Barriers to Integrating New Urbanism in Mixed-Income Housing Plans in Chicago: Developer, Housing Official, and Consultant Perspectives

References

• Bennett, L., Smith, J., & Wright, P. (Eds.). (2006). Where are poor people to live? Transforming public housing communities. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe Inc..
   Google Scholar
• Bohl, C. (2000). New urbanism and the city: Potential applications and implications for distressed inner-city neighborhoods. Housing Policy Debate, 11(4), 761–801.10.1080/10511482.2000.9521387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brophy, P., & Smith, R. (1997). Mixed-income housing: Factors for success. Cityscape, 3(2), 3–31.
   Google Scholar
• Cabrera, J., & Najarian, J. (2013). Can new urbanism create diverse communities? Journal of Planning Education and Research, 33(4), 427–441.10.1177/0739456X13500309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaskin, R., & Joseph, M. (2009). Building “community” in mixed-income developments: Assumptions, approaches, and early experiences. Urban Affairs Review, 1–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chicago Housing Authority. (2005). FY2005 annual plan: Plan for transformation year 5. Chicago, IL: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Chicago Housing Authority. (2013). Plan forward communities that work. Chicago, IL: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Chicago Housing Authority. (2016). FY2016 moving to work annual plan. Chicago, IL: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Cisneros, H., Engdahl, L., & Schmoke, K. (2009). From despair to hope: HOPE VI and the new promise of public housing in America. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, S. L. (2002). Where the poor live: How federal housing policy shapes residential communities. Urban Anthropology, 31(1), 69–92.
   Google Scholar
• Congress for New Urbanism. (1999). Principles for inner city neighborhood design: HOPE IV and the New Urbansim. Washington DC: Department of Housing and Urban Development.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, L. E. (2001). Islands of affordability in a sea of gentrification: Lessons learned from the DC. Housing Authority’s HOPE VI projects. Journal of Affordable Housing and Community Development Law, 10(4), 353–371.
   Google Scholar
• Day, K. (2003). New urbanism and the challenges of designing for diversity. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 23(1), 83–95.10.1177/0739456X03255424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumke, M. Chase, B. Novak T., & Fusco, C. (2016). Beyond the rubble: Life after the CHA upheaval. Chicago Suntimes.
   Google Scholar
• Holin, M., Buron, L., Locke, G., & Cortes, A. (2003). Interim assessment of the HOPE VI program cross-site report. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research.
   Google Scholar
• Housing and Urban Development [HUD]. (2013). Grants awarded. Retrieved June 10. http://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/HUD?src=/program_offices/public_indian_housing/programs/ph/hope6/about
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, A. (2015). Best laid plan: Implementing Chicago’s Re-Newal of three HOPE VI developments ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Illinois, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Joh, K., Boarnet, M. G., Nguyen, M. T., Fulton, W., Siembab, W., & Weaver, S. (2008). Accessibility, travel behavior, and new urbanism: Case study of mixed-use centers and auto-oriented corridors in the South Bay region of Los Angeles, California. Transportation research record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2082, 81–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph, M. (2009). Relational Expectations and Emerging Realities: The Nature of Social Interaction in Mixed-Income Developments ( Unpublished Paper).
   Google Scholar
• Joseph, M. (2010). Creating mixed-income developments in Chicago: Developer and service provider perspectives. Housing Policy Debate, 20(1), 91–118.10.1080/10511481003599894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph, M., & Chaskin, R. J. (2011). Social interaction in mixed-income developments: Relational expectations and emerging reality. Journal of Urban Affairs, 33, 1–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph, M., & Chaskin, R. (2015). Integrating the inner city. The promise and perils of mixed-income public housing transformation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Joseph, M., Chaskin, R. J., & Webber, H. S. (2007). The theoretical basis for addressing poverty through mixed-income development. Urban Affairs Review, 42(3), 369–409.10.1177/1078087406294043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph, M., & Feldman, J. (2009). Creating and sustaining successful mixed-income communities: Conceptualizing the role of schools. Education and Urban Society, 41(6), 623–652.10.1177/0013124508329833
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khare, A. (2016). Privatizing Chicago: The politics of urban redevelopment in public housing reforms ( Doctoral Dissertation). University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Khare, A., Joseph, M., & Chaskin, R. (2014). The enduring significance of race in mixed-income developments. Urban Affairs Review, 51(4), 474–503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khattak, A. J., & Rodriguez, D. (2005). Travel behavior in neo-traditional neighborhood developments: A case study in USA. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 39(6), 481–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J., & Kaplan, R. (2004). Physical and psychological factors in sense of community: New Urbanist Kentlands and nearby Orchard village. Environment and Behavior, 36(3), 313–340.10.1177/0013916503260236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleit, R. G. (2005). HOPE VI new communities: Neighborhood relationships in mixed-income housing. Environment and Planning A, 37(8), 1413–1441.10.1068/a3796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krizek, K. J. (2003). Residential relocation and changes in urban travel: Does neighborhood-scale urban form matter? Journal of the American Planning Association, 69(3), 265–281.10.1080/01944360308978019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipman, P. (2007). From accountability to privatization and African American exclusion: Chicago’s Renaissance 2010. Educational Policy, 21(3), 471–502.10.1177/0895904806297734
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund, H. (2003). Testing the claims of new urbanism: Local access, pedestrian travel, and neighboring behaviors. Journal of American Planning Association, 69(4), 414–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasar, J. L. (2003). Does neotraditional development build community? Journal of Planning Education and Research, 23(1), 58–68.10.1177/0739456X03256224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Popkin, S. (2002). The HOPE VI program: What about the residents? Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Popkin, S., Gwiasda, V., Olson, L., Rosenbaum, D., & Buron, L. (2000). The hidden war: Crime and the tragedy of public housing in Chicago. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, J., Stroh, L., & Flynn, C. (1998). Lake Parc Place: A study of mixed-income housing and comments from Philip Nyden, Lawrence Vale, Shazia Rafiullah Miller. Housing Policy Debate, 9, 703–740.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J. (2002). HOPE VI and new urbanism: Eliminating low-income housing to make mixed-income communities. Planners Network, 151, 22–25.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J., & Stovall, D. (2008). Coming home’ to new homes and new schools: Critical Race Theory and the new politics of containment. Journal of Education Policy, 23(2), 135–152.10.1080/02680930701853062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talen, E. (2010). Affordability in New Urbanist Development: Principle, practice, and strategy. Journal of Urban Affairs, 32(4), 489–510.10.1111/j.1467-9906.2010.00518.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trudeau, D., & Kaplan, J. (2014). Is there diversity in the new urbanism? Analyzing the demographic characteristics of new urbanist neighborhoods in the United States. Urban Geography, 37(3), 458–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vale, L. (2002). Reclaiming public housing: A half century of struggle in three public neighborhoods. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vale, L., & Grave, E. (2010). The Chicago Housing Authority’s plan for transformation: What does the research show so far? Boston, MA: John T. and Catherine D. MacArthur Foundation Report.
   Google Scholar
• Varady, D. P., Raffel, J. A., Sweeny, S., & Denson, L. (2005). Attracting middle-income families in the HOPE VI public housing revitalization program. Journal of Urban Affairs, 27(2), 149–164.10.1111/j.0735-2166.2005.00229.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, S., Celimli, I., Miller, D., Murphy, A., & Turner, B. (2004). Chicago Public Housing and Transformation: A Research Report ( Working Paper). New York, NY: Columbia University Center for Urban Research and Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Wilen, W. (2001). Horner residents negotiate housing redevelopment plans. Illinois Welfare News, December.
   Google Scholar
• Wyly, E., & Hammel, D. (1999). Capital’s metropolis: Chicago and the transformation of American housing policy. Housing Policy Debate, 3(4), 711–770.
   Google Scholar
• Wyly, E., & Hammel, D. (2000). Islands of decay in seas of renewal: Housing policy and the resurgence of gentrification. Geografiska Annaler, Series B, Human Geography, 82(4), 181–206.10.1111/j.0435-3684.2000.00082.x
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. (2003). Case study research: Design and method. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar