References
- Allen, M., Berkowitz, S., Hunt, S., & Louden, A. (1999). A meta-analysis of the impact of forensics and communication education on critical thinking. Communication Education, 48(1), 18–30. doi:10.1080/03634529909379149
- Atchison, J. (2011). Who Cares?: Learning perspective taking through stakeholders. Contemporary Argumentation & Debate, 32, 79–84.
- Berelson, B. (1952). Content analysis in communication research. New York, NY: Free Press.
- Bsumek, P. (2009). Debate as disease: Debate and the dialogue deliberation movement. Contemporary Argumentation & Debate, 30, 1–29.
- Crossman, M. (2005). Burden of proof: An introduction to government and guide to parliamentary debate. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
- Davis, M. (2011). Debate as pedagogy. Contemporary Argumentation & Debate, 32, 70–72.
- Davis, M., & Bsumek, P. (2011). The public debate writing assignment: Developing an academically engaged debate audience. Contemporary Argumentation & Debate, 30, 92–97.
- Fairclough, N. (2003). Analyzing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. New York, NY: Routledge.
- Hensley, D., & Carlin, D. B. (2004). Mastering competitive debate. Austin, TX: Barrett Kendall.
- Ivanic, R. (1998). Writing and identity. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Benjamins.
- Jerome, L., & Algarra, B. (2005). Debating debating: A reflection on the place of debate within secondary schools. The Curriculum Journal, 16(4), 493–508. doi:10.1080/09585170500384610
- Knapp, T. G., & Galizio, L. A. (1998). Elements of parliamentary debate: A guide to public argument. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley Education.
- Krippendorff, K. (2013). Content analysis (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Kuswa, K. (2011). Switch-side debate exercise. Contemporary Argumentation & Debate, 32, 85–91.
- Lantis, J. S. (2004). Ethics and foreign policy: Structured debates for the international studies classroom. International Studies Perspective, 5, 117–133. doi:10.1111/j.1528-3577.2004.00162.x
- McGee, D. S., McGee, B. R., & Kennedy, M. C. (2009). The state of argumentation courses at the U.S. colleges and universities in the 21st century: A review of course inventories and curricula. Contemporary Argumentation & Debate, 30, 50–71.
- McKee, A. (2003). Textual analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Meany, J., & Shuster, K. (2002). Art, argument and advocacy: Mastering parliamentary debate. New York, NY: The International Debate Education Association.
- Mitchell, G. R. (1998). Pedagogical possibilities for argumentative agency in academic debate. Argumentation & Advocacy, 35(2), 41–60.
- Mitchell, G. R. (2000). Simulated public argument as a pedagogical play on worlds. Argumentation & Advocacy, 36, 134–150.
- Mosley-Jensen, W. E. (2011). Competition as education: Bringing the tournament to the classroom. Contemporary Argumentation & Debate, 32, 73–78.
- Omelicheva, M. Y. (2007). Resolved: Academic debate should be a part of political science curricula. Journal of Political Science Education, 3, 161–175. doi:10.1080/15512160701338320
- Rybacki, K. C., & Rybacki, D. J. (2011). Advocacy and opposition: An introduction to argumentation (7th ed.). New York, NY: Pearson.
- Sellnow, D. (2006). Moving the debate about argumentation pedagogy to the next level: Response to Hunt, Meyer, and Lippert. Argumentation & Advocacy, 42, 164–168.
- Snyder, A. C., & Schnurer, M. (2002). Many sides: Debate across the curriculum. New York, NY: The International Debate Education Association.
![Supercharge Your Next Research Paper: Research and write your next paper with Jenni AI.]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/112447/MPU-L1HU.png"})