Transit-Induced Gentrification: Who Will Stay, and Who Will Go?

References

• Alonso, W. (1964). Location and land use. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674730854
   Google Scholar
• Altshuler, A., & Luberoff, D. (2003). Mega projects: The changing politics of urban public investment. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• American Public Transit Association. (2010). Transit commuting reported in the American Community Survey. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Baum-Snow, N., & Kahn, M. (2005). The effects of urban rail transit expansions: Evidence from sixteen cities, 1970 to 2000. Washington DC: Brookings-Wharton Papers on Urban Affairs, Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, G. S. (1965). A theory of the allocation of time. The Economic Journal, 75, 493–508. doi:10.2307/2228949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowes, D. R., & Ihlanfeldt, K. R. (2001). Identifying the impacts of rail transit stations on residential property values. Journal of Urban Economics, 50, 1–25. doi:10.1006/juec.2001.2214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cervero, R., Murphy, S., Ferrell, C., Goguts, N., Tsai, Y.-H., Arrington, G. B., ... Witenstein, N. (2004). Transit-oriented development in the United States: Experiences, challenges, and prospects. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies.
   Google Scholar
• Dawkins, C., & Buehler, R. (2010). Promoting affordable housing near public transit: The role of planning. Washington, DC: Department of Housing and Urban Development.
   Google Scholar
• Debrezion, G., Pels, E., & Rietveld, P. (2007). The impact of railway stations on residential and commercial property values: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 35, 161–180. doi:10.1007/s11146-007-9032-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domencich, T. A., & McFadden, D. (1975). Urban travel demand: a behavioural analysis: a Charles River Associates research study (contributions to Economic Analysis). Vol. 93. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Transit Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. (2008). Better coordination of transportation and housing programs to promote affordable housing near transit. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Gatzlaff, D., & Smith, M. (1993). The impact of the Miami metrorail on the value of residences station locations. Land Economics, 69, 54–66. doi:10.2307/3146278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gin, A., & Sonstelie, J. (1992). The streetcar and residential location in nineteenth century Philadelphia. Journal of Urban Economics, 32, 92–107. doi:10.1016/0094-1190(92)90016-E
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaeser, E. L., Kahn, M. E., & Rappaport, J. (2008). Why do the poor live in cities? The role of public transportation. Journal of Urban Economics, 63, 1–24. doi:10.1016/j.jue.2006.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grube-Cavers, A., & Patterson, Z. (2015). Urban rapid rail transit and gentrification in Canadian urban centres: A survival analysis approach. Urban Studies, 52, 178–194. doi:10.1177/0042098014524287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, W. G. (1959). How accessibility shapes land use. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 25, 73–76. doi:10.1080/01944365908978307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrell, R., Brooks, A., & Nedwick, T. (2009). Preserving affordability and access in livable communities: Subsidized housing opportunities near transit and the 50+ population. Washington, DC: AARP Public Policy Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, D. B., & Almeida, T. M. (2007). Impact of proximity to light rail rapid transit on station-area property values in Buffalo. Urban Studies, 44, 1041–1068. doi:10.1080/00420980701256005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Immergluck, D. (2009). Large redevelopment initiatives, housing values and gentrification: The case of the Atlanta Beltline. Urban Studies, 46, 1725–1747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn, M. E. (2007). Gentrification trends in new transit-oriented communities: Evidence from 14 cities that expanded and built rail transit systems. Real Estate Economics, 35, 155–182. doi:10.1111/reec.2007.35.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leopold J., Getsinger L., Blumenthal P., Abazajian K., & Jordan R. (2015). The housing affordability gap for extremely low-income renters in 2013. Washington, DC: Urban Institute. Retrieved from: http://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/alfresco/publication-pdfs/2000260-The-Housing-Affordability-Gap-for-Extremely-Low-Income-Renters-2013.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• LeRoy, S., & Sonstelie, J. (1983). Paradise lost and regained: Transportation innovation, income and residential location. Journal of Urban Economics, 13, 67–89. doi:10.1016/0094-1190(83)90046-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, J. (2002). Gentrification and transit in northwest Chicago. Transportation Quarterly, 56, 175–191.
   Google Scholar
• Mayo, S. K. (1980). Theory and estimation in the economics of housing demand. Journal of Urban Economics, 10, 95–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, E. S. (1972). Studies in the structure of the urban economy. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moeckel, R. (in press). Constraints in household relocation: Modeling land-use/transport interactions that respect time and monetary budgets. Journal of Transport and Land Use. doi:10.5198/jtlu.2015.810
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Muth, R. F. (1969). Cities and housing. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pollack, S., Bluestone, B., & Billingham, C. (2010). Maintaining diversity in America’s transit-rich neighborhoods: Tools for equitable neighborhood change. Boston, MA: Dukakis Center for Urban and Regional Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Pucher, J., & Renne, J. (2003). Socioeconomics of urban travel: Evidence from the 2001 NHTS. Transportation Quarterly, 57, 49–77.
   Google Scholar
• Rayle, L. (2015). Investigating the connection between Transit-Oriented Development and displacement: Four hypotheses. Housing Policy Debate, 25, 531–548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, A. (2015). Housing policy in the United States (3rd ed.). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shahumyan, H., & Moeckel, R. (2015). Integrating models for complex planning policy analysis: Challenges and a solution in coupling dissimilar models. Proceeding of the International Conference on Computers in Urban Planning and Urban Management (CUPUM), Boston, MA, July 7–10, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• The Urban Institute. (2012). Expanding housing opportunities through inclusionary zoning: Lessons from two counties. Washington, DC: Department of Housing and Urban Development Office of Policy Development and Research.
   Google Scholar
• Thorne-Lyman, A., Nemirow, A., Wood, J., & Hickey, R. (2008). Realizing the potential: One year later. Housing opportunities near transit in a changing market. Washington, DC: Center for Transit Oriented Development, Federal Transit Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• United States Department of Labor. (2014). Expenditures by category and income [Consumer Expenditure Survey]. Retrieved February 2016, from http://www.bls.gov/cex/.
   Google Scholar
• United States Census Bureau. (2015). Population and households by county [American Fact Finder]. Retrieved February 2016, from http://factfinder.census.gov/faces/nav/jsf/pages/index.xhtml.
   Google Scholar
• Washington/Baltimore Metropolitan Areas. (2008). Average trip length [2007-2008 TPB/BMC Household Travel Survey]. Retrieved by request from the MD State Highway Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority. (2010). 2010 Metro media guide. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Wegener, M. (2011). From macro to micro: how much micro is too much? Transport Reviews, 31, 161–177. doi:10.1080/01441647.2010.532883
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheaton, W. C. (1977). Income and urban residence: An analysis of consumer demand for location. American Economic Review, 67, 620–631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar