Intercultural Communication: Taking Stock of the Domain

References

• Asante, M., & Gudykunst, W. (Eds.). (1989). Handbook of international and intercultural communication. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Asante, M., Newmark, E., & Blake, C. (1979). Handbook of intercultural communication. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Carbaugh, D. (2005). Cultures in conversation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Collier, M., & Bornman, E. (1999). Core symbols in South African intercultural friendships. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 23(1), 133–156. doi:10.1016/S0147-1767(98)00029-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellingsworth, H. (1977). Conceptualizing intercultural communication. In B. Ruben (Ed.), Communication yearbook 2 (pp. 345–350). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• Erikson, E. (1959/1980). Identity and the life cycle. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Fitch, K. (1998). Speaking relationally: Culture, communication, and interpersonal connection. New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Flores, L. (2001). Challenging the myth of assimilation: A Chicana feminist response. In M. J. Collier (Ed.), Constituting cultural difference through discourse (pp. 26–46). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gallois, C., Ogay, T., & Giles, H. (2005). Communication accommodation theory. In W. Gudykunst (Ed.), Theorizing about intercultural communication (pp. 121–148). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gudykunst, W. (Ed.). (1983). Intercultural communication theory. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gudykunst, W. (1988). Uncertainty and anxiety. In Y. Kim & W. Gudykunst (Eds.), Theories in intercultural communication (pp. 123–156). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gudykunst, W. (2003). Understanding must precede criticism: A response to Yoshitake’s critique of anxiety/uncertainty (AUM) theory. Intercultural Communication Studies, XII(1), 25–40.
   Google Scholar
• Gudykunst, W. (Ed.). (2005a). Theorizing about intercultural communication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gudykunst, W. (2005b). An anxiety/uncertainty management (AUM) theory of effective communication: Making the mesh of the net finer. In W. Gudykunst (Ed.), Theorizing about intercultural communication (pp. 281–322). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gudykunst, W., & Kim, Y. (1984a). Communicating with strangers: An approach to intercultural communication (1st ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Gudykunst, W., & Kim, Y. (Eds.). (1984b). Methods for intercultural communication research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gudykunst, W., & Mody, B. (Eds.). (2004). Handbook of international and intercultural communication (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, E. (1959). The silent language. New York, NY: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, E. (1976). Beyond culture. New York, NY: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Hecht, M., Warren, J., Jung, E., & Krieger, J. (2005). A communicatioin theory of identity: Development, theoretical perspective, and future directions. In W. Gudykunst (Ed.), Theorizing about intercultural communication (pp. 257–278). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences (1st ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. (1977). Communication patterns of foreign immigrants in the process of acculturation. Human Communication Research, 4(1), 66–77. doi:10.1111/hcre.1977.4.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. (1980). Indochinese refugees in Illinois (5 volumes). Published under contract to Travelers Aid Society-Metropolitan Chicago, based on a grant from the Department of Health, Education & Welfare Region V, PL95-549.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. (1988). Communication and cross-cultural adaptation: An integrative theory. Philadelphia, PA: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. (2001). Becoming intercultural: An integrative theory of communication and cross- cultural adaptation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. (2005). Association and dissociation: A contextual theory of interethnic communication. In W. Gudykunst (Ed.), Theorizing about intercultural communication (pp. 323–349). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. (Ed.). (2018). The international encyclopedia of intercultural communication. Published in cooperation of the International Communication Association. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., & Gudykunst, W. (Eds.). (1988). Theories in intercultural communication. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., Lujan, P., & Dixon, L. (1998). “I can walk both ways”: Identity integration of American Indians in Oklahoma. Human Communication Research, 25(2), 252–274. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1998.tb00445.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., & McKay-Semmler, K. (2013). Social engagement and cross-cultural adaptation: An examination of direct- and mediated interpersonal communication activities of educated non-natives in the United States. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 37(1), 99–112. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2012.04.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., & Paulk, S. (1994). Intercultural challenges and personal adjustments: A qualitative analysis of the communication experiences of American and Japanese coworkers. In R. Wiseman & R. Shuter (Eds.), International and intercultural communication annual 18. Communication in the multinational organization (pp. 117–140). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• La Garza, A., & Ono, K. (2015). Retheorizing adaptation: Differential adaptation and critical intercultural communication. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 8(4), 269–289. doi:10.1080/17513057.2015.1087097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKay-Semmler, K., & Kim, Y. (2014). Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Hispanic Youth: A Study of Communication Patterns, Functional Fitness, and Psychological Health. Communication Monograph, 81(2), 133–156. doi:10.1080/03637751.2013.870346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLuhan, M. (1962). The Gutenberg galaxy. New York, NY: New American Library.
   Google Scholar
• McPhail, T. (2010). Global communication: Theories, stakeholders, and trends (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Orbe, M. (1997). Constructing co-cultural theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Orbe, M., & Spellers, R. (2005). From the margins to the center: Utilizing co-cultural theory in diverse contexts. In W. Gudykunst (Ed.), Theorizing about intercultural communication (pp. 173–191). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pettigrew, T. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 65–85. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philipsen, G. (1997). A theory of speech codes. In G. Philipsen & T. Albrecht (Eds.), Developing communication theories (pp. 119–156). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Philipsen, G., Coutu, L., & Covarrubias, P. (2005). Speech code theory: Restatement, revisions, and response to criticisms. In W. Gudykunst (Ed.), Theorizing about intercultural communication (pp. 55–68). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Prosser, M. (2018). Intercultural communication study in the United States: Early beginnings. In Y. Kim (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of intercultural communication. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Sarbaugh, L. (1988). Intercultural communication. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (2nd ed., pp. 7–24). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Tavernise, S., & Gebeloff, R. (2010, December 14). Immigrants make paths to suburbia, not cities. The New York Times. Retrived from http://www.NYTimes.com
   Google Scholar
• Thussu, D. (2006). International communication: Continuity and change (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ting-Toomey, S. (2005). The matrix of face: An updated face-negotiation theory. In W. Gudykunst (Ed.), Theorizing about intercultural communication (pp. 71–92). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Triandis, H. (1995). Individualism-collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview.
   Google Scholar
• Wiseman, R. (Ed.). (1995). Intercultural communication theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Yoshitake, M. (2002). A critical examination of the anxiety/uncertainty management (AUM) theory as a major intercultural communication theory. Intercultural Communication Studies, XI(2), 177–194.
   Google Scholar