Mother Goose and Mother Nature: Designing Stories to Communicate Information About Climate Change

References

• Barton, S. N., & O’Leary, J. B. (1974). The rhetoric of rural physician procurement campaigns: An application of Tavistock. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 60(2), 144–154. doi:10.1080/00335637409383220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigsby, E., Cappella, J. N., & Seitz, H. H. (2013). Efficiently and effectively evaluating public service announcements: Additional evidence for the utility of perceived effectiveness. Communication Monographs, 80(1), 1–23. doi:10.1080/03637751.2012.739706
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilandzic, H., & Busselle, R. W. (2008). Transportation and transportability in the cultivation of genre-consistent attitudes and estimates. Journal of Communication, 58(3), 508–529. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00397.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloomfield, E. F., & Katula, R. A. (2012). Rhetorical criticism of the 2008 presidential campaign: Establishing premises of agreement in announcement speeches. Communication Research Reports, 29(2), 139–147. doi:10.1080/08824096.2012.667775
   Google Scholar
• Bloomfield, E. F., & Sangalang, A. (2014). Juxtaposition as visual argument: Health rhetoric in super size me and fat head. Argumentation and Advocacy, 50(3), 141–156. doi:10.1080/00028533.2014.11821815
   Google Scholar
• Bormann, E. G. (1972). Fantasy and rhetorical vision: The rhetorical criticism of social reality. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 58(4), 396–407. doi:10.1080/00335637209383138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bormann, E. G. (1982). The symbolic convergence theory of communication: Applications and implications for teachers and consultants. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 10(1), 50–61. doi:10.1080/00909888209365212
   Google Scholar
• Bormann, E. G., Cragan, J. F., & Shields, D. C. (2001). Three decades of developing, grounding, and using symbolic convergence theory (SCT). Annals of the International Communication Association, 25(1), 271–313. doi:10.1080/23808985.2001.11679006
   Google Scholar
• Bormann, E. G., Knutson, R. L., & Musolf, K. (1997). Why do people share fantasies? An empirical investigation of a basic tenet of the symbolic convergence communication theory. Communication Studies, 48(3), 254–276. doi:10.1080/10510979709368504
   Google Scholar
• Braddock, K., & Dillard, J. P. (2016). Meta-analytic evidence for the persuasive effect of narratives on beliefs, attitudes, intentions, and behaviors. Communication Monographs, 1–24. doi:10.1080/03637751.2015.1128555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, E., Durkin, S. J., Wakefield, M. A., & Kashima, Y. (2014). Assessing the effectiveness of antismoking television advertisements: Do audience ratings of perceived effectiveness predict changes in quitting intentions and smoking behaviours? Tobacco Control, 23(5), 412–418. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050949
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bushell, S., Buisson, G. S., Workman, M., & Colley, T. (2017). Strategic narratives in climate change: Towards a unifying narrative to address the action gap on climate change. Energy Research & Social Science, 28, 39–49. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2017.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busselle, R., & Bilandzic, H. (2008). Fictionality and perceived realism in experiencing stories: A model of narrative comprehension and engagement. Communication Theory, 18(2), 255–280. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2008.00322.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busselle, R., & Bilandzic, H. (2009). Measuring narrative engagement. Media Psychology, 12(4), 321–347.
   Google Scholar
• Cobb, M. D., & Kuklinski, J. H. (1997). Changing minds: Political arguments and political persuasion. American Journal of Political Science, 41(1), 88–121. doi:10.2307/2111710
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, K. E., & Nisbet, E. C. (2016). Green narratives: How affective responses to media messages influence risk perceptions and policy preferences about environmental hazards. Science Communication, 38(5), 626–654. doi:10.1177/1075547016666843
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlstrom, M. F. (2010). The role of causality in information acceptance in narratives: An example from science communication. Communication Research, 37(6), 857–875. doi:10.1177/0093650210362683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlstrom, M. F. (2014). Using narratives and storytelling to communicate science with nonexpert audiences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(Supplement 4), 13614–13620. doi:10.1073/pnas.1320645111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dal Cin, S., Zanna, M. P., & Fong, G. T. (2004). Narrative persuasion and overcoming resistance. In E. S. Knowles & J. A. Linn (Eds.), Resistance and persuasion (pp. 175–191). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Dillard, J. P., Shen, L., & Vail, R. G. (2007). Does perceived message effectiveness cause persuasion or vice cersa? 17 consistent answers. Human Communication Research, 33(4), 467–488. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00308.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillard, J. P., Weber, K. M., & Vail, R. G. (2007). The relationship between the perceived and actual effectiveness of persuasive messages: A meta-analysis with implications for formative campaign research. Journal of Communication, 57(4), 613–631. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00360.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlap, R. E., & McCright, A. M. (2008). A widening gap: Republican and democratic views on climate change. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 50(5), 26–35. doi:10.3200/ENVT.50.5.26-35
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endres, T. G. (1994). Co‐existing master analogues in symbolic convergence theory: The knights of columbus quincentennial campaign. Communication Studies, 45(3–4), 294–308. doi:10.1080/10510979409368430
   Google Scholar
• Feeley, T. H., Marshall, H. M., & Reinhart, A. M. (2006). Reactions to narrative and statistical written messages promoting organ donation. Communication Reports, 19(2), 89–100. doi:10.1080/08934210600918758
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, W. R. (1987). Human communication as narration: Toward a philosophy of reason, value, and action. Columbia, S.C.: University of South Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foss, S. K. (1979). Equal rights amendment controversy: Two worlds in conflict. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 65(3), 275–288. doi:10.1080/00335637909383479
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauchat, G. (2012). Politicization of science in the public sphere: A study of public trust in the United States, 1974 to 2010. American Sociological Review, 77(2), 167–187. doi:10.1177/0003122412438225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 1029–1046. doi:10.1037/a0015141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, M. C. (2008). Research challenges in narrative persuasion. Information Design Journal, 16(1), 47–52. doi:10.1075/idj.16.1.07gre
   Google Scholar
• Hart, P. S., & Nisbet, E. C. (2012). Boomerang effects in science communication: How motivated reasoning and identity cues amplify opinion polarization about climate mitigation policies. Communication Research, 39(6), 701–723. doi:10.1177/0093650211416646
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hensley, C. W. (1975). Rhetorical vision and the persuasion of a historical movement: The disciples of Christ in nineteenth century American culture. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 61(3), 250–264. doi:10.1080/00335637509383290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinyard, L. J., & Kreuter, M. W. (2007). Using narrative communication as a tool for health behavior change: A conceptual, theoretical, and empirical overview. Health Education & Behavior, 34(5), 777–792. doi:10.1177/1090198106291963
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, S. (1992). Message effects research: Principles of design and analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, M. D. (2014). Communicating climate change: Are stories better than “just the facts”? Policy Studies Journal, 42(4), 644–673. doi:10.1111/psj.12072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M. D., & McBeth, M. K. (2010). A narrative policy framework: Clear enough to be wrong? Policy Studies Journal, 38(2), 329–353. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00364.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, M., Shi, R., & Cappella, J. N. (2016). Effect of character–Audience similarity on the perceived effectiveness of antismoking PSAs via engagement. Health Communication, 31(10), 1193–1204. doi:10.1080/10410236.2015.1048421
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, R. R., Sigelman, L., & Rovner, I. B. (2007). The effects of negative political campaigns: A meta-analytic reassessment. Journal of Politics, 69(4), 1176–1209. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00618.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiserowitz, A. A. (2004). Day after tomorrow: Study of climate change risk perception. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 46(9), 22–39. doi:10.1080/00139150409603663
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowe, T., Brown, K., Dessai, S., De Doria, M. F., Haynes, K., & Vincent, K. (2006). Does tomorrow ever come? Disaster narrative and public perceptions of climate change. Public Understanding of Science, 15(4), 435–457. doi:10.1177/0963662506063796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moyer-Gusé, E. (2008). Toward a theory of entertainment persuasion: Explaining the persuasive effects of entertainment-education messages. Communication Theory, 18(3), 407–425. doi:10.1111/comt.2008.18.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niederdeppe, J., Shapiro, M. A., Kim, H. K., Bartolo, D., & Porticella, N. (2014). Narrative persuasion, causality, complex integration, and support for obesity policy. Health Communication, 29(5), 431–444. doi:10.1080/10410236.2012.761805
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nolan, J. M. (2010). “An inconvenient truth” increases knowledge, concern, and willingness to reduce greenhouse gases. Environment and Behavior, 42(5), 643–658. doi:10.1177/0013916509357696
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Keefe, D. J. (2015). Message generalizations that support evidence-based persuasive message design: Specifying the evidentiary requirements. Health Communication, 30(2), 106–113. doi:10.1080/10410236.2014.974123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Leary, S. D. (1993). A dramatistic theory of apocalyptic rhetoric. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 79(4), 385–426. doi:10.1080/00335639309384044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perelman, C., & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1969). The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2012). 2012 american values Survey. Retrieved from http://www.people-press.org/values/
   Google Scholar
• Singhal, A., & Rogers, E. M. (1999). Entertainment-education: A communication strategy for social change. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Yzer, M., LoRusso, S., & Nagler, R. H. (2015). On the conceptual ambiguity surrounding perceived message effectiveness. Health Communication, 30(2), 125–134. doi:10.1080/10410236.2014.974131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zebregs, S., Van Den Putte, B., Neijens, P., & deGraaf, A. (2015). The differential impact of statistical and narrative evidence on beliefs, attitude, and intention: A meta-analysis. Health Communication, 30(3), 282–289. doi:10.1080/10410236.2013.842528
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, X., Strasser, A., Cappella, J. N., Lerman, C., & Fishbein, M. (2011). A measure of perceived argument strength: Reliability and validity. Communication Methods and Measures, 5(1), 48–75. doi:10.1080/19312458.2010.547822
   PubMedGoogle Scholar