Three reasons for doubting the adequacy of the reciprocal‐concessions explanation of door‐in‐the‐face effects

References

• Abrahams , M. F. and Bell , R. A. 1994 . Encouraging charitable contributions: An examination of three models of door‐in‐the‐face compliance . Communication Research , 21 : 131 – 153 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsmith , J. M. and Gross , A. E. 1969 . Some effects of guilt on compliance . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 11 : 232 – 239 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cialdini , R. B. 1993 . Influence: Science and practice , (3rd ed.) , New York : HarperCollins .
   Google Scholar
• Cialdini , R. B. , Green , B. L. and Rusch , A. J. 1992 . When tactical pronouncements of change become real change: The case of reciprocal persuasion . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 63 : 30 – 40 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cialdini , R. B. , Vincent , J. E. , Lewis , S. K. , Catalan , J. , Wheeler , D. and Darby , B. L. 1975 . Reciprocal concessions procedure for inducing compliance: The door‐in‐the‐face technique . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 31 : 206 – 215 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillard , J. P. , Hunter , J. E. and Burgoon , M. 1984 . Sequential‐request strategies: Meta‐analysis of foot‐in‐the‐door and door‐in‐the‐face . Human Communication Research , 10 : 461 – 488 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fern , E. F. , Monroe , K. B. and Avila , R. A. 1986 . Effectiveness of multiple request strategies: A synthesis of research results . Journal of Marketing Research , 23 : 144 – 152 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foehl , J. C. and Goldman , M. 1983 . Increasing altruistic behavior by using compliance techniques . Journal of Social Psychology , 119 : 21 – 29 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freedman , J. L. , Wallington , S. A. and Bless , E. 1967 . Compliance without pressure: The effect of guilt . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 7 : 117 – 124 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman , M. 1986 . Compliance employing a combined foot‐in‐the‐door and door‐in‐the‐face procedure . Journal of Social Psychology , 126 : 111 – 116 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman , M. , McVeigh , J. F. and Richterkessing , J. L. 1984 . Door‐in‐the‐face procedure: Reciprocal concession, perceptual contrast, or worthy person . Journal of Social Psychology , 123 : 245 – 251 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grace , C. R. , Bell , P. A. and Sugar , J. 1988 . Effects of compliance techniques on spontaneous and asked‐for helping . Journal of Social Psychology , 128 : 525 – 532 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hale , J. L. and Laliker , M. Explaining the door‐in‐the‐face: Is it really time to abandon reciprocal concessions? . Communication Studies , (this issue)
   Google Scholar
• Kidd , R. F. and Berkowitz , L. 1976 . Effect of dissonance arousal on helpfulness . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 33 : 613 – 622 .
   Google Scholar
• Konecni , V.J. 1972 . Some effects of guilt on compliance: A field replication . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 23 : 30 – 32 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller , R. L. , Seligman , C. , Clark , N. T. and Bush , M. 1976 . Perceptual contrast versus reciprocal concession as mediators of induced compliance . Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science , 8 : 401 – 409 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mowen , J. C. and Cialdini , R. B. 1980 . On implementing the door‐in‐the‐face compliance technique in a business context . Journal of Marketing Research , 27 : 253 – 258 .
   Google Scholar
• O'Keefe , D.J. 2000 . “ Guilt and social influence ” . In Communication yearbook 23 , Edited by: Roloff , M.E. 67 – 101 . Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• O'Keefe , D.J. and Figge , M. 1997 . A guilt‐based explanation of the door‐in‐the‐face influence strategy . Human Communication Research , 24 : 64 – 81 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Keefe , D. J. and Figge , M. 1999 . Guilt and expected guilt in the door‐in‐the‐face technique . Communication Monographs , 66 : 312 – 324 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Keefe , D. J. and Hale , S. L. 1998 . “ The door‐in‐the‐face influence strategy: A random‐effects meta‐analytic review ” . In Communication yearbook 21 , Edited by: Roloff , M. E. 1 – 33 . Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• O'Keefe , D.J. and Hale , S. L. in press . An odds‐ratio‐based meta‐analysis of research on the door‐in‐the‐face influence strategy . Communication Reports ,
   Google Scholar
• Regan , D. T. , Williams , M. and Sparling , S. 1972 . Voluntary expiation of guilt: A field experiment . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 24 : 42 – 45 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanab , M. E. and Isonio , S. A. 1980 . The effects of delay upon compliance with socially undesirable requests in the door‐in‐the‐face paradigm . Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society , 15 : 76 – 78 .
   Google Scholar
• Shanab , M. E. and O'Neill , P. 1979 . The effects of contrast upon compliance with socially undesirable requests in the door‐in‐the‐face paradigm . Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science , 11 : 236 – 244 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tusing , K.J. and Dillard , J. P. in press . The psychological reality of the door‐in‐the‐face: It's helping, not bargaining . Journal of Language and Social Psychology ,
   Google Scholar