Analyzing and judging the manifest rationality of Gloria Steinem’s “Supremacy Crimes”

References

• Arendt, Hannah. 1970. On Violence. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
   Google Scholar
• Aristotle. 1926. ‘Art’ of Rhetoric. Translated by J. H. Freese. Cambridge, MA: Loeb Classical Library, Reprint 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, Carrie, and Nan Stein. 2016. “Obscuring Gender-Based Violence: Marriage Promotion and Teen Dating Violence Research.” Journal of Women, Politics, & Policy 37 (1): 87–109. doi:10.108/1554477X.2016.1116301
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. M. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Translated by Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. M. 1986. Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Translated by Vern W McGee. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boger, George. 2005. “Subordinating Truth—Is Acceptability Acceptable?” Argumentation 19: 187–238. doi:10.1007/s10503-oo5-6578-x.
   Google Scholar
• Booth, Wayne C. 1974. Modern Dogma and the Rhetoric of Assent. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Booth, Wayne C. 2004. The Rhetoric of Rhetoric: The Quest for Effective Communication. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, Pierre. 1991. Language and Symbolic Power. Translated by Gino Raymond and Matthew Adamson. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, Kenneth. 1945. A Grammar of Motives. Berkeley: University of California Press, Reprint 1969.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, Kenneth. 1950 . A Rhetoric of Motives. Berkeley: University of California Press, Reprint 1969.
   Google Scholar
• Clastres, Pierre. 1980. Archeology of Violence. Translated by Jeanine J. Herman. Los Angeles, CA: Semiotext(E) Foreign Agents Series, Reprint 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Crosswhite, James. 1989. “Universality in Rhetoric: Perelman’s Universal Audience.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 22: 157–173.
   Google Scholar
• Editor’s Note. 1999–2000. “Letters to the Editor.” Ms., Dec.–Jan: 6.
   Google Scholar
• Eemeren, F. H. van, Peter Houtlosser, and Francisca Snoek Henkemans. 2007. Argumentative Indicators in Discourse: A Pragma-Dialectical Study. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, Susan. 1991. Backlash: The Undeclared War against American Women. New York: Crown.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, Thomas B. 1977. “Validity and Rationality: The Rhetorical Constituents of Argumentation Form.” Journal of the American Forensics Association 13: 142–149.
   Google Scholar
• Finocchiaro, Maurice A. 2013. Meta-argumentation: An Approach to Logic and Argumentation Theory. London: College Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, J. D. 2010. “Supremacy Crimes.” DJbloggers.
   Google Scholar
• Govier, Trudy. 1998. “Arguing Forever? Or Two Tiers of Argument Appraisal.” OSSA Conference Archive, University of Windsor.
   Google Scholar
• Gross, Allen. 1999. “A Theory of the Rhetorical Audience: Reflections on Chaim Perelman.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 85 (2): 203–211. doi:10.1080/00335639909384254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, Pat. 1999–2000. “Letters to the Editor.” Ms., Dec.–Jan: 6.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, Ralph H. 2000. Manifest Rationality: A Pragmatic Theory of Argument. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Jorgenson, Christine. 2009. “Interpreting Perelman’s Universal Audience: Gross versus Crosswhite,” Argumentation 23: 11–19. doi:10.1007/s10503-008-9117-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keith, Carolyn. 1999–2000. “Letters to the Editor.” Ms., Dec.–Jan: 4.
   Google Scholar
• Madfis, Eric. 2014. “Triple Entitlement and Homicidal Anger: An Exploration of the Intersection Identities of American Mass Murderers.” Men and Masculinities 17 (1): 67–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumford, Lewis. 1964. The Myth of the Machine: The Pentagon of Power. Vol.1. New York: Harcourt Brace, Reprint 1970.
   Google Scholar
• Oswald, Steve and Alain Ribs. 2014. “Metaphor as Argument: Rhetorical and Epistemic Advantages of Extended Metaphors.” Argumentation 28: 133–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patten, Patsy. 1999–2000. “Letters to the Editor.” Ms., Dec.–Jan: 6.
   Google Scholar
• Pepper, Stephen C. 1942. World Hypotheses: A Study in Evidence. Berkeley: University of California Press, Reprint 1970.
   Google Scholar
• Perelman, Ch[aim] and L[ucie] Olbrechts-Tyteca. 1969. The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation. Translated by John Wilkinson and Purcell Weaver. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
   Google Scholar
• Plantin, Christian. 2011. “Analogie et Metaphor Argumentatives,” A Contrario 16 (2): 110–130.
   Google Scholar
• Rainer, Ulrike. 1999–2000. “Letters to the Editor.” Ms. Dec.–Jan: 6.
   Google Scholar
• Santibáñez, Cristián. 2010. “Metaphors and Argumentation: The Case of Chilean Parliamentarian Media Participation.” Journal of Pragmatics 42: 973–989.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sevier, Brian, and Catherine Ashcraft. 2009. “Be Careful What You Wish For: Exploring the Confusion around and Usefulness of the Male Teacher as Male Role Model Discourse.” Men and Masculinities 11 (5): 533–557.
   Google Scholar
• Steinem, Gloria. 1999–2000. “Supremacy Crimes.” Ms. Aug.-Sept., 1999–2000, 45–47.
   Google Scholar
• Steinem, Gloria. 2012. “Gloria Steinem: The Original Ms.” Interview by Marlo Thomas. June 15, updated August 15.
   Google Scholar
• Tindale, Christopher W. 2002. “A Concept Divided: Ralph Johnson’s Definition of Argument.” Argumentation 16: 299–309.
   Google Scholar
• Tindale, Christopher W. 2010. Reason’s Dark Champions: Constructive Strategies of Sophistic Argument. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Toulmin, Stephen, Richard Reike, and Alan Janik. 1984. An Introduction to Reasoning. New York: Macmillan Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau. 1999. Population Profile of the United States. Washington, DC: United States Census Bureau.
   Google Scholar
• Walton, Douglas. 2006. Fundamentals of Critical Argumentation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• White, Hayden. 1978. Tropics of Discourse: Essays in Cultural Criticism. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, Cihua, and Yicheng Wu. 2014. “Metaphors in the Perspective of Argumentation.” Journal of Pragmatics 62: 68–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar