Clickers and Online Homework in the Criminal Justice Classroom: A Test Study

References

• Addison, S., Wright, A., & Milner, R. (2009). Using clickers to improve student engagement and performance in an introductory biochemistry class. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 37(2), 84–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blood, E., & Neel, R. (2008). Using student response systems in lecture-based instruction: Does it change student learning and engagement? Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 16(3), 375–383.
   Google Scholar
• Bojinova, E. D., & Oigara, J. N. (2011). Teaching and learning with clickers: Are clickers good for students? Interdisciplinary Journal of E-learning and Learning Objects, 7, 169–184.
   Google Scholar
• Bojinova, E. D., & Oigara, J. N. (2013). Teaching and learning with clickers in higher education. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 25(2), 154–165.
   Google Scholar
• Buil, I., Catalan, S., & Martinez, E. (2016). Do clickers enhance learning? A control-value theory approach. Computers & Education, 130, 170–182.
   Google Scholar
• Bunce, D. M., VandenPlas, J. R., & Havanki, K. L. (2006). Comparing the effectiveness on student achievement of a student response system versus online WebCT quizzes. Journal of Chemical Education, 83(3), 488–493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnstein, R. A., & Lederman, L. M. (2001). Using wireless keypads in lecture classes. The Physics Teacher, 39, 8–11.
   Google Scholar
• Caldwell, J. E. (2007). Clickers in the large classroom: Current research and best-practice tips. CBE Life Science Education, 6(1), 9–20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen, H., Cannon, A. R., Taylor, M. C. (2017). Impact of homework assignment delivery systems on student learning outcomes in operations management courses. Journal of the Academy of Business Education, 18, 201–211.
   Google Scholar
• Cutts, Q., Kennedy, G., Mitchell, C. & Draper, S. (2004). Maximizing dialogue in lectures using group response systems. Presented at the 7th IASTED International Conference on Computer and Advanced Technology in Education, August 16–18, 2004, Hawaii.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, D., Meadows, K., & Haffie, T. (2010). The effect of performance feedback on student help-seeking and learning strategy use: Do clickers make a difference? The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 1(1), 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Denker, J. K. (2013). Student response systems and facilitating the large lecture basic communication course: Assessing engagement and learning. Communication Teacher, 27(1), 50–69.
   Google Scholar
• Greer, L., & Heaney, P. J. (2004). Real-time analysis of student comprehension: An assessment of electronic student response technology in an introductory earth science course. Journal of Geoscience Education, 52(4), 345–351.
   Google Scholar
• Grodner, A., & Rupp, N. G. (2011). The role of homework in student learning outcomes: Evidence from a field experiment. Greenville: Eastern Carolina University.
   Google Scholar
• Haas, S. M., & Senjo, S. R. (2004). Perceptions of effectiveness and the actual use of technology-based methods of instruction: A study of California criminal justice and crime-related faculty. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 15(2), 263–285.
   Google Scholar
• Hahn, W., Fairchild, C., & Dowis, W. B. (2013). Online homework managers and intelligent tutoring systems: A study of their impact on student learning in the introductory financial accounting classroom. Issues in Accounting Education, 28(3), 513–535.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, S., Crandall, J., Vogler, J., & Robinson, D. (2013). Classroom response systems facilitate student accountability, readiness, and learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 49(2), 155–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunkel, K. R. (2003). Assessing computer technology in the criminal justice classroom: A case study. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 14(1), 83–104.
   Google Scholar
• Morling, B., McAuliffe, M., Cohen, L., & DiLorenzo, T. M. (2008). Efficacy of personal response systems (“clickers”) in large, introductory psychology classes. Teaching of Psychology, 35(1), 45–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penner J., Kreuze E., Langsam S., & Kreuze, J. (2015). Online homework versus pen and pencil homework: Do the benefits outweigh the costs? Journal of Contemporary Business Issues, 21(1), 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Perdian, C. D. (2013). Early identification of student performance and effort using an online homework system: A pilot study. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(5), 697–701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards-Babb, M., Drelick, J., Henry, Z., & Roberton-Honecker, J. (2011). Online homework, help or hindrance? What students think and how they perform. Journal of College Science Teaching, 40(4), 81–93.
   Google Scholar
• Rothman, S. (2014). A study of twitter and clickers as audience response systems in international relations courses. PS Political Science and Politics, 47(3), 698–702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, J. S., McWilliams, M., Chasen, L., & Farley, J. (2011). Using clickers for clinical reasoning and problem solving. Nurse Educator, 36(1), 13–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stowell, J. R., & Nelson, J. M. (2007). Benefits of electronic audience response systems on student participation, learning, and emotion. Teaching of Psychology, 34(4), 253–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trost, S., & Salehi-Isfahani. D. (2012). The effect of homework on exam performance: Experimental results from principles of economics. Southern Economic Journal, 79(1), 224–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, N. W. (2016). Assessment of students’ learning behavior and academic misconduct in a student-pulled online learning and student-governed testing environment: A case study. Journal of Education for Business, 91(7), 387–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velasco, M., & Cavdar, G. (2013). Teaching large classes with clickers: Results from a teaching experiment in comparative politics. PS Political Science and Politics, 46(4), 823–829.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, P., Syncox, D., & Alters, B. (2011). Clicking for grades? Really? Investigating the use of clickers for awarding grade-points in postsecondary education. Interactive Learning Environments, 19(5), 551–561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, P., Syncox, D., Delaney, D., AvilaAkerberg, O., & Alters, B. (2009). Mid-project report – The sustainability of student response systems (SRS) in undergraduate science classes: A case study. Montreal, Canada: The Tomlinson Project in University-Level Science Education (Internal Report), McGill University.
   Google Scholar
• Woolley, D. J. (2015). Which helps accounting students learn more: Traditional homework, online homework, or clickers? Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 19(3), 337–343.
   Google Scholar
• Wooten, T., & Dillard-Eggers, J. (2013). An investigation of online homework: Required or not required? Contemporary Issues in Education Research, 6(2), 189–198.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, X., & Gao, Y. (2011). Applying the extended technology acceptance model to the use of clickers in student learning: Some evidence from macroeconomics classes. American Journal of Business Education, 4(7), 43–49.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, E. (2007). Teaching with clickers. CRLT Occasional Papers, 22, 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Zou, J. J. (2011). With cheating only a click away, professors reduce the incentive. Chronicle of Higher Education, 58(3), A12–A13.
   Google Scholar