A Paragon of Family Ritual: The Zimmerman Family Reunion

References

• Ayoub, M. R. (1966). The family reunion. Ethnology, 5, 415–433. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3772721
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, L. A. (2014). Theorizing the communicative construction of “family.” In L. A. Baxter (Ed.), Remaking “family” communicatively (pp. 33–47). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, L. A., & Braithwaite, D. O. (2002). Performing marriage: Marriage renewal rituals as cultural performance. Southern Communication Journal, 67, 94–109.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, L. A., & Braithwaite, D. O. (2006). Family rituals. In L. H. Turner, & R. West (Eds.), The family communication sourcebook (pp. 259–280). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, L. A., Braithwaite, D. O., Koenig Kellas, J., LeClair-Underberg, C., Lamb Normand, E., Routsong, T., & Thatcher, M. (2009). Empty ritual: Young-adult stepchildren’s perceptions of the remarriage ceremony. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 26, 467–487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baxter, L. A., & Clark, C. L. (1996). Perceptions of family communication patterns and the enactment of family rituals. Western Journal of Communication, 60, 254–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, J. (2015). Narrating family histories: Negotiating identity and belonging through tropes of nostalgia and authenticity. Current Sociology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0011392115578984
   Google Scholar
• Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York, NY: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Canary, D. J., & Stafford, L. (1994). Communication and relational maintenance. London, UK: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Docan-Morgan, S. J. (2014). “They were strangers who loved me”: Discussions, narratives, and rituals during Korean adoptees’ initial reunions with birth families. Journal of Family Communication, 14, 352–373.
   Google Scholar
• Fiese, B. H., & Kline, C. A. (1993). Development of the family ritual questionnaire: Initial reliability and validation studies. Journal of Family Psychology, 6, 290–299.
   Google Scholar
• Floyd, K., & Morman, M. T. (2006). Widening the family circle: New research in family communication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (2001). Making social science matter: Why social science inquiry fails and how it can succeed again. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12, 219–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (2013). Case study. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Strategies of qualitative inquiry (4th ed., pp. 169–203). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., & Straus, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New Brunswick, NJ: Aldine Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, I. (1967). Interaction ritual. Garden City, NY: Anchor.
   Google Scholar
• Kluin, J. Y., & Legto, X. Y. (2012). Measuring family reunion travel motivations. Annals of Tourism Research, 39, 820–841.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knobloch, L. K., Basinger, E. D., Wehrman, E. C., Ebata, A. T., & McGlaughlin, P. C. (2016). Communication of military couples during deployment and reunion: Changes, challenges, benefits, and advice. Journal of Family Communication, 16, 160–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lather, P. (1986). Issues of validity in openly ideological research: Between a rock and a soft place. Interchange, 17, 63–84.
   Google Scholar
• Leach, M. S., & Braithwaite, D. O. (1996). A binding tie: Supportive communication of family kinkeepers. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 24, 200–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindlof, T. R., & Taylor, B. C. (2011). Qualitative communication research methods (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Marks, L. D., Hatch, T. G., & Dollahite, D. C. (2017). Sacred practices and family processes in a Jewish context: Shabbat as the weekly family ritual par excellence. Family Process. Advance online publication. doi:10.1111/famp.12286
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Drawing valid meaning from qualitative data: Toward a shared craft. Educational Researcher, 13, 20–30.
   Google Scholar
• Mishler, E. G. (1990). Validation in inquiry-guided research: The role of exemplars in narrative studies. Harvard Educational Review, 60, 415–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seltzer, M. M. (1988). Reunions: Windows to the past and future. The American Behavioral Scientist, 31, 644–653. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1306757179?accountid=10906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton, C. R. (2004). Celebrating ourselves: The family reunion rituals of African-Caribbean transnational families. Global Networks, 4, 243–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, R. M. (1982). Summoning the wandering tribes: Genealogy and family reunion in American history. Journal of Social History, 16, 21–37. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3787185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, B., Kellas, J. K., Soliz, J., Thompson, J., Epp, A., & Schrodt, P. (2009). Family legacies: Constructing individual and family identity through intergenerational storytelling. Narrative Inquiry, 19, 106–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolin, S. J., & Bennett, L. A. (1984). Family rituals. Family Process, 23, 401–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2005). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Zerubavel, E. (2012). Ancestors & relatives: Genealogy, identity, & community. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar