Relational Spirituality and Forgiveness of Offenses Committed by Religious Leaders

REFERENCES

• Anderson, J., & Gerbing, D. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice. A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, C. D., & Brown, R. P. (2010). A value-congruent bias in the forgiveness forecasts of religious people. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 2, 17–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coffman, D. L., & MacCallum, R. C. (2005). Using parcels to convert path analysis models into latent variable models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 40, 235–259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, A. B., Malka, A., Rozin, P., & Cherfas, L. (2006). Religion and unforgivable offenses. Journal of Personality, 74, 85–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, D. E., Hook, J. N., & Worthington, E., Jr. (2008). Relational spirituality and forgiveness: The roles of attachment to God, religious coping, and viewing the transgression as a desecration. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 27, 293–301.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, D. E., Hook, J. N., Worthington, E. L., Jr., Van Tongeren, D. R., Gartner, A. L., Jennings, D. J., & Norton, L. (2010). Relational Spirituality and dealing with transgressions: Development of the Relational Engagement of the Sacred for a Transgression (REST) Scale. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 20, 288–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, D. E., Van Tongeren, D. R., Hook, J. N., Davis, E. B., & Worthington, E. L., Jr. (2014). Relational spirituality and forgiveness: Appraisals that may hinder forgiveness. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 6, 102–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, D. E., Worthington, E. L., Jr., Hook, J. N., & Hill, P. C. (2013). Research on religion/spirituality and forgiveness: A meta-analytic review. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 5, 233–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, D. E., Worthington, E. L., Jr., Hook, J. N., & Van Tongeren, D. R. (2009). The Dedication to the Sacred (DS) Scale: Adapting a marriage measure to study relational spirituality. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 37, 265–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, D. E., Worthington, E. L. Jr., Hook, J. N., Van Tongeren, D. R., Green, J. D., & Jennings, D. J. (2009). Relational spirituality and the development of the similarity of the offender's spirituality scale. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 1, 249–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorn, K., Hook, J. N., Davis, D. E., Van Tongeren, D. R., & Worthington, E. L., Jr. (2014). Behavioral methods of assessing forgiveness. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 9, 75–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fehr, R., Gelfand, M. J., & Nag, M. (2010). The road to forgiveness: A meta-analytic synthesis of its situational and dispositional correlates. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 894–914.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kishton, J. M., & Widaman, K. F. (1994). Unidimensional versus domain representative parceling of questionnaire items: An empirical example. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 757–765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, P. (2007). Merton's “True self”: A resource for survivors of sexual abuse by priests. Pastoral Psychology, 55, 731–739.
   Google Scholar
• Kline, P. M., McMackin, R., & Lezotte, E. (2008). The impact of the clergy abuse scandal on parish communities. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 17, 290–300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, T. D., Rhemtulla, M., Gibson, K., & Schoemann, A. M. (2013). Why the items versus parcels controversy needn't be one. Psychological Methods, 18, 285–300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcoulides, G. A., & Schumacker, R. E. (2001). New developments and techniques in structural equation modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCullough, M. E., Pargament, K. I., & Thoresen, C. E. (Eds.). (2001). Forgiveness: Theory, research, and practice. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCullough, M. E., Rachal, K. C., Sandage, S. J., Worthington, E. L., Jr., Brown, S. W., & Hight, T. L. (1998). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships: II. Theoretical elaboration and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1586–1603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCullough, M. E., & Worthington, E. L., Jr. (1999). Religion and the forgiving personality. Journal of Personality, 67, 1141–1164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pargament, K. I., Magyar, G. M., Benore, E., & Mahoney, A. (2005). Sacrilege: A study of sacred loss and desecration and their implications for health and well-being in a community sample. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 44, 59–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pop, J. L., Sutton, G. W., & Jones, E. G. (2009). Restoring pastors following a moral failure: The effects of self-interest and group influence. Pastoral Psychology, 57, 275–284.
   Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rye, M. S., Pargament, K. I., Ali, M. A., Beck, G. L., Dorff, E. N., Hallisey, C., … Williams, J. G. (2000). Religious perspectives on forgiveness. In M. E. McCullough, K. I. Pargament, & C. E. Thoresen (Eds.), Forgiveness: Theory, Research, and Practice (pp. 17–40). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Sutton, G. W., McLeland, K. C., Weaks, K. L., Cogswell, P. E., & Miphouvieng, R. N. (2007). Does gender matter? Relationship of gender, spousal support, spirituality, and dispositional forgiveness to pastoral restoration. Pastoral Psychology, 55, 645–663.
   Google Scholar
• Sutton, G. W., & Thomas, E. K. (2005). Can derailed pastors be restored? Effects of offense and age on restoration. Pastoral Psychology, 53, 583–599.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, E. K., & Sutton, G. W. (2008). Religious leadership failure: Forgiveness, apology, and restitution. Journal of Spirituality in Mental Health, 10, 308–327.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, E. K., White, K., & Sutton, G. W. (2008). Clergy apologies following abuse: What makes a difference? Exploring forgiveness, apology, responsibility-taking, gender, and restoration. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 27, 16–29.
   Google Scholar
• West, S. G., Finch, J. F., & Curran, P. J. (1995). The robustness of test statistics to non normality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 1, 16–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, L. J., & O'Boyle, E. (2009). Measurement models for linking latent variables and indicators: A review of human resource management research using parcels. Human Resource Management Review, 18, 233–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, B. T., Worthington, E. L., Jr., Exline, J. J., Yali, A. M., Aten, J. D., & McMinn, M. R. (2010). Development, refinement, and psychometric properties of the Attitudes Toward God Scale (ATGS-9). Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 2, 148–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worthington, E. L., Jr. (2006). Forgiveness and reconciliation: Theory and application. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar