Competing Discourses and Meaning Making in Talk about Romantic Partners’ Cell-Phone Contact with Non-Present Others

References

• Baxter, L. A. (2004). Distinguished scholar article: Relationships as dialogues. Personal Relationships, 11, 1–22. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2004.00068.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baxter, L. A. (2011). Voicing relationships: A dialogic perspective. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, L. A., & Braithwaite, D. O. (2010). Relational dialectics theory, applied. In S. W. Smith & S. R. Wilson (Eds.), New directions in interpersonal communication research (pp. 48–66). Thousand Oaks, CA: Safe.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, L. A., & Montgomery, B. M. (1996). Relating: Dialogues and dialectics. New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Bergdall, A. R., Kraft, J. M., Andes, K., Carter, M., Hatfield-Timajchy, K., & Hock-Long, L. (2012). Love and hooking up in the new millennium: Communication technology and relationships among urban African American and Puerto Rican young adults. Journal of Sex Research, 49, 570–582. doi:10.1080/00224499.2011.604748
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Canary, D. J., Stafford, L., Hause, K. S., & Wallace, L. A. (1993). An inductive analysis of relational maintenance strategies: Comparisons among lovers, relatives, friends, and others. Communication Research Reports, 10, 3–14. doi:10.1080/08824099309359913
   Google Scholar
• Caughlin, J. P., & Sharabi, L. L. (2013). A communicative interdependence perspective of close relationships: The connections between mediated and unmediated interactions matter. Journal of Communication, 63, 873–893. doi:10.1111/jcom.12046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coyne, S., Stockdale, L., Busby, D., Iverson, B., & Grant, D. (2011). “I luv u:)!”: A descriptive study of the media use of individuals in romantic relationships. Family Relations, 60, 150–162. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2010.00639.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among the five approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cupples, J., & Thompson, L. (2010). Heterotexuality and digital foreplay: Cell phones and the culture of teenage romance. Feminist Media Studies, 10(1), 1–17. doi:10.1080/14680770903457063
   Google Scholar
• Duran, R. L., Kelly, L., & Rotaru, T. (2011). Mobile phones in romantic relationships and the dialectic of autonomy versus connection. Communication Quarterly, 59, 19–36. doi:10.1080/01463373.2011.541336
   Google Scholar
• Frisby, B. N., & Westerman, D. (2010). Rational actors: Channel selection and rational choices in romantic conflict episodes. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27, 970–981. doi:10.1177/0265407510378302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gergen, K. J. (2002). The challenge of absent presence. In J. E. Katz & M. Aakhus (Eds.), Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance (pp. 227–241). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gershon, I. (2010). The breakup 2.0: Disconnecting over new media. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, J. L., Ellison, N. B., & Heino, R. D. (2006). Self-presentation in online personals: The role of anticipated future interaction, self-disclosure, and perceived success in Internet dating. Communication Research, 33, 152–177. doi:10.1177/0093650205285368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, N., & Haddon, L. (2009). Mobile communications: An introduction to new media. Oxford, UK: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, A. J., Haigh, M. M., Becker, J. A. H., Craig, E. A., & Wigley, S. (2008). College students’ use of relational management strategies in email in long-distance and geographically close relationships. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 381–404. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2008.00401.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, L., Keaten, J. A., Becker, B., Cole, J., Littleford, L., & Rothe, B. (2012). “It’s the American lifestyle!”: An investigation of text messaging by college students. Qualitative Research Reports in Communication, 13(1), 1–9. doi:10.1080/17459435.2012.719203
   Google Scholar
• Lasén, A. (2011). Mobiles are not that personal: The unexpected consequences of the accountability, accessibility, and transparency afforded by mobile telephony. In R. Ling & S. W. Campbell (Eds.), Mobile communication: Bringing us together and tearing us apart (pp. 83–106). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• Lenhart, A., & Duggan, M. (2014, February 11). Couples, the Internet, and social media. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2014/02/11/couples-the-internet-and-social-media/
   Google Scholar
• Licoppe, C. (2004). “Connected” presence: The emergence of a new repertoire for managing social relationships in a changing communication technoscape. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 22, 135–156. doi:10.1068/d323t
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindlof, T. R., & Taylor, B. C. (2011). Qualitative communication research methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ling, R. (2012). Taken for grantedness: The embedding of mobile communication into society. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ling, R., & Campbell, S. W. (2011). Mobile communication: Bringing us together and tearing us apart. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• Ling, R., & Donner, J. (2009). Mobile communication. Malden, MA: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Ling, R. S. (2008). The mediation of ritual interaction via the mobile telephone. In J. E. Katz (Ed.), Handbook of mobile communication studies (pp. 165–176). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Miller-Ott, A. E., & Kelly, L. (2015). The presence of cell phones in romantic partner face-to-face interactions: An expectancy violation theory approach. Southern Communication Journal, 80, 253–270. doi:10.1080/1041794X.2015.1055371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller-Ott, A. E., Kelly, L., & Duran, R. L. (2012). The effects of cell phone usage rules on satisfaction in romantic relationships. Communication Quarterly, 60, 17–34. doi:10.1080/01463373.2012.642263
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. L. (1996). Focus groups. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 129–152. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettigrew, J. (2009). Text messaging and connectedness within close interpersonal relationships. Marriage & Family Review, 45, 697–716. doi:10.1080/01494920903224269
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2014). Mobile technology fact sheet. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/fact-sheets/mobile-technology-fact-sheet/
   Google Scholar
• Prager, K. J., & Roberts, L. J. (2004). Deep intimate connection: Self and intimacy in couple relationships. In D. J. Mashek & A. Aron (Eds.), Handbook of closeness and intimacy (pp. 43–60). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Przybylski, A. K., & Weinstein, N. (2012). Can you connect with me now?: How the presence of mobile communication technology influences face-to-face conversation quality. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30, 237–246. doi:10.1177/0265407512453827
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reis, H. T., Clark, M. S., & Holmes, J. G. (2004). Perceived partner responsiveness as an organizing construct in the study of intimacy and closeness. In D. J. Mashek & A. Aron (Eds.), Handbook of closeness and intimacy (pp. 201–225). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Rettie, R. (2009). SMS: Exploiting the interactional characteristics of near-synchrony. Information, Communication & Society, 12, 1131–1148. doi:10.1080/13691180902786943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidelinger, R. J., Ayash, G., Godorhazy, A., & Tibbles, D. (2008). Couples go online: Relational maintenance behaviors and relational characteristics use in dating relationships. Human Communication, 11, 341–355. Retrieved from http://www.uab.edu/Communicationstudies/humancommunication/
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A., & Duggan, M. (2013, October 21). Online dating & relationships. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/10/21/online-dating-relationships/
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Tracy, S. J. (2013). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B., & Parks, M. R. (2002). Cues filtered out, cues filtered in: Computer-mediated communication and relationships. In M. L. Knapp & J. A. Daly (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (3rd ed., pp. 529–563). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Weisskirch, R. S., & Delevi, R. (2012). Its ovr b/n u n me: Technology use, attachment styles, and gender roles in relationship dissolution. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(9), 486–490. doi:10.1089/cyber.2012.0169
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar