372
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Quantifying Qualitative Scholarship: A Fool’s Errand or a Methodological Necessity?

References

  • Bickel, C. (2012). From black codes to gang injunctions: Apartheid in the United States. In Pacific Sociological Association Annual Conference, March (Vol. 25).
  • Bucerius, S. (2014). Unwanted: Muslim immigrants, dignity, and drug dealing. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199856473.001.0001
  • Curry, D., Decker, S., & Pyrooz, D. (2014). Confronting gangs: Crime and community. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Decker, S. H. (1996). Collective and normative features of gang violence. Justice Quarterly, 13(2), 243–264.10.1080/07418829600092931
  • Decker, S. H., & Lauritsen, J. L. (1996). Breaking the bonds of membership: Leaving the gang. In C. R. Huff (Ed.), Gangs in America (pp. 103–122). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Decker, S., & Lauritsen, J. (2002). Leaving the gang. In C. R. Huff (Ed.), Gangs in America (pp. 51–68). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Decker, S., & Pyrooz, D. (2012). Contemporary gang ethnographies. In Francis T. Cullen & Pam Wilcox (Eds.), Handbook of Criminological Theory (pp. 274–293). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Decker, S. H., & Van Winkle, B. (1996). Life in the gang. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139174732
  • Decker, S., Bynum, T., & Weisel, D. (1998). A tale of two cities: Gangs as organized crime groups. Justice Quarterly, 15, 395–425.10.1080/07418829800093821
  • Decker, S. H., Melde, C., & Pyrooz, D. C. (2013). What do we know about gangs and gang members and where do we go from here? Justice Quarterly, 30(3), 369–402.10.1080/07418825.2012.732101
  • Densley, J. A. (2012). Street gang recruitment: Signaling, screening, and selection. Social Problems, 59(3), 301–321.
  • Esbensen, F., Peterson, D., Taylor, T., & Osgood, W. (2011). Is G.R.E.A.T. effective? In C. Maxson, A. Egley, J. Miller, & M. Klein (Eds.), The modern gang reader (4th ed., pp. 443–450). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Esterberg, K. (2002). Qualitative methods in social research. Boston, MA: McGraw Hill.
  • Fleisher, M. S. (1998). Dead end kids: Gang girls and the boys they know. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
  • Hagedorn, J. M., & Macon, E. (1988). People and folks: Gangs, crime, and the underclass in a rustbelt city. Chicago, IL: Lake View Press.
  • Hennigan, K. M., & Spanovic, M. (2012). Gang dynamics through the lens of social identity theory. In Finn-Aage Esbensen & Cheryl L. Maxson (Eds.), Youth Gangs in International Perspective: Tales from the Eurogang Program of Research (pp. 127–149). New York, NY: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4614-1659-3
  • Hodson, R. (1999). Analyzing documentary accounts. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.10.4135/9781412983372
  • Hughes, L. (2005). Studying youth gangs: Alternative methods and conclusions. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 21(2), 98–119.10.1177/1043986204272875
  • Hughes, L. (2013). Group cohesiveness, gang member prestige and delinquency and violence in Chicago, 1959–1962. Criminology, 51, 785–832.
  • Hughes, L. A., & Short, J. F. (2005). Disputes involving youth street gang members: Micro-social contexts. Criminology, 43(1), 43–76.10.1111/crim.2005.43.issue-1
  • Jerolmack, C., & Khan, S. (2014). Talk is cheap: Ethnography and the attitudinal fallacy. Sociological Methods and Research, 43(2), 178–209.10.1177/0049124114523396
  • Klein, M. (1971). Street gangs and street workers. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Klein, M. W. (2005). The value of comparisons in street gang research. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 21(2), 135–152.
  • Klein, M., & Maxson, C. L. (2006). Street gang patterns and policies. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195163445.001.0001
  • Klein, M., Kerner, H., Maxson, C., & Weitekamp, E. (Eds.). (2001). The Eurogang paradox: Street gangs and youth groups in the U.S. and Europe. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
  • Lauger, T. (2012). Real gangstas: Legitimacy, reputation, and violence in the intergang environment. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
  • Maxson, C. (2001). A proposal for multi-site study of European gangs and youth groups. In The Eurogang (Ed.), Paradox (pp. 299–307). Cham: Springer.
  • Maxson, C. L. (2004). Civil gang injunctions: The ambiguous case of the national migration of a gang enforcement strategy. In Finn Esbensen, Larry Gaines, & Steve Tibbetts (Eds.), American Youth Gangs at the Millennium. Long Grove, IL: Waveland.
  • Maxson, C. & Esbensen, F. (Eds.). (2016). Gang transitions and transformations in an International Context. New York, NY: Springer.
  • Maxson, C., Egley, A., Miller, J., & Klein, M. (Eds.). (2014). The modern gang reader (4th ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • McGloin, J. (2005). Policy and intervention considerations of a network analysis of street gangs. Criminology & Public Policy, 4(3), 607–635.10.1111/cpp.2005.4.issue-3
  • Merry, S. E. (2016). The seductions of quantification: Measuring human rights, gender violence, and sex trafficking. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226261317.001.0001
  • Miller, J. (2001). One of the guys: Girls, gangs and gender. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Miller, J. (2005). The status of qualitative research in criminology. In Michèle Lamont & Patricia White (Eds.), Final report: Workshop on interdisciplinary standards for systematic qualitative research (pp. 69–75). Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
  • Miller, J. & Palacios, W. R. (Eds.). (2015). Qualitative research in criminology. Volume 20, Advances in Criminological Theory. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction.
  • Muñiz, A. (2015). Police, Power, and the Production of Racial Boundaries. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
  • Myers, T. (2009). The unconstitutionality, ineffectiveness, and alternatives of gang injunctions. Michigan Journal of Race & Law, 14(2), 285–306.
  • Papachristos, A. (2009). Murder by structure: Dominance relations and the social structure of gang homicide. American Journal of Sociology, 115(1), 74–128.10.1086/597791
  • Papachristos, A. (2011). The coming of a networked criminology. Advances in criminological theory, 17, 101–140.
  • Pyrooz, D. C. & Decker, S. H. (2011). Motives and methods for leaving the gang: Understanding the process of gang desistance. Journal of Criminal Justice, 39(5), 417–425.
  • Pyrooz, D., & Mitchell, M. (2015). Little gang research, big gang research. The handbook of gangs, 28–58.10.1002/9781118726822
  • Pyrooz, D., Fox, A., Katz, C., & Decker, S. (2012). Gang organization, offending, and victimization: A cross-national analysis. In Finn-Aage Esbensen & Cheryl L. Maxson (Eds.), Youth gangs in international perspective: Tales from the Eurogang program of Research (pp. 85–105). New York, NY: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4614-1659-3
  • Pyrooz, D., Turanovic, J., Decker, S., & Wu, J. (2016). Taking stock of the relationship between gang membership and offending: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 43(3), 365–397.10.1177/0093854815605528
  • Sampson, R., Morenoff, J., & Gannon-Rowley, T. (2002). Assessing “neighborhood effects”: Social processes and new directions in research. Annual Review of Sociology, 28(1), 443–478.10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141114
  • Sanchez-Jankowski, M. (1991). Islands in the street: Gangs and American urban society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  • Scott, D., & Maxson, C. (2016). Gang organization and violence in youth correctional facilities. Journal of Criminological Research, Policy and Practice, 2(2), 81–94.10.1108/JCRPP-03-2015-0004
  • Short, J. (1985). The level of explanation problem in criminology. Theoretical Methods in Criminology, 51–72.
  • Short, J. (1998). The level of explanation problem revisited—The American Society of Criminology 1997 presidential address. Criminology, 36(1), 3–36.10.1111/crim.1998.36.issue-1
  • Short, J., & Strodtbeck, F. (1965). Group Processes and Gang Delinquency. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Spradley, J. (1979). The ethnographic interview. New York, NY: Holt.
  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques, 2, 101–121.
  • Sykes, B. L., Verma, A., & Hancock, B. H. (2017). Aligning sampling and case selection in quantitative-qualitative research designs: Establishing generalizability limits in mixed- method studies. Ethnography, (00), 1–27.
  • Thornberry, T., Huizinga, D., & Loeber, R. (1995). Prevention of serious delinquency and violence: Implications from the program of research on the causes and correlates of delinquency. In James C. Howell & Barry Krisberg (Eds.), Sourcebook on Serious, Violent, and Chronic Juvenile Offenders (pp. 213–237). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Thrasher, F. M. (1927). The Gang. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Vigil, J. D. (1988). Group processes and street identity: Adolescent Chicano gang members. Ethos, 16(4), 421–445.10.1525/eth.1988.16.issue-4
  • Weerman, F., Maxson, C., Esbensen, F., Aldridge, J., Medina, J., & van Gemert, F. (2009). The Eurogang program manual: Background, development and use of Eurogang instruments in multi-site, comparative research.
  • Whyte, W. F. (1943). Street Corner society, the social structure of an Italian slum. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Wong, J. S., Gravel, J., Bouchard, M., Descormiers, K., & Morselli, C. (2016). Promises kept? A meta-analysis of gang membership prevention programs. Journal of Criminological Research, Policy and Practice, 2(2), 134–147.10.1108/JCRPP-06-2015-0018

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.