem. Ethics & Behavior, 20(2), 110–127. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10508421003595935
- Weick, K. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Sage.
- Werhane, P. H. (2002). Moral imagination and systems thinking. Journal of Business Ethics, 38(1/2), 33–42. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015737431300