Analytic Thinking Reduces Anti-Atheist Bias in Voting Intentions

References

• Berger, J., Meredith, M., & Wheeler, S. C. (2008). Contextual priming: Where people vote affects how they vote. PNAS, 105, 8846–8849.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bering, J. M., McLeod, K. A., & Shackelford, T. K. (2005). Reasoning about dead agents reveals possible adaptive trends. Human Nature, 16, 60–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonanno, G. A., & Jost, J. T. (2006). Conservative shift among high-exposure survivors of the September 11th terrorist attacks. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 28, 311–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, D. (2016, October 24). The guilt-free gospel of Donald Trump. Retrieved from http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/21/politics/trump-religion-gospel/
   Google Scholar
• Calin-Jageman, R. (2017). Direct replication of Gervais & Norenzayan (2012): No evidence that analytic thinking decreases religious belief. PLoS ONE, 12, e0172636, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0172636
   Google Scholar
• Cottrell, C. A., Neuberg, S. L., & Li, N. P. (2007). What do people desire in others? A sociofunctional perspective on the importance of different valued characteristics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 208–223
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cragun, R. T., Kosmin, B., Keysar, A., Hammer, J. H., & Nielson, M. (2012). On the receiving end: Discrimination against the non-religious in the United States. Journal of Contemporary Religion, 27, 105–127.
   Google Scholar
• Didyoung, J., Charles, E., & Rowland, N. J. (2013). Non-theists are no less moral than theists: Some preliminary results. Secularism & Non-religion, 2, 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Edgell, P., Gerteis, J., & Hartmann, D. (2006). Atheists as “other”: Moral boundaries and cultural membership in American society. American Sociological Review, 71, 211–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eidelman, S., Crandall, C. S., Goodman, J. A., & Blanchar, J. C. (2012). Low-effort thought promotes political conservatism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 808–820.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faircloth, S. (2012). Attack of the theocrats! How the religious right harms us all – And what we can do about it. Charlottesville, VA: Pitchstone.
   Google Scholar
• Franks, A. S. (2014, May). United States of Atheism: Anti-atheist prejudice in politics and support for religious bias in public policy. Paper presented at the Center for Inquiry, Grand Rapids, MI.
   Google Scholar
• Franks, A. S. (2017). Improving the electability of atheists in the United States: A preliminary examination. Politics & Religion. Advance online publication.
   Google Scholar
• Franks, A. S., & Scherr, K. C. (2014). A sociofunctional approach to prejudice at the polls: Are atheists more politically disadvantaged than Blacks and gays? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 44, 681–691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franks, A. S., & Scherr, K. C. (2015). Using moral foundations to predict voting behavior: Regression models from the 2012 U.S. presidential election. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, (1), 213–232. doi:10.1111/asap.12074
   Google Scholar
• Frederick, S. (2005). Cognitive reflection and decision making. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19, 25–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gervais, W. M. (2014). Everything is permitted? People intuitively judge immorality as representative of atheists. PLOS ONE, 9, e92302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gervais, W. M., & Norenzayan, A. (2012a). Analytic thinking promotes religious disbelief. Science, 336, 493–496.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gervais, W. M., & Norenzayan, A. (2012b). Reminders of secular authority reduce believers’ distrust of atheists. Psychological Science, 23, 483–491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gervais, W. M., Shariff, A. F., & Norenzayan, A. (2011). Do you believe in atheists? Distrust is central to anti-atheist prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 1189–1206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Personality Processes and Individual Differences, 96, 1029–1046.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, J. D., Morelli, S. A., Lowenberg, K., Nystrom, L. E., & Cohen, J. D. (2008). Cognitive load selectively interferes with utilitarian moral judgment. Cognition, 107, 1144–1154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Henrich, J., Ensimger, J., McElreath, R., Barr, A., Barrett, C., Bolyanatz, A., … Ziker, J. (2010) Markets, religion, community size, and the evolution of fairness and punishment. Science, 327, 1480–1484.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipka, M. (2016, 23 February). U.S. religious groups and their political leanings. Retrieved from http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/02/23/u-s-religious-groups-and-their-political-leanings/
   Google Scholar
• Luguri, J. B., Napier, J. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (2012). Abstract thinking reduces conservatives’ prejudice against nonnormative groups Psychological Science, 23, 756–763. doi:10.1177/0956797611433877
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mani, A., Mullainathan, S., Shafir, E., & Zhao, J. (2013). Poverty impedes cognitive function. Science, 341, 976–980.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norenzayan, A., & Gervais, W. M. (2012). The cultural evolution of religion. In E. Slingerland & M.Collard (Eds.), Creating consilience: Integrating science and the humanities (pp. 243–265). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norenzayan, A., & Shariff, A. F. (2008). The origin and evolution of religious prosociality. Science, 322, 58–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2004). Sacred and secular: Religion and politics worldwide. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pennycook, G., Cheyne, J. A., Seli, P., Koehler, D. J., & Fugelsang, J. A. (2012). Analytic cognitive style predicts religious and paranormal belief. Cognition, 123, 335–346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennycook, G., Ross, R. M., Koehler, D. J., & Fugelsang, J. A. (2016). Atheists and agnostics are more reflective than religious believers: Four empirical studies and a meta-analysis. PLOS ONE, 11(4), e0153039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piazza, J., Bering, J. M., & Ingram, G. (2011). “Princess Alice is watching you”: Children’s belief in an invisible person inhibits cheating. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 109, 311–320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shariff, A. F., & Norenzayan, A. (2007) God is watching you: Priming God concepts increases prosocial behavior in an anonymous economic game. Psychological Science, 18, 803–809.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shariff, A. F., Willard, A. K., Andersen, T., & Norenzayan, A. (2015). Religious priming: A meta-analysis with a focus on prosociality. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 20, 27–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shenhav, A., Rand, D. G., & Greene, J. D. (2012). Divine intuition: Cognitive style influences belief in God. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 423–428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, A., & Rios, K. (2016). How do U.S. Christians and atheists stereotype one another’s moral values? The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 26, 320–336. doi:10.1080/10508619.2016.1167419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sosis, R., & Alcorta, C. (2003). Signaling, solidarity, and the sacred: The evolution of religious behavior. Evolutionary Anthropology, 12, 264–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Elk, M., Matzke, D., Gronau, Q. F., Guana, M., Vandekerckhove, J., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2015, September 15). Meta-analyses are no substitute for registered replications: A skeptical perspective on religious priming. Frontiers in Psychology. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01365
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yilmaz, O., Karadöller, D. Z., & Sofuoglu, G. (2016). Analytic thinking, religion, and prejudice: An experimental test of the dual-process model of mind. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 26, 360–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar