Exploring meaning-making practices via co-speech gestures in TED Talks

References

• Anderson, C. (2016). TED talks. The Official TED Guide to Public Speaking. Mariner.
   Google Scholar
• Baldry, A., & Thibault, P. J. (2006). Multimodal transcription and text analysis. Equinox.
   Google Scholar
• Calbris, G. (2008). From left to right…: Co-verbal gestures and their symbolic use of space. In A. Cienki & C. Müller (Eds.), Metaphor and gesture (pp. 27–54). John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Caliendo, G. (2012). The popularisation of science in web-based genres. In G. Caliendo & G. Bongo (Eds.), The language of popularisation: Theoretical and descriptive models (pp. 101–132). Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Caliendo, G., & Compagnone, A. (2014). Expressing epistemic stance in university lectures and TED talks: A contrastive corpus-based analysis. Lingue e Linguaggi, 11, 105–122.
   Google Scholar
• Carney, N. (2014). Is there a place for instructed gesture in EFL? In N. Sonda & A. Krause (Eds.), JALT 2013 Conference Proceedings (pp. 413–421). JALT.
   Google Scholar
• Church, R. B., Alibali, M. W., & Kelly, S. D. (Eds.). (2017). Why gesture? How the hands function in speaking, thinking and communicating. John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Compagnone, A. (2014). Knowledge dissemination and environmentalism: Exploring the language of TED Talks. In E. Chiavetta, S. Sciarrino & C. Williams (Eds.), Popularisation and the media (pp. 7–25). Edipuglia.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford Camiciottoli, B. (2019). Detecting ideological stance in an economics lecture: A multi-faceted approach. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Dummett, P., Stephenson, H., Lansford, L. (2016). Keynote. National Geographic Learning, CENGAGE Learning. http://www.eltkeynote.com/
   Google Scholar
• Eisenstein, J., Barzilay, R., & Davis, R. (2008, June). Gestural cohesion for topic segmentation. In Proceedings of ACL-08: HLT (pp. 852–860). Association for Computational Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Gullberg, M., & McCafferty, S. G. (2008). Introduction to gesture and SLA: Toward an integrated approach. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30, 133–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Hostetter, A. B. (2011). When do gestures communicate? A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 137(2), 297–315. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022128
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jewitt, C. (Ed.). (2014). The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kendon, A. (2004). Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication (2nd ed.). Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Laudisio, A. (2013, November). Popularization in TED talks: A contrastive analysis of expertise asymmetry [paper presentation]. CLAVIER 13 Conference Discourse in and through the Media. Recontextualizing and Reconceptualizing Expert Discourse, Modena.
   Google Scholar
• Lazaraton, A. (2004). Gesture and speech in the vocabulary explanations of one ESL teacher: A microanalytic inquiry. Language Learning, 54(1), 79–117. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2004.00249.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ledin, P., & Machin, D. (2018). Multimodal critical discourse analysis. In J. Flowerdew & J. E. Richardson (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of critical discourse studies (pp. 60–76). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Littlemore, J., & Low, G. (2006). Figurative thinking and foreign language learning. Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Littlemore, J., MacArthur, F., Cienki, A., & Holloway, J. (2012). How to make yourself understood by international students: The role of metaphor in academic tutorials. ELT Research Papers 12-06. British Council.
   Google Scholar
• Macedonia, M., & von Kriegstein, K. (2012). Gestures enhance foreign language learning. Biolinguistics, 6(3-4), 393–416.
   Google Scholar
• Masi, S. (2016). Gestures in motion in TED talks: Towards multimodal literacy. In V. Bonsignori, B. Crawford Camiciottoli (Eds.), Multimodality across communicative settings, discourse domains and genres (pp.146–165). Cambridge Scholars.
   Google Scholar
• Masi, S. (2019a). Complex mapping of words and gestures in TED Talks. In V. Bonsignori, G. Cappelli & E. Mattiello (Eds), Worlds of words: Complexity, creativity, and conventionality in English language, literature and culture (pp. 115–126). Pisa University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Masi, S. (2019b, November). Disseminating knowledge through TED talks for children [paper presentation]. Research Perspectives on ESP in a Digital Age, University of Pisa.
   Google Scholar
• Masi, S. (2020). The multimodal representation of ‘Ideas worth spreading’ through TED Talks. Lingue e Linguaggi, 36, 155–171.
   Google Scholar
• Mattiello, E. (2017). The popularisation of science via TED Talks. International Journal of Language Studies, 11(4), 69–98.
   Google Scholar
• McCafferty, S. G., & Stam, G. (Eds.). (2008). Gesture. Second language acquisition and classroom research. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: What the hands reveal about thought. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• McNeill, D. (2005). Gesture and thought. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• McNeill, D., Levy, E. T., & Duncan, S. (2015). Gesture in discourse. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen & H. E. Hamilton (Eds.), Handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 262–319). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Merlini, L. (1981). Elementi metatestuali nel discorso argomentativo inglese. Annali di Lingue e Letterature Germaniche dell’Università di Parma 1980-81 (pp. 183–201). Bulzoni.
   Google Scholar
• Mittelberg, I. (2008). Peircean semiotics meets conceptual metaphor: Iconic modes in gestural representations of grammar. In A. Cienki & C. Müller (Eds.), Metaphor and Gesture (pp. 115–154). John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, C. (2008). What gestures reveal about the nature of metaphor. In A. Cienki & C. Müller (Eds.), Metaphor and gesture (pp. 219–245). John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• O’Halloran, K. L., Tan, S., & Smith, B. A. (2016). Multimodal approaches to English for academic purposes. In K. Hyland & P. Shaw (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of English for academic purposes (pp. 257–270). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Scotto di Carlo, G. (2015). Stance in TED talks: Strategic use of subjective adjectives in online popularisation. Ibérica, 29, 201–222.
   Google Scholar
• Scotto di Carlo, G. (2013). Humour in popularisation: Analysis of humour-related laughter in TED talks. European Journal of Humour Research, 1(4), 81–93. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7592/EJHR2013.1.4.scottodicarlo
   Google Scholar
• Scotto di Carlo, G. (2014a). Ethos in TED talks: The role of credibility in popularised texts. Facta Universitatis – Linguistics and Literature, 2, 81–91.
   Google Scholar
• Scotto di Carlo, G. (2014b). New trends in knowledge dissemination: TED Talks. Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture, 36(2), 121–130. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4025/actascilangcult.v36i2.22619
   Google Scholar
• Scotto di Carlo, G. (2014c). The role of proximity in online popularizations: The case of TED Talks. Discourse Studies, 16(5), 591–606. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445614538565
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Servinis, E. (2013). Making the most of the TED talks in the EAP classroom. Contact, 39(3), 54–56.
   Google Scholar
• Takaesu, A. (2014). TED Talks as an extensive listening resource for EAP students. Language Education in Asia, 4(2), 150–162. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5746/LEiA/13/V4/I2/A05/Takaesu
   Google Scholar
• Taleghani-Nikazm, C. (2008). Gestures in foreign language classrooms: An empirical analysis of their organization and function. In M. Bowles, R. Foote, S. Perpiñán & R. Bhatt (Eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 2007 Second Language Research Forum (pp. 229–238). Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
   Google Scholar
• Tseronis, A., & Forceville, C. (2017). Multimodal argumentation and rhetoric in media genres. John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Valeiras Jurado, J. (2017). A Multimodal Approach to Persuasion in Oral Presentations. The case of conference presentations, research dissemination talks and product pitches. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Universitat Jaume I/Ghent University.
   Google Scholar
• Valeiras-Jurado, J., & Ruiz-Madrid, N. (2019). Multimodal enactment of characters in conference presentations. Discourse Studies, 21(5), 561–583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Leeuwen, T. (2005). Introducing social semiotics. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, M. (2010). Multimodal literacy: What does it mean for classroom practice? Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 33(3), 211–223.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, R. (1996). Linguistic features of metaphoric gestures. In L. Messing (Ed.), Proceedings of WIGLS. The Workshop on the Integration of Gesture in Language and Speech (pp. 79–95). Applied Science and Engineering Laboratories Newark.
   Google Scholar
• Wingrove, P. (2017). How suitable are TED talks for academic listening? Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 30, 79–95. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2017.10.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar