One Strike to Second Chances: Using Criminal Backgrounds in Admission Decisions for Assisted Housing

References

• Agnew, R. (2005). Why do criminals offend: A general theory of crime and delinquency. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ammann, J. J. (2000). Criminal records of the poor and their effects on eligibility for affordable housing. Journal of Affordable Housing & Community Development Law, 9, 222–227.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, A., Bonta, J., & Wormith, S. (2010). The Level of Service (LS) Assessment of adults and older adolescents. In R. Otto & K. Douglas (Eds.), Handbook of violence risk assessment tools (pp. 199–225). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bae, J., diZerega, M., Kang-Brown, J., Shanahan, R., & Subramanian, R. (2016). Coming home: An evaluation of the New York City housing authority’s family reentry pilot program. New York, NY: Vera Institute of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Benedict, W. R., Huff-Corzine, L., & Corzine, J. (1998). Clean up and go straight: Effects of drug treatment on recidivism among felony probationers. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 22, 169–187.10.1007/BF02887256
   Google Scholar
• Berg, M. T., & Huebner, B. M. (2011). Reentry and the ties that bind: An examination of social ties, employment, and recidivism. Justice Quarterly, 28, 382–410. doi:10.1080/07418825.2010.498383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonta, J. (2000). Offender assessment: General issues and considerations. Forum on Corrections Research, 12, 14–18.
   Google Scholar
• Braman, D. (2004). Doing time on the outside. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.10.3998/mpub.17629
   Google Scholar
• Broner, N., Lang, M., & Behler, S. A. (2009). The effect of homelessness, housing type, functioning, and community reintegration supports on mental health court completion and recidivism. Journal of Dual Diagnosis, 5, 323–356. doi:10.1080/15504260903358801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burt, M., & Anderson, J. (2005). AB2034 program experiences in housing homeless people with serious mental illness. New York, NY: Corporation for Supportive Housing.
   Google Scholar
• Bushway, S. D., & Paternoster, R. (2013). Desistance from crime: A review and ideas for moving forward. In C. L. Gibson & M. D. Krohn (Eds.), Handbook of life-course criminology: Emerging trends and directions for future research (pp. 213–231). New York, NY: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4614-5113-6
   Google Scholar
• Carey, C. (2005). No second chance: People with criminal records denied access to public housing. Toledo Law Review, 36, 1–58.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, L. M. (2007). Landlord attitudes toward renting to release offenders. Federal Probation, 71, 20–60.
   Google Scholar
• Clifasefi, S. L., Malone, D. K., & Collins, S. E. (2012). Exposure to project-based Housing First is associated with reduced jail time and bookings. International Journal of Drug Policy, 24, 291–296. doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2012.10.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Culhane, D. P., Metraux, S., & Hadley, T. (2002). Public service reductions associated with placement of homeless persons with severe mental illness in supportive housing. Housing Policy Debate, 13, 107–163. doi:10.1080/10511482.2002.9521437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtis, M. A., Garlington, S., & Schottenfeld, L. S. (2013). Alcohol, drug, and criminal history restrictions in public housing. Cityscape, 15, 37–52.
   Google Scholar
• Demuth, S., & Steffensmeier, D. (2004). Ethnicity effects on sentence outcomes in large urban courts: Comparisons among white, black, and hispanic defendants. Social Science Quarterly, 85, 994–1011. doi:10.1111/j.0038-4941.2004.00255.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durose, M. R., Cooper, A. D., & Snyder, H. N. (2014). Recidivism of prisoners released in 30 states in 2005: Patterns from 2005 to 2010. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Durose, M. R., & Langan, P. A. (2007). Felony sentences in state courts, 2004. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.10.1037/e669692007-001
   Google Scholar
• Ehman, M. (2011). Fair housing disparate impact claims based on the use of criminal and eviction records in tenant screening policies. Washington, DC: Poverty & Race Research Action Council.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, Z., Kigerl, A., & Hays, Z. (2015). Removing impediments and reducing correctional costs: Evaluation of Washington State’s housing voucher program. Justice Quarterly, 32, 255–287. doi:10.1080/07418825.2012.761720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammett, T. M., Roberts, C., & Kennedy, S. (2001). Health-related issues in prisoner reentry. Crime & Delinquency, 47, 390–409. doi:10.1177/0011128701047003006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helfgott, J. (1997). Ex-offender needs versus community opportunity in Seattle. Federal Probation, 61, 12–24.
   Google Scholar
• Hipp, J. R., Petersilia, J., & Turner, S. (2010). Parolee recidivism in California: The effect of neighborhood context and social service agency characteristics. Criminology, 48, 947–979. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2010.00209.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horney, J., Osgood, D. W., & Marshall, I. H. (1995). Criminal careers in the short term: Intra-individual variability to crime and its relation to local life circumstances. American Sociological Review, 60, 655–673.10.2307/2096316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Housing Authority of New Orleans. (2016). Criminal background screening procedures. New Orleans, LA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Housing Opportunities Made Equal (HOME). (2016). How to find good tenants. Useful tips for landlords and property managers. Richmond: Housing Opportunities Made Equal of Virginia, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, B. D., & Betsinger, S. (2009). Punishing the “model minority”: Asian-American criminal sentencing outcomes in federal district courts. Criminology, 47, 1045–1090. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2009.00169.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaeble, D., Glaze, L., Tsoutis, A., Minton, T. (2016). Correctional populations in the United States, 2014. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Kirk, D. S. (2009). A natural experiment on residential change and recidivism: Lessons from Hurricane Katrina. American Sociological Review, 74, 484–505. doi:10.1177/000312240907400308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirk, D. S. (2012). Residential change as a turning point in the life course of crime: Desistance or temporary cessation? Criminology, 50, 329–358. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2011.00262.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubrin, C. E., Squires, G., & Stewart, E. (2007). Neighborhoods, race, and recidivism: The community reoffending nexus and its implications for African Americans. SAGE Race Relations Abstracts, 32, 7–37. doi:10.1177/0307920107073250
   Google Scholar
• Kubrin, C. E., & Stewart, E. A. (2006). Predicting who reoffends: The neglected role of neighborhood context in recidivism studies. Criminology, 44, 165–197. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2006.00046.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurlychek, M. C., Brame, R., & Bushway, S. D. (2006). Scarlet letters and recidivism: Does an old criminal record predict future offending? Criminology & Public Policy, 5, 483–504. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9133.2006.00397.x
   Google Scholar
• Kurlychek, M. C., Brame, R., & Bushway, S. D. (2007). Enduring risk? Old criminal records and predictions of future criminal involvement. Crime & Delinquency, 53, 64–83. doi:10.1177/0011128706294439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Vigne, N. G., Mamalian, C. A., Travis, J., & Visher, C. (2003). A portrait of prisoner reentry in Illinois. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.10.1037/e720702011-001
   Google Scholar
• LaFrenz, C., & Spohn, C. (2006). Who is punished more harshly? An examination of race/ethnicity, gender, age and employment status under the federal sentencing guidelines. Justice Research and Policy, 8, 25–56. doi:10.3818/jrp.8.2.2006.25
   Google Scholar
• Larimer, M. E., Malone, D. K., Garner, M. D., Atikins, D. C., Burlingham, B., Lonczak, H. S., … Marlatt, G. A. (2009). Health care and public service use and costs before and after provision of housing for chronically homeless persons with severe alcohol problems. Journal of the American Medical Association, 301, 1349–1357. doi:10.1001/jama.2009.414
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laub, J., & Sampson, R. (2003). Shared beginnings, divergent lives: Delinquent boys to age 70. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, N. (2001). Social capital: A theory of social structure and action. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511815447
   Google Scholar
• Lindquist, C., Willison, J. B., Rossman, S., Walters, J. H., & Lattimore, P. K. (2015). Second chance act adult offender reentry demonstration programs: Implementaiton challenges and lessons learned. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsey, M. W. (1999). Can intervention rehabilitate serious delinquents? Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 564, 142–166.10.1177/0002716299564001009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsey, M. W., & Cullen, F. T. (2007). The effectiveness of correctional rehabilitation: A review of systematic reviews. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 3, 297–320. doi:10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.3.081806.112833
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Losel, F. (1995). The efficacy of correctional treatment: A review and synthesis of meta-evaluations. In J. McGuire (Ed.), What works: Reducing reoffending (pp. 79–111). West Sussex: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, J. P., & Sabol, W. J. (2001). Prisoner reentry in perspective. Crime Policy Report. Vol. 3. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Makarios, M., Steiner, B., & Travis, L. F. (2010). Examining the predictors of recidivism among men and women released from prison in Ohio. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37, 1377–1391. doi:10.1177/0093854810382876
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malik-Kane, K., & Visher, C. (2008). Health and prisoner reentry: How physical, mental, and substance abuse conditions shape the process of reintegration. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Malone, D. K. (2009). Assessing criminal history as a predictor of future housing success for homeless adults with behavioral health disorders. Psychiatric Services, 60, 224–230. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.60.2.224
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maruna, S. (2001). Making good: How ex-convicts reform and rebuild their lives. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.10.1037/10430-000
   Google Scholar
• Maruna, S., & Toch, H. (2005). The impact of imprisonment on the desistance process. In J. Travis & C. Visher (Eds.), Prisoner reentry and crime in America (pp. 139–178). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511813580
   Google Scholar
• Meredith, T., Speir, J. C., & Johnson, S. (2007). Developing and implementing automated risk assessments in parole. Justice Research and Policy, 9, 1–24. doi:10.3818/jrp.9.1.2007.1
   Google Scholar
• Merrill, M. (2016). Ensuring fair housing for people with criminal records: A conversation with HUD. Chicago, IL: Sargent Shriver National Center on Poverty Law.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, O., & Caudy, M. S. (2015). Examining racial disparities in drug arrests. Justice Quarterly, 32, 288–313. doi:10.1080/07418825.2012.761721
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumola, C. J., & Karberg, J. C. (2006). Drug use and dependence, state and federal prisoners, 2004 ( Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.10.1037/e560272006-001
   Google Scholar
• Nagin, D. S., Cullen, F. T., & Jonson, C. L. (2009). Imprisonment and reoffending. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research, (Vol. 38, pp. 115–200). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Housing Law Project. (2008). An affordable home on re-entry. Federally assisted housing and previously incarcerated individuals. Oakland, CA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2007). Parole, desistance from crime, and community integration. Committee on Community Supervision and Desistance from Crime. Committee on Law and Justice, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Osborn, S. G. (1980). Moving home, leaving London and delinquent trends. British Journal of Criminology, 20, 54–61.10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjc.a047132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersilia, J. (2003). When prisoners come home: Parole and prisoner reentry. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Petersilia, J. (2005). Hard time: Ex-offenders returning home after prison. Corrections Today, 67, 66–71.
   Google Scholar
• Petersilia, J., & Rosenfeld, R. (2008). Parole, desistance from crime and community integration. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, National Research Council.
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2013). King’s dream remains an elusive goal; Many Americans see racial disparities. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Reilly, B. (2013). Public housing and disparate impact: A model policy. Oakland, CA: Formerly Incarcerated & Convicted People’s Movement.
   Google Scholar
• Rhine, E. E., Mawhorr, T. L., & Parks, E. C. (2006). Implementation: The bane of effective correctional programs. Criminology & Public Policy, 5, 347–358. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9133.2006.00382.x
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, W., Gaes, G., Luallen, J., Kling, R., Rich, T., & Shively, M. (2016). Following incarceration, most released offenders never return to prison. Crime & Delinquency, 62, 1003–1025. doi:10.1177/0011128714549655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, N., & Brown, B. (2003). Preventing homelessness among people leaving prison. New York, NY: Vera Institute of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Roman, C. G., & Travis, J. (2006). Where will I sleep tomorrow? Housing, homelessness, and the returning prisoner. Housing Policy Debate, 17, 389–418. doi:10.1080/10511482.2006.9521574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (2003). Life-course desisters? Trajectories of crime among delinquent boys followed to age 70. Criminology, 41, 301–340. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2003.tb00997.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• San Antonio Housing Authority. (2017). Moving to work annual MTW Plan FY 2017. San Antonio, TX: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, M. L. (2010). From criminal confinement to social confinement: Helping ex-offenders obtain public housing with a certificate of rehabilitation. New England Journal on Criminal & Civil Confinement, 36, 335–358.
   Google Scholar
• Schram, P. J., Koons-Witt, B. A., Williams, F. P., & McShane, M. D. (2006). Supervision strategies and approaches for female parolees: Examining the link between unmet needs and parolee outcome. Crime and Delinquency, 52, 450–471. doi:10.1177/0011128705281845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seiter, R. P., & Kadela, K. R. (2003). Prisoner reentry: What works, what does not, and what is promising. Crime & Delinquency, 49, 360–388.10.1177/0011128703049003002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, C., & Schwartz, M. (2001). Coming home: Building on family connections. Corrections Management Quarterly, 5, 52–61.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, H. N., & Mulako-Wangota, J. (2014). Arrest in the United States, 1980–2012. Washington, DC: Uniform Crime Reporting Program, Bureau of Justice Statistics, FBI.
   Google Scholar
• Spohn, C. (2009). How do judges decide? The search for fairness and justice in punishment. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Steiner, B., Makarios, M. D., & Travis, L. F. (2015). Examining the effects of residential situations and residential mobility on offender recidivism. Crime & Delinquency, 61, 375–401. doi:10.1177/0011128711399409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tesfai, A., & Gilhuly, K. (2016). The long road home: Decreasing barriers to public housing for people with criminal records. Oakland, CA: Human Impact Partners.
   Google Scholar
• Tillyer, M. S., & Vose, B. (2011). Social ecology, individual risk, and recidivism: A multilevel examination of main and moderating influences. Journal of Criminal Justice, 29, 452–459. doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2011.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tran-Leung, M. (2015). When discretion means denial. A national perspective on criminal records barriers to federally subsidized housing. Chicago, IL: Sargent Shriver National Center on Poverty Law.
   Google Scholar
• Tran-Leung, M. C. (2011). Beyond fear and myth. Using the disparate impact theory under the Fair Housing Act to challenge housing barriers against people with criminal records. Journal of Poverty Law and Policy, 45, 4–11.
   Google Scholar
• Travis, J., Western, B., & Redburn, S. (Eds.). (2014). The growth of incarceration in the United States: Exploring causes and consequences. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Retrieved from http://www.vtlex.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/18613.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, J., & Rosenheck, R. A. (2012). Incarceration among chronically homeless adults: Clinical correlates and outcomes. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 12, 307–324. doi:10.1080/15228932.2012.695653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uggen, C. (1999). Ex-offenders and the conformist alternative: A job quality model of work and crime. Social Problems, 46, 127–151.
10.2307/3097165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ullrich, S., & Coid, J. (2011). Protective factors for violence among released prisoners—Effects over time and interactions with static risk. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 79, 381–390. doi:10.1037/a0023613
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulmer, J. T., Eisenstein, J., & Johnson, B. D. (2010). Trial penalties in federal sentencing: Extra-guidelines factors and district variation. Justice Quarterly, 27, 560–592. doi:10.1080/07418820902998063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urban Homesteading Assistance Board. (2016). A guide to tenant selection, eviction, and good tenant relations. New York, NY: City of New York, Department of Housing Preservation and Development.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau. (2015). 2015 quick facts United States. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (1996a, April 12). Notice PIH 96-16 “One strike and You’re Out” screening and eviction guidelines for public housing authorities. Washington, DC: Author: Retrieved from http://www.hud.gov/offices/pih/publications/notices/96/pih96-16.pdf
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (1996b, May 15). Notice PIH 96-27 occupancy provisions of the Housing Opportunity Program Extension Act of 1996. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from https://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/documents/huddoc?id=DOC_10992.pdf
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (1996c, July 25). Notice PIH 96-52 Public Housing Management Assessment Program (PHMAP) — Indicator #8, Security: “One Strike and You’re Out”. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/HUD?src=/program_offices/administration/hudclips/notices/pih/96pihnotices
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (1997). Meeting the challenge: Public housing authorities respond to the “One Strike and You’re Out” initiative. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/Photocopy/183952NCJRS.pdf
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (2011, June 17). Letter giving public housing authorities discretion to consider housing people leaving the criminal justice system. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.bazelon.org/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=o6OLk7b_6c4%3D&tabid=537
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (2015, November 2). Guidance for public housing agencies (PHAs) and owners of federally-assisted housing on excluding the use of arrest records in housing decisions. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from https://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/documents/huddoc?id=PIH2015-19.pdf
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (2016, April 4). Application of Fair Housing Act standards to the use of criminal records by providers of housing and real estate-related transactions. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from https://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/documents/huddoc?id=HUD_OGCGuidAppFHAStandCR.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vallas, R., & Dietrich, S. (2014). One strike and you’re out. How we can eliminate barriers to economic security and mobility for people with criminal records. Washington, DC: Center for American Progress.
   Google Scholar
• Visher, C. A., & Courtney, S. M. E. (2006). Cleveland prisoners’ experiences returning home. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.10.1037/e719912011-001
   Google Scholar
• Visher, C. A., & Courtney, S. M. E. (2007). One year out: Experiences of prisoners returning to Cleveland. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, J., Solomon, A. L., Vigne, N. G., Travis, J., Funches, M., & Parthasarathy, B. (2004). A portrait of prison reentry in Texas. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Western, B., & Pettit, B. (2010). Incarceration & social inequality. Dædalus, American Adademy of Arts & Sciences, 8–19. doi:10.1162/daed_a_00019
   Google Scholar
• Wormith, J. S., & Olver, M. E. (2002). Offender treatment attrition and its relationship with risk, responsivity, and recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29, 447–471.10.1177/0093854802029004006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yahner, J., & Visher, C. (2008). Illinois prisoners’ reentry success three years after release. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.10.1037/e719392011-001
   Google Scholar
• Zora. (2016). Ultimate tenant screening guide. Learn how to successfully avoid the bad ones. Las Vegas, NV: Zora Computing.
   Google Scholar