Enabling Student Participation in Course Review and Redesign: Piloting Restorative Practices and Design Thinking in an Undergraduate Criminology Programme

References

• Abdelmalak, M., & Trespalacios, J. (2013). Using a learner-centered approach to develop an educational technology course. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 25(3), 324–332.
   Google Scholar
• Alison, C. C., Franklin, C. A., Fisher, B. S., & Bostaph, L. G. (2019). “They were there for people who needed them”: Student attitudes toward the use of trigger warnings in victimology classrooms. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 30(1), 22–45. doi:10.1080/10511253.2018.1433221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arthur, L. (2009). From performativity to professionalism: Lecturers’ responses to student feedback. Teaching in Higher Education, 14(4), 441–454. doi:10.1080/13562510903050228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartels, L., McGovern, A., & Richards, K. (2015). Degrees of difference? A preliminary study of criminology degrees at Australian universities. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 48(1), 119–146. doi:10.1177/0004865814523437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bason, C. (2018). Leading public sector innovation 2E: Co-creating for a better society. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bessell, S. (2015). Inclusive and respectful relationships as the basis for child inclusive policies and practice: The experience of children in out-of-home care in Australia. In T. Gal & G. Duramy (Eds.), International perspectives and empirical findings on child participation: From social exclusion to child-inclusive policies (pp. 183–206). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blair, E., & Noel, K. (2014). Improving higher education practice through student evaluation systems: Is the student voice being heard? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(7), 879–894. doi:10.1080/02602938.2013.875984
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boivard, T. (2007). Beyond engagement and participation: User and community coproduction of public services. Public Administration Review, 67(5), 846–860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovill, C. (2014). An investigation of co-created curricula within higher education in the UK, Ireland and the USA. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 51(1), 15–25. doi:10.1080/14703297.2013.770264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovill, C., & Bulley, C. (2011). A model of active student participation in curriculum design: Exploring desirability and possiblity. In C. Rust (Ed.), Improving student learning (pp. 176–188). Oxford: Oxford Brookes University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bovill, C., Cook-Sather, A., & Felten, P. (2011). Students as co‐creators of teaching approaches, course design and curricula: Implications for academic developers. International Journal for Academic Development, 16(2), 133–145. doi:10.1080/1360144X.2011.568690
   Google Scholar
• Bovill, C., Morss, K., & Bulley, C. (2009). Should students participate in curriculum design? Discussion arising from a first-year cirriculum design project and a literature review. Pedagogical Research in Maximising Education, 3(2), 17–25.
   Google Scholar
• Bron, J., & Veugelers, W. (2014). Why we need to involve our students in curriculum design: Five arguments for student voice. Curriculum and Teaching Dialogue, 16(1), 125–139.
   Google Scholar
• Brooman, S., Darwent, S., & Pimor, A. (2015). The student voice in higher education curriculum design: Is there value in listening? Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 52(6), 663–674. doi:10.1080/14703297.2014.910128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cares, A., Williams, L., & Hirschel, D. (2013). Teaching about victimization. The Criminologist, 38(4), 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Carey, P. (2013). Student as co-producer in a marketised higher education system: A case study of students’ experience of participation in curriculum design. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 50(3), 250–260. doi:10.1080/14703297.2013.796714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, A. (2015). Teaching with trauma: Trigger warnings, feminism, and disability pedagogy. Disability Studies Quarterly, 35(2), 1–21. doi:10.18061/dsq.v35i2.4652
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, A., & Craft, J. (2019). The twin faces of public sector design. Governance, 32(1), 5–21. doi:10.1111/gove.12342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eraut, M. (2004). Informal learning in the workplace. Studies in Continuing Education, 22(4), 247–273.
   Google Scholar
• Erez, E., Jiang, J., & Laster, K. (2020). From Cinderella to consumer: How crime victims can go to the ball. In J. Tapley & P. Davies (Eds.), Victimology: Research, policy and activism (pp. 321–357). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Flodén, J. (2017). The impact of student feedback on teaching in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(7), 1054–1068. doi:10.1080/02602938.2016.1224997
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freire, P. (1993). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York City: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Gal, T. (2017). An ecological model of child and youth participation. Children and Youth Services Review, 79, 57–64. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.05.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gal, T., & Duramy, G. (2015). Enhancing capacities for child participation: Introduction. In T. Gal & G. Duramy (Eds.), International perspectives and empirical findings on child participation: From social exclusion to child-inclusive policies (pp. 1–16). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, M., Schiff, M., & Cunliffe, R. (2013). Teaching restorative justice: Developing a restorative andragogy for face-to-face, online and hybrid course modalities. Contemporary Justice Review, 16(1), 43–69. doi:10.1080/10282580.2013.769305
   Google Scholar
• Gruber, M., de Leon, N., George, G., & Thompson, P. (2015). Managing by design. Academy of Management Journal, 58(1), 1–7. doi:10.5465/amj.2015.4001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gusheh, M., & Powell, A. (2019). Expanding citizenship: Expanding our understanding. In J. Arvanitakis & I. Matthews (Eds.), The citizen in the 21st century (pp. 109–123). Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, J., Pennell, J., & Rikard, R. (2015). Child and family team meetings: The need for youth participation in educational success. In T. Gal & G. Duramy (Eds.), International perspectives and empirical findings on child participation: From social exclusion to child-inclusive policies (pp. 207–226). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, C. (2013). Towards a pedagogy of public criminology. Enhancing Learning in the Social Sciences, 5(2), 20–31. doi:10.11120/elss.2013.00010
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, C. (2019). Criminal justice culture(s) in Ireland: Quo vadis? Irish Probation Journal, 16, 6–21.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, C. (in press). Crime, justice and criminology in the Republic of Ireland. European Journal of Criminology.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hand, L., & Rowe, M. (2001). Evaluation of student feedback. Accounting Education, 10(2), 147–160. doi:10.1080/09639280110081651
   Google Scholar
• Higher Education Authority. (2019). A spatial & socio-economic profile of higher education institutions in Ireland. Dublin: Higher Education Authority. Retrieve from https://hea.ie/assets/uploads/2019/10/Higher-Education-Spatial-Socio-Economic-Profile-Oct-2019.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Karp, D. (2015). The little book of restorative justice for colleges and universities. New York City: Good Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kember, D., Leung, D., & Kwan, K. (2002). Does the use of student feedback questionaires improve the overall quality of teaching? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(5), 411–425. doi:10.1080/0260293022000009294
   Google Scholar
• Knowles, M. (1984). The art and science of helping adults learn. In M. Knowles (Ed.), Andragogy in action: Applying modern principles of adult learning (pp. 1–24). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Kohm, L. (2015). Teen courts: Children participating in justice. In T. Gal & G. Duramy (Eds.), International perspectives and empirical findings on child participation: From social exclusion to child-inclusive policies (pp. 283–302). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lang, J., & Kersting, M. (2007). Regular feedback from student ratings of instruction: Do college teachers improve their ratings in the long run? Instructional Science, 35(3), 187–205. doi:10.1007/s11251-006-9006-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leckey, J., & Neill, N. (2001). Quantifying quality: The importance of stduent feedback. Quality in Higher Education, 7(1), 19–32. doi:10.1080/13538320120045058
   Google Scholar
• Lundy, L. (2007). Voice’ is not enough: Conceptualising Article 12 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. British Educational Research Journal, 33(6), 927–942. doi:10.1080/01411920701657033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, O., Ahmed, Y., Russell, H., & Hosford, K. (2020). Reflections on Irish criminology: Conversations with criminologists. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Mandouit, L. (2018). Using student feedback to improve teaching. Educational Action Research, 26(5), 755–769. doi:10.1080/09650792.2018.1426470
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marder, I., & O'Brien, W. (2020). E4J webinar series: E4J collaborates with Maynooth University to host Justice Dialogue on restorative approaches to teaching criminal justice. Vienna: United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. Retrieve from https://www.unodc.org/e4j/en/tertiary/events/e4j-webinar-series_restorative-approaches-to-building-trust-and-relationships-in-criminal-justice-classrooms.html
   Google Scholar
• Marder, I., & Wexler, D. (2021). Mainstreaming restorative justice and therapeutic jurisprudence through higher education. University of Baltimore Law Review, 50(3), 400–423.
   Google Scholar
• Mark, H., Phyllis, L., Sandra, C., Morag, G., Norrie, B., Judy, G., & Shirley, E. (2008). Collecting student feedback: a comparison of questionnaire and other methods. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(6), 675–686. doi:10.1080/02602930701773000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martens, S., Meeuwissen, S., Dolmans, D., Bovill, C., & Könings, K. (2019). Student participation in the design of learning and teaching: Disentangling the terminology and approaches. Medical Teacher, 41(10), 1203–1205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeod, J. (2011). Student voice and the politics of listening in higher education. Critical Studies in Education, 52(2), 179–189. doi:10.1080/17508487.2011.572830
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morag, T., & Sorek, Y. (2015). Children's participation in Israeli family courts: An account of an ongoign learning process. In T. Gal & G. Duramy (Eds.), International perspectives and empirical findings on child participation: From social exclusion to child-inclusive policies (pp. 157–182). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nasser, F., & Fresko, B. (2002). Faculty views of student evaluation of college teaching. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(2), 187–198. doi:10.1080/02602930220128751
   Google Scholar
• Neumann, R. (2000). Communicating student evaluation of teaching results: Rating interpretation guides (RIGs). Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(2), 121–134. doi:10.1080/02602930050031289
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, D., Biederman, L., Andersen, D., Ditonto, T., & Roe, K. (2019). Mitigating gender bias in student evaluations of teaching. PLoS One, 14(5), e0216241–10. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0216241
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pointer, L., & Giles-Mitson, A. (2020). Sustained restorative dialogue as a means of understanding and preventing sexually harmful behavior on university campuses. Contemporary Justice Review, 23(1), 22–43. doi:10.1080/10282580.2019.1700467
   Google Scholar
• Pointer, L., McGoey, K., & Farrar, H. (2020). The little book of restorative teaching tools. New York City: Good Books.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, J. (2005). Instruments for obtaining student feedback: A review of the literature. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(4), 387–415.
   Google Scholar
• Shah, M., Cheng, M., & Fitzgerald, R. (2017). Closing the loop on student feedback: The case of Scottish and Australian universities. Higher Education, 74(1), 115–129. doi:10.1007/s10734-016-0032-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stockdale, K., & Sweeney, R. (2019). Exploring the criminology curriculum. In British Society of Criminology - Conference Proceedings. Retrieve from https://www.britsoccrim.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/PBCC19.pdf#page=85
   Google Scholar
• Vaugh, T., Brandes, M., Lynch, G., McNeill, O., & Brigham, A. (2018). Designing the transition to higher education for students from under-represented groups. In Universal Design in Higher Education in Transformation Congress (pp. 1–15). Arrow @ TU Dublin.
   Google Scholar
• Vaugh, T., Finnegan-Kessie, T., Donnellan, P., & Oswald, T. (2020). The potential of design thinking to enable change in higher education. All Ireland Journal of Higher Education, 12(3), 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Weiner, R. (2021). Building solidarity amongst students from underrepresented backgrounds in higher education: Observations from research undertaken at Maynooth University. AHEAD Journal, 12. https://www.ahead.ie/journal/Building-Solidarity-Amongst-Students-from-Underrepresented-Backgrounds-in-Higher-Education-Observations-from-research-undertaken-in-Maynooth-University
   Google Scholar