Searching for Affordability and Opportunity: A Framework for the Housing Choice Voucher Program

References

• Acevedo-Garcia, D., McArdle, N., Hardy, E. F., Crisan, U. I., Romano, B., Norris, D., … Reece, J. (2014). The child opportunity index: Improving collaboration between community development and public health. Health Affairs, 33, 1948–1957. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0679
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Applied Geographic Solutions. (2014). CrimeRisk methodology. 2014A release. El Cajon, CA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Arafat, A. A. A. (2011). Evaluating accessibility and travel cost as suitability components in the allocation of land use, a case study of identifying land for affordable housing in three counties in Florida ( Order No. 3586289). ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Full Text. (1517197493). Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1517197493?accountid=10920
   Google Scholar
• Aranoff, M., Clark, H., Lavine, E., & Suteethorn, K. M. (2013). LEED for neighborhood development: does it capture livability? Berkeley Planning Journal, 26, 150–167.
   Google Scholar
• Auerbach, D. I., & Kellermann, A. L. (2011). A decade of health care costs growth has wiped out real income gains for an average U.S. family. Health Affairs, 30, 1630–1636. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baek, M., Lee, S., & Gambhir, S. (2011). Mapping child well-being in Duval County, FL. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University, Kirwan Institute for the Study of Race and Ethnicity.
   Google Scholar
• Basolo, V. (2013). Examining mobility outcomes in the Housing Choice Voucher Program: Neighborhood poverty, employment, and public school quality. Cityscape, 15, 135–154.
   Google Scholar
• Basolo, V., & Nguyen, M. T. (2005). Does mobility matter? The neighborhood conditions of housing voucher holders by race and ethnicity. Housing Policy Debate, 16, 297–324. doi:10.1080/10511482.2005.9521546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basolo, V., & Nguyen, M. T. (2009). Immigrants’ housing search and neighborhoods conditions: A comparative analysis of Housing Choice Voucher holders. Cityscape, 11, 99–126.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, H. J. (2000). Who's wired and who's not: Children's access to and use of computer technology. The Future of Children, 10, 44–75.10.2307/1602689
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Been, V., Cunningham, M., Ellen, I. G., Gordon, A., Parilla, J., Turner, M. A., … Zimmerman, K. (2010). Building environmentally sustainable communities: A framework for inclusivity. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute What Works Collaborative.
   Google Scholar
• Blake, K. S., Kellerson, R. L., & Simic, A. (2007). Measuring overcrowding in housing. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, X. (2005). The geography of opportunity: Race and housing choice in metropolitan America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, F., Lewinson, T., Aszman, J., & Wolk, J. (2011). Voucher users and revitalized public-housing residents 6 years after displacement. Research on Social Work Practice, 22, 10–19. doi:10.1177/104973151142198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, D., Haveman, R., Kaplan, T., & Wolfe, B. (2012). Long-term effects of public low-income housing vouchers on neighborhood quality and household composition. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison, Robert M. LaFollette School of Public Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, M., & Zwick, P. (2007). Smart land-use analysis: The LUCIS model. Redlands, CA: ESRI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2011). Children’s food environment state indicator report. Atlanta, GA: Author. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/obesity/downloads/ChildrensFoodEnvironment.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, M. G., Steiner, F. R., & Rushman, M. J. (2001). Land-use suitability analysis in the United States: Historical development and promising technological achievements. Environmental Management, 28, 611–621. doi:10.1007/s002670010247
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coulton, C. J., Korbin, J., Chan, T., & Su, M. (2001). Mapping residents' perceptions of neighborhood boundaries: A methodological note. American Journal of Community Psychology, 29, 371–383.10.1023/A:1010303419034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham, M. K., & Droesch, A. (2005). Neighborhood quality and racial segregation. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute. doi:10.1037/e727212011-001
   Google Scholar
• Daniel, T. H. (2010). Bringing real choice to the Housing Choice Voucher Program: Addressing voucher discrimination under the Federal Fair Housing Act. The Georgetown Law Journal, 98, 769–794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLuca, S., Garboden, P. M. E., & Rosenblatt, P. (2013). Segregating shelter: How housing policies shape the residential locations of low-income minority families. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 647, 268–299. doi:10.1177/0002716213479310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demsar, U., Harris, P., Brunsdon, C., Fotheringham, A. S., & McLoone, S. (2013). Principal component analysis on spatial data: An overview. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 103, 106–128. doi:10.1080/00045608.2012.689236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, L. (2007). Comparing the effects of housing vouchers and low-income housing tax credits on neighborhood integration and school quality. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 27, 20–35. doi:10.1177/0739456X07301467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devine, D. J., Gray, R. W., Rubin, L., & Taghavi, L. B. (2003). Housing choice voucher location patterns: Implications for participants and neighborhood welfare. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research.
   Google Scholar
• Dyk, P. H., & Wilson, S. M. (1999). Family-based social capital considerations as predictors of attainments among Appalachian youth. Sociological Inquiry, 69, 477–503. doi:10.1111/soin.1999.69.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksen, M., & Ross, A. (2013). The impact of housing vouchers on mobility and neighborhood attributes. Real Estate Economics, 41, 255–277. doi:10.1111/reec.2013.41.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feins, J. D., & Patterson, R. (2005). Geographic mobility in the Housing Choice Voucher Program: A study of families entering the program, 1995–2002. Cityscape, 8, 21–47.
   Google Scholar
• Finkel, M., & Buron, L. (2001). Study on Section 8 voucher success rates: Vol. 1 Quantitative study of success rates in metropolitan areas. Final report. Washington, DC: Abt Associates for the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research.
   Google Scholar
• Flowerdew, R., Manley, D. J., & Sabel, C. E. (2008). Neighbourhood effects on health: Does it matter where you draw the boundaries? Social Science & Medicine, 66, 1241–1255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furstenberg, F. F., & Hughes, M. E. (1995). Social capital and successful development among at-risk youth. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 580–592. doi:10.2307/353914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galster, G. (2010, February). The mechanism(s) of neighborhood effects: Theory, evidence, and policy implications. Paper presented at the ESRC Seminar Neighborhood Effects: Theory & Evidence, St. Andrews University, Scotland.
   Google Scholar
• Galster, G. C., & Killen, S. P. (1995). The geography of metropolitan opportunity: A reconnaissance and conceptual framework. Housing Policy Debate, 6, 7–43. doi:10.1080/10511482.1995.9521180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galster, G., Metzger, K., & Waite, R. (1999). Neighborhood opportunity structures and immigrants’ socioeconomic advancement. Journal of Housing Research, 10, 95–128.
   Google Scholar
• Galvez, M. 2010. What do we know about Housing Choice Voucher program location outcomes? What Works Collaborative Working Paper. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute. Retrieved from http://www.urban.org/uploadedpdf/412218-housing-choice-voucher.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Glaeser, E. L. (2011). Triumph of the city: How our greatest invention makes us richer, smarter, greener, healthier, and happier. New York, NY: Penguin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glickman, T. S. (2004). Evaluating equity in Alleghany County. New York, NY: Program for the Human Environment, Rockefeller University. Retrieved from http://phe.rockefeller.edu/comm_risk/commrsk3.html
   Google Scholar
• Guo, J. Y., & Bhat, C. R. (2004). Modifiable areal units: Problem or perception in modeling of residential location choice? Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1898, 138–147. doi:10.3141/1898-17
   Google Scholar
• Handy, S. L. (2005). Planning for accessibility: In theory and in practice. In D. Levinson & K. Krizek (Eds.), Access to Destinations (pp. 131–147). Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Hanson, S. (2004). The context of urban travel: Concepts and recent trends. In S. Hanson & G. Giuliano (Eds.), The Geography of Urban Transportation (3rd ed., pp. 3–29). New York, NY: The Guildford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, P., Brunsdon, C., & Charlton, M. (2011). Geographically weighted principal components analysis. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 25, 1717–1736. doi:10.1080/13658816.2011.554838
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartung, J. M., & Henig, J. R. (1997). Housing vouchers and certificates as a vehicle for deconcentrating the poor: Evidence from the Washington, D.C., Metropolitan Area. Urban Affairs Review, 32, 403–419. doi:10.1177/107808749703200305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hipp, J. R. (2007). Block, tract, and levels of aggregation: neighborhood structure and crime and disorder as a case in point. American Sociological Review, 72, 659–680. doi:10.1177/000312240707200501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn, K. M., Ellen, I. G., & Schwartz, A. E. (2014). Do housing choice voucher holders live near good schools? Journal of Housing Economics, 23, 28–40. doi:10.1016/j.jhe.2013.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iceland, J., & Steinmetz, E. (2003). The effects of using census block groups instead of census tracts when examining residential housing patterns. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/hhes/www/housing/housing_patterns/unitofanalysis.html
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. New York, NY: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Kasarda, J. D. (1993). Inner-city concentrated poverty and neighborhood distress: 1970-1990. Housing Policy Debate, 4, 253–302. doi:10.1080/10511482.1993.9521135
   Google Scholar
• Katz, B., & Turner, M. A. (2008). Chapter 10: Rethinking U.S. rental housing policy: A new blueprint for federal, state and local action. In N. P. Retsinas & E. S. Belsky (Eds.), Revisiting rental housing: Policies, programs, and priorities (pp. 319-358). Washington, DC: The Brookings Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Kawachi, I., Kennedy, B. P., & Glass, R. (1999). Social capital and self-rated health: A contextual analysis. American Journal of Public Health, 89, 1187–1193. doi:10.2105/AJPH.89.8.1187
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khadduri, J. (2001). Deconcentration: What do we mean? What do we want? Cityscape, 5, 69–84.
   Google Scholar
• Kingsley, G. T. (2009). Chapter 15: Taking advantage of what we have learned. In H. C. Cisneros & L. Engdahl (Eds.), From despair to hope. Hope VI and the new promise of public housing in America’s cities (pp. 263–297). Washington, DC: The Brookings Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Ladd, H. F., & Ludwig, J. (1997). Federal housing assistance, residential relocation, and educational opportunities: Evidence from Baltimore. American Economic Review, 87, 272–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, C. (2014). 2014 Survey of operating income & expenses in rental apartment communities: Executive summary. National Apartment Association. Retrieved from http://www.naahq.org/sites/default/files/naa-documents/income-expenses-survey/2014-Income-Expenses-Summary.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lipman, B. J. (2006). A heavy load: The combined housing and transportation burdens of working families. Washington, DC: Center for Housing Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Ludwig, J., Duncan, G. J., & Pinkston, J. C. (2005). Housing mobility programs and economic self-sufficiency: Evidence from a randomized experiment. Journal of Public Economics, 89, 131–156. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2003.07.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, K. (1981). A theory of good city form. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mallach, A. (2008). Managing neighborhood change. A framework for sustainable and equitable revitalization. Montclair, NJ: National Housing Institute. Retrieved from http://www.nhi.org/pdf/ManagingNeighborhoodChange.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mavoa, S., Witten, K., McCreanor, T., & O’Sullivan, D. (2012). GIS-based destination accessibility via public transit and walking in Auckland, New Zealand. Journal of Transport Geography, 20, 15–22. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClure, K. (2010). The prospects for guiding housing choice voucher households to high-opportunity neighborhoods. Cityscape, 12, 101–122.
   Google Scholar
• McClure, K. (2011). Housing Choice Voucher marketing opportunity index: Analysis of data at the tract and block group level. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research.
   Google Scholar
• Morenoff, J. D., Sampson, R. J., & Raudenbush, S. W. (2001). Neighborhood inequality, collective efficacy, and the spatial dynamics of homicide. Criminology, 39, 517–558. doi:10.1111/crim.2001.39.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Bureau of Economic Research. (2015). Data appendix census variables. Cambridge, MA: Author. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/data-appendix/w13236/BFM_appendices.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Oakley, D., & Burchfield, K. (2009). Out of the projects, still in the hood: The spatial constraints on public-housing residents' relocation in Chicago. Journal of Urban Affairs, 31, 589–614. doi:10.1111/juaf.2009.31.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, M. (2013). Housing vouchers as a means of poverty deconcentration and race desegregation: Patterns and factors of voucher recipients’ spatial concentration in Cleveland. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 28, 451–468. doi:10.1007/s10901-012-9319-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pendall, R. (2000). Why voucher and certificate users live in distressed neighborhoods. Housing Policy Debate, 11, 881–910. doi:10.1080/10511482.2000.9521391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pendall, R., Hayes, C., George, A., McDade, Z., Dawkins, C., Jeon, J. S., … Smart, M. (2014). Driving to opportunity: Understanding the links among transportation access, residential outcomes, and economic opportunity for housing voucher recipients. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Philippatos, G. C., Christofi, A., & Christofi, P. (1983). The inter-temporal stability of international stock market relationships: Another view. Financial Management, 12, 63–69. doi:10.2307/3665270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popkin, S., & Cunningham, K. (2000). Searching for rental housing with Section 8 in the Chicago region. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, J. A. (2001). Minority-majority nation: Racing the population in the twenty-first century. Fordham Urban Law Journal, 29, 1395–1415.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, J. A. (2003). Opportunity-based housing. Journal of Affordable Housing & Community Development Law, 188–228.
   Google Scholar
• Program for International Student Assessment (PISA). (2011). Does participation in pre-primary education translate into better learning outcomes at school? Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Public Housing Agency Plans, 24 C.F.R. § 903 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Reece, J., Gambhir, S., Ratchford, C., Martin, M., & Olinger, J. (2010). The geography of opportunity: Mapping to promote equitable community development and fair housing in King County, WA. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University, Kirwan Institute for the Study of Race and Ethnicity.
   Google Scholar
• Rengert, G. F., & Lockwood, B. (2009). Chapter 5. Geographical units of analysis and the analysis of crime. In D. Weisburd, et al. (Eds.), Putting crime in its place (pp. 109–122). New York, NY: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-09688-9
   Google Scholar
• Rice, D., & Sard, B. (2007). The effects of the Federal budget squeeze on low-income housing assistance. Washington, DC: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
   Google Scholar
• Sampson, R. J., Raudenbush, S., & Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277, 918–924. doi:10.1126/science.277.5328.918
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santiago, A. M., Galster, G. C., Lucero, J. L., Ishler, K. J., Lee, E. L., Kypriotakis, G., & Stack, L. (2014). Opportunity neighborhoods for Latino and African American children. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, A. F. (2015). Housing policy in the United States (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shroder, M. (2002). Locational constraint, housing counseling, and successful lease-up in a randomized housing experiment. Journal of Urban Economics, 51, 315–338. doi:10.1006/juec.2001.2247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, R., Naparstek, A., Popkin, S., Bartlett, L., Bates, L., Cigna, J., … Vinson, E. (2002). Housing choice for HOPE VI relocates. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Sperling, J. (2012). The tyranny of census geography: Small-area data and neighborhood statistics. Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research, 14, 219–223.
   Google Scholar
• Srinivasan, S., O’Fallon, L. R., & Dearry, A. (2003). Creating healthy communities, healthy homes, healthy people: Initiating a research agenda on the built environment and public health. American Journal of Public Health, 93, 1446–1450. doi:10.2105/AJPH.93.9.1446
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturtevant, L. A. (2015). The future of housing research: The importance of going local. Housing Policy Debate, 25, 809–812. doi:10.1080/10511482.2015.1043700
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talen, E., & Koschinsky, J. (2011). Is subsidized housing in sustainable neighborhoods? Evidence from Chicago. Housing Policy Debate, 21, 1–28. doi:10.1080/10511482.2010.533618
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatian, P. A., Kingsley, T., Parilla, J., & Pendall, R. (2012). Building successful neighborhoods. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, R. B. (1995). The impact of crime on communities. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 539, 28–45. doi:10.1177/0002716295539001003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, R. B. (2012). Defining neighborhoods in space and time. Cityscape, 14, 225–230.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, M. A., Comey, J., Kuehn, D., Nichols, A., Franks, K., & Price, D. (2011). Helping poor families gain and sustain access to high-opportunity neighborhoods. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, M. A., Popkin, S., & Cunningham, M. (1999). Section 8 mobility and neighborhood health: Emerging issues and policy challenges. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, M. A., & Wilson, C. (1998). Affirmatively furthering fair housing: Neighborhood outcomes for tenant-based assistance in six metropolitan areas. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau. (2013). ACS Demographic and Housing Estimates, 2009-2013 American Community Survey 5-year estimates. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). (2012). Food access research atlas documentation. Retrieved from http://www.ers.usda.gov/datafiles/Food_Access_Research_Atlas/Download_the_Data/Current_Version/documentation.pdf
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). (2010). HUD strategic plan: FY 2010—2015. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/documents/huddoc?id=DOC_4436.pdf
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). (2013a). AFFH data documentation. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from https://www.huduser.gov/publications/pdf/FR-5173-P-01_AFFH_data_documentation.pdf
