356
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Redrawing the Boundaries of Criminology: Increasing Forensic Literacy by Including Forensic Studies in the Curriculum

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 250-268 | Received 09 Mar 2022, Accepted 23 Jun 2022, Published online: 12 Jul 2022

References

  • Australia New Zealand Policing Advisory Agency - National Institute of Forensic Science. (n.d.). Forensic science disciplines. Retrieved July 4, 2022 from http://www.anzpaa.org.au/forensic-science/forensic-sciences/forensic-science-disciplines
  • Biedermann, A., Voisard, R., Scoundrianos, A., Furrer, J., Taroni, F., & Champod, C. (2014). Supporting interdisciplinary case studies: Development and implementation of a joint learning environment for students in forensic science and criminal law. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 46(3), 317–329. doi:10.1080/00450618.2013.868926
  • Blagg, H., & Anthony, T. (2019). Decolonising criminology: Imagining justice in a postcolonial world. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Bradford, J., Mowder, D., & Bohte, J. (2016). You can lead students to water, but you can’t make them think: An assessment of student engagement and learning through student-centered teaching. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 16(4), 33–43. doi:10.14434/josotl.v16i4.20106
  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  • Burke, A. S., & Fedorek, B. (2017). Does “flipping” promote engagement? A comparison of a traditional, online and flipped class. Active Learning in Higher Education, 18(1), 11–24. doi:10.1177/1469787417693487
  • Campbell, A. (2011). The fingerprint inquiry report. Edinburgh: APS Group.
  • Carrington, K., Hogg, R., & Sozzo, M. (2016). Southern criminology. British Journal of Criminology, 56(1), 1–20. doi:10.1093/bjc/azv083
  • Casey, E., Ribaux, O., & Roux, C. (2019). The Kodak syndrome: Risks and opportunities created by decentralization of forensic capabilities. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 64(1), 127–136. doi:10.1111/1556-4029.13849
  • Cashman, K., & Henning, T. (2012). Lawyers and DNA: Issues in understanding and challenging the evidence. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 24(1), 69–83. doi:10.1080/10345329.2012.12035945
  • Clark, K., Gerstenblith, S., Alonso, D., Wright, R., & Pandya, N. (2013). Inter-institutional partnerships: The development of a multidisciplinary/interprofessional course in forensics. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 24(3), 357–373. doi:10.1080/10511253.2012.740056
  • Cole, S. A. (2013). Forensic culture as epistemic culture: The sociology of forensic science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 44(1), 36–46. doi:10.1016/j.shpsc.2012.09.003
  • Cole, S. A. (2016). Scandal, fraud, and the reform of forensic science: The case of fingerprint analysis. West Virginia Law Review, 119(2), 523–548.
  • Connell, R. (2007). Southern theory: The global dynamics of knowledge in social science. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.
  • Cordner, S. (2018). Humanitarian forensic science. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 50(6), 1–12. doi:10.1080/00450618.2018.1461930.
  • Crispino, F., Rossy, Q., Ribaux, O., & Roux, C. (2015). Education and training in forensic intelligence: A new challenge. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 47(1), 49–60. doi:10.1080/00450618.2014.906655
  • Cunneen, C., & Rowe, S. (2014). Changing narratives: Colonised peoples, criminology and social work. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 3(1), 49–67. doi:10.5204/ijcjsd.v3i1.138
  • Cunneen, C., & Tauri, J. (2016). Indigenous criminology. Bristol: Policy Press.
  • Dioso-Villa, R. (2015). A repository of wrongful convictions in Australia: First steps toward estimating prevalence and causal contributing factors. Flinders Law Journal, 17, 161–202.
  • Dioso-Villa, R., Julian, R., Kebbell, M., Weathered, L., & Westera, N. (2016). Investigation to exoneration: A systemic review of wrongful conviction in Australia. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 28(2), 157–172. doi:10.1080/10345329.2016.12036066
  • Edmond, G., Carr, S., & Piasecki, E. (2018). Science friction: Streamlined forensic reporting, reliability and justice. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 38(4), 764–792. doi:10.1093/ojls/gqy025
  • Forensic Science Regulator. (2019). Annual report November 2017–November 2018. Birmingham: Forensic Science Regulator. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/786137/FSRAnnual_Report_2018_v1.0.pdf
  • Fradella, H. F., Owen, S. S., & Burke, T. W. (2007). Building bridges between criminal justice and the forensic sciences to create forensic studies programs. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 18(2), 261–282. doi:10.1080/10511250701383376
  • Garrett, B. L., & Fabricant, M. C. (2018). The myth of the reliability test. Fordham Law Review, 86, 1559–1599.
  • Garrett, B. L., Gardner, B. O., Murphy, E., & Grimes, P. (2021). Judges and forensic science education: A national survey. Forensic Science International, 321, e110714. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2021.110714
  • Gieryn, T. F. (1983). Boundary work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review, 48(6), 781–795. doi:10.2307/2095325
  • Gin, J., & Imwinkelried, E. J. (2020). Gas chromatography-mass spectrometer (GC/MS): In scientific evidence, even “gold standard” techniques require close scrutiny. Criminal Law Bulletin, 56(1), 109–149.
  • Henry, J. S. (2014). Promoting the study of wrongful convictions in criminal justice curricula. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 25(2), 236–251. doi:10.1080/10511253.2014.885070
  • Home Office. (2018). Forensics review: Review of the provision of forensic science to the criminal justice system in England and Wales. London: Information Policy Team, National Archives.
  • House of Lords. (2019). Forensic science and the criminal justice system: A blueprint for change (Science and Technology Select Committee, 3rd Report of Session 2017–19). London: House of Lords.
  • Howes, L. M. (2017). “Sometimes I give up on the report and ring the scientist”: Bridging the gap between what forensic scientists write and what police investigators read. Policing and Society, 27(5), 541–559. doi:10.1080/10439463.2015.1089870
  • Human Rights Watch. (2017, December 13). China: Minority region collects DNA from millions. HRW News. Retrieved from www.hrw.org/news/2017/12/13/chinaminorityregion-collects-dna-millions
  • Illes, M., Wilson, P., & Bruce, C. (2020). Forensic epistemology: A need for research and pedagogy. Forensic Science International. Synergy, 2, 51–59. doi:10.1016/j.fsisyn.2019.11.004
  • Innocence Project. (2022). Explore the numbers: Innocence Project’s impact. Retrieved May 31, 2022 from https://innocenceproject.org/exonerations-data/
  • Julian, R., Howes, L., & White, R. (2022). Critical forensic studies. London: Routledge.
  • Julian, R., & Jendly, M. (2018). A rendezvous between forensic science and criminology: Towards a public forensic criminology? In Q. Rossy, D. Décary-Hétu, O. Delémont, & M. Mulone (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of forensic criminology (pp. 48–61). London: Routledge.
  • Julian, R., Kelty, S., & Robertson, J. (2012). “Get it right the first time”: Critical issues at the crime scene. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 24(1), 25–37. doi:10.1080/10345329.2012.12035942
  • Kelty, S. F., Julian, R., Bruenisholz, E., & Wilson-Wilde, L. (2018). Dismantling the justice silos: Flowcharting the role and expertise of forensic science, forensic medicine and allied health in adult sexual assault investigations. Forensic Science International, 285, 21–28. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.01.015
  • Kelty, S. F., Julian, R., & Ross, A. (2013). Dismantling the justice silos: Avoiding the pitfalls and reaping the benefits of information- sharing between forensic science, medicine and law. Forensic Science International, 230(1-3), 8–15.
  • Knepper, P. (2018). Twin sciences? The history of forensic science and criminology. In Q. Rossy, D. Décary-Hétu, O. Delémont & M. Mulone (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of forensic criminology (pp. 7–17). London: Routledge.
  • Kruse, C. (2016). The social life of forensic evidence. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
  • Lawless, C. (2010). A curious reconstruction? The shaping of ‘marketized’ forensic science. London: Centre of Analysis of Risk and Regulation, the London School of Economics and Political Science.
  • Lawless, C. (2016). Forensic science: A sociological introduction. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Ludwig, A., Fraser, J., & Williams, R. (2012). Crime scene examiners and volume crime investigations: An empirical study of perception and practice. Forensic Science Policy & Management: An International Journal, 3(2), 53–61. doi:10.1080/19409044.2012.728680
  • Machado, H., & Silva, S. (2019). What influences public views on forensic DNA testing in the criminal field? A scoping review of quantitative evidence. Human Genomics, 13(1), 23. doi:10.1186/s40246-019-0207-5
  • Mann, M., & Daly, A. (2019). (Big) data and the North-in-South: Australia’s informational imperialism and digital colonialism. Television & New Media, 20(4), 379–395. doi:10.1177/1527476418806091
  • Martire, K. A., & Edmond, G. (2017). Rethinking expert opinion evidence. Melbourne University Law Review, 40, 967–998.
  • McCartney, C., & Cassella, J. (2008). When science doesn’t meet the law: Addressing the absence of forensic skills in law degrees. New Directions, 4, 1–4. doi:10.29311/ndtps.v0i4.367
  • Mnookin, J. (2001). Scripting expertise: The history of handwriting identification evidence and the judicial construction of reliability. Virginia Law Review, 87(8), 1723–1845. doi:10.2307/1073905
  • Morelato, M., Baechler, S., Ribaux, O., Beavis, A., Tahtouh, M., Kirkbride, P., … Margot, P. (2014). Forensic intelligence framework – Part I: Induction of a transversal model by comparing illicit drugs and false identity documents monitoring. Forensic Science International, 236, 181–190. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.12.045
  • Mousseau, V., Baechler, S., & Crispino, F. (2019). Management of crime scene units by Quebec police senior managers: Insight on forensic knowledge and understanding of key stakeholders. Science & Justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society, 59(5), 524–532. doi:10.1016/j.scijus.2019.04.004
  • Murphy, E. (2010). Relative doubt: Familial searches of DNA databases. Michigan Law Review, 109, 291–348.
  • National Academy of Sciences. (2009). Strengthening forensic science in the US: A path forward. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  • National Registry of Exonerations. (2022, May 31). % exonerations by contributing factor. Retrieved from https://www.law.umich.edu/special/exoneration/Pages/ExonerationsContribFactorsByCrime.aspx
  • Oosthuizen, T., & Howes, L. M. (2022). The development of forensic DNA analysis: New debates on the issue of fundamental human rights. Forensic Science International. Genetics, 56, 102606. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2021.102606
  • Peterson, J. L., Hickman, M. J., Strom, K. J., & Johnson, D. J. (2013). Effect of forensic evidence on criminal justice case processing. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 58(S1), S78–S90. doi:10.1111/1556-4029.12020
  • President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. (2016). Forensic science in criminal courts: Ensuring scientific validity of feature-comparison methods. Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President.
  • Raymond, T., & Julian, R. (2015). Forensic intelligence in policing: Organisational and cultural change. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 47(4), 371–385. doi:10.1080/00450618.2015.1052759
  • Ribaux, O. (2019). Reframing forensic science and criminology for catalyzing innovation in policing practices. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 13(1), 5–11. doi:10.1093/police/pax057
  • Roux, C., Willis, S., & Weyermann, C. (2021). Shifting forensic science from means to purpose: A path forward for the discipline? Science & Justice, 61(6), 678–686. doi:10.1016/j.scijus.2021.08.005
  • Sallavaci, O. (2016). Streamlined reporting of forensic evidence in England and Wales: Is it the way forward? The International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 20(3), 235–249. doi:10.1177/1365712716643549
  • Smit, N. M., Morgan, R. M., & Lagnado, D. A. (2018). A systematic analysis of misleading evidence in unsafe rulings in England and Wales. Science & Justice, 58(2), 128–137. doi:10.1016/j.scijus.2017.09.005
  • Vincent, F. (2010). Report: Inquiry into the circumstances that led to the conviction of Mr Farah Abdulkadir Jama. Melbourne: State Government of Victoria.
  • Weyermann, C., & Roux, C. (2021). A different perspective on the forensic science crisis. Forensic Science International, 323, 110779. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2021.110779
  • White, R. (2022). Theorising green criminology: Selected essays. London: Routledge.
  • White, R., Perrone, S., & Howes, L. (2019). Crime, criminality and criminal justice. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
  • Williams, A. (2015). Forensic criminology. London: Routledge.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.