Where Does Location Affordability Drive Residential Mobility? An Analysis of Origin and Destination Communities

References

• Acevedo-Garcia, D., Osypuk, T. L., Werbel R. E., Meara E. R., Cutler D. M., & Berkman, L. F. (2004). Does housing mobility policy improve health? Housing Policy Debate., 15, 49–98. doi:10.1080/10511482.2004.9521495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldrich, L., Beale, C., & Kassel, K. (2001). Commuting and the economic functions of small towns and places. Rural Development Perspectives, 12, 26–31.
   Google Scholar
• Allard, S. W., & Danziger, S. (2002). Proximity and opportunity: How residence and race affect the employment of welfare recipients. Housing Policy Debate., 13, 675–700. doi:10.1080/10511482.2002.9521461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alonso, W. (1964). Location and land use. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674730854
   Google Scholar
• Assuncao, R. M., Schmertmann, C. P., Potter, J. E., & Cavenaghi, S. M. (2005). Empirical bayes estimation of demographic schedules for small areas. Demography, 42, 537–558. doi:10.1353/dem.2005.0022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barkley, D. L. (1995). The economics of change in rural America. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 77, 1252–1258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Akiva, M., & Lerman, S. R. (1985). Discrete choice analysis: Theory and application to travel demand. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bernardo, C., Paleti, R., Hoklas, M., & Bhat, C. (2015). An empirical investigation into the time-use and activity patterns of dual-earner couples with and without young children. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 76, 71–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackman, A., & Krupnick, A. (2001). Location-efficient mortgages: Is the rationale sound? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 20, 633–649. doi:10.1002/pam.1021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blakely, E. J. (2001). Competitive advantage for the 21st-century city: Can a place-based approach to economic development survive in a cyberspace age? Journal of the American Planning Association, 67, 133–141.
   Google Scholar
• Bolton, R. (1992). 'Place prosperity vs people prosperity' revisited: An old issue with a new angle. Urban Studies, 29, 185–203. doi:10.1080/00420989220080261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bookings Institute (2006). The affordability index: A new tool for measuring the true affordability of a housing choice. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Boushey, H., Chapman, J. (2009). Analysis of Miriam King, Steven Ruggles, Trent Alexander, Donna Leicach, and Matthew Sobek, integrated public use microdata series, current population survey: Version 2.0. machine-readable database. Minneapolis, MN: Minnesota Population Center.
   Google Scholar
• Bowles, S. (1970). Migration as investment: Empirical tests of the human investment approach to geographical mobility. Review of Economics and Statistics, 52, 356–362. Briggs, 2007. doi:10.2307/1926312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, M. L., Edin, K., Clampet-Lundquist, S., & Duncan, G. J. (2010). The durability of gains from the Gautreaux Two residential mobility program: A qualitative analysis of who stays and who moves from low-poverty neighborhoods. Housing Policy Debate, 20, 119–146. doi:10.1080/10511481003599902
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briggs, X. D. S. (1997). Moving up versus moving out: Neighborhood effects in housing mobility programs. Housing Policy Debate, 8, 195–234. doi:10.1080/10511482.1997.9521252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briggs, X. D. S., Popkin, S.J., & Goering, J. (2010). Moving to opportunity. Cambridge: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195393712.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Browne, W. P. (2001). The failure of national rural policy: Institutions and interests. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cao, X. J. (2009). Disentangling the influence of neighborhood type and self-selection on driving behavior: An application of sample selection model. Transportation, 36, 207–222. doi: 10.1007/s11116-009-9189-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, P. J., & Kefalas, M. J. (2009). Hollowing out the middle: The rural brain drain and what it means for America. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chetty, R., & Hendren N. (2015). The impacts of neighborhoods on intergenerational mobility: Child exposure effects and county-level estimates ( Working Paper). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER).
   Google Scholar
• Chetty, R., Hendren, N., & Katz, L. F. (2015). The effects of exposure to better neighborhoods on children: New evidence from the moving to opportunity experiment ( Working Paper). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER).
   Google Scholar
• Clark, G. L., & Ballard, K. P. (1980). Modeling out-migration from depressed regions: The significance of origin and destination characteristics. Environment and Planning A, 12, 799–812. doi: 10.1068/a120799
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, W. A., Huang, Y., & Withers, S. (2003). Does commuting distance matter?: Commuting tolerance and residential change. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 33, 199–221. doi: 10.1016/S0166-0462(02)00012-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotter, D. A. (2002). Poor people in poor places: Local opportunity structures and household poverty. Rural Sociology, 67, 534–555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crane, R. (2007). Is there a quiet revolution in women's travel? Revisiting the gender gap in commuting. Journal of the American Planning Association, 73, 298–316. doi: 10.1080/01944360708977979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crane, R., Manville, M. (2006). People or Place? Revisiting the who versus the where of urban development. Land Lines ( July 2008), 2–7.
   Google Scholar
• Cushing, B. (1999). Migration and persistent poverty in rural America. In K. Pandit, & S. Davies (Eds.), Migration and restructuring in the United States: A geographic perspective (pp. 15–36). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Danielsen, K. A., Lang, R. E., & Fulton, W. (1999). Retracting suburbia: Smart growth and the future of housing. Housing Policy Debate, 10, 513–540. doi:10.1080/10511482.1999.9521341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dempwolf, C. S., & Lyles, L. W. (2012). The uses of social network analysis in planning: A review of the literature. Journal of Planning Literature, 27, 3–21. doi: 10.1177/0885412211411092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drabenstott, M. (2000). A new structure for agriculture: A revolution for rural America. Journal of Agribusiness, 18, 61–70.
   Google Scholar
• van Duijn, M. A. J., & Huisman, M. (2011). Statistical models for ties and actors. In J. Scott & P. J. Carrington (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social network analysis (pp. 459–483). London, UK: SAGE Publications. doi: 10.4135/9781446294413
   Google Scholar
• Evers, G. (1989). Simultaneous models for migration and commuting: Macro and micro economic approaches. In J. Van Dijk, H. Folmer, H. W. Herzog Jr, & A. M. Schlottmann (Eds.), Migration and labor market adjustment (pp. 239–250). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Ewing, R., & Cervero, R. (2010). Travel and the built environment: A meta-analysis. Journal of the American Planning Association, 76, 265–294. doi:10.1080/01944361003766766
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feser, E., & Sweeney, S. (2003). Out-migration, depopulation, and the geography of U.S. economic distress. International Regional Science Review, 26, 38–67. doi: 10.1177/0160017602238985
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galster, G. C., & Killen, S. P. (1995). The geography of metropolitan opportunity: A reconnaissance and conceptual framework. Housing Policy Debate, 6, 7–43. doi:10.1080/10511482.1995.9521180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gan, Q., & Hill, R. J. (2009). Measuring housing affordability: Looking beyond the median. Journal of Housing Economics, 18, 115–125. doi:10.1016/j.jhe.2009.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganning, J. P., McCall, B. D. (2012). The spatial heterogeneity and geographic extent of population deconcentration: Measurement and policy implications. In L. J. Kulcsár, K. J. Curtis (Eds.) International handbook of rural demography (pp. 319–332). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-1842-5
   Google Scholar
• Gaumer, E., Jacobowitz, A., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2014). Building ties: The social networks of affordable-housing residents. Cityscape, 16, 47–68.
   Google Scholar
• Glaeser, E. L., & Resseger, M. G. (2010). The complementarity between cities and skill. Journal of Regional Science., 50, 221–244. doi: 10.1111/jors.2010.50.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasmeier, A., Salant, P. (2006). Low-skill workers in rural America Face permanent job loss (policy brief no. 2). Durham, NH: The Carsey Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Greenlee, A. J. (2011). A different lens: Administrative perspectives on portability in Illinois' Housing Choice Voucher program. Housing Policy Debate., 21, 377–403. doi: 10.1080/10511482.2011.591409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenlee, A. J. (2014). More than meets the market: Landlord influence in the Illinois Housing Choice Voucher program. Housing Policy Debate, 24, 500–524. doi:10.1080/10511482.2014.913649
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood, M. J. (1969). An analysis of the determinants of geographic labor mobility in the United States. Review of Economics and Statistics, 51, 189–194. doi: 10.2307/1926728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood, M. J. (1985). Human migration: Theory, models, and empirical studies. Journal of Regional Science, 25, 521–544. doi: 10.1111/jors.1985.25.issue-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grund, T. U. (2014). Nwcommands: Software tools for the statistical modeling of network data in stata. Retrieved from http://nwcommands.org
   Google Scholar
• Haas, P. C., Makarewicz, A. B., & Bernstein, S. (2008). Estimating transportation costs by characteristics of neighborhood and household. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2077, 62–70. doi:10.3141/2077-09
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haughey, R. M. (2002). Workforce housing: Barriers, solutions, and model programs. Washington, DC: The ULI Housing Forum.
   Google Scholar
• Head, A., & Lloyd-Ellis, H. (2012). Housing liquidity, mobility, and the labour market. Review of Economic Studies., 79, 1559–1589. doi:10.1093/restud/rds004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helling, A., & Sawicki, D. S. (2003). Race and residential access to goods and services. Housing Policy Debate., 14, 69–101. doi:10.1080/10511482.2003.9521469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicks, J. R. (1932). The theory of wages. London, UK: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Howell-Moroney, M. (2005). The geography of opportunity and unemployment: An integrated model of residential segregation and spatial mismatch. Journal of Urban Affairs, 27, 353–377. doi: 10.1111/juaf.2005.27.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, M. A. (1993). A mobility strategy for improving opportunity. Housing Policy Debate., 6, 271–297. doi:10.1080/10511482.1995.9521187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulchanski, J. D. (1995). The concept of housing affordability: Six contemporary uses of the housing expenditure‐to‐income ratio. Housing Studies, 10, 471–491. doi:10.1080/02673039508720833
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ihlanfeldt, K. R. (1999). The geography of economic and social opportunity in metropolitan areas. In A. Altshuler, W. Morrill, H. Wolman, & F. Mitchell (Eds.), Governance and opportunity in metropolitan America (pp. 213–252). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Isserman, A. M. (2005). In the national interest: Defining rural and urban correctly in research and public policy. International Regional Science Review, 28, 465–499. doi: 10.1177/0160017605279000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jewkes, M. D., & Delgadillo, L. M. (2010). Weaknesses of housing affordability indices used by practitioners. Journal of Financial Counseling and Planning, 21, 43–52.
   Google Scholar
• Jolliffe, D. (2004). Rural poverty at a glance. Washington, DC: USDA Economic Research Service.
   Google Scholar
• Kain, J.F. (1968). Housing segregation, negro employment, and metropolitan decentralization. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 175–197 doi: 10.2307/1885893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kling, J. R., Liebman, J. B., & Katz, L.F. (2007). Experimental analysis of neighborhood effects. Econometrica, 75, 83–119. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0262.2007.00733.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krackhardt, D. (1988). Predicting with networks: Nonparametric multiple regression analysis of dyadic data. Social Networks, 10, 359–381. doi: 10.1016/0378-8733(88)90004-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krizek, K. (2003). Transit supportive home loans: Theory, application, and prospects for smart growth. Housing Policy Debate, 14, 657–677. doi:10.1080/10511482.2003.9521490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutty, N. K. (2005). A new measure of housing affordability: Estimates and analytical results. Housing Policy Debate, 16, 113–142. doi:10.1080/10511482.2005.9521536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee Jr., D. B. (1973). Requiem for large-scale models. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 39, 163–178. doi: 10.1080/01944367308977851
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeSage, J. P., & Pace, R. K. (2008). Spatial econometric modeling of origin-destination flows. Journal of Regional Science, 48, 941–967. doi: 10.1111/jors.2008.48.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leventhal, T., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2003). Moving to opportunity: an experimental study of neighborhood effects on mental health. American Journal of Public Health, 93, 1576–1582. doi:10.2105/AJPH.93.9.1576
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lichter, D. T., McLaughlin, D. K., Cornwell, G. T. (1995). Migration and the loss of human resources in rural America. In L. J. Beaulieu & D. Mulkay (Eds.), Investing in people: The human capital needs of rural America (pp. 235–256). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ludwig, J., Duncan, G. J., Gennetian, L. A., Katz, L. F., Kessler, R. C., Kling, J. R., & Sanbonmatsu, L. (2013). Long-term neighborhood effects on low-income families: Evidence from moving to opportunity ( Working Paper No. 18772). Washington, DC: National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, N. C., Brown, A. L., Marchetti, L. M., & Pedroso, M.S. (2011). U.S. school travel, 2009: An assessment of trends. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41, 146–151. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.04.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFadden, D. L. (1974). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In P. Zarembka (Ed.), Frontiers in Econometrics (pp. 105–142). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• McFadden, D. (1978). Modeling the choice of residential location. In A. Karlqvist (Ed.), Spatial Interaction Theory and Residential Location (pp. 75–96). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, E.S. (1967). An aggregative model of resource allocation in a metropolitan area. The American Economic Review, 57, 197–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moretti, E. (2012). The new geography of jobs. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
   Google Scholar
• Muth, R. F. (1969). Cities and housing: The spatial pattern of urban residential land use. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Low Income Housing Coalition. (2015). Out of reach 2015: Low wages & high rents lock renters out. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Parr, J. B. (1966). Outmigration and the depressed area problem. Land Economics, 42, 149–159. doi: 10.2307/3145615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patridge, M. D., Rickman, D. S., Ali, M. K., & Olfert, R. (2008). Lost in space: Population growth in the American hinterlands and small cities. Journal of Economic Geography., 8, 727–757. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbn038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Partridge, M. D., Rickman, D. S., Olfert, M. R., & Ali, K. (2012). Dwindling U.S. internal migration: Evidence of spatial equilibrium or structural shifts in local labor markets? Regional Science and Urban Economics., 42, 375–388. doi:10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2011.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pendall, R. (2000). Why voucher and certificate holders live in distressed neighborhoods. Housing Policy Debate., 11, 891–910. doi:10.1080/10511482.2000.9521391
   Google Scholar
• Plane, D.A. (1993). Demographic influences on migration. Regional Studies., 27, 375–383. doi: 10.1080/00343409312331347635
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plane, D.A., Henrie, C. J., & Perry, M. (2005). Moving up and down the urban hierarchy across the life course. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102, 15313–15318. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0507312102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollack, C.E., Green, H. D., Jr, Kennedy, D. P., Griffin, B. A., Kennedy-Hendricks, A., Burkhauser, S., & Schwartz, H. (2014). The impact of public housing on social networks: A natural experiment. American Journal of Public Health, 104, 1642–1649. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.301949
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauterkus, S., Thrall G., & Hangen E. (2010). Location efficiency and mortgage default. Journal of Sustainable Real Estate, 2, 117–141. doi:10.5555/jsre.2.1.w00u2v11w56118p7
   Google Scholar
• Ravenstein, E. G. (1889). The laws of migration. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 52, 241–305. doi: 10.2307/2979333
   Google Scholar
• Renkow, M., & Hoover, D. M. (2000). Commuting, migration, and rural-urban population dynamics. Journal of Regional Science, 40, 261–287. doi: 10.1111/0022-4146.00174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, M., Scobie, G. M., & Hallinan, B. (2006). Affordability of housing: Concepts measurement and evidence. Wellington: New Zealand Treasury. Working Paper 06/03.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, J. E. (1995). Changing the geography of opportunity by expanding residential location choice: Lessons from the gautreaux program. Housing Policy Debate., 6, 231–269. doi:10.1080/10511482.1995.9521186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, E., & Harris, L. E. (2001). Residential mobility and opportunities: Early impacts of the moving to opportunity demonstration program in Chicago. Housing Policy Debate, 12, 321–346. doi:10.1080/10511482.2001.9521408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, J. E., Reynolds, L., & Deluca, S. (2002). How do places matter? The geography of opportunity, self-efficacy and a look inside the black box of residential mobility. Housing Studies, 17, 71–82. doi: 10.1080/02673030120105901
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, E., Harris, L., & Denton, N. (2003). New places, new faces: An analysis of neighborhoods and social ties among MTO movers in Chicago. In J. Goering & J. Feins (Eds.), Choosing a better life? Evaluating the moving to opportunity experiment (pp. 275–310). Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rossi, P. H. (1955). Why families move: A study in the social psychology of urban residential mobility. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sampson, R.J. (2008). Moving to inequality: Neighborhood effects and experiments meet structure. American Journal of Sociology, 114, 189. doi:10.1086/589843
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez, T. W. (2015). Where has housing policy debate been? Housing Policy Debate, 25, 208–214. doi: 10.1080/10511482.2015.1006030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos, A., McGuckin, N., Nakamoto, H. Y., Gray, D., & Liss, S. (2011). Summary of travel trends: 2009 national household travel survey (No. FHWA-PL-ll-022). Washington, DC: US Department of Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• Schirmer, P. M., Van Eggermond, M. A., & Axhausen, K. W. (2014). The role of location in residential location choice models: A review of literature. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 7, 3–21. doi: 10.5198/jtlu.v7i2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shuai, Xiaobing. (2012). Does commuting lead to migration? Journal of regional analysis & policy, 42, 237–250.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, W. (1987). Workplace location, residential location, and urban commuting. Urban Studies, 24, 119–128. doi: 10.1080/713703872
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, W. (2001). QAP: The quadratic assignment procedure. In North American Stata Users’ Group Meeting, March 20–21, 2001. (pp. 12–13). Retrieved from http://www.stata.com/meeting/1nasug/simpson.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sirgy, M. J., & Cornwell, T. (2002). How neighborhood features affect quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 59, 79–114. doi: 10.1023/A:1016021108513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Squires, G. D., & Kubrin, C. E. (2005). Privileged places: Race, uneven development and the geography of opportunity in urban America. Urban Studies, 42, 47–68. doi: 10.1080/0042098042000309694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahl, K. (1983). A note on the microeconomics of migration. Journal of Urban Economics, 14, 318–326. doi: 10.1016/0094-1190(83)90012-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, M. E. (1993). Shelter poverty: New ideas on housing affordability. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, M. E. (2006). What is housing affordability? The case for the residual income approach. Housing Policy Debate., 17, 151–184. doi:10.1080/10511482.2006.9521564
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, B. D., & Morris, E. A. (2015). Public transportation objectives and rider demographics: are transit’s priorities poor public policy? Transportation, 42, 347–367. doi: 10.1007/s11116-014-9547-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, B. D., & Ong, P. M. (1995). spatial mismatch or automobile mismatch? An examination of race, residence and commuting in US metropolitan areas. Urban Studies, 32, 1453–1473. doi: 10.1080/00420989550012348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiebout, C. M. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64, 416–424. doi: 10.1086/257839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolbert, C. M., & Killian, M. S. (1987). Labor market areas for the United States. Washington, DC: ERS, USDA.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Agriculture. (2000). ERS commuting zones. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Agriculture. (2013). USDA rural-urban continuum codes. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. (2008–2012). American community survey. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. (2011–2013). American community survey. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. Current population survey. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (2006). Housing impact analysis. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (2015). Location affordability index user guide. Retrieved from http://www.locationaffordability.info/lai.aspx?url=user_guide.php Accessed August 14, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service. (2008–2009). IRS statistics of income migration data. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service. (2009–2010). IRS statistics of income migration data. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service. (2010–2011). IRS statistics of income migration data. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Varady, D., & Walker, C. C. (2003). Housing vouchers and residential mobility. Journal of Planning Literature., 18, 17–30. doi:10.1177/0885412203254333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Thunen, J. ([1826] 1966). The isolated state. English edition edited by Peter Hall (Ed.). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Voss, P. R., Long, D. D., Hammer, R. B., & Friedman, S. (2006). County child poverty rates in the U.S.: A spatial regression approach. Population Research and Policy Review, 25, 369–391. doi: 10.1007/s11113-006-9007-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegener, M. (2013). The future of mobility in cities: Challenges for urban modelling. Transport Policy, 29, 275–282. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, W. J. (1987). The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson B., & A. J. Greenlee. (2015). The geography of opportunity: An exploratory spatial data analysis of U.S. counties. GeoJournal, 1–16. doi:10.1007/s10708-015-9642-6
   Google Scholar