Neighborhood Opportunity and Location Affordability for Low-Income Renter Families

References

• Acevedo-Garcia, D., McArdle, N., Hardy, E. F., Crisan, U. I., Romano, B., Norris, D., … Reece, J. (2014). The child opportunity index: Improving collaboration between community development and public health. Health Affairs, 33, 1948–1957. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0679.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Been, V., Cunningham, M., Ellen, I. G., Gordon, A., Parilla, J., Turner, M. A., & Zimmerman, K. (2010). Building environmentally sustainable communities: A framework for inclusivity. Washington, DC: Furman Center, Urban Institute, What Works Collaborative.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, S. (2011). Transportation and fair housing part 2: Consider transportation cost to make fair housing practical. Shelterforce, 165. Retrieved from http://www.shelterforce.org/article/2175/transportation_and_fair_housing_part_2_consider_transportation_cost_to_make/P0/
   Google Scholar
• Beron, K. J., Hanson, Y., Murdoch, J. C., & Thayer, M. A. (2004). Hedonic price functions and spatial dependence: Implications for the demand for urban air quality. In L. Anselin, R. Florax & S. J. Rey (Eds.), Advances in spatial econometrics: Methodology, tools and applications (pp. 267–281). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.10.1007/978-3-662-05617-2
   Google Scholar
• Brasington, D., & Haurin, D. R. (2006). Educational outcomes and house values: A test of the value added approach. Journal of Regional Science, 46, 245–268. 10.1111/jors.2006.46.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, H. S., & Yarnell, L. M. (2013). The price of access: Capitalization of neighborhood contextual factors. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 10, 95–95. doi:10.1186/1479-5868-10-95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Center for Neighborhood Technology, & Center for Transit-Oriented Development. (2006). The affordability index: A new tool for measuring the true affordability of a housing choice. In Urban Markets Initiative, Market Innovation Brief. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, Metropolitan Policy Program. Retrieved from: http://www.brookings.edu/research/reports/2006/01/01-affordability-index.
   Google Scholar
• Chetty, R., Hendren, N., & Katz, L. F. (2015). The effects of exposure to better neighborhoods on children: New evidence from the Moving to Opportunity experiment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University and NBER. 10.3386/w21156
   Google Scholar
• Chiodo, A. J., Hernández-Murillo, R., & Owyang, M. T. (2010). Nonlinear effects of school quality on house prices. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, 92, 185–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• diversitydatakids.org (2014). Waltham, MA: diversitydatakids.org, Institute for Child, Youth and Family Policy, Heller School for Social Policy & Management, Brandeis University. Retrieved on April 4, 2016 from http://www.diversitydatakids.org
   Google Scholar
• diversitydatakids.org, & Kirwan Institute for the Study of Race and Ethnicity. (2014). Child opportunity index mapping. Waltham, MA: Brandeis University.
   Google Scholar
• diversitydatakids.org, Institute for Child, Youth and Family Policy, Heller School for Social Policy & Management, Brandeis University. 2016. Retrieved on April 4, 2016 from http://www.diversitydatakids.org/files/CHILDOI/DOCS/DDK_KIRWAN_CHILDOI_OVERVIEW.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Early, D. W. (2011). Racial and ethnic disparities in rents of constant quality units in the Housing Choice Voucher program: Evidence from HUD’s customer satisfaction survey assisted housing research cadre report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
   Google Scholar
• Ellen, I. G., & Glied, S. (2015). Housing, neighborhoods, and children’s health. The Future of Children, 25, 135–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellen, I. G., & Yager, J. (2015). Race, poverty, and federal rental housing policy. In Ross, L.M. (Ed.), HUD at 50: Creating Pathways to Opportunity (pp. 103–132). Washington, DC: Department of Housing and Urban Development.
   Google Scholar
• Ewing, R., & Hamidi, S. (2014). Measuring urban sprawl and validating sprawl measures. Salt Lake City, UT: Metropolitan Research Center, University of Utah. Prepared for the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Ford Foundation, Smart Growth America.
   Google Scholar
• Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988. (1988). 42 § 3601 et seq
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, L., Pollakowski, H., & Zabel, J. (2009). Amenity-based housing affordability indexes. Real Estate Economics, 37, 705–746. 10.1111/reec.2009.37.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goering, J., & Feins, J. D. (Eds.) (2003). Choosing a better life? Evaluating the Moving to Opportunity social experiment. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, D. J., & McArdle, N. (2004). More than money: The spatial mismatch between where homeowners of color in metro boston can aford to live and where they actually reside. Cambridge, MA: The Civil Rights Project at Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Hox, J. (2002). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Iceland, J., & Sharp, G. (2013). White residential segregation in U.S. metropolitan areas: Conceptual issues, patterns, and trends from the U.S. census, 1980 to 2010. Population Research and Policy Review, 32, 663-686. doi: 10.1007/s11113-013-9277-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jud, G. D., & Winkler, D. T. (2002). The dynamics of metropolitan housing prices. Journal of Real Estate Research, 23, 29–45.
   Google Scholar
• Krysan, M., & Bader, M. D. (2009). Racial blind spots: Black-white-Latino differences in community knowledge. Social Problems, 56, 677–701. 10.1525/sp.2009.56.4.677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan, J. R., & Stults, B. J. (2011). The persistence of segregation in the metropolis: New findings from the 2010 census, census brief prepared for project US2010 U.S. 2010: Discover America in a new century: American communities project. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Loubert, L. (2005). Housing markets and school financing. Journal of Education Finance, 30, 412–429.
   Google Scholar
• Massey, D. S., & Denton, N. A. (1989). Hypersegregation in U.S. metropolitan areas: Black and Hispanic segregation along five dimensions. Demography, 26, 373–391. 10.2307/2061599
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, B. (2000). Driven to spend: The impact of sprawl on household transportation expenses. Washington, DC: Surface Transportation Policy Project.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D. Y. (2012). Methodological framework for the metropolitan power diffusion index. In Research Note. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public and International Affairs, Center for Metropolitan Studies. Retrieved from: https://www.metrostudies.pitt.edu/Projects/Metropolitan-Power-Diffusion-Index
   Google Scholar
• Newman, S. J., & Holupka, C. S. (2014a). Housing affordability and child well-being. Housing Policy Debate, 25, 116–151. doi:10.1080/10511482.2014.899261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, S. J., & Holupka, C. S. (2014b). Housing affordability and investments in children. Journal of Housing Economics, 24, 89–100. doi:10.1016/j.jhe.2013.11.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen-Hoang, P., & Yinger, J. (2011). The capitalization of school quality into house values: A review. Journal of Housing Economics, 20, 30–48. 10.1016/j.jhe.2011.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pendall, R. (2000). Local land use regulation and the chain of exclusion. Journal of the American Planning Association, 66, 125–142. 10.1080/01944360008976094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pendall, R., Puentes, R., & Martin, J. (2006). From traditional to reformed: A review of the land use regulations in the nation’s 50 largest metropolitan areas (pp. 39). Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, Metropolitan Policy Program.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, J. (2005). Expert remedial report in Thompson v. HUD. Columbus, OH: Kirwan Institute for the Study of Race & Ethnicity.
   Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S., & Bryk, A. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, J. E. (1995). Changing the geography of opportunity by expanding residential choice: Lessons from the Gautreaux program. Housing Policy Debate, 6, 231–269. 10.1080/10511482.1995.9521186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenblatt, P., & DeLuca, S. D. (2012). “We don’t live outside, we live in here”: Neighborhoods and residential mobility decisions among low-income families. City and Community, 11, 254–284. 10.1111/cico.2012.11.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothwell, J. T. (2012). Housing costs, zoning, and access to high-scoring schools. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, Metropolitan Policy Program.
   Google Scholar
• Rothwell, J. T., & Massey, D. S. (2010). Density zoning and class segregation in U.S. metropolitan areas. Social Science Quarterly, 91, 1123–1143. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6237.2010.00724.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampson, R. J. (2012). Great American city. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226733883.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Sard, B., & Rice, D. (2014). Creating opportunity for children: How housing location can make a difference. Washington, DC: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, L. A., & Child Health Impact Working Group (2005). Affordable housing and child health– A child health impact assessment of the Massachusetts rental voucher program. Boston, MA: Boston Medical Center.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, M. (1993). Shelter poverty: New ideas on housing affordability. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau. (2010). Census 2010 summary file 1 (SF1), Table P1, total population. Retrieved 10 June 2015 from U.S. Census http://factfinder.census.gov.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau. (2011). American community survey, 5 year estimates. Tables B17001B, B17001D, B17001H, B17001I, poverty in the last 12 months by sex by age. Retrieved 18 June 2014 from U.S. Census http://factfinder.census.gov.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau. (2014). 2010 geographic terms and concepts. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/geo/reference/gtc/gtc_ct.html
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (2012). Program policy guidance OSHC-2012-2013. Fair housing equity assessment. Retrieved from http://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/documents/huddoc?id=OSHC2012-03FHEAss.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (2012). Affordable housing. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (2013). Affirmatively furthering fair housing data documentation. Retrieved from http://www.huduser.org/portal/publications/pdf/FR-5173-P-01_AFFH_data_documentation.pdf
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (2015a). Affirmatively furthering fair housing (final rule). Federal Register, 80, 42272–42371.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (2015b). Establishing a more effective fair market rent (FMR) system; using small area fair market rents (SAFMRs) in Housing Choice Voucher program instead of the current 50th percentile FMRs. Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Federal Register, 80, 31332–31336.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Office of Management and Budget. (2009). Update of statistical area definitions and guidance on their uses. OMB Bulletin, No. 10-12. Retrieved from https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/assets/bulletins/b10-02.pdf
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, & U.S. Department of Transportation. (2014). The location affordability portal version 2. Retrieved from http://www.locationaffordability.info/default.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Zuk, M., & Carlton, I. (2015). Equitable transit oriented development: Examining the progress and continued challenges of developing affordable housing in opportunity and transit-rich neighborhoods. Washington, DC: Poverty & Race Research Action Council.
   Google Scholar