Content Matters: Perceptions of the Science-Religion Relationship

References

• Alper, J. (1993). The pipeline is leaking women all the way along. Science, 260(5106), 409–411. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.260.5106.409
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altemeyer, B., & Hunsberger, B. (1992). Authoritarianism, religious fundamentalism, quest, and prejudice. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 2(2), 113–133. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327582ijpr0202_5
   Google Scholar
• Altemeyer, B., & Hunsberger, B. (2004). A revised religious fundamentalism scale: The short and sweet of it. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 14(1), 47–54. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327582ijpr1401_4
   Google Scholar
• Baker, J. O. (2012). Public perceptions of incompatibility between “science and religion.” Public Understanding of Science, 21(3), 340–353. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662511434908
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brecht, B. (1943/1966). Galileo. Grove Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brenan, M. (2019, July 26). 40% of Americans believe in creationism. Gallup. https://news.gallup.com/poll/261680/americans-believe-creationism.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Brooke, J. H. (1991). Science and religion: Some historical perspectives. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, D. (2017). Origin. Bantam Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, T. A. (2015). Methodology in the social sciences. Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cheryan, S., Plaut, V. C., Davies, P. G., & Steele, C. M. (2009). Ambient belonging: How stereotypical environments impact gender participation in computer science. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(6), 1045–1060. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016239
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costello, A., & Osborne, J. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 10(7), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.7275/jyj1-4868.
   Google Scholar
• Davoodi, T., Jamshidi-Sianaki, M., Abedi, F., Payir, A., Cui, Y. K., Harris, P. L., & Corriveau, K. H. (2018). Beliefs about religious and scientific entities among parents and children in Iran. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10(7), 847–855. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550618806057
   Google Scholar
• Davoodi, T., & Lombrozo, T. (2020, August 28). Explaining the existential: Scientific and religious explanations play different psychological roles. OSF Preprints. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/ws79n
   Google Scholar
• Dawkins, R. (2006). The God delusion. Bantam Press.
   Google Scholar
• Doane, M. J., & Elliot, M. (2015). Perceptions of discrimination among atheists: Consequences for atheist identification, psychological and physical well-being. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 7(2), 130–141. https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ecklund, E. H., Johnson, D. R., Scheitle, C. P., Matthews, K. R. W., & Lewis, S. W. (2016). Religion among scientists in international context: A new study of scientists in eight regions. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, 2, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023116664353
   Google Scholar
• Ecklund, E. H. (2010). Science vs. religion: What scientists really think. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elsdon-Baker, F., & Leicht, C. (2017). [Science & religion exploring the spectrum: Nationally representative UK sample]. Unpublished raw data.
   Google Scholar
• Elsdon-Baker, F., Leicht, C., Mason-Wilkes, W., Preece, E., & Piggott, L. (2017, September 5). Science & religion exploring the spectrum: Summary report of preliminary findings for a survey of public perspectives on evolution and the relationship between evolutionary science and religion [Press release]. https://sciencereligionspectrum.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/SRESYouGov-survey-preliminary-findings-5.9.17.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Elsdon-Baker, F. (2015). Creating creationists: The influence of “issues framing” on our understanding of public perceptions of clash narratives between evolutionary science and belief. Public Understanding of Science, 24(4), 422–439. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662514563015
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Elsdon-Baker, F. (2020). Creating hardline ‘secular’ evolutionists: The influence of question design on our understanding of public perceptions of clash narratives. In F. Elsdon-Baker & B. Lightman (Eds.), Identity in a secular age: Science, religion and public perceptions (pp. 30–49). University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2010, June). Special Eurobarometer 340: Science and technology. https://ec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion/archives/ebs/ebs_340_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J. H., & Evans, M. S. (2008). Religion and science: Beyond the epistemological conflict narrative. Annual Review of Sociology, 34(1), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.34.040507.134702
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.4.3.272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farias, M., Newheiser, A.-K., Kahane, G., & de Toledo, Z. (2013). Scientific faith: Belief in science increases in the face of stress and existential anxiety. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49(6), 1210–1213. https://osf.io/ws79n.
   Google Scholar
• Gervais, W. M., & Norenzayan, A. (2012). Analytic thinking promotes religious disbelief. Science, 336(6080), 493–496. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1215647
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gervais, W. M., Shariff, A. F., & Norenzayan, A. (2011). Do you believe in atheists? Distrust is central to anti-atheist prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(6), 1189–1206. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025882
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gervais, W. M., Xygalatas, D., McKay, R. T., van Elk, M., Buchtel, E. E., Aveyard, M., and Bulbulia, J. (2017). Global evidence of extreme intuitive moral prejudice against atheists. Nature Human Behavior, 1(150), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0151
   Google Scholar
• Guenther, K. M., Mulligan, K., & Papp, C. (2013). From the outside in: Crossing boundaries to build collective identity in the new atheist movement. Social Problems, 60(4), 457–475. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2013.60.4.457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, P. (2015). The territories of science and religion. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hildering, P., Consoli, L., & van den Born, R. (2013). Denying Darwin: Views on science in the rejection of evolution by Dutch Protestants. Public Understanding of Science, 22(8), 988–998. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662512437328
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hill, J. P. (2014). Rejecting evolution: The role of religion, education, and social networks. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 53(3), 575–594. https://doi.org/10.1111/jssr.12127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, J. P. (2019). Survey-based research on science and religion: A review and critique. In S. H. Jones, T. Kaden, & R. Catto (Eds.), Science, belief, and society: International perspectives on religion, non-religion and the public understanding of science (pp. 25–54). Bristol University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hitzhusen, G. E., & Tucker, M. E. (2013). The potential of religion for Earth Stewardship. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 11(7), 368–376. https://doi.org/10.1890/120322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inglehart, R., Haerpfer, C., Moreno, A., Welzel, C., Kizilova, K., Diez-Medrano, J., Lagos, M., Norris, P., Ponarin, E., and Puranen, B. (eds.). (2014). World values survey: Round five - country-pooled datafile version. JD Systems Institute. www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSDocumentationWV5.jsp
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, L. M., & Hunsberger, B. (1999). An intergroup perspective on religion and prejudice. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 38(4), 509–523. https://doi.org/10.2307/1387609
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Järnefelt, E., Canfield, C. F., & Kelemen, D. (2015). The divided mind of a disbeliever: Intuitive beliefs about nature as purposefully created among different groups of non-religious adults. Cognition, 140, 72–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2015.02.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, K. A., Sharp, C. A., Okun, M. A., Shariff, A. F., & Cohen, A. B. (2018). SBNR identity: The role of impersonal God representations, individualistic spirituality, and dissimilarity with religious groups. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 28(2), 121–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508619.2018.1445893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. K., Rowatt, W. C., & LaBouff, J. P. (2012). Religiosity and prejudice revisited: In-group favoritism, outgroup derogation, or both? Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 4(2), 154–168. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenny, D. A., Kaniskan, B., & McCoach, D. B. (2015). The performance of RMSEA in models with small degrees of freedom. Sociological Methods & Research, 44(3), 486–507. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124114543236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, E. S., Cao, C., Wang, Y., & Nguyen, D. T. (2017). Measurement invariance testing with many groups: A comparison of five approaches. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 24(4), 524–544. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2017.1304822
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krumrei-Mancuso, E. J., & Rouse, S. V. (2016). The development and validation of the comprehensive intellectual humility scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 98(2), 209–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2015.1068174
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legare, C. H., Evans, E. M., Rosengren, K. S., & Harris, P. L. (2012). The coexistence of natural and supernatural explanations across cultures and development. Child Development, 83(3), 779–793. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01743.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legare, C. H., & Gelman, S. A. (2008). Bewitchment, biology or both: The coexistence of natural and supernatural explanatory frameworks across development. Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 32(4), 607–642. https://doi.org/10.1080/03640210802066766
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legare, C. H., & Visala, A. (2011). Between religion and science: Integrating psychological and philosophical accounts of explanatory coexistence. Human Development, 54(3), 169–184. https://doi.org/10.1159/000329135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lightman, B. (2001). Victorian sciences and religions: Discordant harmonies. In J. H. Brooke, M. J. Osler, & J. van der Meer (Eds.), Science in theistic contexts: Cognitive dimensions (Osiris. Vol. 16, pp. 343–366). University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lockenhoff, C. E., Ironson, G. H., O’Cleirigh, C., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (2009). Five-factor model personality traits, spirituality/religiousness,and mental health among people living with HIV. Journal of Personality, 77(5), 1411–1436. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00587.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lombrozo, T., Thanukos, A., & Weisberg, M. (2008). The importance of understanding the nature of science for accepting evolution. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 1(3), 290–298. doi:10.1007/s12052-008-0061-8.
   Google Scholar
• Longest, K., & Uecker, J. (2020). It all depends on what you want to believe: How young adults navigate science and religion. Review of Religious Research, 63, 1–21 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s13644-020-00436-9
   Google Scholar
• Malhotra, D. (2008). (When) are religious people nicer? Religious salience and the “Sunday effect” on prosocial behavior. Judgment and Decision Making, 5, 138–143. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1297275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCauley, R. N. (2000). The naturalness of religion and the unnaturalness of science. In F. C. Keil & R. A. Wilson (Eds.), Explanation and cognition (pp. 61–86). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• McGrath, A. E. (1999). Science and religion: An introduction. Blackwell Publishing, Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• McGrath, A. (2015). The big question: Why we can’t stop talking about science, faith and god. St. Martin’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• McPhetres, J., Jong, J., & Zuckerman, M. (2020). Religious Americans have less positive attitudes toward science, but this does not extend to other cultures. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 12(4), 528–536 . https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550620923239
   Google Scholar
• Norenzayan, A., Shariff, A. F., Willard, A. K., Slingerland, E., Gervais, W. M., McNamara, R. A., & Henrich, J. (2016). The cultural evolution of prosocial religions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 39(e1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X14001356
   Google Scholar
• Payir, A., Davoodi, T., Cui, K. Y., Clegg, J. M., Harris, P. L., & Corriveau, K. (2020). Are high levels of religiosity inconsistent with a high valuation of science? Evidence from the United States, China, and Iran. International Journal of Psychology, 56(2), 216–227. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12701
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pew. (2015). Religion and science. https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2015/10/22/science-and-religion/
   Google Scholar
• Polkinghorne, J. C. (1998). Science and theology: An introduction. Fortress Press.
   Google Scholar
• Preston, J. L., Ritter, R. S., & Hernandez, J. I. (2010). Principles of religious prosociality: A review and reformulation. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(8), 574–590. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00286.x
   Google Scholar
• Preston, J., & Epley, N. (2009). Science and God: An automatic opposition between ultimate explanations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(1), 238–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.07.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Rammstedt, B., & John, O. P. (2007). Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the big five inventory in English and German. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(1), 203–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2006.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rios, K., Cheng, Z. H., Totton, R. R., & Shariff, A. F. (2015). Negative stereotypes cause christians to underperform in and disidentify with science. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6(8), 959–967. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615598378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rios, K. (2020). Examining christians’ reactions to reminders of religion–science conflict: Stereotype threat versus disengagement. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 47(3), 441–454. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167220929193
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutjens, B. G., Heine, S. J., & Wicherts, J. M. (2016). The immoral landscape? Scientists are associated with violations of morality. PLoS ONE, 11(4), e0152798. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152798
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutjens, B. T., Sengupta, N., der Lee, R. V., van Koningsbruggen, G. M., Martens, J. P., Rabelo, A., & Sutton, R. M. (2021). Science skepticism across 24 countries. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 19485506211001329 https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506211001329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saroglou, V., Pichon, I., Trompette, L., Verschueren, M., & Dernelle, R. (2005). Prosocial behavior and religion: New evidence based on projective measures and peer ratings. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 44(3), 323–348. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5906.2005.00289.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saroglou, V. (2002). Religion and the five-factors of personality: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Individual Differences, 32(1), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00233-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharp, C. A., Leicht, C., Rios, K., Zarzeczna, N., & Elsdon-Baker, F. (2021). Religious diversity in science: Social identities and stereotypes. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 136843022098759. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430220987598
   Google Scholar
• Sharp, C. A., & Leicht, C. (2020). Beyond belief systems: Promoting a social identity approach to the study of science and religion. In F. Elsdon-Baker & B. Lightman (Eds.), Identity in a secular age: Science, religion, and public perceptions (pp. 111–126). University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shenhav, A., Rand, D. G., & Greene, J. D. (2012). Divine intuition: Cognitive style influences belief in God. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(3), 423–428. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025391
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suedfeld, P., Tetlock, P. E., & Streufert, S. (1992). Conceptual/integrative complexity. In C. P. Smith, J. W. Atkinson, D. C. McClelland, & J. Veroff (Eds.), Motivation and personality: Handbook of thematic content analysis (pp. 393–400). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H. (Ed.). (1978). European monographs in social psychology series: No. 14. Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, J. C., Brown, R. J., & Tajfel, H. (1979). Social comparison and group interest in ingroup favouritism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 9(2), 187–204. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420090207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verkuyten, M. (2007). Religious group identification and interreligious relations: A study among Turkish-Dutch Muslims. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 10(3), 341–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430207078695
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster, D. M., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1994). Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(6), 1049. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.1049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, P. W., Hood, R. W., Jr, Ahmad, A., Sadiq, M., & Hill, P. C. (2010). The intratextual fundamentalism scale: Cross-cultural application, validity evidence, and relationship with religious orientation and the big 5 factor markers 1. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 13(7–8), 721–747. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674670802643047
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, D. S. (2002). Darwin’s cathedral: Evolution, religion, and the nature of society. The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ysseldyk, R., Matheson, K., & Anisman, H. (2010). Religiosity as identity: Towards an understanding of religion from a social identity perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(1), 60–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309349693
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar