Rooms for Improvement: A Qualitative Metasynthesis of the Housing Choice Voucher Program

References

• Apgar, W. C. (1990). Which housing policy is best? Housing Policy Debate, 1(1), 1–32.10.1080/10511482.1990.9521033
   Google Scholar
• Basolo, V., & Nguyen, M. T. (2005). Does mobility matter? The neighborhood conditions of housing voucher holders by race and ethnicity. Housing Policy Debate, 16, 297–324.10.1080/10511482.2005.9521546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, M., Edin, K., Duncan, G. J., & Clampet-Lundquist, S. (2006, March). The durability of the Gautreaux Two residential mobility program: A qualitative analysis of who stays and who moves from low-poverty neighborhoods. Paper presented at the Population Association of America Annual Meeting, Los Angeles, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, X. D. S., Popkin, S. J., & Goering, J. (2010). Moving to opportunity: The story of an American experiment to fight ghetto poverty. NewYork: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, X. D. S., & Turner, M. A. (2006). Assisted housing mobility and the success of low-income minority families: Lessons for policy, practice, and future research. Northwestern Journal of Law and Social Policy, 1, 25, 25–61.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, F., Zugazaga, C., Wolk, J., & Adams, M. A. (2005). Resident perceptions of housing, neighborhood, and economic conditions after relocation from public housing undergoing HOPE VI redevelopment. Research on Social Work Practice, 15, 481–490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, W. A. (2008). Reexamining the moving to opportunity study and its contribution to changing the distribution of poverty and ethnic concentration. Demography, 45, 515–535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, D., Haveman, R., Kaplan, T., & Wolfe, B. (2012). Long-term earnings and employment effects of housing voucher receipt. Journal of Urban Economics, 71, 128–150.10.1016/j.jue.2011.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLuca, S., Garboden, P. M. E., & Rosenblatt, P. (2013). Segregating shelter: How housing policies shape the residential locations of low-income minority families. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 647, 268–299.10.1177/0002716213479310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLuca, S., & Rosenblatt, P. (2010). Does moving to better neighborhoods lead to better schooling opportunities? Parental school choice in an experimental housing voucher program. The Teachers College Record, 112, 7–8.
   Google Scholar
• De Winter, J. C., Zadpoor, A. A., & Dodou, D. (2014). The expansion of Google Scholar versus Web of Science: A longitudinal study. Scientometrics, 98, 1547–1565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devine, D. J., Gray R. W., Rubin L., & Tahiti, L. B. (2003). Housing choice voucher location patterns: Implications for participant and neighborhood welfare. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, G. (2008). New lessons from gautreaux and moving to opportunity residential mobility programs. Irvine, CA: University of California. Retrieved from http://merage.uci.edu/ResearchAndCenters/CRE/Resources/Documents/Duncan.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Finkel, M., & Buron, L. (2001). Study on Section 8 voucher success rates. volume I. Quantitative Study of Success Rates in Metropolitan Areas. Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates for the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research..
   Google Scholar
• Finkel, M., & Kennedy, S. (1994). Section 8 rental voucher and rental certificate utilization study: Final report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, L. (2012). The impact of source of income laws on voucher utilization. Housing Policy Debate, 22, 297–318.10.1080/10511482.2011.648210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freiman, L., Harris, L., Mireles, A., & Popkin, S. (2013). Housing assistance and supportive services in Memphis final brief. Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://aspe.hhs.gov/hsp/13/HousingMemphis/Memphis%20Final%20Brief.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Galster, G. C., Tatian, P., & Smith, R. (1999). The impact of neighbors who use Section 8 certificates on property values. Housing Policy Debate, 10, 879–917.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galvez, M. M. (2010a). What do we know about housing choice voucher program location outcomes? A review of recent literature. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Galvez, M. M. (2010b). Getting past “no”: Housing Choice Voucher holders’ experiences with discrimination and search costs. Unpublished working paper.
   Google Scholar
• Green, R. K. (2011). Thoughts on rental housing and rental housing assistance. Cityscape, 13, 39–55.
   Google Scholar
• Greenlee, A. J. (2011). A different lens: Administrative perspectives on portability in Illinois' housing choice voucher program. Housing Policy Debate, 21, 377–403.10.1080/10511482.2011.591409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guhathakurta, S., & Mushkatel, A. (2000). Does locational choice matter? A comparison of different subsidized housing programs in Phoenix. Arizona. Urban Affairs Review, 35, 520–540.10.1177/10780870022184516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacob, B. A. (2003). Public housing, housing vouchers, and student achievement: Evidence from public housing demolitions in Chicago ( NBER Working Paper 9652). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w9652
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, L. A., & Allen, M. N. (1996). Meta-synthesis of qualitative findings. Qualitative Health Research, 6, 553–560.10.1177/104973239600600407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, L. F., Kling, J. R., & Liebman, J. B. (2000). Moving to opportunity in Boston: Early results of a randomized mobility experiment ( NBER Working Paper 7973). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w7973
   Google Scholar
• Katz, B. J., & Turner, M. A. (2001). Who should run the housing voucher program? A reform proposal. Housing Policy Debate 12: 239–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleit, R. G., & Manzo, L. C. (2006). To move or not to move: Relationships to place and relocation choices in HOPE VI. Housing Policy Debate, 17, 271–308.10.1080/10511482.2006.9521571
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kling, J. R., Liebman, J. B., Katz, L. F., & Sanbonmatsu, L. (2004). Moving to opportunity and tranquility: Neighborhood effects on adult economic self-sufficiency and health from a randomized housing voucher experiment. Princeton IRS Working Paper 481, Industrial Relations Section. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.
   Google Scholar
• Kling, J. R., Liebman, J. B., & Katz, L. F. (2005). Bullets don't got no name: Consequences of fear in the ghetto." In T. S. Weisner (Ed.), Discovering successful pathways in children's development: New methods in the study of childhood and family Life (pp. 243–81). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lens, M. C. (2013). Safe, but could be safer: Why do HCVP households live in higher crime neighborhoods. Cityscape, 15, 131–152.
   Google Scholar
• Leopold, J. (2012). The housing needs of rental assistance applicants. Cityscape, 14, 275–298.
   Google Scholar
• Leventhal, T., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2003). Moving to opportunity: An experimental study of neighborhood effects on mental health. American Journal of Public Health, 93, 1576–1582.10.2105/AJPH.93.9.1576
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsey, M. W. & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ludwig, J., Duncan, G. J., Gennetian, L. A., Katz, L. F., Kessler, R. C., Kling, J. R., & Sanbonmatsu, L. (2012). Neighborhood effects on the long-term well-being of low-income adults. Science, 337, 1505–1510. doi:10.1126/science.1224648.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marr, M. D. (2005). Mitigating apprehension about section 8 vouchers: The positive role of housing specialists in search and placement. Housing Policy Debate, 16, 85–111.10.1080/10511482.2005.9521535
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massey, D. S. (1996). The age of extremes: Concentrated affluence and poverty in the twenty-first century. Demography, 33, 395–412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews Jr., M. (1998). Vouchers come home. Policy Review, 92, 7–8.
   Google Scholar
• McClure, K. (2005). Comment on Victoria Basolo and Mai Thi Nguyen’s “Does mobility matter? The neighborhood conditions of housing voucher holders by race and ethnicity”. Housing Policy Debate, 16, 347–359.10.1080/10511482.2005.9521549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClure, K. (2008). Deconcentrating poverty with housing programs. Journal of the American Planning Association, 74, 90–99.10.1080/01944360701730165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClure, K. (2010). The prospects for guiding housing choice voucher households to high-opportunity neighborhoods. Cityscape, 12, 101–122.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, E. O. (2014). Pursuing poverty deconcentration distracts from housing policy reforms that would have a greater effect on poverty alleviation. Cityscape, 16(2), 135–138.
   Google Scholar
• Pashup, J., Edin, K., Duncan, G. J., & Burke, K. (2005). Participation in a residential mobility program from the client’s perspective: Findings from Gautreaux two. Housing Policy Debate, 16, 361–392.10.1080/10511482.2005.9521550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paterson, B. L., Thorne, B. L., Canam, C., & Jillings, C. (2001). Meta- study of qualitative health research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Pendall, R. (2000). Why voucher and certificate users live in distressed neighborhoods. Housing Policy Debate, 11, 881–910.10.1080/10511482.2000.9521391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popkin, S. J. (2000). Searching for rental housing with Section 8 in Chicago Region. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Popkin, S. J., Levy, D. K., Harris, L. E., Comey, J., Cunningham, M. K., & Buron, L. F. (2008). Hope VI Panel Study Baseline Report. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Popkin, S. J., & Cunningham, M. K. (2000). Searching for Rental Housing with Section 8 in Chicago. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Popkin, S. J., Galster, G. C., Temkin, K., Herbig, C., Levy, D. K., & Richer, E. K. (2003). Obstacles to desegregating public housing: Lessons learned from implementing eight consent decrees. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 22, 179–199.10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, L. M., Shlay, A. B., & Picon, M. G. (2012). You can’t always get what you want: The role of public housing and vouchers in achieving residential satisfaction. Cityscape, 14, 35–53.
   Google Scholar
• Rumberger, R. W. (2003). The causes and consequences of student mobility. Journal of Negro Education, 72(1), 6–21.
   Google Scholar
• Sampson, R. J. (2012). Great American city: Chicago and the enduring neighborhood effect. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sanbonmatsu L., Katz, L. F., Ludwig, J., Gennetian, L. A., Duncan, G. J., Kessler, R. C., … Lindau, S. T. (2011). Moving to opportunity for fair housing demonstration program: Final impacts evaluation. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research.
   Google Scholar
• Sandelowski, M., Docherty, S., & Emden, C. (1997). Focus on qualitative methods qualitative metasynthesis: Issues and techniques. Research in Nursing & Health, 20, 365–371.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-240X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sard, B., & Averez-Sanchez, T. (2011). Large majority of housing voucher recipients work, are elderly, or have disabilities. Washington, DC: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
   Google Scholar
• Sard, B., & Coven, M. (2006November). Fixing the housing voucher formula: A no-cost way to strengthen the Section 8 program. Washington, DC: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, Washington, DC, November 1.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, D. A. (2013). A case study of Anacostia: The role of housing vouchers on the local housing market (Doctoral dissertation). University of Maryland, College Park, MD.
   Google Scholar
• Small, M. L., & Feldman, J. (2012). Ethnographic evidence, heterogeneity, and neighbourhood effects after moving to opportunity. In M. van Ham, D. Manley, N. Bailey, L. Simpson, & D. Maclennan (Eds.), Neighbourhood effects research: New perspectives (pp. 57–77). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.10.1007/978-94-007-2309-2
   Google Scholar
• Smith, R. E. (2002). Housing choice for HOPE VI relocatees: Final report. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Snell, E. K., & Duncan, G. J. (2006). Child characteristics and successful use of housing vouchers: Estimates from the moving to opportunity demonstration. Housing Policy Debate, 17, 727–754.10.1080/10511482.2006.9521588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Squires, G. D. (Ed.). (2002). Urban sprawl: Causes, consequences, & policy responses. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
   Google Scholar
• Teater, B. J. (2011). A qualitative evaluation of the Section 8 housing choice voucher program: The recipients' perspectives. Qualititative Social Work, 10, 503–519. doi:10.1177/1473325010371242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorne, S., & Paterson, B. (1998). Shifting images of chronic illness. Image: The Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 30, 173–178.10.1111/jnu.1998.30.issue-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thomas, J. & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8, 1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, M. A. (1998). Moving out of poverty: Expanding mobility and choice through tenant-based housing assistance. Housing Policy Debate, 9, 373–394.10.1080/10511482.1998.9521299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• US Department of Housing and Urban Development (2014). Housing Choice Vouchers Fact Sheet. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved fromhttp://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/HUD?src=/topics/housing_choice_voucher_program_section
   Google Scholar
• Varady, D. P., & Walker, C. C. (2000). Distressed subsidized developments: Does moving lead to improvements in housing and neighborhood conditions. Housing Policy Debate, 11, 115–162.10.1080/10511482.2000.9521365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varady, D. P., Walker, C. C., & Wang, X. (2001). Voucher recipient achievement of improved housing conditions in the U.S.: Do moving distance and relocation services matter? Urban Studies, 38, 1273–1304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varady, D. P., Wang, X., Murphy, D., & Stahlke, A. (2013). How housing professionals perceive effects of the Housing Choice Voucher Program on suburban communities. Cityscape, 15, 105–129.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, L. A. (2014). Resident responses to section 8 relocation outcomes:“If you’re Gonna move, you want to move up”. Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work, 11, 97–113.10.1080/15433714.2013.842441
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wood, M., Turnham, J., & Mills, G. (2008). Housing affordability and family well-being: Results from the housing voucher evaluation. Housing Policy Debate, 19, 367–412.10.1080/10511482.2008.9521639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittemore, R., & Knafl, K. (2005). The integrative review: updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52, 546–553.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, W. J. (1996). When work disappears: The world of the urban poor. New York, NY: Alfred Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Yinger, J. (1998). Housing discrimination is still worth worrying about. Housing Policy Debate, 9, 893–927.10.1080/10511482.1998.9521322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar