1,015
Views
25
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Housing Programs Fail to Deliver on Neighborhood Quality, Reexamined

&
Pages 463-496 | Received 03 Dec 2013, Accepted 08 Jul 2014, Published online: 22 Aug 2014

References

  • Baer, W. C. (2008). California's fair-share housing 1967–2004: The planning approach. Journal of Planning History, 7, 48–71.
  • Basolo, V., & Nguyen, M. (2005). Does mobility matter? The neighborhood conditions of housing voucher holders by race and ethnicity. Housing Policy Debate, 16, 297–324.
  • Berry, J. M., Portney, K. E., & Thompson, K. (1993). The rebirth of urban democracy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
  • Devine, D. J., Gray, R. W., Rubin, L. B., & Taghavi, L. (2003). Housing choice voucher location patterns: Implications for participants and neighborhood welfare. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
  • Donovan, S. (2010, March 17). Testimony of Secretary Shaun Donovan: Hearing on Choice Neighborhoods legislation before the House Financial Services Committee. Retrieved from http://portal.hud.gov/portal/page/portal/HUD/press/testimonies/2010/2010-03-17.
  • Downs, A. (1990). A strategy for designing a fully comprehensive national housing policy for the federal government of the United States. In D. DiPasquale & L. C. Keys (Eds.), Building foundations (pp. 61–112). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
  • Downs, A. (1991). The Advisory Commission on Regulatory Barriers to Affordable Housing: Its behavior and accomplishments. Housing Policy Debate, 2, 1095–1137.
  • Duke, J. (2010). Exploring homeowner opposition to public housing developments. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 37, 49–74.
  • Ellen, I. G. E., Schwartz, A. E., Voicu, I., & Schill, M. H. (2007). Does federally subsidized rental housing depress neighborhood property values? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 26, 257–280.
  • Ellen, I. G., & Turner, M. A. (2003). Do neighborhoods matter and why? In J. Goering & J. Feins (Eds.), Choosing a better life? Evaluating the Moving to Opportunity experiment (pp. 313–328). Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
  • Freeman, L. (2004). Siting affordable housing: Location and neighborhood trends of Low-Income Housing Tax Credit developments in the 1990s. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution. Retrieved from http://www.brookings.edu/∼/media/research/files/reports/2004/4/metropolitanpolicy%20freeman/20040405_freeman.pdf.
  • Galster, G. C. (2005). Consequences from the redistribution of urban poverty during the 1990s: A cautionary tale. Economic Development Quarterly, 19, 119–125.
  • Galster, G. C., Tatian, P., & Smith, R. (1999). The impact of neighbors who use section 8 certificates on property values. Housing Policy Debate, 10, 879–917.
  • Galvez, M. (2010). What do we know about Housing Choice Voucher program location outcomes? A review of recent literature. Washington, DC: What Works Collaborative.
  • Galvez, M. (2011). Defining “choice” in the Housing Choice Voucher program: The role of market constraints and household preferences in location outcomes  (Doctoral dissertation). New York University.
  • Goering, J., & Feins, J. D. (2003). Choosing a better life? Evaluating the Moving to Opportunity program. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
  • Goering, J., Kamely, A., & Richardson, T. (1997). Recent research on racial segregation and poverty concentration in public housing in the United States. Urban Affairs Review, 32, 723–745.
  • Goetz, E. G. (2008). Words matter: The importance of issue framing and the case of affordable housing. Journal of the American Planning Association, 74, 222–229.
  • Jargowsky, P. A. (2003). Stunning progress, hidden problems: The dramatic decline of concentrated poverty in the 1990s. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
  • Jargowsky, P. A. (2013). Concentration of poverty in the new millennium: Changes in the prevalence, composition, and location of high-poverty neighborhoods. New York, NY: Century Foundation; Camden, NJ: Center for Urban Research and Education, Rutgers University. Retrieved from http://tcf.org/bookstore/detail/concentration-of-poverty-in-the-new-millennium.
  • Kasarda, J. D. (1993). Inner-city concentrated poverty and neighborhood distress: 1970 to 1990. Housing Policy Debate, 4, 253–302.
  • Khadduri, J. (2001). Deconcentration: What do we mean? What do we want? Cityscape, 5, 69–84.
  • Lee, C. M., Culhane, D. P., & Wachter, S. M. (1999). The differential impacts of federally assisted housing programs on nearby property values: A Philadelphia case study. Housing Policy Debate, 10, 75–93.
  • Lens, M. (2013, April). Employment accessibility among housing subsidy recipients. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Urban Affairs Association, San Francisco, CA.
  • Lowi, T. J. (1972). Four systems of policy, politics, and choice. Public Administration Review, 32, 298–310.
  • Lowi, T. J. (1985). The state in politics: The relation between policy and administration. In R. Noll (Ed.), Regulatory policy and the social sciences (pp. 67–105). Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Ludwig, J., Sanbonmatsu, L., Gennetian, L., Adam, E., Duncan, G. J., Katz, L. F., … McDade, T. W. (2011). Neighborhoods, obesity, and diabetes: A randomized social experiment. New England Journal of Medicine, 365, 1509–1519.
  • McClure, K. (2005). Rent burden in the Housing Choice Voucher program. Cityscape, 8, 5–20.
  • McClure, K. (2006). The Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program goes mainstream and moves to the suburbs. Housing Policy Debate, 17, 419–446.
  • McClure, K. (2008). Deconcentrating poverty with housing programs. Journal of the American Planning Association, 74, 90–99.
  • McClure, K. (2010). Are Low-Income Housing Tax Credit developments locating where there is a shortage of affordable units? Housing Policy Debate, 20, 153–171.
  • Molotch, H. (1976). The city as a growth machine: Toward a political economy of place. American Journal of Sociology, 82, 309–332.
  • Newman, S. J., & Schnare, A. B. (1997). “…And a suitable living environment”: The failure of housing programs to deliver on neighborhood quality. Housing Policy Debate, 8, 703–741.
  • Nguyen, M., Basolo, V., & Tiwari, A. (2013). Opposition to affordable housing in the USA: Debate framing and the responses of local actors. Housing, Theory and Society, 30, 107–130.
  • Oakley, D. (2008). Location patterns of Low-Income Housing Tax Credit developments: A sociospatial analysis of four metropolitan areas. Urban Affairs Review, 43, 599–628.
  • Oakley, D., Ruel, E., & Reid, L. (2013). “It was really hard. … It was alright. … It was easy.”: Public housing relocation experiences and destination satisfaction in Atlanta. Cityscape, 15, 173–192.
  • O'Regan, K. M., & Horn, K. M. (2013). What can we learn about the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program by looking at the tenants? Housing Policy Debate, 23, 597–613.
  • Orr, L., Feins, J. D., Jacob, R., Beecroft, E., Sanbonmatsu, L., Katz, L. F., … Kling, J. R. (2003). Moving to Opportunity interim impacts evaluation. Washington, DC: Office of Policy Development and Research, U.S Department of Housing and Urban Development.
  • Pendall, R. (2000). Why voucher and certificate users live in distressed neighborhoods. Housing Policy Debate, 11, 881–910.
  • Pendall, R., Davies, E., Freiman, L., & Pitingolo, R. (2011). A lost decade: Neighborhood poverty and the urban crisis of the 2000s. Washington, DC: Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies.
  • Peterson, P. E. (1981). City limits. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Popkin, S. J. (2013). How Chicago's public housing transformation can inform federal policy. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
  • Quercia, R. C., & Galster, G. C. (1997). The challenges facing public housing authorities in a brave new world. Housing Policy Debate, 8, 535–569.
  • Rohe, W. M., & Freeman, L. (2001). Assisted housing and residential segregation: The role of race and ethnicity in the siting of assisted housing developments. Journal of the American Planning Association, 67, 279–292.
  • Roisman, F. W., & Botein, H. (1993). Housing mobility and life opportunities. Clearinghouse Review, 27, 335–351.
  • Rosenbaum, J. E. (1995). Changing the geography of opportunity by expanding residential choice: Lessons from the Gautreaux program. Housing Policy Debate, 6, 231–269.
  • Rubinowitz, L. S., & Rosenbaum, J. E. (2000). Crossing the class and color lines: From public housing to white suburbia. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Sabatier, P. A., & Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (1999). The advocacy coalition framework: An assessment. In P. A. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process (pp. 117–166). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  • Scally, C. P. (2013). The nuances of NIMBY: Context and perceptions of affordable rental housing development. Urban Affairs Review, 49, 718–747.
  • Scally, C. P., & Koenig, R. (2012). Beyond NIMBY and poverty deconcentration: Reframing the outcomes of affordable rental housing development. Housing Policy Debate, 22, 435–461. Retrieved from http://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/HUD?src = /program_offices/public_indian_housing/programs/hcv/semap/semap.
  • Turner, M. A. (1998). Moving out of poverty: Expanding mobility and choice through tenant-based housing assistance. Housing Policy Debate, 9, 373–394.
  • Turner, M. A., Popkin, S. J., & Cunningham, M. J. (2000). Section 8 mobility and neighborhood health. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
  • U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (2011). Low-Income Housing Tax Credits: About the LIHTC database, users note. Retrieved from http://www.huduser.org/portal/datasets/lihtc.html.
  • U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (2012). Section Eight Management Assessment Program (SEMAP) Factsheet. Washington, DC: Author.
  • U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (2014a). Choice neighborhoods. Retrieved from http://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/HUD?src = /program_offices/public_indian_housing/programs/ph/cn.
  • U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (2014b). Housing Choice Voucher program guidebook. Retrieved from http://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/HUD?src = /program_offices/public_indian_housing/programs/hcv/forms/guidebook.
  • U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (2014c). HUD's public housing program. Retrieved from http://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/HUD?src = /topics/rental_assistance/phprog.
  • U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (2014d). Section 8 program background information. Retrieved from http://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/HUD?src = /program_offices/housing/mfh/rfp/s8bkinfo.
  • U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (2014e). Section 202 supportive housing for the elderly program. Retrieved from http://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/HUD?src = /program_offices/housing/mfh/progdesc/eld202.
  • U.S. Government Accountability Office. (1978). Section 236 rental housing: An evaluation with lessons for the future. Retrieved from http://www.gao.gov/products/PAD-78-13.
  • Von Hoffman, A. (2012). History lessons for today's housing policy: The politics of low-income housing. Housing Policy Debate, 22, 321–376.
  • Williamson, A. R., Smith, M. T., & Strambi-Kramer, M. (2009). Housing Choice Vouchers, the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit, and the federal poverty deconcentration goal. Urban Affairs Review, 45, 119–132.
  • Winnick, L. (1995). The triumph of housing allowance programs: How a fundamental policy conflict was resolved. Cityscape, 1, 95–121.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.