1,779
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Grey zones and good practice: A European survey of academic integrity among undergraduate students

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon show all

REFERENCES

  • ALLEA. (2017). The European code of conduct for research integrity - revised edition. https://www.allea.org/publications/joint-publications/european-code-conduct-research-integrity/
  • Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory. A practical guide thought qualitative analysis. Sage.
  • Childers, D., & Bruton, S. (2016). “Should It Be Considered Plagiarism?” Student perceptions of complex citation issues. Journal of Academic Ethics, 14(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-015-9250-6
  • Curtis, G., & Tremaine, K. (2019). Is plagiarism really on the rise? Results from four 5-yearly surveys. Studies in Higher Education, 46(9), 1816–1826. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1707792
  • Davis, S., Drinan, P., & Gallant, T. (2009). Cheating in school: What we know and what we can do. Wiley-Blackwell.
  • EHEA. (2015). ECTS Users Guide. Available from EHEA.info. URL=https://www.ehea.info/media.ehea.info/file/ECTS_Guide/00/0/ects-users-guide2015_614000.pdf
  • Franklyn-Stokes, A., & Newstead, S. (1995). Undergraduate cheating: Who does what and why? Studies in Higher Education, 20(2), 159–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079512331381673
  • Glendinning, I. (2016). European perspectives on Academic Integrity. In T. Bretag (Ed.), Handbook of Academic Integrity (p. Ch 5). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-098-8_3
  • Goddiksen, M., Johansen, M., Armond, A., Clavien, C., Hogan, L., Kovács, N., Merit, M., Olsson, I., Quinn, U., Santos, J., Santos, R., Schöpfer, C., Varga, O., Wall, P., Sandøe, P., & Lund, T. (2023). “The person in power told me to” - European PhD students’ perspectives on guest authorship and good authorship practice. Plos One, 18(1), e0280018. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280018
  • Goddiksen, M., Quinn, U., Kovács, N., Lund, T., Sandøe, P., Varga, O., & Johansen, M. (2021). Good friend or good student? An interview study of perceived conflicts between personal and academic integrity among students in three European countries. Accountability in Research, 28(4), 247–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2020.1826319
  • Hibberts, M., Johnson, R., & Hudson, K. (2012). Common survey sampling techniques. In L. Gideon (Ed.), Handbook of survey methodology for the social sciences (pp. 53–74). Springer.
  • Hopp, C., & Speil, A. (2020). How prevalent is plagiarism among college students? Anonymity preserving evidence from Austrian undergraduates. Accountability in Research, 28(3), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2020.1804880
  • Johansen, M., & Christiansen, F. (2020). Handling anomalous data in the lab: Students’ perspectives on deleting and discarding. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26(2), 1107–1128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-020-00206-4
  • Johansen, M. W., Goddiksen, M. P., Centa, M., Clavien, C., Gefenas, E., Globokar, R., Hogan, L., Merit, M. T., Nielsen, S. S., Olsson, I. A. S., Poškutė, M., Quinn, U., Santos, J. B., Santos, R., Schöpfer, C., Strahovnik, V., Wall, P. J., Sandøe, P., & Lund, T. B. (2022). Lack of ethics or lack of knowledge? European upper secondary students’ doubts and misconceptions about integrity issues. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 18(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-022-00113-0
  • Katsarov, J., Andorno, R., Krom, A., & van den Hoven, M. (2022). Effective strategies for research integrity training—a meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 34(2), 935–955. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09630-9
  • Lerouge, I., & Hol, A. (2020). Towards a research integrity culture at universities: From recommendations to implementation. LERU. https://www.leru.org/files/Towards-a-Research-Integrity-Culture-at-Universities-full-paper.pdf
  • Martinson, B., Anderson, M., & deVries, R. (2005). Scientists behaving badly. Nature, 435(7043), 737–738. https://doi.org/10.1038/435737a
  • McCabe, D., Trevino, L., & Butterfield, K. (2001). Cheating in Academic Institutions: A decade of research. Ethics & Behaviour, 11(3), 219–232. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327019EB1103_2
  • Pennock, R., & O’rourke, M. (2017). Developing a scientific virtue-based approach to science ethics training. Science and Engineering Ethics, 23(1), 243–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-016-9757-2
  • Pizzolato, D., & Dierickx, K. (2021). Stakeholders’ perspectives on research integrity training practices: A qualitative study. BMC Medical Ethics, 22(1), 67. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-021-00637-z
  • Roig, M. (1997). Can undergraduate students determine whether text has been plagiarized? The Psychological Record, 47(1), 113–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395215
  • Schmidt, J. (2014). Changing the paradigm for engineering ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 20(4), 985–1010. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-013-9491-y
  • Stoesz, B., & Yudintseva, A. (2018). Effectiveness of tutorials for promoting educational integrity: A synthesis paper. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 14(6). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-018-0030-0
  • Teixeira, A., & Rocha, M. (2010). Cheating by economics and business undergraduate students: An exploratory international assessment. Higher Education, 59(6), 663–701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-009-9274
  • WCRI. (2010). Singapore statement on research integrity. www.singaporestatement.org
  • Yang, S. C., Huang, C. -L., & Chen, A. -S. (2013). An investigation of college students’ perceptions of academic dishonesty, reasons for dishonesty, achievement goals, and willingness to report dishonest behavior. Ethics & Behavior, 23(6), 501–522. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2013.802651