The persuasive effects of delaying identification of high‐and low‐credibility communicators: A meta‐analytic review

Works cited

• Boster , Franklin J. and Mongeau , Paul . 1984 . “Fear‐Arousing Persuasive Messages.” . In Communication Yearbook 8. , Edited by: Bostrom , Robert N. 330 – 75 . Beverly Hills, CA : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Bostrom , Robert N. 1982 . “Theoretical Interactions of Receivers, Sources, and Attitude Objects: ‘RSO’ Theory.” . In Communication Yearbook 5. , Edited by: Burgoon , Michael . 833 – 55 . New Brunswick, NJ : Transaction .
   Google Scholar
• Bostrom , Robert N. 1983 . Persuasion. , Englewood Cliffs, NJ : Prentice .
   Google Scholar
• Burgoon , Judee K. 1976 . “The Ideal Source: A Reexamination of Source Credibility Measurement.” . Central States Speech Journal , 27 : 200 – 06 .
   Google Scholar
• Clark , Ruth Anne , Stewart , Roy and Marston , Alan . 1972 . “Scale Values for Highest and Lowest Levels of Credibility.” . Central States Speech Journal , 23 : 193 – 96 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly , Alice H. and Carli , Linda L. 1981 . “Sex of Researchers and Sex‐Typed Communications as Determinants of Sex Differences in Influenceability: A Meta‐Analysis of Social Influence Studies.” . Psychological Bulletin , 90 : 1 – 20 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glass , Gene V. , McGaw , Barry and Smith , Mary L. 1981 . Meta‐Analysis in Social Research. , Beverly Hills, CA : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg , Bradley S. and Miller , Gerald R. 1966 . “The Effects of Low‐Credible Sources on Message Acceptance.” . Speech Monographs , 33 : 127 – 36 .
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg , Bradley S. and Tannenbaum , Percy H. 1961 . “The Effects of Bylines on Attitude Change.” . Journalism Quarterly , 38 : 535 – 37 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harmon , Robert R. and Coney , Kenneth A. 1982 . “The Persuasive Effects of Source Credibility in Buy and Lease Situations.” . Journal of Marketing Research , 19 : 255 – 60 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedges , Larry V. and Olkin , Ingram . 1983 . “Clustering Estimates of Effect Magnitude from Independent Studies.” . Psychological Bulletin , 93 : 563 – 73 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hovland , Carl I. , Janis , Irving L. and Kelley , Harold H. 1953 . Communication and Persuasion , New Haven : Yale .
   Google Scholar
• Husek , T. R. 1965 . “Persuasive Impacts of Early, Late, or No Mention of a Negative Source.” . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 2 : 125 – 28 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson , Sally and Jacobs , Scott . 1983 . “Generalizing About Messages: Suggestions for Design and Analysis of Experiments.” . Human Communication Research , 9 : 169 – 81 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills , Judson and Harvey , John . 1972 . “Opinion Change as a Function of When Information About the Communicator is Received and Whether He is Attractive or Expert.” . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 21 : 52 – 55 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osgood , Charles E. and Tannenbaum , Percy H. 1955 . “The Principle of Congruity in the Prediction of Attitude Change.” . Psychological Review , 62 : 42 – 55 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenthal , Robert . 1984 . Meta‐Analytic Procedures for Social Research. , Beverly Hills, CA : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal , Robert and Rubin , Donald B. 1982 . “A Simple, General Purpose Display of Magnitude of Experimental Effect.” . Journal of Educational Psychology , 74 : 166 – 69 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternthal , Brian , Dholakia , Ruby and Leavitt , Clark . 1978 . “The Persuasive Effect of Source Credibility: Tests of Cognitive Response.” . Journal of Consumer Research , 4 : 252 – 60 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward , Charles D. and McGinnies , Elliott . 1973 . “Perception of Communicator's Credibility as a Function of When He is Identified.” . Psychological Record , 23 : 561 – 62 .
   Google Scholar
• Ward , Charles D. and McGinnies , Elliott . 1974 . “Persuasive Effects of Early and Late Mention of Credible and Noncredible Sources.” . Journal of Psychology , 86 : 17 – 23 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar