Understanding the impact of a DUI court through treatment integrity: A mixed-methods approach

References

• Ahlin, E. M., & Douds, A. S. (2016). Military socialization: A motivating factor for seeking treatment in a veterans’ treatment court. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 41, 83–96. doi:10.1007/s12103-015-9332-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, D. A. (2006). Enhancing adherence to risk-need-responsivity: Making quality a matter of policy. Criminology & Public Policy, 5, 595–602. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9133.2006.00394.x
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (2010a). Rehabilitating criminal justice policy and practice. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 16, 39–55. doi:10.1037/a0018362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (2010b). The psychology of criminal conduct (5th ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, D. A., Zinger, I., Hoge, R. D., Bonta, J., Gendreau, P., & Cullen, F. T. (1990). Does correctional treatment work? A clinically relevant and psychologically informed meta-analysis. Criminology, 28, 369–404. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.1990.tb01330.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aos, S., Miller, M., & Drake, E. (2006). Evidence-based public policy options to reduce future prison construction, criminal justice costs, and crime rates. Federal Sentencing Review, 19, 275–290.
   Google Scholar
• Bakker, L. W., Hudson, S. M., & Ward, T. (2000). Reducing recidivism in driving while disqualified: A treatment evaluation. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27, 531–560. doi:10.1177/0093854800027005001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belenko, S., Taxman, F. S., & Wexler, H. K. (2008). Technology transfer in correctional agencies for substance abuse treatment programs. Washington, DC: National Institute of Corrections.
   Google Scholar
• Blair, L., Sullivan, C. C., Lux, J., Thielo, A. J., & Gormsen, L. (2016). Measuring drug court adherence to the what works literature: The creation of the evidence-based correctional program checklist-drug court. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 60, 165–188. doi:10.1177/0306624x14549950
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouffard, J., & Taxman, F. (2004). Looking inside the “black box” of drug court treatment services using direct observations. Journal of Drug Issues, 34, 195–218. doi:10.1177/002204260403400109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouffard, J. A., & Richardson, K. A. (2007). The effectiveness of drug court programming for specific kinds of offenders: Methamphetamine and DWI offenders versus other drug-involved offenders. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 18, 274–293. doi:10.1177/0887403406298621
   Google Scholar
• Bouffard, J. A., Richardson, K. A., & Franklin, T. (2010). Drug courts for DWI offenders? The effectiveness of two hybrid drug courts on DWI offenders. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 25–33. doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2009.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourgon, G., & Armstrong, B. (2005). Transferring the principles effective correctional treatment into a “real world” prison setting. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 32, 3–25. doi:10.1177/0093854804270618
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, R. T. (2010). Systematic review of the impact of adult drug-treatment courts. Translational Research, 155, 263–274. doi:10.1016/j.trsl.2010.03.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callahan, L., Steadman, H. J., Tillman, S., & Vesselinov, R. (2013). A multi-site study of the use of sanctions and incentives in mental health courts. Law and Human Behavior, 37, 1–9. doi:10.1037/h0093989
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavanaugh, M. R., & Franklin, T. W. (2012). Do DWI courts work? An empirical evaluation of a Texas DWI court. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 51, 257–274. doi:10.1080/10509674.2011.641074
   Google Scholar
• Dill, P. L., & Wells-Parker, E. (2006). Court-mandated treatment for convicted drinking drivers. Alcohol Research & Health, 29, 41–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drake, E. K., Aos, S., & Miller, M. G. (2009). Evidence-based public policy options to reduce crime and criminal justice costs: Implications in Washington state. Victims & Offenders, 4, 170–196.
   Google Scholar
• Duwe, G., & Clark, V. (2015). Importance of program integrity: Outcome evaluation of a gender-responsive, cognitive-behavioral program for female offenders. Criminology & Public Policy, 14, 301–328. doi:10.1111/1745-9133.12123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eibner, C., Morral, A. R., Pacula, R. L., & MacDonald, J. (2006). Is the drug court model exportable? The cost-effectiveness of a driving-under-the-influence court. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 31, 75–85. doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2006.03.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farabee, D., Prendergast, M., & Anglin, M. D. (1998). The effectiveness of coerced treatment for drug-abusing offenders. Federal Probation, 62, 3–10.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2015). Uniform crime reports: 2014 crime in the United States. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Fell, J. C., Tippetts, A. S., & Ciccel, J. D. (2011). An evaluation of three driving-under-the-influence courts in Georgia. Annals of Advances in Automotive Medicine, 55, 301–312.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Frederick, A. (2014). Veterans treatment courts: Analysis and recommendations. Law & Psychology Review, 38, 211–230.
   Google Scholar
• Gendreau, P., & Andrews, D. A. (1996). The correctional program assessment inventory. Fredericton, Canada: University of New Brunswick.
   Google Scholar
• Gendreau, P., Goggin, C., & Smith, P. (1999). The forgotten issue in effective correctional treatment: Program implementation. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 43, 180–187. doi:10.1177/0306624x99432005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldkamp, J. S., White, M. D., & Robinson, J. B. (2001). Do drug courts work? Getting inside the drug court black box. Journal of Drug Issues, 31, 27–72. doi:10.1177/002204260103100104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottfredson, D. C., Kearley, B. W., Najaka, S. S., & Rocha, C. M. (2005). The Baltimore City drug treatment court 3-year self-report outcome study. Evaluation Review, 29, 42–64. doi:10.1177/0193841x04269908
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gover, A. R., MacDonald, J. M., & Alpert, G. P. (2003). Combating domestic violence: Findings from an evaluation of a local domestic violence court. Criminology & Public Policy, 3, 109–132. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9133.2003.tb00028.x
   Google Scholar
• Gutierrez, L., & Bourgon, G. (2012). Drug treatment courts: A quantitative review of study and treatment quality. Justice Research and Policy, 14, 47–77. doi:10.3818/jrp.14.2.2012.47
   Google Scholar
• Hiday, V. A., & Ray, B. (2010). Arrests two years after exiting a well-established mental health court. Psychiatric Services, 61, 463–468. doi:10.1176/ps.2010.61.5.463
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiller, M. L., Malluche, D., Bryan, V., DuPont, M. L., Martin, B., Abensur, R., Leukefeld, C., & Payne, C. (2010). A multisite description of juvenile drug courts program models and during-program outcomes. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 54, 213–235. doi:10.1177/0306624x08327784
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, S., Hubbard, D. J., & Latessa, E. J. (2000). Drug courts and treatment: Lessons to be learned from the “what works” literature. Corrections Management Quarterly, 4, 70–77.
   Google Scholar
• Langworthy, R. H., & Latessa, E. J. (1996). Treatment of chronic drunk drivers: A four-year follow-up of the turning point project. Journal of Criminal Justice, 24, 273–281. doi:10.1016/0047-2352(96)00009-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapham, S. C., Kapitula, L. R., C’de Baca, J., & McMillan, G. P. (2006). Impaired-driving recidivism among repeat offenders following an intensive court-based intervention. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 38, 162–169. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2005.08.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latessa, E. J. (2004). The challenge of change: Correctional programs and evidence-based practices. Criminology & Public Policy, 4, 547–560. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9133.2004.tb00061.x
   Google Scholar
• Latessa, E. J., & Holsinger, A. (1998). The importance of evaluating correctional programs: Assessing outcome and quality. Corrections Management Quarterly, 2, 22–29.
   Google Scholar
• Latessa, E. J., & Reitler, A. K. (2015). What works in reducing recidivism and how does it relate to drug courts? Ohio Northern University Law Review, 41, 757–789.
   Google Scholar
• Latessa, E. J., Shaffer, D. K., & Lowenkamp, C. T. (2002). Outcome evaluation of Ohio’s drug court efforts. Cincinnati, OH: Center for Criminal Justice Research, University of Cincinnati.
   Google Scholar
• Lindquist, C. H., Krebs, C. P., Warner, T. D., & Lattimore, P. K. (2009.) An exploration of treatment and supervision intensity among drug court and non-drug court participants. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 48, 167–193. doi:10.1080/10509670902766489
   Google Scholar
• Lipsey, M. W., & Cullen, F. T. (2007). The effectiveness of correctional rehabilitation: A review of systematic reviews. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 3, 297–320. doi:10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.3.081806.112833
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowenkamp, C. T. (2004). Correctional program integrity and treatment effectiveness: A multi-site program-level analysis (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH.
   Google Scholar
• Lowenkamp, C. T., Holsinger, A. M., & Latessa, E. J. (2005). Are drug courts effective: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Community Corrections, 15, 5–11.
   Google Scholar
• Lowenkamp, C. T., & Latessa, E. J. (2004). Understanding the risk principle: How and why correctional interventions can harm low-risk offenders. Topic in Community Corrections, 2004, 3–8.
   Google Scholar
• Lowenkamp, C. T., & Latessa, E. J. (2005a). Evaluation of Ohio’s CCA programs. Cincinnati, OH: Center for Criminal Justice Research, University of Cincinnati.
   Google Scholar
• Lowenkamp, C. T., & Latessa, E. J. (2005b). Evaluation of Ohio’s reclaim funded programs, community correctional facilities, and DYS facilities. Cincinnati, OH: Center for Criminal Justice Research, University of Cincinnati.
   Google Scholar
• Lowenkamp, C. T., Latessa, E. J., & Holsinger, A. (2006). The risk principle in action: What have we learned from 13,676 cases and 97 correctional programs? Crime & Delinquency, 52, 77–93. doi:10.1177/0011128705281747
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowenkamp, C. T., Latessa, E. J., & Smith, P. (2006). Does correctional program quality really matter? The impact of adhering to the principles of effective intervention. Criminology and Public Policy, 5, 575–594. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9133.2006.00388.x
   Google Scholar
• Lowenkamp, C. T., Makarios, M. D., Latessa, E. J., Lemke, R., & Smith, P. (2010). Community corrections facilities for juvenile offenders in Ohio: An examination of treatment integrity and recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37, 695–708. doi:10.1177/0093854810363721
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowenkamp, C. T., Pealer, J., Smith, P., & Latessa, E. J. (2006). Adhering to the risk and need principles: Does it matter for supervision based programs? Federal Probation, 70, 3–8.
   Google Scholar
• Lutze, F. E., & van Wormer, J. G. (2007). The nexus between drug and alcohol treatment program integrity and drug court effectiveness: Policy recommendations for pursuing success. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 18, 226–245. doi:10.1177/0887403406302327
   Google Scholar
• Lutze, F. E., & van Wormer, J. G. (2014). The reality of practicing the ten key components in adult drug court. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 53, 351–383. doi:10.1080/10509674.2014.922155
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald, J. M., Morral, A. R., Raymond, B., & Eibner, C. (2007). The efficacy of the Rio Hondo DUI court: A 2-year field experiment. Evaluation Review, 31, 4–23. doi:10.1177/0193841x06287189
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makarios, M. D., Lovins, L., Latessa, E. J., & Smith, P. (2016). Staff quality and treatment effectiveness: An examination of the relationship between staff factors and the effectiveness of correctional programs. Justice Quarterly, 33, 348–367. doi:10.1080/07418825.2014.924546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maltz, M. D. (2001). Recidivism. Orlando, FL: Originally published by Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marlowe, D. B., Festinger, D. S., Lee, P. A., Dugosh, K. L., & Benasutti, K. M. (2006). Matching judicial supervision to clients’ risk status in drug court. Crime & Delinquency, 52, 52–76. doi:10.1177/0011128705281746
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNiel, D. E., & Binder, R. L. (2007). Effectiveness of a mental health court in reducing criminal recidivism and violence. American Journal of Psychiatry, 164, 1395–1403. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.06101664
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melde, C., Esbensen, F., & Tusinski, K. (2006). Addressing program fidelity using onsite observations and program provider descriptions of program delivery. Evaluation Review, 30, 714–740. doi:10.1177/0193841x06293412
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, H. V., Tillyer, R., & Miller, J. M. (2012). Recognizing the need for prisoner input in correctional research: Observations from an in-prison driving while intoxicated reduction program evaluation. The Prison Journal, 92, 274–289. doi:10.1177/0032885512439164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J. M., & Miller, H. V. (2015). Rethinking program fidelity for criminal justice. Criminology & Public Policy, 14, 339–349. doi:10.1111/1745-9133.12138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, P. G., Curtis, A., Sønderlund, A., Day, A., & Droste, N. (2015). Effectiveness of interventions for convicted DUI offenders in reducing recidivism: A systematic review of the peer-reviewed scientific literature. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 41, 16–29. doi:10.3109/00952990.2014.966199
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, O., Wilson, D. B., Eggers, A., & MacKenzie, D. L. (2012). Assessing the effectiveness of drug courts on recidivism: A meta-analytic review of traditional and non-traditional drug courts. Journal of Criminal Justice, 40, 60–71. doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2011.11.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, K. A., Harrison, M., Young, M. S., & Ochshorn, E. (2008). A cognitive therapy treatment program for repeat dui offenders. Journal of Criminal Justice, 36, 539–545. doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2008.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, M. E., & Hiday, V. A. (2006). Mental health court outcomes: A comparison of re-arrest and re-arrest severity between mental health court and traditional court participants. Law and Human Behavior, 30, 659–674. doi:10.1007/s10979-006-9061-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Association of Drug Court Professionals. (2013). Adult drug court best practice standards: Volume I. Retrieved from http://www.allrise.org/sites/default/files/nadcp/AdultDrugCourtBestPracticeStandards.pdf
   Google Scholar
• National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. (2015). Traffic safety facts: Alcohol-impaired driving. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Pratt, T. C., Holsinger, A. M., & Latessa, E. J. (2000). Treating the chronic DUI offender “turning point” ten years later. Journal of Criminal Justice, 28, 271–281. doi:10.1016/s0047-2352(00)00046-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn, T. P., & Quinn, E. L. (2015). The effect of cognitive-behavioral therapy on driving while intoxicated recidivism. Journal of Drug Issues, 45, 431–446. doi:10.1177/0022042615603390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronan, S. M., Collins, P. A., & Rosky, J. W. (2009). The effectiveness of Idaho DUI and misdemeanor/DUI courts: Outcome evaluation. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 48, 154–165. doi:10.1080/10509670802641030
   Google Scholar
• Rossi, P. H., Lipsey, M. W., & Freeman, H. E. (2004). Evaluation: A systematic approach. (7th ed.): Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.
   Google Scholar
• Shaffer, D. K. (2011). Looking inside the black box of drug courts: A meta-analytic review. Justice Quarterly, 28, 493–521. doi:10.1080/07418825.2010.525222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaffer, D. K., Hartman, J. L., & Listwan, S. J. (2009). Drug abusing women in the community: The impact of drug court involvement on recidivism. Journal of Drug Issues, 39, 803–827. doi:10.1177/002204260903900402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaffer, D. K., Listwan, S. J., & Latessa, E. J. (2004). The effectiveness of Ohio’s drug courts. Ohio Department of Corrections Research Compendium, 2, 255–263.
   Google Scholar
• Shaffer, D. K., Listwan, S. J., Latessa, E. J., & Lowenkamp, C. T. (2008). The drug court phenomenon: Findings from Ohio. National Drug Court Institute Review, 6, 33–66.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, P., Gendreau, P., & Schwartz, K. (2009). Validating the principles of effective intervention: A systematic review of the contributions of meta-analysis in the field of corrections. Victims and Offenders, 4, 148–169. doi:10.1080/15564880802612581
   Google Scholar
• Spohn, C., Piper, R. K., Martin, T., & Frenzel, E. D. (2001). Drug courts and recidivism: The results of an evaluation using two comparison groups and multiple indicators of recidivism. Journal of Drug Issues, 31, 149–176. doi:10.1177/002204260103100109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein, D. M., Homan, K. J., & DeBerard, S. (2015). The effectiveness of juvenile treatment drug courts: A meta-analytic review of literature. Journal of Child & Adolescent Substance Abuse, 24, 80–93. doi:10.1080/1067828x.2013.764371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stinchcomb, J. B. (2010). Drug courts: Conceptual foundation, empirical findings, and policy implications. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 17, 148–167. doi:10.3109/09687630802286901
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, C. J., Blair, L., Latessa, E., & Sullivan, C. C. (2016). Juvenile drug courts and recidivism: Results from a multisite outcome study. Justice Quarterly, 33, 291–318. doi:10.1080/07418825.2014.908937
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taxman, F. S. (2014). Building effective service delivery mechanisms for justice-involved individuals: An under-researched area. Health & Justice, 2, 1–12. doi:10.1186/2194-7899-2-2
   Google Scholar
• Taxman, F. S., & Bouffard, J. A. (2002a). Assessing therapeutic integrity in modified therapeutic communities for drug-involved offenders. The Prison Journal, 82, 189–212. doi:10.1177/003288550208200203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taxman, F. S., & Bouffard, J. A. (2002b). Treatment inside the drug treatment court: The who, what, where, and how of treatment services. Substance Use & Misuse, 37, 1665–1688. doi:10.1081/ja-120014426
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, B. (2000). Trend toward specialized domestic violence courts: Improvements on an effective innovation. The Fordham Law Review, 68, 1285–1327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Voorhis, P., Cullen, F. T., & Applegate, B. (1995). Evaluating interventions with violent offenders: A guide for practitioners and policymakers. Federal Probation, 59, 17–28.
   Google Scholar
• Washington State Institute for Public Policy. (2004). Outcome evaluation of Washington state’s research-based programs for juvenile offenders. Olympia, WA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Wieczorek, W. F. (2013). Criminal justice public health policies to reduce the negative impacts of DUI. Criminology & Public Policy, 12, 195–201. doi:10.1111/1745-9133.12038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, D. B., Mitchell, O., & MacKenzie, D. L. (2006). A systematic review of drug courts effects on recidivism. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 2, 459–487. doi:10.1007/s11292-006-9019-4
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, C. (1998). Evaluation: Methods for studying programs and policies (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar