Work Requirements in Public Housing: Impacts on Tenant Employment and Evictions

References

• Abravanel, M. D., Smith, R., Turner, M. A., Cove, E., Harris, L. E., & Manjarrez, C. (2004). Testing public housing deregulation: A summary assessment of HUD’s “moving to work” demonstration. Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://www.urban.org/publications/311009.html
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, H. S., Riccio, J. A., & Verma, N. (2005). Promoting work in public housing: The effectiveness of Jobs-Plus. New York, NY. Retrieved from http://www.mdrc.org/publication/promoting-work-public-housing
   Google Scholar
• Bratt, R. G. (2002). Housing and family well-being. Housing Studies, 17, 13–26. doi:10.1080/02673030120105857.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bratt, R. G., Stone, M. E., & Hartman, C. (Eds.). (2006). A right to housing: Foundation for a new social agenda. Philadelphia, PA: Temple UP.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, X. S., & Popkin, S. J., & Goering, J. (2010). Moving to opportunity. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195393712.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Brown, K. E. (2010). Fewer eligible families have received cash assistance since the 1990s, and the recession’s impact on caseloads varies by state. GAO-10-164. Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d10164.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Couch, L. (2014). Public housing: Moving to work demonstration program. Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://nlihc.org/sites/default/files/2014AG-131.pdf
   Google Scholar
• De Silva, L., Wijewardena, I., Wood, M., & Kaul, B. (2011). Evaluation of the family self-sufficiency program: Prospective study. Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://www.huduser.org/portal/publications/familyselfsufficiency.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Deacon, A. (2004). Justifying conditionality: the case of anti‐social tenants. Housing Studies, 19, 911–926. doi:10.1080/0267303042000293008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edgar, B., Doherty, J., & Meert, H. (2002). Access to housing: Homelessness and vulnerability in Europe. Bristol, UK: The Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Falk, G., Mccarty, M., & Aussenberg, R. A. (2014). Work requirements, time limits, and work incentives in TANF, SNAP, and housing assistance. Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://greenbook.waysandmeans.house.gov/sites/greenbook.waysandmeans.house.gov/files/R43400_gb.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ficke, R. C., & Piesse, A. (2004). Evaluation of the family self-sufficiency program: Retrospective analysis, 1996 to 2000. Washington DC.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, W. (2015). HUD seeks significant improvements to “Moving to Work” demonstration, but additional changes needed. Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://www.cbpp.org/files/1-21-15hous.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Floyd, I., Pavetti, L., & Schott, L. (2015). TANF continues to weaken as a safety net. Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://www.cbpp.org/sites/default/files/atoms/files/6-16-15tanf.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fording, R. C., Schram, S. F., & Soss, J. (2013). Do welfare sanctions help or hurt the poor? Estimating the causal effect of sanctioning on client earnings. Social Service Review, 87, 641–676. doi:10.1086/674111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goetz, E. G. (2013). New deal ruins: Race, economic justice, and public housing policy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graves, E. M. (2011). Mixed outcome developments. Journal of the American Planning Association, 77, 143–153. doi:10.1080/01944363.2011.567921.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, S., & Fraser, M. W. (2010). Propensity score analysis: Statistical methods and applications. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hasenfeld, Y., Ghose, T., & Larson, K. (2004). The logic of sanctioning welfare recipients: An empirical assessment. Social Service Review, 78, 304–319. doi:10.1086/382771.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph, M. L., Chaskin, R. J., & Webber, H. S. (2007). The theoretical basis for addressing poverty through mixed-income development. Urban Affairs Review, 42, 369–409. doi:10.1177/1078087406294043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleit, R. G. (2005). HOPE VI new communities: Neighborhood relationships in mixed-income housing. Environment and Planning A, 37, 1413–1441. doi:10.1068/a3796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitz, J. (2013, May 6). Public housign agenceis push to impose time limits, work requirements for aid recipients. Wall Street Journal. New York, NY. Retrieved from http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424127887323820304578410382522144560
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, O. (1959). Five families: Mexican case studies in the culture of poverty. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Massey, D. S., & Denton, N. A. (1993). American apartheid: Segregation and the making of the underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McClure, K., Schwartz, A. F., & Taghavi, L. B. (2015). Housing choice voucher location patterns a decade later. Housing Policy Debate, 25, 215–233. doi:10.1080/10511482.2014.921223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mead, L. M. (1992). The new politics of poverty. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mead, L. M. (1997). Welfare employment. In: L. M. Mead (Ed.), The New Paternalism (pp. 97–112). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mead, L. M. (1998). Telling the poor what to do. The Public Interest, ( Summer), 97–112.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, S. J. (1999). From the eye of the housing practicioner. In Newman (Ed.), The Home Front (pp. 221–235). Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
   Google Scholar
• NLIHC. (2015). FY16 omnibus spending bill enacted. Retrieved from http://nlihc.org/article/fy16-omnibus-spending-bill-enacted.
   Google Scholar
• Office of Policy Development and Research. (1987). Project self-sufficiency: An interim report on progress and performance. Washington, DC: Department of Housing and Urban Development. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015029295287
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, E. O., Tyler, C. A., King, J. W., & Carrillo, P. E. (2005). The effects of different types of housing assistance on earnings and employment. Cityscape, 8, 163–187.
   Google Scholar
• Reingold, D. A., Van Ryzin, G. G., & Ronda, M. (2001). Does urban public housing diminish the social capital and labor force activity of its tenants? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 20, 485–504. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riccio, J. A. (2008). Subsidized housing and employment: building evidence of what works. In R. Rental (Ed.), Housing: Policies, Programs, and Prioirities (pp. 191–224). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rice, J. (1995). Mathematical statistics and data analysis (2nd ed.). Belmont, California: Duxbury Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rohe, W. M., & Kleit, R. G. (1997). From dependency to self‐sufficiency: An appraisal of the Gateway Transitional Families Program. Housing Policy Debate, 8, 75–108.doi:10.1080/10511482.1997.9521248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohe, W. M., & Kleit, R. G. (1999). Housing, welfare reform, and self-sufficiency: An assessment of the Family Self-Sufficiency Program. Housing Policy Debate, 10, 333–369. doi:10.1080/10511482.1999.9521335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohe, W. M., Webb, M. D., & Frescoln, K. P. (2015). Moving to innovation: The Charlotte housing authority’s moving forward program. NC: Chapel Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1985). Constructing a control group using multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity score. The American Statistician, 39, 33–38. doi:10.1080/00031305.1985.10479383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, A. F. (2015). Housing policy in the United States (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Scirè, M. J. (2013). HUD data on self-sufficiency programs should be improved. Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://gao.gov/assets/660/655797.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Stockard, J. G., Byrne, G. A., Day, K., Maneval, G. A., Nielsen, L. A., & James, K. (2003). Public housing operating cost study. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, M. E. (1993). Shelter poverty: New ideas on housing affordability. Philadelphia, PA: Temple UP.
   Google Scholar
• Susin, S. (2005). Longitudinal outcomes of subsidized housing recipients in matched survey and administrative data. Cityscape, 8, 189–218.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, M., Popkin, S. J., & Rawlings, L. (2009). Public housing and the legacy of segregation. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vale, L. (2000). From the puritans to the projects: Public housing and public neighbors. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP.
   Google Scholar
• von Hoffman, A. (2012). History lessons for today’s housing policy: The politics of low-income housing. Housing Policy Debate, 22, 321–376. doi:10.1080/10511482.2012.680478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb, M. D., Frescoln, K. P., & Rohe, W. M. (2016). Innovation in U.S. public housing: A critique of the moving to work demonstration. International Journal of Housing Policy, 16, 111–124. doi:10.1080/14616718.2015.1085215.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, W. J. (1987). The truly disadvantaged: The inner-city, the underclass, and public policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar