Dosage is more than just counting program hours: The importance of role-playing in treatment outcomes

References

• Allison, P. D. (2010). Survival analysis using SAS: A practical guide (2nd ed.). Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
   Google Scholar
• American Medical Association. (2007). AMA manual of style: A guide for authors and editors (10th ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (2010). The psychology of criminal conduct (5th ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J., & Wormith, S. (1995). Manual for the level of service/case management inventory IS/CMI. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, D. A., Zinger, I., Hoge, R. D., Bonta, J., Gendreau, P., & Cullen, F. T. (1990). Does correctional treatment work? A clinically relevant and psychologically informed meta-analysis. Criminology, 28(3), 369–404. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.1990.tb01330.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnoski, R. (2004). Outcome evaluation of Washington State’s research-based programs for juvenile offenders (Document No. 04–01-1201). Olympia, WA: Washington State Institute for Public Policy. Retrieved from http://www.wsipp.wa.gov/ReportFile/852/Wsipp_Outcome-Evaluation-of-Washington-States-Research-Based-Programs-for-Juvenile-Offenders_Full-Report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bourgon, G., & Armstrong, B. (2005). Transferring the principles of effective treatment into a “real world” prison setting. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 32(1), 3–25. doi:10.1177/0093854804270618
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleves, M. A., Gould, W. W., & Gutierrez, R. G. (2004). An introduction to survival analysis using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Dowden, C., & Andrews, D. A. (2004). The importance of staff practice in delivering correctional treatment: A meta-analytic review of core correctional practice. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 48(2), 203–214. doi:10.1177/0306624x03257765
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fall, K. A., Holden, J. M., & Marquis, A. (2010). Theoretical models of counseling and psychotherapy. New York, NY: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Flores, A. W., Holsinger, A. M., Lowenkamp, C. T., & Cohen, T. H. (2016). Time-free effects in predicting recidivism using both fixed and variable follow-up periods: Do different methods produce different results? Criminal Justice & Behavior, 44, 121–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett, C. J. (1985). Effects of residential treatment of adjudicated delinquents. A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 22(4), 287–308. doi:10.1177/0093854890017001008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gendreau, P., & Andrews, D. A. (1994). The correctional program assessment inventory (5th ed.). Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada: University of New Brunswick.
   Google Scholar
• Holsinger, A. M. (1999). Opening the ‘black box’: Assessing the relationship between program integrity and recidivism (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global database (UMI No. 9945561).
   Google Scholar
• Huey, S. J., Henggeler, S. W., Brondino, M. J., & Pickrel, S. G. (2000). Mechanisms of change in multisystemic therapy: Reducing delinquent behavior through therapist adherence and improved family and peer functioning. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68(3), 451–467. doi:10.1037//0022-006X.68.3.451
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Izzo, R. L., & Ross, R. R. (1990). Meta-analysis of rehabilitation programs for juvenile delinquents. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17, 134–142. doi:10.1177/0093854890017001008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landenberger, N. A., & Lipsey, M. W. (2005). The positive effects of cognitive-behavioral programs for offenders: A meta-analysis of factors associated with effective treatment. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1(4), 451–476. doi:10.1007/s11292-005-3541-7
   Google Scholar
• Latessa, E., Brusman-Lovins, L., & Smith, P. (2010). Follow-up evaluation of Ohio’s community based correctional facility and halfway house programs—outcome study. University of Cincinnati. Retrieved from http://www.uc.edu/content/dam/uc/ccjr/docs/reports/project_reports/2010%20ODRC%20HWH%20FINAL%20REPORT2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Latessa, E. J., Lovins, L. B., Smith, P., & Makarios, M. (2010). Follow-up evaluation of Ohio’s community based correctional facility and halfway house programs: Program characteristics supplemental report. University of Cincinnati. Retrieved from http://www.uc.edu/content/dam/uc/ccjr/docs/reports/project_reports/Program_Characteristics_Supplementary_Report_FINAL.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lipsey, M. (2009). Primary factors that characterize effective interventions with juvenile offenders: A meta-analytic overview. Victims & Offenders, 4(2), 124–147. doi:10.1080/15564880802612573
   Google Scholar
• Lovins, B., Lowenkamp, C. T., & Latessa, E. J. (2009). Applying the risk principle to sex offenders: Can treatment make some sex offenders worse? The Prison Journal, 89(3), 344–357. doi:10.1177/0032885509339509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovins, L. B., Lowenkamp, C. T., Latessa, E. J., & Smith, P. (2007). Application of the risk principle to female offenders. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 23(4), 383–398. doi:10.1177/1043986207309437
   Google Scholar
• Lowenkamp, C. T. (2004). Correctional program integrity and treatment effectiveness: A multi-site, program-level analysis (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global database (UMI No. 3120848).
   Google Scholar
• Lowenkamp, C. T., & Latessa, E. J. (2002). Evaluation of Ohio’s community based correctional facilities and halfway house programs: Final report. Cincinnati: University of Cincinnati.
   Google Scholar
• Lowenkamp, C. T., & Latessa, E. J. (2004a). Investigating the relationship between program integrity and correctional program effectiveness. In Ohio corrections research compendium Vol. 2. Columbus, OH: Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction. Retrieved from https://www.uc.edu/content/dam/uc/ccjr/docs/articles/Program_Integrity_and_Program_Effectiveness.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lowenkamp, C. T., & Latessa, E. J. (2004b). Understanding the risk principle: How and why correctional interventions can harm low risk cases. In Topics in community corrections annual issue 2004: Assessment issues for managers (pp. 3–8). Washington, DC: U.S. National Institute of Corrections. Retrieved from http://www.uc.edu/content/dam/uc/ccjr/docs/articles/ticc04_final_complete.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lowenkamp, C. T., & Latessa, E. J. (2005). Increasing the effectiveness of correctional programming through the risk principle: Identifying offenders for residential placement. Criminology & Public Policy, 4(2), 262–290. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9133.2005.00021.x
   Google Scholar
• Lowenkamp, C. T., Latessa, E. J., & Smith, P. (2006). Does correctional program quality really matter? The impact of adhering to the principles of effective intervention. Criminology & Public Policy, 5(3), 575–594. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9133.2006.00388.x
   Google Scholar
• Makarios, M. D., Sperber, K. G., & Latessa, E. J. (2014). Treatment dosage and the risk principle: An extension and refinement. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 53(5), 334–350. doi:10.1080/10509674.2014.922157
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, F. S., Lipton, D. S., Cleland, C. M., & Yee, D. S. (2002). The effects of behavioral/cognitive-behavioral programs on recidivism. Crime & Delinquency, 48(3), 476–496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoenwald, S. K., Carter, R. E., Chapman, J. E., & Sheidow, A. J. (2008). Therapist adherence and organizational effects on change in youth behavior problems one year after multisystemic therapy. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 35, 379–394. doi:10.1007/s10488-0080181-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sperber, K. G., Latessa, E. J., & Makarios, M. D. (2013a). Examining the interaction between level of risk and dosage of treatment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 40(3), 338–348. doi:10.1177/0093854812467942
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sperber, K. G., Latessa, E. J., & Makarios, M. D. (2013b). Establishing a risk-dosage research agenda: Implications for policy and practice. Justice Research & Policy, 15(1), 123–141. doi:10.3818/JRP.15.1.2013.123
   Google Scholar