College Student Perceptions of Frequency and Effectiveness of Use of Relevance Strategies: A Replication and Extension

References

• Bowman, N. D., & Akcaoglu, M. (2014). “I see smart people!”: Using Facebook to supplement cognitive and affective learning in the university mass lecture. The Internet and Higher Education, 23, 1–8. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, C. F., & Young, S. L. (2016). Exploring communication and course format: Conversation frequency and duration, student motives, and perceived teacher approachability for out-of-class contact. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17. Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20180508100437/http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/2561/3863
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesebro, J. L., & Wanzer, M. B. (2006). Instructional message variables. In T. P. Mottet, V. P. Richmond, & J. C. McCroskey (Eds.), Handbook of instructional communication: Rhetorical and relational perspectives (pp. 89–116). Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Fedesco, H. N., Kentner, A., & Natt, J. (2017). The effect of relevance strategies on student perceptions of introductory courses. Communication Education, 66, 196–209. doi:10.1080/03634523.2016.1268697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frymier, A. B. (1994). The use of affinity-seeking in producing liking and learning in the classroom. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 22, 87–105. doi:10.1080/00909889409365391
   Google Scholar
• Frymier, A. B. (2002). Making content relevant to students. In J. L. Chesebro & J. C. McCroskey (Eds.), Communication for teachers (pp. 83–92). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Frymier, A. B., & Houser, M. L. (1998). Does making content relevant make a difference in learning? Communication Research Reports, 15, 121–129. doi:10.1080/08824099809362106
   Google Scholar
• Frymier, A. B., & Shulman, G. M. (1995). “What’s in it for me?”: Increasing content relevance to enhance students’ motivation. Communication Education, 44, 40–50. doi:10.1080/03634529509378996
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frymier, A. B., Shulman, G. M., & Houser, M. (1996). The development of a learner empowerment measure. Communication Education, 45, 181–199. doi:10.1080/03634529609379048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fusani, D. S. (1994). “Extra-class” communication: Frequency, immediacy, self-disclosure, and satisfaction in student-faculty interaction outside the classroom. Journal of Applied Communication, 22, 232–255. doi:10.1080/00909889409365400
   Google Scholar
• Goodboy, A. K., & Myers, S. A. (2015). Revisiting instructor misbehaviors: A revised typology and development of a measure. Communication Education, 64, 133–153. doi:10.1080/03634523.2014.978798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaasma, M. A., & Koper, R. J. (2001, May). Talk to me: An examination of the content of out-of-class interaction between students and faculty. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Communication Association, Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, K. K. (1999). Training teachers to use verbal immediacy behaviors. Communication Research Reports, 16, 223–232. doi:10.1080/08824099909388721
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, L., Becker, A., Estrada, V., & Freeman, A. (2016). NMC horizon report: 2016 higher education edition. Austin, TX: The New Media Consortium. Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/182009/report_182009.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Karnad, A. (2014). Trends in educational technologies. London, UK: The London School of Economics and Political Science. Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20180403164203/http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/55965/1/__lse.ac.uk_storage_LIBRARY_Secondary_libfile_shared_repository_Content_Centre%20for%20Learning%20Technology_Trends%20in%20Education%20Technology.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Keller, J. M. (1983). Motivational design of instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models: An overview of their current status (pp. 384–434). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, J. M. (1987). Strategies for stimulating the motivation to learn. Performance and Instruction, 26, 1–7. doi:10.1002/pfi.4160260902
   Google Scholar
• Keller, J. M. (1999). Using the ARCS motivational process in computer-based instruction and distance education. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 78, 39–47. doi:10.1002/tl.7804
   Google Scholar
• Keller, J. M., & Suzuki, K. (2004). Learner motivation and e-learning design: A multinationally validated process. Journal of Educational Media, 29, 229–239. doi:10.1080/1358165042000283084
   Google Scholar
• Ledbetter, A. M., & Finn, A. N. (2018). Perceived teacher credibility and students’ affect as a function of instructors’ use of PowerPoint and email. Communication Education, 67, 31–51. doi:10.1080/03634523.2017.1385821
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazer, J. P. (2012). Development and validation of the student interest and engagement scales. Communication Methods and Measures, 6, 99–125. doi:10.1080/19312458.2012.679244
   Google Scholar
• Mazer, J. P. (2018). Instructor message variables. In M. L. Houser & A. M. Hosek (Eds.), Handbook of instructional communication: Rhetorical and relational perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 22–37). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Millette, D. M., & Gorham, J. (2002). Teacher behavior and student motivation. In J. L. Chesebro & J. C. McCroskey (Eds.), Communication for teachers (pp. 141–153). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Muddiman, A., & Frymier, A. B. (2009). What is relevant?: Student perceptions of relevance strategies in college classrooms. Communication Studies, 60, 130–146. doi:10.1080/10510970902834866
   Google Scholar
• Myers, S. A. (1995). Student perceptions of teacher affinity-seeking and classroom climate. Communication Research Reports, 12, 192–199. doi:10.1080/08824099509362056
   Google Scholar
• Myers, S. A., & Knox, R. L. (1999). Verbal aggression in the college classroom: Perceived instructor use and student affective learning. Communication Quarterly, 47, 33–45. doi:10.1080/01463379909370122
   Google Scholar
• Newby, T. J. (1991). Classroom motivation: Strategies of first-year teachers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 195–200. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.83.2.195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, J. F. (1992). Effective teacher behaviors. Communication Education, 41, 167–180. doi:10.1080/03634529209378878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pajares, F. (2003). Self-efficacy beliefs, motivation, and achievement in writing: A review of the literature. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 19, 139–158. doi:10.1080/10573560308222
   Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Santos, I. M., Bocheco, O., & Habak, C. (2018). A survey of student and instructor perceptions of personal mobile technology usage and policies for the classroom. Education and Information Technologies, 23, 617–632. doi:10.1007/s10639-017-9625-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sass, E. J. (1989). Motivation in the college classroom: What students tell us. Teaching of Psychology, 16, 86–88. doi:10.1207/s15328023top1602_15
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schrodt, P. (2013). Content relevance and students’ comfort with disclosure as moderators of instructor disclosures and credibility in the college classroom. Communication Education, 62, 352–375. doi:10.1080/03634523.2013.807348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, W. A. (1955). Reliability of content analysis: The case of nominal scale coding. Public Opinion Quarterly, 19, 321–325. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/2746450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seemiller, C., & Clayton, J. (2019). Developing the strengths of generation Z college students. Journal of College & Character, 20, 268–275. doi:10.1080/2194587X.2019.1631187
   Google Scholar
• Seemiller, C., & Grace, M. (2016). Generation Z goes to college. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Seemiller, C., & Grace, M. (2017). Generation Z: Educating and engaging the next generation of students. About Campus: Enriching the Student Learning Experience, 22, 21–26. doi:10.1002/abc.21293
   Google Scholar
• Teven, J. J., & McCroskey, J. C. (1997). The relationship of perceived teacher caring with student learning and teacher evaluation. Communication Education, 46, 1–9. doi:10.1080/03634529709379069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Usher, A., & Kober, N. (2012). Student motivations: An overlooked piece of school reform. The Education Digest, 78, 9–16.
   Google Scholar
• Weaver, R. L., & Cottrell, H. W. (1988). Motivating students: Stimulating and sustaining student effort. College Student Journal, 22, 22–32.
   Google Scholar
• Young, S. L., Pulido, M. D., & Brooks, C. F. (2018). Reasons for student engagement in extra-class communication. Communication Research Reports, 35, 172–177. doi:10.1080/08824096.2017.1383234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar