699
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The Affectivity of Things in Julie Dash’s Daughters of the Dust

References

  • Alexander, George. Why We Make Movies. Black Women Talk about the Magic of Cinema. New York: Broadway, 2003.
  • Appadurai, Arjun. The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1986.
  • Bambara, Cade Toni. “Reading the Signs, Empowering the Eye: Daughters of the Dust and the Black Independent Cinema Movement.” Black American Cinema, edited by Manthia Diawara, 118–141. New York: Routledge, 1993.
  • Balázs, Béla. Early Film Theory: Visible Man and the Spirit of Film 1924/1931, edited by Erica Carter, translated by Rodney Livingstone. NY, Oxford: Berghahn Books & Screen, 2010.
  • Bjørnar, Olsen. “Material Culture after Text: Re‐Remembering Things.” Norwegian Archaeological Review 36, no. 2 (2003): 87–104. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00293650310000650
  • Bobo, Jacqueline. Black Women as Cultural Readers. New York: Columbia University Press, 1995.
  • Boyd, Valerie. “Daughters of the Dust.” American Visions 6, (1991): 46–48.
  • Brown, Bill. Things. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2004.
  • Brown, Bill. “Thing Theory.” Critical Inquiry 28, no. 1 (2001): 1–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/449030
  • Brown, Bill. “Objects, Others, and Us (the Refabrication of Things.” Critical Inquiry 36, no. 2 (2010): 183–217. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/648523
  • Cixous, Hélène. “Sonia Rykiel in Translation.” In On Fashion, edited by Shari Benstock and Suzanne Ferris, 95–99. New Brunswick: Rutgers UP, 1988.
  • Dash, Julie. Daughters of the Dust: The Making of an African American Woman’s Film, edited by Julie Dash. New York: The New Press, 1992.
  • Deleuze, Gilles. Essays Critical and Clinical, translated by D. W. Smith and M. A. Greco. Minneapolis (MN): University of Minnesota Press, 1997.
  • Deleuze, Gilles. Cinema: The Movement Image. London: Bloomsberry Publishing, 2005.
  • Diawara, Manthia. “Black American Cinema: The New Realism.” In Black American Cinema, 3–25. New York: Routledge, 1993.
  • Ebert, Roger. “Daughters of the Dust.” Review. March 13, 1992. https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/daughters-of-the-dust-1992.
  • Epstein, Jean. “On Certain Characteristics of Photogénie.” French Film Theory and Criticism, Vol. I: 1907–1929, edited by Richard Abel, 316–317. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1988.
  • Erll, Astrid. “Travelling Memory.” Parallax 17, no. 4 (2011): 4–18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13534645.2011.605570
  • Ezra, Elizabeth. The Cinema of Things. London: Bloomsbury, 2017.
  • Gourdine, Angeletta K. M. “Fashioning the Body (as) Politic in Julie Dash’s Daughters of the Dust.” African American Review 38, no. 3 (2004): 499–511. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/1512450
  • Guattari, Felix. “Ritornellos and Existential Affects.” In The Guattari Reader. Pierre Felix Guattari, edited by Gary Genosko, 158–171. Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell, 1996.
  • Holden, Stephen. “Review/Film; ‘Daughters Of the Dust': The Demise Of a Tradition.” January 16, 1992. https://www.nytimes.com/1992/01/16/movies/review-film-daughters-of-the-dust-the-demiseof-a-tradition.html
  • Hudson-Gibson, Gloria J. “The Ties That Bind: Cinematic Representation by Black Women Filmmakers.” In Black Women Film & Video Artists, edited by Jaqueline Bobo, 43–67. New York: Routledge, 1998.
  • Latour, Bruno. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2005.
  • Latour, Bruno. We Have Never Been Modern. Harlow: Pearson Education, 1993.
  • Machiorlatti, Jennifer. “Revisiting Julie Dash's ‘Daughters of the Dust’: Black Feminist Narrative and Diasporic Recollection.” South Atlantic Review 70, no. 1 (2005): 97–116.
  • Mellencamp, Patricia. “Making History: Julie Dash.” Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies 15, no. 1 (1994): 76. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/3346614
  • Navaro-Yassin, Yael. “Affective Spaces, Melancholic Objects: Ruination and the Production of Anthropological Knowledge.” The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 15, no. 1 (2009): 1–18.
  • Ntongela, Masisela. “The Los Angeles School of Black Filmmakers.” In Black American Cinema, edited by Manthia Diawara, 107–117. New York: Routledge, 1993.
  • O’Moore, Rachel. Savage Theory: Cinema as Modern Magic. Durham: Duke University Press, 2000.
  • Rhines, Jesse Algernon. Black Film/White Money. New Brusnwick: Rutgers UP, 1996.
  • Sedgwick, Kosofsky Eve. Touching Feeling: Affect, Pedagogy, Performativity. Durham: Duke Universty Press, 2003.
  • Shiffer, Michael B., and Andrea R. Miller. The Material Life of Human Beings: Artifacts, Behavior and Communication. New York: Routledge, 1999.
  • Shing, Gregory Mathew. Feeling Film: Affect and Authenticity in Popular Cinema. New York: Routledge, 2014.
  • Shohat, Ella, and, and Robert Stam. Unthinking Eurocentrism: Multiculturalism and the Media. 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 2014.
  • Silva, Kathryn M. “Daughters and Sons of the Dust: The Challenges of Accuracy in African American Historical Film.” The History Teacher 51, no. 2 (2018): 247–267.
  • Smith, Patricia. “A Daughter’s Tale: Julie Dash Finally Gets to Tell Her Story of Gullah Life.” Boston Globe (1992): B33–B35.
  • Stern, Leslie. “Paths That Wind through the Thicket of Things.” In Things, edited by Bill Brown, 393–430. Chicago: University of Chicago, 2004.
  • Thomas, Kevin. 1992. “Filmmakers Unique View of the Black Experience.” Los Angeles Times, March 20, F15–F16.
  • Women Make Movies. “Julie Dash.” Available at https://www.wmm.com/filmmaker/Julie+Dash/

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.