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). (2013b). Section 8 Management Assessment Program (SEMAP) certification. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from https://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/documents/huddoc?id=52648.pdf
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). (2014). The budget for fiscal year 2015. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/budget/fy2015/assets/housing.pdf
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and Department of Transportation (DOT). (2013). Data and methodology: Location Affordability Index Version 2.0. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.locationaffordability.info/LAPMethodsV2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (2011). Energy efficiency in affordable housing: A guide to developing and implementing greenhouse gas reduction programs. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://epa.gov/statelocalclimate/documents/pdf/affordable_housing.pdf
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2012). TRI data and tools. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from https://www.epa.gov/toxics-release-inventory-tri-program/tri-data-and-tools
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2015). EJSCREEN Environmental Justice Mapping and Screening Tool: EJSCREEN Technical Documentation. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www2.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-05/documents/ejscreen_technical_document_20150505.pdf
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC). (2009). LEED reference guide for neighborhood development. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Varady, D. P., & Walker, C. (2007). Neighborhood choices: Section 8 housing vouchers and residential mobility. New Brunswick, NJ: CUPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Varady, D., Walker, C., & Wang, X. (2001). Voucher recipient achievement of improved housing conditions in the U.S.: Do moving distance and relocation services matter? Urban Studies, 38, 1273–1304. doi:10.1080/00420980124918
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, C., & Winston, F. (2014). Community development investments and neighborhood change: An analysis of LISC’s building sustainable communities neighborhoods. Washington, DC: Local Initiatives Support Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Walter, R., Evans, A., & Atherwood, S. (2015). Addressing the affordable housing crisis for vulnerable renters: Insights from Broward County on an affordable housing acquisition tool. Housing Policy Debate, 26, 123–149. doi:10.1080/10511482.2014.1003190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter, R. Li, Y., & Atherwood, S. (2015). Moving to opportunity? An examination of Housing Choice Vouchers on urban poverty deconcentration in South Florida. Housing Studies, 30, 1064–1091. doi:10.1080/02673037.2015.1009004
   Google Scholar
• Wang, F., & Feliberty, Y. C. (2010). Chapter 8: Spatial distribution of toxic release inventory sites in Chicago area: Is there environmental inequity? In P. S. Showalter & Y. Lu (Eds.), Geospatial techniques in urban hazard and disaster analysis (pp. 157–177). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, R., Larsen, K., & Ray, A. (2015). Rethinking locational outcomes for Housing Choice Vouchers: A case study in Duval County, Florida. Housing Policy Debate, 1-24. doi:10.1080/10511482.2014.968182
   Google Scholar
• Wang, X., & Varady, D. P. (2005). Using hot-spot analysis to study the clustering of Section 8 housing voucher families. Housing Studies, 20, 29–48. doi:10.1080/0267303042000308714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X., Varady, D. P., & Wang, Y. (2008). Measuring the deconcentration of Housing Choice Voucher program recipients in eight U.S. metropolitan areas using hot-spot analysis. Cityscape, 10, 65–90.
   Google Scholar
• Wei, F., & Knox, P. L. (2013). Neighborhood change in metropolitan America, 1990 to 2010. Urban Affairs Review, 52, 33–65. doi:10.1177/1078087413501640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, M. J., & Glick, J. E. (2000). Generation status, social capital, and the routes out of high school. Sociological Forum, 15, 671–691. doi:10.1023/A:1007515100190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, A. R., Smith, M. T., & Strambi-Kramer, M. (2009). Housing Choice Vouchers, the low-income housing tax credit, and the federal poverty deconcentration goal. Urban Affairs Review, 45, 119–132. doi:10.1177/1078087409336529
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, M., Turnham, J., & Mills, G. (2008). Housing affordability and family well-being: Results from the housing voucher evaluation. Housing Policy Debate, 19, 367–412. doi:10.1080/10511482.2008.9521639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar