Spotlight on the Main Actors: How Land Banks and Community Development Corporations Stabilize and Revitalize Cleveland Neighborhoods in the Aftermath of the Foreclosure Crisis

References

• Alexander, F. S. (2011). Land banks and land banking. Flint, MI: Center for Community Progress.
   Google Scholar
• Biswas, A. (2012). Housing submarkets and the impacts of foreclosures on property prices. Journal of Housing Economics, 21, 235–245. doi: 10.1016/j.jhe.2012.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bratt, R. G. (2008). Nonprofit and for-profit developers of subsidized rental housing: Comparative attributes and collaborative opportunities. Housing Policy Debate, 19, 323–365. doi: 10.1080/10511482.2008.9521638
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bratt, R. G. (2012). The quadruple bottom line and nonprofit housing organizations in the United States. Housing Studies, 27, 438–456. doi: 10.1080/02673037.2012.677016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coulton, C., Chan, T., Schramm, M., & Hirsh, A. (2008). Beyond REO: Property transfers at extremely distressed prices in Cuyahoga County, 2005–2008. Cleveland, OH: Center on Urban Poverty and Community Development, Case Western Reserve University.
   Google Scholar
• Coulton, C., Chan, T., Schramm, M., & Mikelbank, K. (2008). Pathways to foreclosure: A longitudinal study of mortgage loans, Cleveland and Cuyahoga County, 2005–2008. Cleveland, OH: Case Western Reserve University.
   Google Scholar
• Coenen, C., Drain, J., Druta, O., Holman, G., Te-Ping, K., Kitjakarnlertudom, P. … Twardy, J. (2011). From revenue to reuse: Managing tax-reverted properties in Detroit. Ann Arbor, MI: Taubman College of Architecture & Urban Planning, University of Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Dewar, M. (2006). Selling tax-reverted land: Lessons from Cleveland and Detroit. Journal of American Planning Association, 72, 167–180.10.1080/01944360608976737 doi: 10.1177/1078087414551717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewar, M. (2009). The effects on cities of “best practice” in tax foreclosure: Evidence from Detroit and Flint. CLOSEUP ( Working Paper Series 2). Ann Arbour, MI: University of Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Dewar, M., Seymour, E., & Druta, O. (2014). Disinvesting in the city: The role of tax foreclosure in Detroit. Urban Affairs Review, 51, 587–615. doi: 10.1177/1078087414551717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisinger, P. (2013). Is Detroit dead? Journal of Urban Affairs, 36(1), 1–12. doi: 10.1111/juaf.12071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellen, I. G., Madar, J., & Weselcouch, M. (2014). The foreclosure crisis and community development: Exploring REO dynamics in hard-hit neighborhoods. Housing Studies. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1080/02673037.2014.882496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellen, I. G., & Voicu, I. (2006). Nonprofit housing and neighborhood spillovers. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 25, 31–52. doi: 10.1002/pam.20155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick IV, Thomas J. (2010). Ohio’s land bank legislation: Modernizing an aged model. Journal of Affordable Housing and Community Development Law, 19, 127–147.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, F. (2012). Rebuilding markets: Single family redevelopment through non-profit and for-profit partnerships. Cleveland, OH: Neighborhood Progress, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, F., Hirsh, A., Clover, K., Marks, J. A., Dubin, R., Schramm, M., … Cabrera, N. (2013). The role of investors in the one-to-three family REO market: The case of Cleveland. Cambridge, MA: Joint Center for Housing Studies, Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Frame, W. S. (2009). The 2008 federal intervention to stabilize Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (Working Paper 2009–13). Atlanta, GA: Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, J. (2010). Reimagining Detroit: Opportunities for redefining an American city. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, J. (2013). Revolution Detroit: Strategies for urban reinvention. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Galster, G. (2013). Driving Detroit: The quest for respect in the Motor City. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilderbloom, J. I., Ambrosius, J. D., Squires, G. D., Hanka, M. J., & Kenitzer Z. E. (2012). Investors: The missing piece in the foreclosure racial gap debate. Journal of Urban Affairs, 34, 559–582. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9906.2012.00619.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillotti, T., & Kildee, D. (2007). Land banks as revitalization tools: The example of Genesee County and the city of Flint, Michigan. In K. Pallagst et al. (Eds.), The future of shrinking cities: Problems, patterns and strategies of urban transformation in a global context (pp. 139–148). Berkeley, CA: University of California, Institute of Urban and Regional Development.
   Google Scholar
• Greater Ohio Policy Center. (2014). Documenting the Slavic village recovery project: An early review of a model for neighborhood revitalization in Cleveland. Columbus, OH: Greater Ohio Policy Center.
   Google Scholar
• Hackworth, J. (2014). The limits to market-based strategies for addressing land abandonment in shrinking American cities. Progress in Planning, 90, 1–37. doi: 10.1016/j.progress.2013.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammel, D. J., & Shetty, S. (2013). Complexity and change in the foreclosure process in Toledo, Ohio. Housing Policy Debate, 23, 35–58. doi: 10.1080/10511482.2012.751932
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harding, J. P., Rosenblatt, E., & Yao, V. W. (2009). The contagion effect of foreclosed properties. Journal of Urban Economics, 66, 164–178. doi: 10.1016/j.jue.2009.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heins, P., & Abdelazim, T. (2014). Take it to the bank: How land banks are strengthening America’s neighborhoods. Washington, DC: Center for Community Progress.
   Google Scholar
• Herbert, C. E., Lew, I., & Sanchez-Moyano, R. (2013). The role of investors. In Acquiring foreclosed properties in low- and moderate-income neighborhoods: A review of findings from four case studies. Cambridge, MA: Joint Center for Housing Studies, Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Immergluck, D. (2011). The local wreckage of global capital: The subprime crisis, federal policy and high-foreclosure neighborhoods in the US. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 35, 130–146. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2010.00991.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Immergluck, D. (2012). Distressed and dumped: Market dynamics of low-value, foreclosed properties during the advent of the federal neighborhood stabilization program. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 32, 48–61. doi: 10.1177/0739456X11423263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Immergluck, D., & Law, J. (2014). Investing in crisis: The methods, strategies, and expectations of investors in single-family foreclosed homes in distressed neighborhoods. Housing Policy Debate, 24, 568–593. doi:10.1080/10511482.2013.850733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Immergluck, D., & Smith, G. (2005). Measuring the effect of subprime lending on neighborhood foreclosures: Evidence from Chicago. Urban Affairs Review, 40, 362–389. doi: 10.1177/1078087404271444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, D. H., & Sommers, G. G. (2009). An analysis of the relationship between housing foreclosures, lending practices, and neighborhood ecology: Evidence from a distressed county. The Professional Geographer, 61, 101–120. doi: 10.1080/00330120802577723
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keating, W. D. (2010). Redevelopment of vacant land in the blighted neighborhoods of Cleveland, Ohio: Resulting from the housing foreclosure crisis. Journal of Regeneration and Renewal, 4, 39–52.
   Google Scholar
• Keating, W. D, Krumholz, N., & Perry, D. C. (Eds.), (1995). Cleveland: A metropolitan reader. Cleveland, OH: Kent State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keating, W. D., & Lind, K. J. (2012). Responding to mortgage crisis: Three Cleveland examples. The Urban Lawyer, 44(1), 1–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kildee, D. (2012). Ending land speculation that drives blight: Change the system, change the players. The Huffington Post, posted March 8 2012 and updated May 8 2012. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dan-kildee/ending-land-speculation-t_b_1332087.html
   Google Scholar
• Kobie, Timothy F., & Lee, S. (2011). The spatial-temporal impact of residential foreclosures on single-family residential property values. Urban Affairs Review, 47, 3–30. doi: 10.1177/1078087410376614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krumholz, N., Keating, W. D., Star, P. D., & Chupp, M. C. (2006). The long-term impact of CDCs on urban neighborhoods: Case studies of Cleveland’s Broadway-Slavic village and Tremont neighborhoods. Journal of the Community Development Society, 37, 33–52.10.1080/15575330609490194
   Google Scholar
• Krumholz, N., & Hexter, K. (2012). Re-thinking the future of Cleveland’s neighborhood developers. Cleveland, OH: Urban Publications, Cleveland State University.
   Google Scholar
• Leonard, T., & Murdoch, J. C. (2009). The neighborhood effects of foreclosure. Journal of Geographic Systems, 11, 317–332. doi: 10.1007/s10109-009-0088-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y., & Morrow-Jones, H. A. (2010). The impact of residential mortgage foreclosure on neighborhood change and succession. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 30, 22–39. doi: 10.1177/0739456X10375305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y., & Walter, R. (2013). Single-family housing market segmentation, post-foreclosure resale duration, and neighborhood attributes. Housing Policy Debate, 23, 643–665. doi: 10.1080/10511482.2013.835331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livingston, S. (2009, November 21). “HUD criticized for its practices as an owner and seller of foreclosed homes.” The Plain Dealer. Retrieved November 17, 2014, from http://blog.cleveland.com/metro/2009/11/hud_criticized_for_its_practic.html
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald, H. (2012). Managing the consequences of financial crisis: A long view of housing disposition. Housing Policy Debate, 22, 201–218. doi: 10.1080/10511482.2011.648205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallach, A. (2011, March 29). Where do we fit in? CDCs and the emerging shrinking city movement. Shelterforce. Montclair, NJ: National Housing Institute. Retrieved from http://www.shelterforce.org/article/2180/where_do_we_fit_in_cdcs_and_the_emerging_shrinking_city_movement/
   Google Scholar
• Mallach, A. (2014). Lessons from Las Vegas: Housing markets, neighborhoods, and distressed single-family property investors. Housing Policy Debate, 24, 769–801. doi: 10.1080/10511482.2011.648205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McQuarrie, M. (2013). Community organizations in the foreclosure crisis: The failure of neoliberal civil society. Politics & Society, 41, 73–101. doi: 10.1177/0032329212473087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, H. Y., Chang, H., & Misra, K. (2012). The impact of mortgage securitization on the housing bubble and subprime mortgage crisis: A self-organization perspective. International Research Journal of Applied Finance, 3, 830–851.
   Google Scholar
• Renuart, E. (2004). An overview of the predatory mortgage lending process. Housing Policy Debate, 15, 467–502. doi: 10.1080/10511482.2004.9521511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samsa, M. J. (2008). Reclaiming abandoned properties: Using public nuisance suits and land banks to pursue economic redevelopment. Cleveland State Law Review, 56, 189–232.
   Google Scholar
• Schramm, M., Hirsh, A., Vadapalli, D., Van Grol, D. J., Nelson, K. M., & Coulton, C. (2011). Stalling the foreclosure process: The complexity behind bank walkaways. Cleveland, OH: Case Western Reserve University.
   Google Scholar
• Schuetz, J., Been, V., & Ellen, I. G. (2008). Neighborhood effects of concentrated mortgage foreclosures. Journal of Housing Economics, 17, 306–319. doi: 10.1016/j.jhe.2008.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharpe, Steven. (2013, March-April). Strategies for defending foreclosures of FHA-insured mortgages. Clearinghouse Review: Journal of Poverty Law and Policy, 46, 484–491.
   Google Scholar
• Steil, J. P. (2011). Innovative responses to foreclosures: Paths to neighborhood stability and housing opportunity. Columbia Journal of Race and Law, 1(1), 63–117.
   Google Scholar
• Tappendorf, J. A., & Denzin, B. O. (2011). Turning vacant properties into community assets through land banking. Urban Lawyer, 43, 801–812.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treuhaft, S., Rose, K., & Black, K. (2010). When investors buy up the neighborhood: Preventing investor ownership from causing neighborhood decline. St. Paul, MI; Oakland, CA; Minneapolis, MI: Northwest Area Foundation, PolicyLink, and Family Housing Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Whitaker, S., & Fitzpatrick IV, T. J. (2013). Deconstructing distressed-property spillovers: The effects of vacant, tax-delinquent, and foreclosed properties in housing submarkets. Journal of Housing Economics, 22, 79–91. doi: 10.1016/j.jhe.2013.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar