Addressing Restrictive Zoning for Affordable Housing: Experiences in Four States

References

• American FactFinder. (n.d.). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. Retrieved from http://factfinder.census.gov/home/saff/main.html?_lang = en.
   Google Scholar
• Basolo, V., & Scally, C. P. (2008). State innovations in affordable housing policy: Lessons from California and New Jersey. Housing Policy Debate, 19, 741–774.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bratt, R.G., with assistance fromVladeck, A.2012. Overcoming restrictive zoning for affordable housing in five states: Observations for Massachusetts. Boston, MA: Citizens' Housing and Planning Association. Retrieved from https://www.chapa.org/housing-policy/research-reports/overcoming-restrictive-zoning-affordable-housing-five-states.
   Google Scholar
• Bratt, R. G., DeGenova, A., Goodwin, B., Moriarty, S., & Robitaille, J. (2012). Fear of affordable housing: Perception vs. reality. Shelterforce, 34, 36–39.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, X. de S., Popkin, S., & Goering, J. (2010). Moving to Opportunity: The story of an American experiment to fight ghetto poverty. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Callies, D. L., King, L. A., Nicholas, J. C., & Barclay, C. T. (2011). Workforce and affordable housing: Local government inclusionary housing programs and the courts. Planning & Environmental Law, 63, 3–10.
   Google Scholar
• Census CD 1970 and Census CD 1980 in 2000 Boundaries (2002). The Geolytics information can be found as follows: http://www.geolytics.com.
   Google Scholar
• Citizens’ Housing and Planning Association. (2011). Fact sheet on Chapter 40B: The state's affordable housing zoning law. Boston, MA: Author. Retrieved from http://www.chapa.org/sites/default/files/Fact%20Sheet%20on%20Chapter%2040B%202011%20update.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Community Preservation Act, Mass. Gen. Laws, ch 44B (2000)
   Google Scholar
• Comprehensive Permit Act, Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 40B, §§ 20–23 (1968)
   Google Scholar
• Deng, L. (2011). The external neighborhood effects of Low-Income Housing Tax Credit projects built by three sectors. Journal of Urban Affairs, 33, 143–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Housing and Community Development. (2013). Chapter 40B Subsidized Housing Inventory (SHI) as of April 30, 2013. Retrieved from http://www.mass.gov/hed/docs/dhcd/hd/shi/shiinventory.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ellen, I. G. (2008). Spillovers and subsidized housing: The impact of subsidized rental housing on neighborhoods. In N. P.Retsinas & E. S.Belsky (Eds.), Revisiting rental housing: Policies, programs and priorities (pp. 144–158). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fair Housing Act. N.J.S.A. 52:27D-301 (1985)
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, L. (2007). Chapter 40B permitting and litigation: A report by the Housing Affordability Initiative. Cambridge, MA: MIT Center for Real Estate. Retrieved from http://mitcre.mit.edu/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/40B-report_fisher_07-0618.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Flores, M. (2009, October 9). Inspector general cites waste, fraud and abuse in 40B. Wicked Local. Retrieved from http://www.wickedlocal.com/x366048201/Inspector-general-cites-waste-fraud-and-abuse-in-40B.
   Google Scholar
• Funderburg, R., & MacDonald, H. (2010). Neighbourhood valuation effects from new construction of Low-Income Housing Tax Credit projects in Iowa: A natural experiment. Urban Studies, 47, 1745–1771.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galster, G., Levy, D. K., Sawyer, N., Temkin, K., & Walker, C. (2005). The impact of community development corporations on urban neighborhoods. Washington, DC: Urban Institute. Retrieved from http://www.urban.org/UploadedPDF/311217_CDCs.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Galster, G., Temkin, K., Walker, C., & Sawyer, N. (2004). Measuring the impacts of community development initiatives: A new application of the adjusted interrupted time-series method. Evaluation Review, 28, 502–538.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaeser, E. L., Schuetz, J., & Ward, B. (2006). Regulation and the rise of housing prices in Greater Boston: A study based on new data from 187 communities in Eastern Massachusetts. Boston, MA: Pioneer Institute. Retrieved from http://www.hks.harvard.edu/rappaport/downloads/housing_regulations/regulation_housingprices.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Goetz, E. G. (2000). Fair share or status quo? The Twin Cities Livable Communities Act. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 20, 37–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goetz, E. G., & Chapple, K. (2010). You gotta move: Advancing the debate on the record of dispersal. Housing Policy Debate, 20, 209–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goetz, E. G., Chapple, K., & Lukermann, B. (2004). The Minnesota Land Use Planning Act and the promotion of low- and moderate-income housing in suburbia. Law and Inequality, 22, 31–72.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, A. M. (2009). Jumpstarting the economy by creating housing: What COAH really means for New Jersey's communities. Cherry Hill, NJ: Fair Share Housing Center.
   Google Scholar
• Hasse, J., Reiser, J., & Pichacz, A. (2011). Evidence of persistent exclusionary effects of land use policy within historic and projected development patterns in New Jersey: A case study of Monmouth and Somerset Counties. Glassboro, NJ: Geospatial Research Laboratory, Rowan University.
   Google Scholar
• Ihlanfeldt, K. R. (2004). Exclusionary land-use regulations within suburban communities: A review of the evidence and policy prescriptions. Urban Studies, 41, 261–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawitzky, S., Freiberg, F., Houk, D. L., & Hankins, S. (2013). Choice constrained, segregation maintained: Using federal tax credits to provide affordable housing. New York, NY: Fair Housing Justice Center.
   Google Scholar
• Knaap, G., Meck, S., Moore, T., & Parker, R. (2007). Zoning as a barrier to multifamily housing development(Report No. 548). Chicago, IL: Planning Advisory Service, American Planning Association.
   Google Scholar
• Kneebone, E., & Garr, E. (2010). The suburbanization of poverty: Trends in metropolitan America, 2000 to 2008. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution. Retrieved from http://www.brookings.edu/papers/2010/0120_poverty_kneebone.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Krefetz, S. P. (2001). The impact and evolution of the Massachusetts Comprehensive Permit and Zoning Appeals Act: Thirty years of experience with a state legislative effort to overcome exclusionary zoning. Western New England Law Review, 22, 381–430.
   Google Scholar
• Ludwig, J., Duncan, G. J., Gennetian, L. A., Katz, L. F., Kessler, R. C., Kling, J. R., & Sanbonmatsu, L. (2013). Long-term neighborhood effects on low-income families: Evidence from Moving to Opportunity. American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings, 103, 226–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallach, A. (2009). Decent home: Planning, building, and preserving affordable housing. Chicago, IL: American Planning Association.
   Google Scholar
• Mallach, A., & Calavita, N. (2010). United States: From radical intervention to mainstream housing policy. In N.Calavita & A.Mallach (Eds.), Inclusionary housing in international perspective: Affordable housing, social inclusion, and land value recapture (pp. 15–77). Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Massey, D. S., Albright, L., Casciano, R., Derickson, E., & Kinsey, D. N. (2013). Climbing Mount Laurel: The struggle for affordable housing and social mobility in an American suburb. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McClure, K. (2010). Are Low-Income Housing Tax Credit developments locating where there is a shortage of affordable units?Housing Policy Debate, 20, 153–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery County Department of Housing and Community Affairs. (2010). Number of MPDUs produced since 1976, including data through 2010.
   Google Scholar
• National Commission on Urban Problems. (1968). Building the American city: Report to the Congress and to the President of the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• National Low Income Housing Coalition. (2013, September 27). New Jersey Supreme Court decisions affirm Mount Laurel doctrine, separate decision protects supportive housing. Retrieved from http://nlihc.org/article/new-jersey-supreme-court-decisions-affirm-mount-laurel-doctrine-separate-decision-protects-s.
   Google Scholar
• New Jersey Council on Affordable Housing, 2008. Third Round Substantive Rules, Chapter 5:97, with amendments through October 20.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, M. T. (2005). Does affordable housing detrimentally affect property values? A review of the literature. Journal of Planning Literature, 20(1), 15–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pendall, R. (2000). Local land use regulation and the chain of exclusion. Journal of the American Planning Association, 66, 125–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pendall, R. (2008). From hurdles to bridges: Local land-use regulations and the pursuit of affordable rental housing. In N. P.Retsinas & E. S.Belsky (Eds.), Revisiting rental housing: Policies, programs, and priorities (pp. 225–274). Washington, DC: Joint Center for Housing Studies & Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pollakowski, H. O., Ritchay, D., & Weinrobe, Z. (2005). Effects of mixed-income, multi-family rental housing developments on single-family housing values. Cambridge, MA: MIT Center for Real Estate. Retrieved from http://community-wealth.org/sites/clone.community-wealth.org/files/downloads/paper-pollatowski-et-al.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Rhode Island Housing Resources Commission. (2006). Rhode Island five year strategic housing plan: 2006–2010. Retrieved from http://www.planning.ri.gov/documents/guide_plan/shp06.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Rhode Island Comprehensive Planning and Land Use Act, R.I. Gen. Laws § 45–22.2–6 (2011)
   Google Scholar
• Roman, S. (2008, February 9). Briefing on inclusionary zoning: The MPDU program, Montgomery County, Maryland [PowerPoint presentation].
   Google Scholar
• Rothwell, J., & Massey, D. S. (2009). The effect of density zoning on racial segregation in U.S. urban areas. Urban Affairs Review, 44, 779–806.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salsich, P. W., Jr. (2003). The impact of land use laws on affordable housing. Unpublished manuscript, Saint Louis University, School of Law, MO. Retrieved from http://www.ewgateway.org/pdffiles/BluePrintDocs/LandUseLaws.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Scally, C. P., & Koenig, R. (2012). Beyond NIMBY and poverty deconcentration: Reframing the outcomes of affordable rental housing development. Housing Policy Debate, 22, 435–461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, H. (2010). Housing policy is school policy: Economically integrative housing promotes academic success in Montgomery County, Maryland. New York, NY: Century Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, H. L., Ecola, L., Leuschner, K. J., & Kofner, A. (2012). Is inclusionary housing inclusionary? A guide for practitioners. Arlington, TX: RAND.
   Google Scholar
• Smart Growth Zoning Overlay District Act, Mass. Gen. Laws, ch 40R and ch 40S (2004)
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. P. (2012, October 26). NJ Supreme Court to hear oral argument on COAH third round affordable housing regulation. Gibbons Real Property & Environmental Law Alert. Retrieved from http://www.rpelawalert.com/2012/10/articles/development/nj-supreme-court-to-hear-oral-argument-on-coah-third-round-affordable-housing-regulations/.
   Google Scholar
• Stonefield, S. (2001). Affordable housing in suburbia: The importance but limited power and effectiveness of the state override tool. Western New England Law Review, 22, 323–354.
   Google Scholar
• Summary of Zoning Reform Bill. (2013). An act promoting the planning and development of sustainable communities. House Docket #3216. Retrieved from http://ma-smartgrowth.org/wp-content/uploads/Summary-of-Consensus-Bill-Final-1-22-13.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Tegeler, P. D. (2005). The persistence of segregation in government housing programs. In X. de S.Briggs (Ed.), The geography of opportunity: Race and housing choice in metropolitan America (pp. 197–216). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• The HUD LIHTC database. Accessed at: http://lihtc.huduser.org.
   Google Scholar
• Vladeck, A. (2010). A reasonable methodology? Measuring the effects of the Mount Laurel doctrine on residential segregation (Unpublished master's thesis). Tufts University, Medford, MA.
   Google Scholar
• West v. McDonald. 18 A.3d 526 (R.I. 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, W. J. (1987). The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Witten, J. D. (2003). The cost of developing affordable housing: At what price?Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review, 30, 509–554.
   Google Scholar